Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Origin and development of primitive "porcelain" (proto-porcelain) in China

Se Jixian

Postgraduate student, Saint-Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design

191186, Russia, g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Bol'shaya Morskaya, 18

llliiimmmx@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2022.7.38429

EDN:

ACRXKY

Received:

12-07-2022


Published:

03-08-2022


Abstract: The article discusses the features of the development of Chinese primitive porcelain (proto-porcelain). The purpose of the article is to reveal the periodization of the development of Chinese porcelain in the early stages of its history and the influence of proto-porcelain on the so-called "mature" porcelain of later periods. Primitive porcelain, which is the transitional stage from earthenware to real porcelain, dates back to the era between the Shang Dynasty and the Eastern Han Dynasty. The study was conducted using historical and comparative methods, as well as the method of formal stylistic analysis. It was important to determine the characteristics of primitive porcelain and to reveal its role in the development of the global art of folklore production. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that it not only reveals the time frame for the production of primitive porcelain in China and determines its technological and chemical properties, but also points out the influence factors of primitive porcelain on the historical development of Chinese and world porcelain. It was revealed that the origin of primitive porcelain dates back to the 16th-11th centuries BC, its development took place in the XI-II centuries BC, and the end of the era of primitive porcelain refers to the II-III centuries BC. Primitive porcelain has evolved over nearly two millennia. Having reached its peak, the technology of its manufacture provided the technological basis for the creation of "mature" porcelain. The conclusion is made about the significant influence that primitive porcelain had on Chinese, and through it – on world porcelain, largely determining the formation of this significant phenomenon of material culture.


Keywords:

clay, pottery, porcelain, protofarfor, ceramics, firing, chemical composition, China, Shang Dynasty, Han dynasty

This article is automatically translated.

Introduction

In China, about 4,000 years have passed from the creation of the first "porcelain" (proto-porcelain, preceding porcelain) products to the present day, while the beginning of the production of porcelain proper dates back to the IV-VI centuries. The invention of porcelain is closely connected with the history of pottery, the manufacture of which dates back to the Bronze and Iron Age. The earliest porcelain appeared during the Shang Dynasty, and the real porcelain – during the reign of the eastern Han Dynasty. Primitive porcelain (proto-porcelain), which became a transitional type from pottery to the production of real porcelain, belonged to the era between the reign of the Shang Dynasty and the eastern Han Dynasty. Without considering the history of Chinese porcelain, including its primitive variety, it is impossible to analyze the history of porcelain as a material in general, including as a phenomenon of world culture.

Literature review. The history of Chinese porcelain, often analyzed in comparison with the history of porcelain in Europe, becomes the subject of research by many scientists. H. Chen and S.V. Veselova note the connection of the development of Chinese porcelain with its design [9], Huang Xiaoying writes about the influence of the culture and customs of the people on the manufacture of porcelain utensils [8, p. 9], E.H. Westphalen and M.N. Krechetova mention the "very intensive, consistent work carried out in China to improve the quality of the shard and glaze [1, p. 3]. I.S. Zhuschikhovskaya is struck by "the viability of pottery traditions that have come down to us through the centuries and remain in demand in modern society" [3, p. 97], E.K. Querfeld – the presence of Chinese masters of a special "ceramic sense" [4, p. 7], and to M.M. Kurbatov – that "the mystery of real Chinese porcelain has remained unsolved" [5, p. 72]. Most often, historians and art historians turn to the development of Chinese porcelain in the XX century, when it already exists in mature forms; such are the studies of T. Li [6], I.G. Yakovleva [10], T. Kanepa [11]. At the same time, the questions of the history of primitive porcelain (proto-porcelain, porcelain at the initial stage of the formation of this artistic phenomenon) in China are rarely touched upon by researchers and require separate careful study.

Research methodology

The main methods of this study were cultural-historical (which allowed to establish the historical context of the creation of porcelain, to identify related cultural processes) and comparative methods (used in comparing the characteristics of clay products of different types), as well as the method of formal and stylistic analysis used in describing the features of the history of porcelain in China, comparing various features and methods of creating porcelain and generalization based on the found correspondences. An interdisciplinary approach was applied, consisting in combining data from various disciplines – art history, cultural studies, history, chemistry.

Research results

Pottery is made from natural material by processing it at high temperatures. Before its appearance, the creation of products made of stone, bone, wood and other natural materials changed only the external shape of objects, but not their physical and chemical properties, whereas firing clay changes not only the external shape of objects, but also their properties. When sintering at temperatures above 800 °C, a number of chemical reactions occur in clay, including loss of crystallization water integrated into clay particles, crystal transformation, solid-phase reactions, etc. [7, p. 60]. Compared with other containers made of natural materials, pottery has advantages such as resistance to fire, oxidation and corrosion.

Porcelain was the result of the experience accumulated in the long process of making pottery by man, the study of the physical and chemical nature of raw materials, experiments with proportions and the constant improvement of firing technology.

If the pottery is usually unglazed or covered with a low-temperature glaze, then the surface of the porcelain is usually covered with a glaze fired at high temperatures.

Porcelain is made by firing porcelain stones containing aluminum oxide. Porcelain must be fired at high temperatures reaching more than 1200 °C. Moreover, the firing temperature varies depending on the grade of special porcelain clay. Pottery is usually made on the basis of clay, and the total temperature of its manufacture is 700 ° C – 800 ° C, and in some cases reaches 1000 ° C. Since the firing temperature of porcelain is much higher than that of pottery, the density of porcelain after firing is much greater than that of pottery.

At the beginning of the history of porcelain, there was such a variety of it as primitive porcelain (protopharfor). Neolithic pottery with colored, red, gray, black and white coloring shows that by the time of its creation, man had already accumulated some experience and formed ideas about the process of its production. During the long practice of firing pottery, a person learned how to select and process clay raw materials, and has already used porcelain clay to burn white pottery. Although its chemical composition was close to that of porcelain, but due to the insufficient firing temperature in the furnace used at that time, the material of such white dishes showed an insufficient degree of sintering. Actually, that's why these products are still pottery and cannot be called porcelain.

During the reign of the Shang Dynasty, around the XVI century BC, porcelain products were first created during the development of the practice of firing white and stamped hard pottery (Fig. 1), improving the choice and methods of processing materials, as well as increasing the temperature during firing and glazing of the surface.

Fig. 1. Stamped solid pottery of the Shang Dynasty

The green glazed ware of the eastern Han dynasty (Fig. 2), discovered during excavations in the Shanyu area (Zhejiang), basically already reached the standards of modern porcelain, which is determined by the analysis of its physical and chemical properties [12, p. 318].

Fig. 2. Green glazed tableware of the Eastern Han Dynasty

Art historians believe that China created primitive porcelain around the middle of the reign of the Shang Dynasty in the XVI century BC [4, p. 7]. However, it is noted that there is an intermediate stage of development and improvement between the creation of pottery and porcelain, therefore, in the period from the Shang Dynasty to the eastern Han Dynasty, glazed tableware should be called primitive porcelain, because primitive porcelain was close to porcelain in chemical composition and physical properties, but differed little from pottery, therefore this type of tableware can no longer be called glazed pottery [2, p. 70].

Thus, primitive porcelain, which is a transitional stage from pottery to the production of real porcelain, belonged to the era between the reign of the Shang Dynasty and the eastern Han Dynasty.

The origin of primitive porcelain dates back to the XVI–XI centuries BC.

The development of geometric stamped pottery and the appearance of white and hard ceramics provided the necessary conditions for the origin of primitive porcelain in terms of the choice of clay and firing temperature, and the combination with glaze accelerated its development. The earliest discovery of primitive porcelain was made during the study of the Shanghai Maqiao culture in the Taihu Basin between 3500-3900 years [3, p. 90]. Early primitive porcelain in texture, decor and production technique was basically the same as stamped solid pottery. For its production, a ceramic or wooden rivet was used, on which a geometric pattern was engraved to decorate the surface of the vessel by applying a stamp. In general, the experience of firing hard pottery also became a prerequisite for the gradual formation of primitive porcelain in the Shang Dynasty.

Primitive porcelain of the Shang Dynasty consists of two materials: one with a high content of Fe2O3, having brown and gray colors, and the other with a lower content of Fe2O3, grayish-white. Both have a high content of SiO2 (silicon dioxide). Such products are often covered with a greenish-yellow or greenish-green glaze. The material is solid, but still contains a different amount of impurities, and the condition of the glaze is poor, it has thin, uneven layers, different in color.

Primitive porcelain glazes originate in the firing of stamped hard ware. Most primitive porcelain glazes were made from various clays as the main raw material, together with CaO-containing wood ash, limestone or calcium-containing clay.

Primitive porcelain, in general, is divided into a series of styles characteristic of the Central Plain and determined by the type of products, such as jugs with a deep bottom, basins, small jugs and tsun with a wide neck; as well as local styles that characterize various types of jugs and urns, cylindrical jugs with a concave bottom, pots in the form of ducks and other series with a concave base.

The technique of firing primitive porcelain evolved from the early round kiln system to the dragon kilns of the late Shang Dynasty. These two types of furnaces have coexisted for a long time for firing various products. In particular, the first peak in the history of the development of primitive porcelain is associated with the firing of large dishes in Wucheng in Jiangxi province [9, p. 189].

The development of primitive Chinese porcelain took place in the XI–II centuries BC. Since the Western Zhou Dynasty, the variety, quantity and quality of primitive porcelain has advanced significantly compared to the Shang Dynasty. Primitive porcelain gained great popularity and became the main subject of everyday life, which was also used for ritual purposes – it was placed in burials.

During the Shang Dynasty, the shape and decor of primitive porcelain were mainly borrowed from stamped hard pottery, and these two types of products show the continuity of style. Since the time of Western Zhou, under the influence of the bronze culture, primitive porcelain has appeared, imitating the shape and decor of bronze ceremonial vessels.

In the middle and end of the Chunqiu Period (the period of Spring and Autumn), ceramics were mainly used to make bowls, jugs, plates and other simple objects produced with fewer decorative patterns.

From the end of the Western Zhou period to the end of the Spring and Autumn period, a dragon furnace specializing in firing primitive porcelain already existed in Zhejiang Province, thanks to it, primitive porcelain formed such characteristics as the correct shape, dense material, greenish-yellow glaze and a good combination of glazes [9, p. 190]. The production process and firing technique of such primitive porcelain were preserved until the period of the Fighting Kingdoms.

The end of the era of primitive porcelain dates back to the II–III centuries BC.

Frequent changes in the political situation from the middle of the Warring Kingdoms period to the Han Dynasty led to the interruption of the tradition of firing primitive porcelain in the middle of the Warring Kingdoms period and its resumption only at the end of the Warring Kingdoms era, in the middle and end of the reign of the Eastern Han Dynasty. It was then that the transformation of porcelain into a mature variety completed its almost two thousand-year history. At the same time, it should be understood that the heyday of porcelain in later times was prepared by the stage of development of the technology of firing primitive porcelain.

During the Han Dynasty, primitive porcelain experienced a significant rise and breakthrough in terms of product types, decorative techniques and technologies. In the Western Han Dynasty, primitive porcelain was used to produce not only ceremonial items, but also secular utensils, replacing products made of other materials, which played a major role in the development of primitive porcelain. The firing of primitive porcelain also reached its heyday, which made it possible to further improve the experience of breading and cleaning the material, glaze, experiments with the firing temperature, which eventually provided the technological basis for the formation of "mature", real porcelain of the Eastern Han dynasty, while primitive porcelain left the historical scene.

 

Conclusion

The primitive "porcelain" of China can be called the basis of real porcelain of a later period. It was formed as a cultural phenomenon by long practice, in which the understanding of clay as a material and the technology of using the furnace reached a qualitatively new level.

Primitive porcelain originates in the process of firing stamped hard pottery, and the almost two thousand-year history of its development covers the Bronze and Iron Ages. The nature of the origin, development, metamorphosis of primitive porcelain at different times was determined by both the level of material culture and the actual firing technique. The interweaving of various internal and external factors has led to the fact that the stylistic appearance of primitive porcelain in each period bears a deep imprint of its time.

The prospects of this research consist in further in-depth analysis of the varieties of primitive Chinese porcelain, its chemical composition and the processes involved in its manufacture, as well as identifying the role of primitive porcelain in the development of Chinese and world material culture.

References
1. Westfalen, E.Kh., Krechetova, M.N. (1947) Chinese porcelain. Leningrad: Kommunist.
2. Golovina, A.D. (2020) Chinese porcelain: the history of the appearance of ceramics in the Celestial Empire. In Polyanskaya L.P. (eds) Youth of the XXI century: education, science, innovations: Materials of the IX All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 69–71). Novosibirsk: NGPU.
3. Zhushchikhovskaya, I.S. (2002) Traditional pottery of China. Bulletin of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1 (101), 85–98.
4. Querfeld, E.K. (1940) Porcelain. Brief historical outline. Leningrad: State Hermitage.
5. Kurbatova, M.M. (2017) Chinese porcelain. Heritage of millennia. Science, education and culture, 1-16, 72–74.
6. Li, T. (2020) Study of the cultural significance and aesthetic value of Chinese porcelain in the Ming era (1368-1644). Decorative arts and object-spatial environment. Vestnik MGHPA, 3-1, 287–294.
7. Savitkin N.I., Avdeev Ya.G., Tyurina M.V. (2017) Works of Russian scientists in the field of silicate chemistry: porcelain and binders. Chemistry at school, 4, 58–63.
8. Huang Xiaoying. (2020) History of Chinese porcelain. Moscow: Chance.
9. Chen, H., Veselova, S.V. (2020) Chinese Porcelain Design: History and Modernity // In Innovative Materials and Technologies in Design: Abstracts of the VI All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 189–190). St. Petersburg: SPbGIKiT.
10. Yakovleva, I.G. (2012) Chinese porcelain of the Late Qing (1896–1911) in the light of its representative function. Society and State in China, 42-2, 343–347.
11. Canepa, T. (2014) Chinese Porcelain: Late Ming (1366–1644) and Qing (1644–1911) Dynasties. In: Smith C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer: Cham.
12. Simsek Franci, G. (2020) Handheld X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Versus Wavelength Dispersive XRF: Characterization of Chinese Blue-and-White Porcelain Sherds Using Handheld and Laboratory-Type XRF Instruments. Applied Spectroscopy, 74 (3), 314–322.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The article "The Origin and development of primitive porcelain in China" presented for publication in the journal Culture and Art is devoted to one of the types of ceramics of Ancient China, considered by the author in the context of the development of the tradition of porcelain production in China. It is worth noting here that the author unintentionally replaces the concepts and declares that "In China, about 4,000 years have passed from the creation of the first porcelain products to the present day," which is erroneous. Porcelain itself (which is a very specific type of ceramics) appears in China no earlier than the IV century AD (in some sources you can find information about the VI or VII century). In view of this, the author is recommended to be more precise in the use of terms, and to put the word "porcelain" in quotation marks in the title, since the article is about the ceramic tradition. The methodology of the research is not articulated by the author, after reviewing the literature, the results of the study are immediately presented, which do not follow logically from the previous part of the text. The literature review is an enumeration of the theses that arise in a number of works (and most of them are present in almost all studies on Chinese porcelain). Not a single name of the researchers is mentioned, the author suggests that the reader constantly return to the list of references. There is no analysis of the work carried out by the predecessors within the framework of the topic in the "literature review" stated in the subtitle. The author also did not indicate the relevance of the study, which undoubtedly exists and could be voiced in the case of a real review of the work of the predecessors. The novelty, which is not quite clearly traceable, is also connected with this. The work evokes a sense of abstractiveness and compilability. The style and structure of the article are logical (except for the absence of important blocks for a scientific article, in particular a description of the research methodology), the author is distinguished by the vivacity of the language, while not exceeding the norms of academic writing. However, it should be noted that the author uses too many cliched phrases or cliches, for example: "Primitive porcelain can be figuratively called the quintessence of folk wisdom", or "historians believe" (in this case without reference to "historians"). The author's peremptory arguments are very frequent, based neither on research nor on his own analysis of specific subjects, but issued as if "suddenly". The bibliographic list includes eleven titles of works by various authors, undoubtedly authoritative within their fields. However, it should be noted that the choice of sources is very eclectic, sometimes surprising (as in the case of Don ceramics – information about the processes occurring during firing is unlikely to be the author's discovery of these specialists and precisely in 2021). The randomness noted in the essentially absent literature review was obviously clearly expressed in the author's choice of sources. Due to the above, a large volume of questions and comments, inaccuracies and flaws, (with even more careful analysis, the list of flaws may be many times larger) the article "The origin and development of primitive porcelain in China" is not recommended for publication in a journal with a confirmed WAKA status and is recommended for rejection.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

In the journal Philosophy and Culture, the author presented his article "The origin and development of primitive "porcelain" (proto-porcelain) in China", which conducted a study of the appearance of primitive porcelain in China and the manufacture of products from it in the period between the reign of the Shang Dynasty and the Eastern Han Dynasty. The author proceeds in studying this issue from the fact that the invention of porcelain is closely related to the history of pottery, the manufacture of which dates back to the Bronze and Iron Ages. The earliest porcelain appeared during the Shang Dynasty, and the real porcelain appeared during the reign of the Eastern Han Dynasty. Without considering the history of Chinese porcelain, as the author believes, including its primitive variety, it is impossible to analyze the history of porcelain either as a material in general or as a phenomenon of world culture. Porcelain was the result of human experience accumulated in the long process of making pottery, research on the physical and chemical nature of raw materials, experiments with proportions and constant improvement of firing technology. The purpose of this study is to analyze the appearance of an intermediate type of porcelain (protopharphor) in ancient China and the dynamics of improving the methods of its manufacture. The methodological basis was an integrated approach, which includes cultural-historical and comparative methods, as well as the method of formal stylistic analysis. The theoretical basis of the article is the works of domestic and foreign art historians and historians (H. Chen, S.V. Veselova, E.H. Westphalen, M.N. Krechetova, T. Li, etc.). The author also applied an interdisciplinary approach consisting in combining data from various disciplines – art history, cultural studies, history, chemistry. The empirical material of the study was samples of ancient Chinese art. Analyzing the degree of scientific validity, the author notes that the history of Chinese porcelain, often studied in comparison with the history of porcelain in Europe, becomes the subject of research by many scientists. However, according to the author, the issues of the history of primitive porcelain (proto-porcelain, porcelain at the initial stage of the formation of this artistic phenomenon) in China are rarely touched upon by researchers and require separate careful study, which is the scientific novelty of this study. In the article, the author, conducting a historical analysis, notes that in China, about 4,000 years have passed from the creation of the first proto-porcelain products to the present day, while the beginning of the production of porcelain proper dates back to the IV-VI centuries. The earliest discovery of primitive porcelain was made during the study of the Shanghai Maqiao culture in the Taihu Basin between 3500-3900 years. The author substantiates that Neolithic pottery with colored, red, gray, black and white coloring shows that by the time of its creation, man had already accumulated some experience and formed ideas about the process of its production. During the long practice of firing pottery, a person learned how to select and process clay raw materials, and has already used porcelain clay to burn white pottery. Although its chemical composition was close to that of porcelain, but due to the insufficient firing temperature in the furnace used at that time, the material of such white dishes showed an insufficient degree of sintering, which does not allow the studied products to be called porcelain directly. The author pays special attention to the study of the technological process of making protopharphor: "porcelain is made by firing porcelain stones containing aluminum oxide. Porcelain must be fired at high temperatures reaching more than 1200 °C." Exploring the dynamics of the development and improvement of protopharphor, the author analyzes the products of Chinese ceramics and porcelain from the XVI–XI centuries BC to the II–III centuries BC, the author notes the characteristic features of the products: a ceramic or wooden rivet was used for their production, on which a geometric pattern was engraved to decorate the surface of the vessel by applying the brands. In general, the experience of firing hard pottery also became a prerequisite for the gradual formation of primitive porcelain in the Shang Dynasty. The products are often covered with a greenish-yellow or greenish-green glaze. The material is solid, but still contains different amounts of impurities, and the glaze condition is poor, it has thin, uneven layers, different in color. The author notes the variety of styles (deep-bottomed jugs, basins, small jugs and wide-necked tsun, various types of jugs and urns, cylindrical jugs with a concave bottom, duck-shaped pots and other series with a concave base), as well as the wide practical use of proto-porcelain products in ancient China both in everyday life and at home conducting various ceremonies and rituals. Studying the evolution of protofarfor manufacturing technology, the author notes that the firing of primitive porcelain also reached its heyday, which made it possible to further improve the experience of breading and cleaning the material, glaze, experiments with firing temperature, which eventually provided the technological basis for the formation of "mature", real porcelain of the eastern Han Dynasty, while primitive porcelain left the historical scenes. In conclusion, the author presents a conclusion on the conducted research, which contains all the key provisions of the presented material. It seems that the author in his material touched upon relevant and interesting issues for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge, choosing a topic for analysis, consideration of which in scientific research discourse will entail certain changes in the established approaches and directions of analysis of the problem addressed in the presented article. The results obtained allow us to assert that the study of the emergence and development of certain cultures and their art is of undoubted scientific and practical cultural interest and deserves further study. The material presented in the work has a clear, logically structured structure that contributes to a more complete assimilation of the material. The bibliographic list of the research consists of 12 sources, including foreign ones, which seems sufficient for generalization and analysis of scientific discourse on the studied problem. However, the text of the article needs to be corrected, the word "porcelain" is being replaced by "folklore" in the text. It should be stated: the article may be of interest to readers and deserves to be published in an authoritative scientific publication after eliminating this shortcoming. Comments of the editor-in-chief dated 07/20/2022: "The author has fully taken into account the comments of the reviewers and corrected the article. The revised article is recommended for publication"