Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International Law
Reference:

Regulation of Remote Sensing of the Earth from Space: International Practice

Popova Svetlana Mikhailovna

PhD in Politics

Associated professor, Center for Comparative Law, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University

518172, China, Guangdong Province, Shenzhen, International University Park Road, Dayun New Town, Longgang District, 1

condrieu2020@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 
Uvarov Valentin Borisovich

CEO, SR Climate Monitoring System

115516, Russia, Moscow, Moscow, Novy Arbat str., 21, office 2401

uvarov.valent@yandex.ru
Yanik Andrey Aleksandrovich

PhD in Technical Science

Leading Research Associate, Institute for Demographic Research of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

119333, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Fotievoi, 6, korp.1, of. 1

cpi_2002_1@yahoo.co.uk
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2644-5514.2022.3.38577

EDN:

QLBQXQ

Received:

05-08-2022


Published:

12-08-2022


Abstract: The article is devoted to the results of the study of international experience in regulating activities in the field of remote sensing of the Earth from space. The institutional and legal approaches of a number of countries and regional associations with a developed remote sensing sector are considered. The purpose is to identify models of regulation and experience useful for russian context. The source base consisted of more than 100 official documents (normative legal acts, strategies, programs, official reports, other materials), as well as academic publications related to the issue under consideration. General scientific research methods, content analysis, formal legal analysis, and comparative legal approaches were used to solve the research tasks. Summary information (on the main regulatory legal acts and institutions regulating remote sensing, features of licensing procedures, approaches to the storage and dissemination of remote sensing data) is presented in tabular form. Authors consider the approaches of states to remote sensing regulation can be described by a limited number of core models (three legal models, two institutional approaches), but international practice differs in a wide variety of details that reflect the specifics of the national context. Authors found the essential similarity of approaches to the regulation of space activities of the two space powers – the Russian Federation and the United States, so the analysis of American failures with the privatization of remote sensing in the late 1970s and 1980s can be useful in determining the ways of development and commercialization of this sector in Russia. The relevance of attention to the international practice of remote sensing regulation is justified by the importance of creating favorable legal mode for the development of this sector in Russia facing the challenges of rapid growth of the market for active Earth observation from space, as well as sharp expansion in the number of users and applications of remote sensing data.


Keywords:

Remote sensing, International law, National law, Space activities, Space economy, Commercial space activities, Licensing, Data processing, Data dissemination, International practice

This article is automatically translated.

Introduction

 

The creation of legal incentives for the development of various areas of space activity is relevant in modern conditions, when space technologies are increasingly becoming one of the tools for solving "terrestrial" tasks, including those related to the need to constantly observe and evaluate the processes taking place on the surface of the planet and in its atmosphere.

Of particular interest are the technologies of remote sensing of the Earth from space (hereinafter – remote sensing), which are used to obtain up-to-date and reliable information about the surface of the planet and analyze its physical characteristics. Remote sensing data is needed for mapping the Earth's surface and monitoring changes in its condition; for obtaining geodetic, geological, seismological information; for exploration and evaluation of mineral deposits; conducting hydrobiological studies; prevention and liquidation of emergency situations, disaster management; management of natural resources (forest, water, land, etc.); and also in other areas.

The number of intermediate and end users of remote sensing data in the public, business and public sectors is constantly growing. This is due to the fact that the paradigm of working with remote sensing data and spatial information in general is changing: these resources are increasingly being used "not only for display and visualization, but also for integration with other data sources, data analysis, modeling and development of management decisions"[1, p. 72].

Earth remote sensing technologies are of particular importance in the context of solving the problems of the global climate agenda, including the transition to low-carbon and carbon-neutral models of economic development [2-6].

It is not surprising that the remote sensing market is becoming increasingly attractive for public and private entrepreneurship. According to experts of the international market research company Grand View Research, Inc., the global market for remote sensing technologies will grow from 2020 to 2027 with a cumulative average annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.6% and will reach more than $29.6 billion by 2027 (in 2020 it amounted to $13.8 billion) [7]. In relation to Europe (EU27), market growth is projected at an average annual rate of 8.8%. However, in critical sectors of the economy, such as IT technology, the Internet of Things, agriculture and the living resources market, the average annual growth rate will exceed 13% [7].

And although in the future the overwhelming market share (about 60%) will continue to be relatively inexpensive passive remote sensing technologies, active remote sensing technologies are leading in terms of growth rates. Thus, it is predicted that by 2027 the market for active Earth observation from space will grow by 2 times [7, p. 14], and the volume of the lidar market by 2030 will grow by almost 5.6 times (from 0.96 billion US dollars in 2019 to 5.35 billion US dollars) with an average annual growth rate (CAGR) in 16.9% [8].

The key factors contributing to the growth of the market for Earth remote sensing technologies from space are an increase in the number of Earth observation projects, the expansion of the use of remote sensing data for defense purposes, the introduction of precision farming technologies [9], the development of a "green economy".

But despite the fact that the market for remote sensing technologies is developing rapidly, its explosive growth is hindered by the need for large initial investments in the production of numerous components. Market participants need to simultaneously solve several tasks at the start – not only to master the production of components necessary for the implementation of remote sensing projects, but also to ensure the licensing of equipment and encryption of relevant data sets according to strict standards established by regulatory organizations. Strict rules governing the exchange of data and the production of components for remote sensing are the most important factor affecting the prospects for the development of the remote sensing market [10, p. 10]. In general, resource-intensive projects and cumbersome bureaucratic procedures limit the opportunities for rapid growth of companies in the market.

It is obvious that it is the state of the legal regulation of the remote sensing sphere that plays a key role both for the development of remote sensing at the national level (and, accordingly, for the prospects of using new technologies to effectively solve the tasks of national defense, the climate agenda, the transition to a "green economy", and other issues), and in ensuring the competitive advantages of national companies at the global the market of remote sensing technologies and remote sensing data-based services.

As is known, at the international level, activities in the field of remote sensing are regulated by the following fundamental acts:

-        Convention on the Transmission and Use of Earth Remote Sensing Data from Space (concluded in Moscow, May 19, 1978);

-        Principles on Remote Sensing of the Earth from Space (approved by UN General Assembly Resolution 41/65 of December 3, 1986) (hereinafter – Principles on Remote Sensing from Space 1986).

In particular, the Principles on Remote Sensing from Space of 1986 define the basic concepts (remote sensing, primary data, processed data, analyzed information, remote sensing activities), and also establish the general framework (principles) for the implementation of such activities ("for the benefit and in the interests of all countries", "in accordance with international law, including the UN Charter, the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, and relevant documents of the International Telecommunication Union")

Special attention in international documents is paid to the issues of access to remote sensing data. For example, the States implementing the remote sensing program are obliged to inform the UN Secretary-General, as well as "to provide, to the maximum extent possible and practicable, (...) relevant information to any other State (...) from among those affected by this program, at his request" (Principle XI). In turn, the probed States should be provided with access to primary and processed data, as well as to analyzed information on a non-discriminatory basis and on reasonable payment terms (Principle XII).

As for the national experience of regulating activities in the field of remote sensing, it is distinguished by a significant variety of institutional and legal approaches.

The analysis of international practice is of not only theoretical but also practical interest, since the Russian Federation is a space power and a key player in the global space market. The increasing knowledge intensity of the state space policy, the imperatives of the climate agenda of Russia, as well as the need to create an independent national space monitoring system in conditions of reduced access to international data make it relevant to study the approaches of other countries to regulating activities in the field of remote sensing from space.

 

Methods

 

The source base for the analysis was an array of foreign official sources (normative legal acts, strategies, programs, official reports, other documents related to the so-called "gray literature"), as well as scientific publications related to the issue under consideration. General scientific research methods were used (analysis, synthesis, comparison, hypotheses, etc.), content analysis. formal legal analysis, comparative legal approaches.

 

Results

 

The research summarizes and analyzes information concerning institutional and legal approaches to remote sensing regulation in nine countries and three regional integration associations.

Attention was focused on the following aspects:

- the main regulatory legal acts regulating remote sensing;

- institutions involved in the regulation of remote sensing activities;

- availability of licensing procedures and their features;

- approaches to the storage and dissemination of remote sensing data.

Summary information obtained as a result of the analysis of documents is presented in tabular form for ease of review.

Table 1 presents, with separate comments, basic regulatory legal acts and key institutions regulating relations in the field of remote sensing from space at the national level (USA, Canada, Australia, Germany, France, India, Kazakhstan, China, Japan), as well as at the level of regional associations (European Union, Commonwealth of Independent States, Eurasian Economic Union).

 

 

Table 1. Institutional and legal structure of the regulation of remote sensing activities in various countries

 

 

State, regional association

Main regulatory legal acts

Key institutions involved in the regulation of remote sensing activities

 
 

USA

Land Remote-Sensing Commercialization Act (1984);

Land Remote Sensing Policy Act (1992)

U. S. Commercial Remote Sensing Policy (2003)

United States Secretary of State;

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA);

The US Department of Defense (Department of Defense);

U.S. Department of Commerce;

Advisory Committee on Commercial Remote Sensing (ACCRES) - operates under the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the U.S. Department of Commerce;

Federal Communications Commission

 

 

Canada

Remote Sensing Space Systems Act (2005);

Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations (2007)

Governor General of Canada;

Canadian Space Agency;

Department of National Defense of Canada (Department of National Defense);

Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, or Public Safety Canada);

Department of International Affairs of Canada (Global Affairs Canada)

 

 

Australia

There is no special legislation on remote sensing.

General acts:

Space Activities Act (1998);

Space (Launches and Returns) Act (2018);

Advancing Space: Australian Civil Space Strategy 2019—2028 (2019)

Remote sensing regulation takes place with the help of export control institutions and a licensing system.

The quality and protection of remote sensing data are ensured by following the international FAIR data principles based on the ISO 19115 standard.

 

[Note: FAIR is an abbreviation of the following words: F – Findable; A – Accessible; I – Interoperable; R – Re-usable. For more information, see: https://www.ga.gov.au/data-pubs/datastandards/fairdata ]

 

Ministry of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources (Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources);

Australian Space Agency;

Geoscience Australia (government agency and advisory body on all aspects of geoscience, Center for Geoscientific Research and storage and processing of Geoscientific Data);

Non-governmental association Earth Observation Australia Inc. (center for cooperation and coordination for all people who collect and use remote sensing in Australia).

 

Germany

National Data Security Policy for Earth Remote Sensing Space Systems (2007)

(Satellitendatensicherheitsgesetz – SatDSiG)

 

Federal Office for Economic Affairs and Export Control (Bundesamt f?r Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle, BAFA)

 

 

France

Law No. 2008 of June 3, 2008 on space operations (Loi No 2008-518 du 3 Juin 2008 relative aux op?rations spatiales);

Decree No. 2009-640 of June 9, 2009 on the implementation of the provisions provided for in Title VII of the Space Operations Act (Decree No. 2009-640 of June 9, 2009 implementing the provisions provided for in Title VII of Space Operations Act)

 

General Secretariat of National Defense and Security under the Prime Minister of the French Republic

(Secr?tariat g?n?ral de la D?fense et de la S?curit? nationale);

The National Center for Space Research (Centre National d'?tudes Spatiales, CNES) is a French space agency

 

India

Political and legal acts:

Remote Sensing Data Policy (2001 and 2011);

National Data Sharing and Accessibility Policy (2012);

Space Based Remote Sensing Policy of India (2020)

 

The Department of Space Research of India (DOS) is a government department controlled by the Prime Minister of India;

Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) – Indian National Space Agency);

State–owned company Antrix Corporation Ltd - operates under the control of the Department of Space Research of India

 

 

Kazakhstan

Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated January 6, 2012 No. 528-IV (as amended on 11/24/2021) "On Space activities"

Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Kazakhstan;

Ministry of Investment and Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan;

National Company "Kazakhstan Garysh Sapary"

 

 

China

There is no special space legislation.  The exploration and use of space is carried out in accordance with the national five-year plan in the field of space activities (adopted by the State Council of the People's Republic of China) - the so-called "White Book" (official government document) China's Outer Space White Papers. The latest official document "China's Space activities-2021" was adopted on January 28, 2022.

 

A number of aspects of space activities are regulated by government acts: Measures to manage the registration of objects launched into Outer Space (2001);  Temporary measures to manage the licensing of civil space launch projects (2002); Administrative measures to prevent the formation of space debris and protect spacecraft (2010);  Interim measures for the Management of the Civil Space Research Project (2010); Interim Measures for the Management of Civil Satellite Projects (2016); Circular on the Promotion of Standardized and Orderly Development of Commercial Launch Vehicles (2019), etc.

 

State Administration of Defense Science, Technology and Industry of the People's Republic of China (State Administration for Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense, SASTIND*);

China National Space Administration;

Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences – RADI CAS)

 

Japan

The Law on Ensuring the Proper Handling of Satellite Remote Sensing Data (Law No. 77 of November 16, 2016) (Act on Ensuring Appropriate Handling of Satellite Remote Sensing Data (Act No. 77 of November 16, 2016).

 

Prime Minister of Japan

Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)

 

 

 

eu

Regulation (EC) 2021/696 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing the Union Space Programme and the European Union Agency for the Space Programme and repealing Regulations (EC) No 912/2010, (EC) No 1285/2013 and (EC) No 377/2014 and Decision No 541/2014/EC (2021)

 

European Commission

European Space Agency

 

CIS

Convention of the Commonwealth of Independent States on Cooperation in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for Peaceful Purposes (2018)**

 

Interstate Space Council of the CIS

 

The EAEU

Decision of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council No. 4 dated July 17, 2020 "On the interstate program "Integrated System of the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union for the Production and Provision of Space and Geoinformation Products and Services Based on National Data Sources of Remote sensing of the Earth" (2020)

 

Eurasian Intergovernmental Council;

State Corporation for Space Activities "Roscosmos";

National Academy of Sciences of Belarus;

Ministry of Digital Development, Innovation

and the aerospace industry of the Republic of Kazakhstan

 

___________________

Notes to Table 1:

 

* The State Administration of Defense Science, Technology and Industry of the People's Republic of China is part of the Ministry of Industry and Information of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. Until 2008, the structure was called the Commission for Defense Science, Technology and Industry (Commission for Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense, COSTIND) and was a civil ministry in the structure of the Government of the People's Republic of China (State Council of the People's Republic of China).

** The Commonwealth of Independent States Convention on Cooperation in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for Peaceful Purposes was signed on September 28, 2018 by six CIS States (the Russian Federation, the Republic of Armenia, the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Republic of Tajikistan and the Republic of Uzbekistan), entered into force on May 22, 2019, and is open for accession. The procedure for carrying out joint activities under the Convention is regulated by a separate intergovernmental agreement of the CIS member States, which addresses, inter alia, issues of technology protection, intellectual property rights, information exchange, export control, customs regulation, liability of the parties, and the activities of the Interstate Space Council.

 

 

Table 2 provides summary data on the national specifics of licensing procedures in the field of remote sensing (for which types of activities licenses are required, which entities can apply for licenses, what are the terms of consideration and issuance of licenses, and other information).

 

Table 2. Features of licensing in the field of remote sensing

 

State, regional association

Licensing, terms of consideration of applications, features

 
 

USA

The legislation establishes the need for licensing of private remote sensing space systems; licensing of individual operations.

The decision on licensing is made within 120 days.

Features:

- the possibility of changing the terms of the license in the process of obtaining;

- multi-stage nature of coordination;

- the license is not an asset;

- judicial procedure for revoking licenses.

According to § 60121 of Section No. 51 of the US Code of Laws "State and Commercial Space Programs" (2010) [11], the US Department of Commerce has the right to license the private sector for the use of private remote sensing space systems in coordination with other interested US agencies.

The Federal Communications Commission, in accordance with the Communications Act (1934) and on the basis of § 60146 of Section No. 51 of the United States Code of Laws "State and Commercial Space Programs" (2010), issues licenses for radio communications equipment used during remote sensing within 120 days.

 

 

Canada

An application for licensing can be submitted by any entity associated with Canadian citizenship or entrepreneurial activity;

180 days is the waiting period for notification of whether the application data is complete or additional documents are required.;

The license may be transferred to another person in agreement with the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development (Minister of International Affairs of Canada).

The Minister of National Defense may request (for a fee within 15 days) from the licensee to provide, on reasonable grounds, any service that, in his opinion, is desirable for the defense of Canada or the security of the Canadian armed forces. The Minister of Public Security and Emergency Preparedness has similar powers.

 

 

Australia

A company with foreign investments, or a company intending to supply remote sensing data abroad, is required to undergo export control procedures.

The Ministry has the right to restrict launches for remote sensing purposes for security, defense and compliance with international obligations.

Data quality and protection are provided for by the rules of the international community, which guarantee the possibility of finding, accessibility, compatibility and the possibility of repeated use of remote sensing data, namely FAIR data principles, which in turn are based on the ISO 19115 standard regulating the creation of metadata.

 

 

Germany

High-resolution remote sensing systems, including space and ground-based segments, are subject to licensing. The law requires obtaining a license by the system operator, as well as by the data provider, regardless of whether it acts as an operator or not.

Subjects of obtaining a license:

- legal entities of Germany;

- associations registered in the jurisdiction of the Federal Republic of Germany;

- foreign entities with a head office in Germany (with a share of 25%).

It is also required to obtain a license if the invariable sequence of commands to the satellites is carried out from the territory of Germany.

It is permissible to change (clarify) the license. The license covers the period until the data is received directly from the satellite, but does not apply to suppliers of products based on this data with added value.

 

 

France

The mechanism of declarative regulation and sanctions response. Any data operator (regardless of nationality) who programs, manages or operates a remote sensing satellite within the French jurisdiction is obliged to declare his actions no later than 60 days before the start of operations (for non-compliance with deadlines or violation of conditions - a fine of 200 thousand euros).

The Secretary General of National Defense and Security may, after consultation with the interdepartmental commission, adopt a resolution providing for restrictive measures for declared activities. The operator must also obtain a simplified permit for each space operation in each specific case.

 

 

India

Mandatory licensing (authorization) of all means used for remote sensing, as well as activities for obtaining and distributing remote sensing data is required.

Licenses are issued by the Department of Space Research. In particular, registration/authorization of space equipment from which remote sensing is conducted is required; ground stations for receiving remote sensing data, means for tracking satellites, monitoring and monitoring.

Users receive a license to use remote sensing data and process it to add additional value.

Only the National Remote Sensing Center, one of the centers of the Indian National Space Agency and Antrix Corporation Ltd, is authorized to purchase remote sensing data from foreign suppliers

 

 

Kazakhstan

Space objects belonging to individuals or legal entities of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as the rights to them, are subject to state registration (term – five working days). Refusal of state registration may be appealed in court. The activities of individuals and legal entities in the field of the use of outer space are carried out on the basis of a license.

 

 

China

Licensing of all types of remote sensing activities is mandatory.

License holders are subject to constant supervision; insurance of space activities is mandatory.

 

 

Japan

An entity planning to use a remote sensing satellite device in a specific operational orbit through radio equipment located in Japan is required to obtain a permit for each device

The Prime Minister of Japan may prohibit the transmission of certain remote sensing data for a limited time, if necessary for national security

 

 

eu

The emphasis is on licensing the data of third parties (persons) to ensure their accuracy and compatibility, including taking into account the requirements of national security. Space Surveillance and Tracking (SST) data They are separated into a separate segment, along with the data of the segments "Space Weather" (SWE) and "Near-Earth Objects" (Near Earth Objects, NEO).

If the data, in particular, under the Copernicus program are sensitive to security requirements, the European Commission may entrust the procurement, supervision of the acquisition, access to this data and their distribution to one or more independent trusted organizations that must create and maintain a register of accredited users and provide access to restricted data on the basis of a separate workflow.

 

 

CIS

No data available

 

 

The EAEU

No data available

 

 

 

 

Table 3 summarizes information on the presence/absence of special centralized remote sensing data storage banks in the States under consideration, as well as on the general principles governing the mode of access to remote sensing data and their dissemination.

 

Table 3. Features of remote sensing data storage regulation and access to them

 

State, regional association

Remote sensing data regulation

Data storage structure

Data access mode

USA

The National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive, U.S. Geological Survey) (The National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive, U.S. Geological Survey)

 

The mode of distribution of remote sensing data depends on the source of funding: with the predominance of budget allocations, non–discriminatory access;

in the presence of private investment – reasonable commercial conditions.

 

Canada

Remote Sensing Research Centre, University of Queensland (The Remote Sensing Research Centre, University of Queensland)

The primary (raw) data is transmitted to the Government of the probed State, the licensee, or the project participant, or the person to whom they can be transferred on the basis of the permission of the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development. The processed data is transmitted on paid terms

 

Australia

Digital Earth Australia (DEA) platform (supports Geoscience Australia);

Data processing – scientific organization Research Center for Remote Sensing of the Earth (Remote Sensing Research Center)

 

The owner of the data is the "people of Australia" (the principle approach is that the data obtained and created with taxpayers' money belongs to the entire people of Australia).

Geoscience Australia encourages the free dissemination and exchange of information created by it on the basis of remote sensing. The copyright of the data created by GA is protected by a public international license CC BY 4.0.

If remote sensing data is unlicensed, then their protection is implemented in accordance with the Copyright Law of 1968.

 

Germany

The data provider acts on the basis of an admission.

The priority of obtaining data for state purposes is fixed, but only in certain cases related to defense, counteraction or emergency situations in NATO or in Germany. The provision of such information is paid at average market prices. The sensitivity of data for national security is determined by the data provider based on computerized algorithms.

 

France

Data is stored by operators

The provision of information is paid at average market prices.

 

India

National Center for Remote Sensing (National Remote Sensing Centre);

National Natural Resources Management System (NNRMS)

 

The sole and exclusive owner of all remote sensing data is the Government of India.

Remote sensing data is available to users through the NRSC Data Centre on a commercial basis) and Bhuvan Geoportal (owned by ISRO) on a free, publicly available basis.

 

Kazakhstan

The data is stored by the National Company "Kazakhstan Garysh Sapary"

The national operator of the Earth remote Sensing space system plans space surveys, receives, processes and distributes Earth remote sensing data from space to individuals and (or) legal entities, state bodies of the Republic of Kazakhstan in accordance with the procedure determined jointly with the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

 

China

The Digital Earth Science platform has been launched to accumulate and exchange data, including in the interests of the One Belt– One Road project.

The PRC supports maximum openness of publicly available data on a global basis (Beijing Declaration, 2019).

As part of the Earth Observation Data Sharing Project, data from international Earth observation satellites, such as the US Landsat system, are open to domestic Chinese users.

 

Japan

There is no national center for remote sensing data collection, storage and processing

 

Remote sensing data is received only by the entity specified in the license.

This position does not apply to emergencies.

 

eu

Unified infrastructure of data storage and processing services of the Member States

Policy of free, complete and open data subject to the relevant conditions and restrictions in order to facilitate their use, exchange and dissemination

 

CIS

No data available

The principle of mutual data exchange (Article 4 of the CIS Convention on Cooperation in the Field of Exploration and Use of Outer Space for Peaceful Purposes) does not directly imply the transfer of data to third parties, that is, it proceeds from the criterion of the closeness of remote sensing data of the CIS member States

 

The EAEU

No data available

No data available

 

 

 

Discussion

 

Modern approaches of states and regional associations to the regulation of relations in the field of remote sensing from space are different, but in general formally fit into the framework of three legal models described by N.R. Malysheva and A.M. Gurova [12]:

1) Adoption of special acts regulating remote sensing (special laws on remote sensing, standards, etc.).

2) Remote sensing regulation within the framework of the general law on space activities (norms in the laws on space activities).

3) Relations in the field of remote sensing are regulated by laws and legal acts that are not directly related to space activities (for example, legislation in the field of export control, trade, information, communications, etc.).

 

The generalization of the practical experience of states also shows a wide variety of organizational schemes for regulating the remote sensing sector, but two key approaches can be distinguished in principle:

1) The regulation of activities in the field of remote sensing is carried out only by state structures.

2) The State establishes the general framework and principles of activities in the field of remote sensing, and specific issues are resolved through self-regulation (in particular, through non-governmental organizations uniting remote sensing stakeholders).

 

An example of a country with a developed special regulation of activities in the field of remote sensing is the United States. Despite the fact that the admission of private entrepreneurs to this sector began almost half a century ago, and the first act on commercial activity in the field of remote sensing was adopted back in 1984, the state plays a central role in it. As you know, at the very end of the 1970s -1980s, an attempt was made to privatize remote sensing in the United States, since the rapid development of Landsat system applications created the feeling that remote sensing of the Earth could be removed from the jurisdiction of the federal government and become a profitable private sector activity (by analogy with the privatization of the satellite communications system). However, the attempt failed. Despite the fact that private companies have sharply raised prices for remote sensing data (sometimes by dozens of times), they have not become financially stable, since users simply left the market. According to experts, this story has become an example of an inefficient and even harmful policy, as a result of which remote sensing data users and private entrepreneurs who tried to create a new industry suffered (until 1992, no private company dared to apply for a license to operate a commercial remote sensing satellite) [13, pp. 4-8].

Currently, many government agencies are involved in the regulation, licensing, and licensing control of remote sensing activities in the United States, requiring entrepreneurs to provide a huge amount of information and capable, in fact, at any time to prohibit the implementation of private remote sensing projects, or to require changes in their interests that can significantly increase the costs of applicants.

For example, in order to obtain licenses for remote sensing activities, the applicant must submit the following blocks of information:

1) corporate information (name, location, all personnel in contact with foreign partners, the owner who owns at least 10 percent of the authorized capital of the applicant, the foreign owner who owns at least five percent, a description of all important contracts, etc.;

2) information about the launch site (launch vehicle, spaceport, launch date, orbit data, etc.);

3) information about the space segment (name and number of the satellite that will carry the remote sensing system, navigation tools, motion parameters, period of operation;

4) information about the ground segment (information collection system, technical details of signal encoding and decoding, etc.);

5) other information (in particular, a description of the plan for the sale or other ways of disseminating information, methods of providing information to governments whose territory is being probed, as well as to any scientific institutions, a plan for providing information to the Ministry of Internal Affairs for posting in the National Archive of Remote Sensing Data).

The information provided is confidential, but within 30 days after receiving the license, the licensee is obliged to submit a brief description of the licensed system for public access.

The current remote sensing control system in the USA is considered extremely cumbersome and outdated today. Critics note that national security considerations combined with insufficient attention to the promotion of commercial remote sensing have created an excessively burdensome and archaic surveillance regime, and the variability and opacity of regulation in the absence of explanations why American private companies cannot use certain opportunities available in other jurisdictions put the United States at a disadvantage in the international remote sensing market [14].

In this context, it is worth noting that repeated attempts to liberalize American legislation in the field of remote sensing have not yet succeeded.

For example, in 2017, the bill H.R. 2809 - American Space Commerce Free Enterprise Act of 2017 [15] was considered in Congress, which, among other things, was supposed to "embroider" bottlenecks that hindered the development of the commercial remote sensing sector. The key tools are to increase the transparency of government actions and provide private companies with the opportunity to appeal against refusals. For example, a gradual transition from a permissive to an affirmative supervision regime was assumed. And for the Minister of Commerce, deadlines were set for submitting a decision on refusal or approval of an application, if exceeded, it would be considered automatically approved. The bill was approved by the House of Representatives (April 24, 2018), but it was never passed by the US Senate.

In 2019, the Committee on Science, Space and Technology of the House of Representatives of the US Congress introduced a bill with the same name (H.R.3610 - American Space Commerce Free Enterprise Act of 2019), which provided for the reform of the licensing system to accelerate the development of the commercial remote sensing industry (a single permit for various operations within the same sensing system, shortening the time for issuing licenses, etc.). However, this document did not even reach the voting stage [16].

But, despite the complexity and cumbersomeness of regulation, the American remote sensing market, as well as the private sector of the space economy as a whole, is developing rapidly. It seems that this is facilitated by the availability of various tools in the form of special programs and various mechanisms of interaction with non-State participants in space activities, as well as a wide range of incentives for the development of private initiative in new and potentially profitable areas of space activities. For example, no matter how one treats the US Law on the Competitiveness of Commercial Space Launches of November 25, 2015 [17] in the context of the contradiction of a number of its provisions to the fundamentals of international space law [18-23], this act is important for the American space business, since it creates the legal certainty necessary to stimulate entrepreneurial initiative in a completely new and a potentially lucrative field of space activity. As you know, this document is also called the Law on Stimulating Private Aerospace Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship (Spurring Private Aerospace Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship (SPACE) Act of 2015).

 

As for the institutional approaches themselves, the most common model in the world is full state control of all aspects of space activities, including remote sensing. However, in the context of rapid changes, the expansion of the private space sector and the growing number of entities interested in remote sensing data and services based on them, there is a need for greater flexibility and efficiency in managing this multidimensional sphere.

 

Australia is a typical example of flexible, adaptive interaction between the state and society in the field of remote sensing regulation. The priorities of the remote sensing policy are determined based on the interests and requests of consumers, which can change very quickly and sometimes radically. Therefore, the State reserves the right to establish the most general regulatory framework, and other practical issues are solved by self-regulation mechanisms.

 

The model of the Federal Republic of Germany is original and interesting from the point of view of the balance of protection of public and private interests.

German regulation combines reliable protection of national interests by establishing three types of licensing of remote sensing participants (operators, suppliers of primary remote sensing data and data exporters) with the rapid introduction of remote sensing data into commercial circulation (the time frame for obtaining permission to distribute remote sensing data is several times less than in the USA and Canada).

The main focus of the main document in the field of remote sensing regulation – the National Data Security Policy for Earth Remote Sensing Space Systems (2007) is focused on sensitive data related to state security and foreign policy interests, which are created by high-quality remote sensing space systems (but do not cover the operation of military satellites). In pursuance of this act, a series of by-laws aimed at regulating the functioning of optical, radar and other types of remote sensing satellites has been adopted. The law requires obtaining a license by the system operator, as well as by the data provider, regardless of whether it acts as an operator or not.

The authority authorized to issue the license is the Federal Office for Economic Affairs and Export Control - Bundesamt f?r Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle (BAFA), responsible for licensing German goods intended for export.

The law establishes the priority of obtaining data for state purposes, but only in clearly defined cases related to defense, counteraction or emergency situations in NATO or in Germany.

It is the responsibility of the data provider to determine whether the data is sensitive to national security or not, which is obliged to check them against this criterion on the basis of computerized algorithms. If the supplier believes that the data is not sensitive, it can allow the customer's receiving stations to download the data without further consideration by BAFA. If the data has signs of sensitive, the supplier requests permission from BAFA to transfer the data to the client. BAFA is obliged to submit its response no later than one month.

 

In general, country approaches in the field of access to remote sensing data and their dissemination are divided into two large groups: (a) completely state regulation (state bodies or state agencies); (b) a public-private model (the basic principles are established by the state, the details are a non–governmental or commercial structure that has the right to receive, store, process and distribute remote sensing data).

It is noteworthy that national practice in the field of freedom of data dissemination, in addition to the criterion of their sensitivity to national security interests, often depends on the resolution of digital images. For example, in India, remote sensing data with a resolution of more than 1 m is distributed on a non-discriminatory basis and as requested. Data with a resolution of less than 1 m is usually checked and deleted before distribution. In the case of providing high-precision data, depending on the subject, agreements on non-disclosure of data or a ban on their sale are concluded.

An analysis of approaches to regulating the interaction of state bodies with non-state actors in the field of remote sensing shows that the choice of a principled model depends on the overall national strategy for private space.

The admission of the private sector to remote sensing through licensing mechanisms, as well as the introduction by States of various kinds of restrictions on the implementation of remote sensing, the receipt and dissemination of data in order to ensure the interests of national security, defense, compliance with obligations under international treaties are common practice. By themselves, various kinds of restrictions and licensing are the standard rules of the game in the field of space activities. The only question is whether the procedures intended for the admission of new players to the remote sensing market are not becoming essentially protective.

In the world, access to remote sensing activities is, as a rule, permissive (licensing, including obtaining export licenses), although there are examples of application practice (France).

Summing up, it can be concluded that states aimed at stimulating the development of remote sensing from space as a rapidly developing market and an important source of data for solving many managerial and economic tasks are striving to reduce the height of barriers to "entry" into this sphere of commercial participants without prejudice to the interests of national security, and also try to build an effective balance between the state regulation and self-regulation.

 

Conclusions

 

Comparative analysis shows that the models of institutional and legal regulation of remote sensing that have developed in international practice are not very diverse in their fundamental design, since this sphere, like space activity in general, has historically been associated with the interests of the state, national defense and security and, accordingly, budget financing. With the increase in the number of participants in space activities, there is a need to define the rules of the game for the commercial sector, although the timing and principles of legislative liberalization depend not so much on market demands as on the general policy of the State regarding private space. The growing interest in the use of remote sensing data in various spheres of economics and management leads to the fact that the focus of regulators' attention is shifted from the initial to the final links of the remote sensing production chain – data processing, production of secondary data, dissemination of information received from space.

At the same time, approaches to determining the gradations of access of civilian users to remote sensing data and the principles of their distribution on a paid or free basis are very diverse and depend on national specifics, which does not allow us to draw conclusions about the prospects of borrowing a particular model. In this context, the development of domestic regulation of the use of remote sensing data could focus on the development of some basic principles in determining the order of access to information obtained from space, "which would not create unnecessary interference with the commercial activities of operators and at the same time reliably meet the needs of society" [24].

From a practical point of view, the US experience is of particular interest to Russia, because, despite external differences (especially in terms of interaction with commercial space exploration), there is an internal similarity of the approaches of the two space powers to regulating activities in the field of remote sensing of the Earth from space: the dominant role of the state; permissive approach; complexity and opacity of the system of admission of non-state participants in space activities; lack of mechanisms for challenging refusals.

In particular, it seems important to pay attention to the analysis of the causes of failures with the privatization of the remote sensing sector, since at present the issue of the entry of commercial participants into this sphere of space activity is widely discussed in our country (see, for example, the discussion of the draft law "On remote sensing of the Earth from space", submitted by the State Corporation "Roscosmos" for consideration by the Government of the Russian Federation in June 2021 [25-26]).

Of course, as has been repeatedly noted, each State sets the rules and limits for the admission of private entrepreneurs to space activities based on the hierarchy of its national interests, among which economic benefit plays a subordinate role. However, the demand for monitoring data from space is constantly growing, and the principle of "one window" may not be enough to meet it. At the same time, not only the "raw" observation data, images, and other information are important, but, first of all, specialized applications created on their basis that more accurately meet the needs of users.

As you know, the already mentioned domestic bill on remote sensing of the Earth involves licensing not only the actual work in the field of remote sensing and obtaining primary data, but also work on the creation of secondary data, as well as processing (interpretation) and dissemination of remote sensing data. This approach raises concerns of market participants and users [27].

In this context, the experience of different countries can be useful in terms of ensuring an effective balance between the need to protect national interests and the importance of freedom of data dissemination, their rapid introduction into civil circulation. It is also important to correctly assess the technological and market maturity of the civil sector (both in terms of production and consumption of remote sensing data), since it was these factors, along with an unsuccessful privatization plan, that led to the collapse of an attempt to create a steadily developing "remote sensing industry" in the United States in the 1980s.

According to experts, it is the extremely diverse use of remote sensing "that can become an obstacle to creating a user community," because even professional users have difficulty understanding the value of data, since special technologies and methods of their interpretation are needed [13, p. 8]. In contrast to the ease of using satellite communication and navigation services, working with remote sensing data requires either special user training or the presence of "intermediaries" in the form of intuitive applications.

The analysis of these aspects is important for assessing the commercial prospects for the development of not only the sector of remote sensing of the Earth from space, but also the market of relevant digital applications, as well as making decisions on the principles of their regulation.

References
1. (2020) Spatial data: the needs of the economy in the conditions of digitalization / E. B. Belogurova, V. E. Vorobyov, O. G. Gvozdev et al.; Federal Service of State Registration, Cadastre and Cartography; Nats. research. Higher School of Economics; Research Institute "Aerospace".Moscow: HSE, 2020. – 128 p.
2. Zogg, C. (2020). CO2 Tracking in Space, Phys.org. Feb. 25, 2020. Retrieved from URL: https://phys.org/news/2020-02-co2-tracking-space.html.
3. Bunning, J.M. (2013). Decarbonising cities and the role of remote sensing for planning, developing, and monitoring low carbon precincts. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Volume 17, 35th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment (ISRSE35) 22–26 April 2013, Beijing, China. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/17/1/012009.
4. (2022) Taking climate action now—how satellite data can help. Retrieved from URL: https://www.kayrros.com/blog/taking-climate-action-now-how-satellite-data-can-help.
5. (2022) Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques for Terrestrial Carbon Inventory. Climate Policy Watcher. 03 Apr 2022. Retrieved from URL: https://www.climate-policy-watcher.org/carbon-stocks/remote-sensing-and-gis-techniques-for-terrestrial-carbon-inventory.html.
6. Uvarov, V.B. (2021). Cosmos as a platform in the climate war, Russia in Global politics. 29.03.2021. Retrieved from URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/kosmos-platforma-klimat.
7. (2020) Remote Sensing Technology Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Technology (Active, Passive), By Application (Agriculture, Military, Disaster Management, Weather), By Platform, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2020 – 2027. Retrieved from URL: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/remote-sensing-technologies-market.
8. (2020) LiDAR Market by Product (Terrestrial / Static, Aerial, Mobile, and Short-range), by Application (Corridor mapping, Seismology, Exploration and detection, and Others), by Components (Laser, Inertial navigation system, Camera, Gps/Gnss receiver, and Micro Electro Mechanical System (MEMS)), by End User (Defense and aerospace, Civil Engineering, Archaeology, Forestry and Agriculture, Mining Industry, and Transportation) - Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2020 – 2030. NMSC, 372 p.
9. (2020) Remote Sensing Technology. Market estimates and Trend analysis to 2027. San Francisco: Grand View Research, 51 p.
10. (2020) Remote Sensing Technology Market Analysis & Segment Forecast to 2027. V0. - 1 Grand View Research, Inc., USA.
11. Enactment of Title 51 - National and Commercial Space Programs dated December 18, 2010. Public Law No. 111–314. Retrieved from URL: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW111publ314/pdf/PLAW-111publ314.pdf.
12. Malysheva, N. R., & Gurova, A.M. (2020). Models of legal regulation of activity in the field of remote sensing of the Earth in the world: experience for Ukraine, Space Science and technology, 4 (125), 86-110. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2020.04.086
13. Vedda J.A. (2009). U.S. National Security and Economic Interests in Remote Sensing: The Evolution of Civil and Commercial Policy. Feb. 29, 2009. Retrieved from URL: https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB404/docs/27-new.pdf.
14. Hampson J. (2017) The American Space Commerce Free Enterprise Act. Jun 15, 2017. Retrieved from URL: https://medium.com/niskanen-center/the-american-space-commerce-free-enterprise-act-8a23284cbbb5.
15. H.R. 2809 — 115th Congress: American Space Commerce Free Enterprise Act.” www.GovTrack.us. 2017. Retrieved from URL: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr2809.
16. H.R. 3610 — 116th Congress: American Space Commerce Free Enterprise Act of 2019.” www.GovTrack.us. 2019. Retrieved from URL: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/hr3610.
17. The U. S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act dated November 25, 2015. Public Law No. 114-90. Retrieved from URL: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/housebill/2262/text.
18. Abashidze, A. K., & Chernykh, I. A. (2022). United States policy and legislation on the exploration of natural resources of celestial bodies (international legal aspects). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 13(1), 158-180. doi: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.109
19. Tronchetti F. (2016). Title IV – Space Resource Exploration and Utilization of the US Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act: A Legal and Political Assessment. Air and Space Law, 41(2), 143–156.
20. Oduntan G. (2015). Who owns space? US asteroid-mining act is dangerous and potentially illegal. The Conversation, November 25, 2015. Retrieved from URL: https://theconversation.com/who-owns-space-us-asteroid-mining-act-is-dangerous-and-potentially-illegal-51073.
21. Selding, de, P. B. New U.S. Space Mining Law’s Treaty Compliance May Depend on Implementation. SpaceNews, December 9, 2015. Retrieved from URL: http://spacenews.com/u-s-commercial-space-acts-treaty-compliance-may-depend-on-implementation/#sthash.r5TiS1gK.dpuf.
22. Alekseenko, A.P. (2016). Survey and extraction of space resources: law making experience of the USA. Legal Studies, 5, 34-41. doi: 10.7256/2409-7136.2016.5.18968.
23. Popova, S.M. (2016). The US Law on Commercial Space 2015 and issues of modernization of international space law. Space Research, 1, 51-65. doi: 10.7256/2453-8817.2016.1.20590.
24. Lozhkovoi, P.N. (2019). Challenges of improving legal regime of remote probing of Earth from space. International Law, 4, 60-68. doi: 10.25136/2644-5514.2019.4.31163.
25. (2021) Expert: The new law on remote sensing does not take into account the interests of private Russian cosmonautics. Bulletin of GLONASS, December 21, 2021. Retrieved from URL: http://vestnik-glonass.ru/news/corp/ekspert-novyy-zakon-o-dzz-ne-uchityvaet-interesy-chastnoy-rossiyskoy-kosmonavtiki-/.
26. (2021) Who will look after Russia from space: a draft law on remote sensing has been submitted to the Government of the Russian Federation. Pro Cosmos, May 31, 2021. Retrieved from URL: https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/60e80ff669c00063f7948710/kto-prismotrit-za-rossiei-iz-kosmosa-v-pravitelstvo-rf-vnesen-zakonoproekt-o-dzz-629625214d5e23721f51fe83.
27. Stukov S. (2021). Roscosmos wants to ban unauthorized use of satellite images. Ural Meridian, June 16, 2021. Retrieved from URL: https://ural-meridian.ru/news/309350/.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

REVIEW of an article on the topic "Regulation of remote sensing of the Earth from space: international experience". The subject of the study. The article proposed for review is devoted to the international experience of regulating "... remote sensing of the Earth from space ...". The author has chosen a special subject of research: the proposed issues are investigated from the point of view of international law, the law of various countries, while the author notes that "... it is the state of legal regulation of the field of remote sensing that plays a key role both for the development of remote sensing at the national level (and, accordingly, for the prospects of using new technologies to effectively solve national defense tasks, the climate agenda, the transition to a "green economy", and other issues), as well as in ensuring the competitive advantages of national companies in the global market of remote sensing technologies and remote sensing data-based services." The "array of foreign official sources (normative legal acts, strategies, programs, official reports, other documents related to the so-called "gray literature"), the Convention on the Transfer and Use of Earth Remote Sensing Data from Space, the Principles of Remote Sensing from Space in 1986, and other international documents related to the purpose are being studied research. A large volume of modern scientific literature on the stated problems is also studied and summarized, analysis and discussion with the opposing authors are provided. At the same time, the author notes that "Modern approaches of states and regional associations to regulating relations in the field of remote sensing from space are different, but in general they formally fit into the framework of three legal models described by N.R. Malysheva and A.M. Gurova [12]" and cites them, agreeing with the opponent. Research methodology. The purpose of the study is determined by the title and content of the work: "The analysis of international practice is of not only theoretical but also practical interest, since the Russian Federation is a space power and a key player in the global space market." It can be designated as the consideration and resolution of certain problematic aspects related to the above-mentioned issues and the use of certain experience. Based on the set goals and objectives, the author has chosen a certain methodological basis for the study. In particular, the author uses a set of general scientific, special legal methods of cognition ("(analysis, synthesis, comparison, hypotheses, etc.), content analysis. formal legal analysis, comparative legal approaches"). In particular, the methods of analysis and synthesis made it possible to generalize various approaches to the proposed topic and influenced the author's conclusions. The most important role was played by special legal methods. In particular, the author used a formal legal method, which allowed for the analysis and interpretation of the norms of existing international documents and conventions. In particular, the following conclusions are drawn: "An analysis of approaches to regulating the interaction of state bodies with non-state participants in remote sensing activities shows that the choice of a principled model depends on the overall national strategy for private space," etc. At the same time, in the context of the purpose of the study, "... information concerning institutional and legal approaches to remote sensing regulation in nine countries and three regional integration associations is summarized and analyzed." Thus, the methodology chosen by the author is fully adequate to the purpose of the article, allows you to study certain aspects of the topic. The relevance of the stated issues is beyond doubt. This topic is one of the most important both in the world and in Russia. "The experience of the United States is of particular interest to Russia, since, despite external differences (especially in terms of interaction with commercial cosmonautics), there is an internal similarity in the approaches of the two space powers to regulating activities in the field of remote sensing of the Earth from space", with from a legal point of view, the work proposed by the author can be considered relevant, namely, he notes that "technologies of remote sensing of the Earth from space (hereinafter referred to as remote sensing), which are used to obtain relevant and reliable information about the surface of the planet and analyze its physical characteristics, are of particular interest." The author shows the ability to master the material. Thus, scientific research in the proposed field is only to be welcomed. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the proposed article is beyond doubt. It is expressed in the specific scientific conclusions of the author. Among them, for example, is this: "... despite the complexity and cumbersomeness of regulation, the American remote sensing market, as well as the private sector of the space economy as a whole, is developing rapidly. It seems that this is facilitated by the availability of various tools in the form of special programs and various mechanisms for interaction with non-State participants in space activities, as well as a wide range of incentives for the development of private initiative in new and potentially profitable areas of space activity." As can be seen, these and other "theoretical" conclusions can be used in further scientific research. Thus, the materials of the article as presented may be of interest to the scientific community. Style, structure, content. The subject of the article corresponds to the specialization of the journal "International Law", as it is devoted to the international experience of regulating "... remote sensing of the Earth from space ...". The article contains an analysis of the opponents' scientific works, so the author notes that a question close to this topic has already been raised and the author uses their materials, discusses with opponents. The content of the article corresponds to the title, as the author considered the stated problems and achieved the goal of his research. The quality of the presentation of the study and its results should be recognized as improved. The subject, objectives, methodology, results of legal research, and scientific novelty directly follow from the text of the article. The design of the work generally meets the requirements for this kind of work, except for the volume of the article (more than 50 thousand characters). No significant violations of these requirements were found. Bibliography. The quality of the literature presented and used should be highly appreciated. The works of these authors correspond to the research topic, have a sign of sufficiency, and contribute to the disclosure of many aspects of the topic. Appeal to opponents. The author conducted a serious analysis of the current state of the problem under study. The author describes different points of view on the problem, argues for a more correct position in his opinion based on the work of opponents, and offers solutions to individual problems. Conclusions, the interest of the readership. The conclusions are logical, specific, and they are obtained using a generally accepted methodology. The article in this form may be of interest to the readership in terms of the systematic positions of the author in relation to the issues stated in the article, which should be typical for legal research. Based on the above, summing up all the positive and negative sides of the article, I recommend "publishing".