Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Security Issues
Reference:

Forensic Support for the Disclosure and Investigation of Crimes under Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Occupying the Highest Position in the Criminal Hierarchy)

Khamidullin Ruslan Sibagatullovich

PhD in Law

Head of the Department of Operational Investigative Activities of Internal Affairs Bodies, Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

620072, Russia, Sverdlovskaya oblast', g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Syromolotova, 7, kv. 11

sledgsugu@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7543.2023.3.38481

EDN:

ZSSAIM

Received:

19-07-2022


Published:

05-10-2023


Abstract: Based on scientific sources and practical experience, the article examines problematic issues of criminalistic support for the disclosure and investigation of crimes related to the occupation of a person of the highest position in the criminal hierarchy. The subject of the study is some features of the identification, disclosure and investigation of the crime provided for in Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The object of the study is public relations arising in the process of countering organized crime, in particular criminal authorities having the statute "thief in law", "polozhenets", "looker". The author examines in detail such aspects of the topic as the peculiarities of identifying persons occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, establishing the circumstances of "crowning" or obtaining the appropriate status. Within the framework of forensic support, the issues of technical-forensic and tactical-forensic support for the detection of signs of a crime, material and ideal traces, as well as the specifics of their fixation and use in proving criminal cases are considered. The main conclusions of the study: effective forensic support for the disclosure and investigation of a crime under Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation "Occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy" is not possible without a clear legislative definition of the concept of a person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy. To increase the effectiveness of the fight against organized crime, it is necessary to develop methodological recommendations and algorithms for identifying and bringing to criminal responsibility persons occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy.


Keywords:

criminal hierarchy, criminal community, thief in law, leader of criminal communities, higher position, posenets, looking, community service holder, thug, criminal subculture

This article is automatically translated.

Exploring the positive experience of combating organized crime in other post-Soviet countries, the legislator in Russia adopted Federal Law No. 245-FZ dated November 3, 2009, which supplemented Article 210 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (hereinafter the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) with Part 4, providing for responsibility for organizing a criminal community (criminal organization) by a person in a senior position in the criminal hierarchy [1]. In continuation of the set criminal law policy, Federal Law No. 46-FZ of April 1, 2019 entered into force, supplementing Criminal legislation with a new Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, providing for liability for a person occupying a higher position in the criminal hierarchy [2]. The analysis of the results of expert surveys of operatives, investigators, and prosecutors undergoing advanced training or professional retraining at the Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (hereinafter the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia), as well as at the V. F. Yakovlev Ural State Law University, showed that currently law enforcement officers are faced with the need to clarify many issues that arise in the process of disclosure and investigation of a crime under Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In addition, there is a need to develop programs for criminalistic counteraction to persons occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy. The fight against organized crime has been and is one of the priorities of all law enforcement agencies and the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in particular, since the illegal activities of organized groups and organized criminal communities (organizations) pose a threat not only to public safety, but also negatively affects the economic condition of the state. At the same time, the greatest danger is posed by the leaders of the criminal environment, who head organized groups and organized criminal communities (organizations), coordinate their activities, create conditions for the commission of crimes. Persons occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy not only influence the relationship between the criminal and criminal environment, but also interfere in the public relations of the law-abiding population, sometimes replacing official authorities. The fight against the leaders of the criminal criminal environment is conditioned not only by the fight against existing organized groups and organized criminal communities (organizations), but also by the goal of suppressing the emergence of new criminal formations, since persons occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, among other things, propagandize criminal theft traditions and norms of behavior among the population, in particular including among young people. By putting into effect a new norm of criminal legislation providing for responsibility for a person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, the legislator calls on law enforcement agencies to intensify the fight against organized crime in general and in particular with the leaders of the criminal environment. The identification of such persons, the successful disclosure and investigation of their illegal activities, bringing them to criminal responsibility, will allow disorganizing the illegal activities of the criminal community, ensuring public safety and the eradication of criminal theft traditions and norms of behavior. In addition, the relevance of clarifying a number of issues arising in the process of disclosure and investigation of crimes under Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is due to the large number of persons occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy. Thus, according to the Main Information Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (GIAC of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia), in the 1st half of 2021 alone, there were 45 criminal cases against 45 persons occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy in the status of "thief in law", "poser", "looker", and a total of Since the entry into force of the article in question of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, 22 criminal cases have been sent to the court. The relatively low rate of referral of criminal cases against persons occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy for consideration by the court can be explained by the presence of problems, including legal ones. In legal terms, investigators and employees of operational units face such problems as the absence of any normative legal acts that consolidate the concept of a person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, the lack of explanations of who exactly is considered the subject of a crime, as well as the lack of forensic recommendations that ensure effective counteraction. It is noteworthy that in Georgia, back in 2005, amendments were introduced providing for liability for membership in a thieves' community in the form of imprisonment for a period of 3 to 8 years, and for a person in the position of a thief in law – imprisonment for a period of 5 to 10 years. (Article 223.1 "Membership in the thieves' community, thief in law"). At the same time, the Law "On Combating Organized Crime and Racketeering" clarifies the terms "thieves' world" and "thief in law". In Georgia, thanks to this law, several hundred thieves in law have been brought to criminal responsibility, and property worth a huge amount has been seized from the state [3]. Analyzing the disposition of Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, it can be concluded that the subject of the crime is a special one, that is, a natural, sane person who has reached the age of sixteen, occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy. Thus, in Russian legislation, unlike Georgian legislation, there is no consolidation of any criteria for classifying one or another representative of the criminal environment to persons occupying a higher position in it, these concepts are part of the criminal world, which law enforcement agencies should fight. In paragraph 24 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 10. 06. 2010 No. 12 "On the judicial practice of considering criminal cases on the organization of a criminal community (criminal organization) or participation in it (her)", an explanation is given about the subject of the crime specified in Part 4 of Article 210 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, that is, the person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, in relation to the criminal community (criminal organization) [4]. That is, this explanation does not apply to the norm in question, in which it is necessary to prove the very fact that a person occupies a higher position in the criminal hierarchy. In the process of working with persons from the criminal environment, studying their concepts, relationships, law enforcement officers get an idea of the criminal hierarchy, including from written sources of this environment, the so-called "thieves' runs", as well as from other records containing the "thieves' way of life. Based on the generalization of the information received, the "thieves" way of life is an established system of subordination and relationships between persons entering the criminal environment and sharing the rules and traditions of the "thieves" subculture. This "thievish" way of life has a strict vertical of power - a criminal hierarchy that requires uncompromising fulfillment and subordination to persons in a higher position in the criminal hierarchy in general and in a certain territory, namely the territory, region, city, district, street, as well as in places of isolation, colonies, detachments, cells. Basically, the "thieves' way of life extends to the relationships of persons held in penitentiary institutions, but having taken root in the minds of convicts, these rules, largely due to the negative influence of persons occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, spread outside the walls of correctional institutions So there are different categories of representatives of the criminal environment, one of which is "black", these are those persons who accept and support the "thievish" traditions established by the highest persons in the criminal hierarchy, the so-called "thieves in law", these include "postionists" - "watchers", "vagrants", "thieves", "men". Another category of convicts are "red", "official" or "knitted", those persons who support the rules and regime established by the administration of the colony, cooperate with representatives of the administration, perform part of the functions of colony employees, are caretakers, foremen of any production, economic facilities on the territory of the colony. The next category of convicts are persons with a reduced social status, they include: "devils", "roosters", "gadye", "rats", these are those persons who betrayed unwritten thievish laws and traditions, the general way of criminal life, committed an act that defames the "right" prisoner. Analyzing the criminal hierarchy, the question arises what status a person should have in order to be the subject of a crime under Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Thus, the highest position in the entire criminal hierarchy is occupied by a person with the status of a "thief in law", he is appointed by a "thieves' meeting", that is, a meeting of persons who already have the status of a "thief in law", by the decision of the majority of "thieves in law". The "thief in law" has unquestioning authority in the criminal environment in relation to persons of lower status. The "thief in law" acts as an arbitrator between various criminal formations, appoints "officers" who "look" at certain territories, "community service holders", and also organizes the collection of "thieves' community service" - criminal cash register, by committing crimes in various spheres, promotes a criminal lifestyle. Also, the "thief in law" determines the persons responsible for replenishing the "community", organizes the commission of crimes, provides patronage to various criminal groups. Next in the criminal hierarchy is a "poser", who, in the absence of a "thief in law", represents his interests and makes decisions on his behalf, is appointed by the decision of a "thieves' meeting" or by the decision of one "thief in law". The "lookout" is appointed a "thief in law" or a "poser", is responsible for a certain territory or sphere of influence, including a colony, a pre-trial detention center (SIZO), a cell, and is a person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy in the territory of his responsibility. The "watcher" performs the functions of a "thief in law" in a certain territory, except for solving the question of the fate of a person. This is how the "lookout" resolves controversial issues between criminal groups, provides them with patronage, ensures the formation of a "thieves' community" by committing crimes, and provides support to persons serving sentences. The "looker" has unquestioning authority among persons from the criminal environment[5]. Despite this, it is worth noting that some representatives of law enforcement agencies are of the opinion that the subject of the crime provided for in Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is only a person with the status of "thief in law". From another point of view, persons with the status of "poser" and "looker" also have the characteristics of a person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, since they have similar functions and "powers" in the criminal environment, only their sphere of influence is limited to a certain territory. In defense of this position, it can be noted that the "layman" and the "lookout", performing their functions in the process of engaging in criminal activity, also coordinate the activities of criminal formations, create conditions for committing crimes, influence the relationship of the criminal-criminal environment, and interfere in the public relations of the law-abiding population, promote criminal traditions and norms behavior. Criminalistic support for the disclosure and investigation of crimes related to the occupation of a person of the highest position in the criminal hierarchy consists in the features of obtaining operationally significant information that a person really has the appropriate status in the criminal world, as well as the features of detecting, fixing and procedural registration of both ideal traces (testimony) and material (material evidence) in order to bringing such persons to the responsibility established by law. In specialized operational investigative units, such as departments for combating organized crime (OBOP) The Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia conducts relevant accounting cases in which information about persons occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy is concentrated and their "development" is carried out, that is, the collection of information about their criminal activities for detention and prosecution. If there is sufficient data indicating that a person occupies a higher position in the criminal hierarchy, the results of investigative activities are transferred to investigative units for making procedural decisions, such as, for example, the initiation of a criminal case under Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. It is worth noting that persons who are criminal authorities are often accomplices and organizers of many other crimes (extortion, robbery, robbery, murder, fraud, bribery) [6]. Thus, in the course of tactical-forensic and technical-forensic support of investigative and operational-investigative activities, the evidence base is collected on the totality of criminal episodes of a person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy and charges are brought against him. Thus, criminalistic support for the disclosure and investigation of a crime provided for in Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation "Occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy" is a set of measures aimed at providing subjects of criminal prosecution with knowledge of the most effective and rational forensic tools, techniques and methods in order to establish circumstances relevant to a full and comprehensive investigation crimes [7]. Currently, law enforcement agencies engaged in countering organized crime, including those occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, face problems establishing the location of such a person. In connection with the conduct of appropriate criminal liability, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia records the mass departure of criminal authorities outside the territory of the Russian Federation, while modern information and telecommunications capabilities allow organizing and controlling criminal activities in a remote format while on the territory of states where there is no corresponding criminal liability. In addition, the relevant operational investigative units record events related to the fact that some criminal authorities voluntarily renounce the relevant status in a criminal measure in order to avoid criminal liability and attempt to legalize their activities. Based on the above, persons with the status of "layman" and "looker" also pose a danger to public safety and, therefore, are also subject to criminal liability under Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Bringing to justice only persons with the status of "thief in law" will not achieve the goal of suppressing the activities of organized criminal groups, since the greatest spread of "thieving" traditions occurs in small and remote territories. At the same time, it is worth noting that persons with the status of "thief in law" pose a great public danger and are capable of causing greater harm to public relations. Unambiguously resolve the problem of determining who is still subject to criminal liability under Article 210 . 1 Of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, in our opinion, will allow the legislative consolidation of the concept of a person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy in a note to the article under consideration. In addition, due to the different social danger of persons occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, we consider it possible to divide the disposition of the article into two parts, providing for different responsibilities for persons with the status of a "thief in law" and for persons with the status of a "layman", "looker". For example, the disposition of the first part of Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation can be stated in the following wording: "occupation of the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, associated with the functions of a "thief in law". The disposition of the second part of the article under consideration should be stated as follows: "the occupation of the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, associated with the functions of a "layman (lookout)". At the same time, the note to this article may contain deciphers of the status of a "thief in law" and a "layman (looking)" as follows: "a person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, associated with the functions of a "thief in law" with this Article and part 4 of Article 210 of this Code means a person heading a criminal organization hierarchy, and having organizational, administrative, regulatory and disciplinary functions in the criminal environment on the territory of the Russian Federation, a subject of the Russian Federation. A person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, associated with the functions of a "supervisor" in this article and part 4 of Article 210 of this Code, is understood to be a person who heads a criminal hierarchy and has organizational, administrative, regulatory and disciplinary functions in the criminal environment on the territory of a municipality." The consolidation of these criminal statuses and differentiated responsibility for occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy at different levels in the law will allow the development of effective and rational forensic tools, techniques and methods to combat organized crime. The changes will make it possible to correctly interpret the norm and remove the uncertainty of attributing a person to a special subject of a crime.

References
1. On amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Article 100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation: Feder. Law of November 3, 2009 No. 245-FZ. Collected. legislation Ros. Federation. 2009. No. 45, art. 5263.
2. On amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in terms of combating organized crime: Feder. Law of April 1, 2019 No. 46-FZ. Collected. legislation Ros. Federation. 2019. No. 14 (part 1), art. 1459.
3. Truntsevsky, Yu. V., & Sukharenko A.N. (2016). Legal regulation of the fight against thieves in law in the CIS countries. International public and private law, 2, 45.
4. On the judicial practice of considering criminal cases on the organization of a criminal community (criminal organization) or participation in it (her): Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of June 10, 2010 No. 12. Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 8.
5. Grigoriev, D.A., & Morozov, V.I. (2014). How to determine the person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy? Legal science and law enforcement practice, 4(30), 50-52.
6. Retyunskikh, I.A. (2022). Peculiarities of checking the message about occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy. Law and State: Theory and Practice, 1(205), 142-144.
7. Khamidullin, R.S. (2018). Forensic support of the activities of the investigator on the application of the norms of a special procedure for criminal proceedings when concluding a pre-trial agreement on cooperation: author. dis. … cand. legal Sciences: 12.00.12. R.S. Khamidullin. Yekaterinburg.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study is the legal aspects of criminalistic support for the disclosure and investigation of crimes provided for in Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation "Occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy". The methodology consists of theoretical and practical aspects. The author analyzes the works of scientists and empirical data, in particular, special terminology and rules of life in places of detention. Based on the above, it follows that the author applied an empirical method, methods of analysis, synthesis, and comparison. General legal methods, methods of deduction and induction. The chosen topic is relevant, since the amendment to the Criminal Code introduced in 2019 needs legal reflection, as well as monitoring of practical application. The scientific novelty consists in an informal author's approach, proposed recommendations and solutions. The style of the article as a whole should be characterized as scientific with elements of journalistic presentation. The structure of the article includes an introduction, the main and the operative parts. In the introduction, the author substantiates the importance of the study, informing readers that the analysis of the results of expert surveys of operatives, investigators, prosecutors undergoing advanced training or professional retraining at the Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (hereinafter the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia), as well as at the Ural State Law University named after V.F. Yakovlev showed that currently For a long time, law enforcement officers are faced with the need to clarify many issues that arise in the process of disclosing and investigating a crime under Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In addition, there is a need to develop programs for criminalistic counteraction to persons occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy. The content of the article reveals the stated topic. The author believes that by putting into effect a new norm of criminal legislation providing for responsibility for a person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, the legislator calls on law enforcement agencies to intensify the fight against organized crime in general and in particular with the leaders of the criminal environment. The identification of such persons, the successful disclosure and investigation of their illegal activities, bringing them to criminal responsibility, will allow disorganizing the illegal activities of the criminal community, ensuring public safety and the eradication of criminal theft traditions and norms of behavior. Analyzing the disposition of Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the author concludes that the subject of the crime is a special one, that is, a natural, sane person who has reached the age of sixteen, occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy. Thus, in Russian legislation, unlike in Georgian, there is no consolidation of any criteria for classifying one or another representative of the criminal environment to persons occupying a higher position in it, these concepts are part of the criminal world, which law enforcement agencies should fight. The author's proposals regarding the consolidation of the criminal statuses studied in the article and differentiated responsibility for occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy of different levels are also of interest. The author believes that this will make it possible to develop effective and rational forensic tools, techniques and methods to combat organized crime. The changes will make it possible to correctly interpret the norm and remove the uncertainty of attributing a person to a special subject of a crime. The bibliography includes current sources, including works published in 2022. The article may attract readers' interest and is recommended for publication.