Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Litera
Reference:

Structural model of the concept of "education"

Makashova Victoria

Postgraduate student, Department of General and Russian Linguistics, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

117198, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 10-2A

Viktoria_m27@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8698.2022.5.37891

Received:

15-04-2022


Published:

30-04-2022


Abstract: The article is devoted to the study of the concept of "education". This concept is fundamental for the Russian consciousness, since it is inextricably linked with the generally accepted system of moral coordinates. The purpose of this study is to build a structural model of the concept of "education" and determine its type. The solution of the following tasks contributes to the achievement of this goal: to systematize the definitions of the concept as a key category of cognitive linguistics, to consider approaches to the structure of the concept developed by representatives of various directions in cognitive linguistics (cultural, linguistic, logical, semantic-cognitive, philosophical-semiotic directions), to identify and describe the structural models of the concept. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that it is for the first time a segment-field model of the concept of "education" is proposed. The study was conducted using the method of free associative experiment. In the course of the study, the hierarchical relations core-periphery of the concept of "education" were described, as well as the attitudes of consciousness arising from its content. It is revealed that the concept of "education" is segmented, since the basic and additional cognitive layers that make up the scope of this concept surround strictly defined segments. The results of the study can be used in lexicographic practice in the compilation of associative dictionaries, as well as in courses of cognitive linguistics, linguoculturology and psycholinguistics.


Keywords:

concept, concept structure, segment-field model, sensory-shaped core, near periphery, the far periphery, extreme periphery, interpretative field, segment concept, education

This article is automatically translated.

Introduction

Cognitive linguistics is a field of linguistics that studies the specifics of the assimilation and processing of information data, types and forms of mental representation of knowledge through language.

In modern cognitive linguistics, the key concept is considered to be "concept", which is increasingly used by researchers considering the problem of linguistic expression of cognition as a process of cognition. Mental in nature, the concept reflects the content of an individual's opinions and knowledge about reality, the experience of interacting with it.

Definition and structure of the concept

        In the works of modern researchers of various fields of cognitive linguistics, the content of the concept of "concept" varies significantly [23, p. 452].

Representatives of the cultural direction (Stepanov, Telia) define concepts as elements of culture and distinguish three layers (layers) in their structure:

  1. The main, active, up-to-date layer of the concept. The concept is relevant for native speakers of this culture and acts as a means of communication and mutual understanding.
  2. An additional, passive layer of the concept. The concept is relevant only for individual social communities.
  3. The etymological layer of the concept (the inner form of the concept) is available to researchers. Meanwhile, this layer of concept content exists in the mind of an ordinary native speaker, but only in an indirect form.

Within the framework of the linguoculturological direction (Karasik, Slyshkin, Vorkachev, Alefirenko, Voloshina, Maslova, Zimina, Radbil, Yevtushenko, Mizheguli), concepts are considered as elements of national linguoculture in their relationship with national values and attitudes of this cultural community. The structure of the linguocultural concept assumes the arrangement of cognitive features at the following levels: conceptual (factual), metaphorical (figurative) and meaningful (value). At the same time, the core of the concept is invariably the value component. 

Adherents of the logical direction (Arutyunova, Pavlenis, Peacock) concepts are analyzed by means of logical methods in isolation from their linguistic form. 

The specifics of the semantic-cognitive direction (Kubryakova, Boldyrev, Rakhilina, Lukashevich, Popova, Sternin, Babushkin, Pimenova, Manaenko, Johnson, Lakoff, Gentner, Goldin-Meadow) consists in studying the representation of the relationship between semantic and cognitive processes. The concept is recognized as a universal element of the thought process, access to the content of which opens the language. In the works of I. A. Sternin, Z. D. Popova, a field model of the concept is substantiated, including the sensory-figurative core of the concept, additional cognitive layers (the periphery of the concept), as well as an interpretive field (a system of value orientations). The structure of the concept is organized by cognitive classification features that organize the cognitive differential features that make up the content of the concept as a mental education. The field structure of the concept is confirmed by the research of E. V. Lukashevich: the structure of the concept, from the point of view of a linguist, is based on the hierarchical relationship "core-periphery", where the core is characterized by stability, a clear fixation in human consciousness, and the periphery is the openness of "meanings actualized in the activity of the subject" [19, p. 65].  

         Representatives of the philosophical and semiotic direction (Kravchenko, Solomonik) study the cognitive basis of signedness. The concept is understood as an operational unit of consciousness, which contains all the cognitive processes and abilities of an individual: the concept combines both perceptual, sensorimotor, emotional, and linguistic components.

     Thus, the difference in the interpretation of the concept of "concept" is due to the difference in the choice of features underlying it and appearing essential for representatives of one or another direction of cognitive linguistics.

The concept of "education"

          The concept of "education" is the basic one in the Russian conceptual sphere [4]. We emphasize that this concept is primarily studied within the framework of linguoculturology.

       E. V. Alymova examines the concept (cultural concept) "education" in Russian and English linguistic cultures. The researcher offers a field model of the concept of "education", in which he identifies the sensory-figurative core of the concept, its universal and idioethnic cognitive features. 

    I. V. Romanova, L. A. Yushkova also rely on the field model of the concept, which includes conceptual (factual), metaphorical (figurative) and meaningful (value) components. At the same time, linguists focus on the value component of the concept. Considering the concept of "education" in the German and Russian language consciousness, L. A. Yushkova argues that the axiological content of this concept consists of identical semantic groups ("education", "status indicator", etc.), each of which is characterized by a number of conceptually significant features.

      Exploring the linguistic representation of the concept of "education" in the English-speaking linguoculture, V. V. Egorova puts forward a field structural model of the concept. The linguist believes that the structure of the concept of "education" consists of a core represented by basic cognitive features, collective semantic and interpretative fields.

      The problem of the functioning of the concept of "education" in autobiographical discourse is posed in the work of S. V. Voloshina. The linguist identifies two functions of this concept in autobiographical texts: genre-forming and discourse-forming. It should be noted that the methodology for analyzing the concept of "education" is based on a three-part field model, the components of which are conceptual, figurative and axiological levels.

      Ethnolinguistic works are also devoted to the study of the concept of "education". U. Mizheguli defines significant differences in the idea of education in the Russian and Chinese language picture of the world. For example, in the Chinese language picture of the world, the concepts of "education" and "knowledge" are exclusively positive values, while in the Russian language picture of the world they can be evaluated negatively.

   Thus, modern researchers adhere to the field organization of the concept of "education". The structural model proposed by us is called the segment-field model, which fixes not only the nuclear peripheral zone, but also the segments of this concept.

      Exploring the structure of the concept of "education", we first of all identified its basic layer (sensory-figurative core), additional cognitive layers (near, far and extreme periphery of the concept), as well as the interpretative field – individual and collective attitudes of consciousness that follow from the content of this concept in Russian culture.

In order to build a structural model of the concept of "education", we conducted a free associative experiment in which 79 respondents of three age categories (14-18 years old; 20-28 years old and 30-54 years old) took part.  The subjects worked in the mode of unprepared oral speech: they were asked to respond to the presented word-stimulus "education" with the first word-reaction that came to mind (phrase-reaction).

As a result of a free associative experiment, we received 84 reaction words:

School, University, Teacher, Student, Knowledge, Training, Education, Perspective, Books, Diploma, Teach, Complex, Interesting, Accessible, Continuous, Free, Process, Career, Communication, Science, Research, Study, Exam, Intelligence, Cognition, Work, Traditional, Higher, Distance, Work, Disappointment, Benefit, Discovery, Lecture, Synopsis, Team, Audience, Additional, Necessity, Enlightenment, Information, Red Diploma, Virtue, Development, Self-Development, Erudition, Literacy, Creativity, Technology, Student, Session, Youth, Grades, Scores, Rating, Experience, Office, Classes, Lesson, Change, Tutor, Punishment, Discipline, Attention, Graduation, Desk, Library, Self-education, Nervous, Roman, Digital, Musical, Technical, Universal, Comprehensive, Academic, Stupid, Granite of Science, Boring, Proud, Long, Useless.

The sensory-figurative core of the associative field of the concept "education" consists of the most frequent reactions: training – 6, education – 6, school – 6, university – 6, teacher – 6, student – 6, knowledge – 5, perspective – 4, books – 4, diploma – 4, teach – 4, complex – 4, interesting – 4, accessible – 4, continuous – 4, free – 4.

In the periphery of the associative field of the concept "education" includes reactions, characterized by a lower frequency: process – 3, a career – 3, communication – 3, science – 3, study – 3, - study – 3, exam – 3, intelligence – 3, cognition – 3, labor – 3, traditional – 3, high – 3, remote – 3, work – 2, disappointment – 2, use – 2, open – 2, lecture – 2, abstract – 2, command – 2, audience – 2, additional – 2, the need – 1, education – 1, info – 1, red diploma – 1, virtue – 1, development, 1, self-development – 1, erudition – 1, literacy, 1, the creativity – 1, technology – 1, student – 1, session – 1, youth – 1, assessment 1, the points – 1, rating – 1, experience – 1, office – 1, class – 1, lesson – 1, change 1, the tutor – 1, punishment – 1, discipline – 1, note a – 1, a prom – 1, row – 1, library -1, self – 1, nervous – 1, Roman – 1, digital – to 1 music – 1, technical – 1, universal – 1, full – 1, academic – 1, stupid – 1, the granite of science – 1, bored – 1, proudly – 1, long 1, the useless – 1.

         The near periphery is based on reactions: process – 3, career – 3, communication – 3, science – 3, research – 3, study – 3, exam – 3, intelligence – 3, cognition – 3, labor – 3, traditional – 3, higher – 3, distance - 3.

        The far periphery is formed by reactions: to work – 2, disappointment – 2, benefit – 2, discovery – 2, lecture – 2, synopsis – 2, team – 2, audience – 2, additional – 2.

        The extreme periphery is represented by reactions: necessity – 1, enlightenment – 1, information – 1, red diploma – 1, virtue – 1, development – 1, self–development – 1, erudition – 1, literacy – 1, creativity – 1, technology – 1, student – 1, session - 1, youth – 1, grades – 1, points – 1, rating – 1, experience – 1, office – 1, classes – 1, lesson - 1, recess – 1, tutor - 1, punishment – 1, discipline – 1, attention – 1, graduation – 1, desk - 1, library -1, self–education – 1, nervous - 1, roman – 1, digital – 1, musical – 1, technical – 1, universal – 1, comprehensive – 1, academic – 1, stupid – 1, granite of science – 1, boring – 1, proud – 1, long – 1, useless – 1.

The analysis of the stimulus word "education" showed: from the point of view of partial affiliation, 68% of reaction words refer to nouns; 3.7% - to verbs; 21% – to adjectives, 4.9% – to adverbs. Phrases-reactions make up 2.4%. It should be noted that in the answers of informants, there is a dominance of words-reactions belonging to nouns. In our opinion, this is explained by the morphological features of the stimulus word "education" - a noun in the form of the nominative singular.

The interpretative field of the concept of "education" contains the following settings: an ignorant person – that an axe is inaccurate; you can't weave without knowledge; live for a century – learn for a century; the world is illuminated by the sun, and a person is knowledge; education is a guest, and the mind is the host; learning without skill is not a benefit, but a misfortune; an evil scientist it is not worth a good fool; to go into science is to suffer torment. Thus, on the one hand, the Russian consciousness highly values education, and on the other, it levels its value (education brings suffering both to the individual himself and to the people around him).

           In addition to the nuclear peripheral zone, the concept of "education" includes a number of segments, which indicates the segmental nature of this concept:

  1. General education is the process of education and upbringing carried out within the framework of a school or preschool institution.  
  2. Vocational education is a process of education and upbringing carried out within the framework of higher or secondary educational institutions.
  3. Additional education is the process of education and upbringing carried out in educational organizations that provide additional education services.
  4. Vocational training is a lifelong learning and education process.

       We propose a segment-field model of the concept of "education": the sensory-shaped core, periphery and segments of this concept are inscribed in the axiological system of Russian consciousness (see diagram 1).

                                                                                  

Scheme 1. Segment-field model of the concept "education".

 

 

Conclusion

      Thus, we have developed a segment-field model of the concept of "education". In order to build a structural model of this concept, we conducted a free associative experiment, the results of which allowed us to identify the sensory-figurative core, the periphery (near, far and extreme), as well as the interpretative field of this concept.

      We have established that around the sensory-figurative core and the periphery of the concept of "education" there are several segments equal in degree of abstraction. This allows us to consider this concept from a more concrete cognitive layer to a more abstract one.

References
1. Alefirenko N. F. Concept – notion – category in the light of modern linguocognitivistics // Scientific Bulletin of the Belarusian State University. Ser. Humanities. No. 18. Issue 7. 2010. pp. 5-12.
2. Alymova E. V. Linguoculturological model of the concept "education" in national consciousness: dis...candidate of philology. Saratov: 2007, 260 p.
3. Arutyunova N. D. Logical analysis of language. Cultural concepts. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. 204 p.
4. Babenko L. G., Kazarin Yu. V., Kusova M. L., Mukhin M. Yu. The conceptosphere of the Russian language: key concepts and their representations in language and speech (based on vocabulary, phraseology and paremiology). Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2017. 1023 p.
5. Babina L. V., Furs L. A. N. N. Boldyrev's Scientific school "Cognitive linguistics. Interaction of mental and linguistic structures" // Bulletin of TSU. No. 7. 2010. pp. 320-324.
6. Babushkin A. P. Categorization of "kaleidoscopic" concepts // Cognitive studies of language. Issue XXXVII: Integrative processes in Modern Cognitive Linguistics: Proceedings of the International Congress on Cognitive Linguistics. May 16-18, 2019 Nizhny Novgorod: DECOM Publishing House, 2019. pp. 131-135.
7. Babushkin A. P., Sternin I. A. Cognitive Linguistics and semasiology. Monograph. Voronezh: LLC "Rhythm", 2018. 229 p.
8. Boldyrev N. N. Conceptual basis of language // Cognitive studies of language. Issue IV. Conceptualization of the world in language. Moscow – Tambov: Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Publishing House of TSU named after G.R. Derzhavin, 2009. pp. 25-78.
9. Voloshina S. V. The concept of "education" in the speech genre of autobiography // Communicative research. Vol.8. No.4. 2020. pp. 734-750.
10. Vorkachev S. G. Postulates of linguoconceptology / Anthology of concepts. Vol.1. Volgograd: Paradigm, 2005. pp.10-13.
11. Yevtushenko O. V. On the prospects of studying the structure of the concept // Questions of cognitive linguistics. No. 1. 2009. pp. 35-42.
12. Egorova V. V. Linguistic representation of the concept of "education" in English-language linguoculture (based on the material of the English mass media discourse of the XXI century): dis... candidate of philology. Krasnodar: 2018, 282 p.
13. Zimina M. V. Method of revealing the content of a concept by analyzing verbal and visual associations // Cognitive studies of language. Issue XXXVII: Integrative processes in Modern Cognitive Linguistics: Proceedings of the International Congress on Cognitive Linguistics. May 16-18, 2019 Nizhny Novgorod: DECOM Publishing House, 2019. pp. 186-190.
14. Karasik V. I. Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. M.: GNOSIS, 2004. 389 p.
15. Karasik V. I., Slyshkin G. G. Basic characteristics of linguocultural concepts / Anthology of concepts. Vol.1. Volgograd: Paradigm, 2005. pp.13-15.
16. Kravchenko A.V. What does conceptology study? // Functional-cognitive analysis of language units and its applicative potential. Barnaul: AltGPA Publishing House, 2012. pp. 201-204.
17. Kubryakova E. S., Demyankov V. Z., Pankrats Yu. G., Luzina L. G. A concise dictionary of cognitive terms. M.: Philol. fac. Moscow State University, 1996. 245 p.
18. Lakoff J., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Moscow: URSS, 2004. 252 p.
19. Lukashevich E. V. Cognitive semantics: evolutionary-prognostic aspect: Monograph. Barnaul: Publishing house of the Alt. State University, 2002. 233 p.
20. Manaenko G. N. Concept as relation and parameters of its comprehension // Cognitive studies of language. Issue XXXVII: Integrative processes in Modern Cognitive Linguistics: Proceedings of the International Congress on Cognitive Linguistics. May 16-18, 2019 Nizhny Novgorod: DECOM Publishing House, 2019. pp. 87-90.
21. Maslova V. A. Concept as a way of studying culture through language // Actual problems of philology and pedagogical linguistics. No.14. 2012. pp. 20-25.
22. Mizheguli U. Concept "education" in Russian and Chinese language pictures of the world: ethnolinguistic aspect: dis... candidate of philology. B.: BSU, 2020. 112 p.
23. Nadezhkin A.M. "Sunset" of the concept // Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University. No.6. 2011. pp. 452-454.
24. Pavilienis R.I. The problem of meaning: A modern logical and philosophical analysis of language. Moscow: Mysl, 1983. 286 p.
25. Pimenova M. V. Conceptology at the present stage (methods of research of conceptual structures) // Humanitarian vector. Vol.12. No.5. 2017. pp. 13-22.
26. Popova Z. D., Sternin I. A. Essays on cognitive linguistics. Voronezh: Voronezh State University, 2001. 191 p.
27. Rakhilina E. V. Cognitive analysis of subject names: semantics and compatibility. Moscow: Russian dictionaries, 2008. 416 p.
28. Romanova I. V. Value aspects of the concept of "education" in the German language culture // Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice. No. 12. 2014. pp. 168-172.
29. Stepanov Yu. S. Constants: Dictionary of Russian Culture: 3rd Ed., ispr. and add. M.: Academic project, 2004. 992 p.
30. Yushkova L. A. The concept of "education" in German and Russian linguistic consciousness // Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice. No. 12. 2014. pp. 214-21.
31. Gentner D., Goldin-Meadow S. Language in Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003. 439 p.
32. Peacocke Ch. A study of concepts. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; London: A Bradford Book, 1992. 266 p.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The article "The structural model of the concept of "education", proposed for publication in the journal "Litera", is undoubtedly relevant, devoted to the development of problems of cognitive science. Cognitive linguistics, being one of the rapidly developing branches of linguistics, is becoming a priority for many scientists. So, there are associations of cognitive scientists in different regions of our country, whose research in related subjects is not mentioned in the article. The scientific corpus itself is based mainly on the works of V.I. Karasik and fundamental ones that have already become archaic classics – Arutyunova N.D. and Kubryakova E.S., without taking into account the new paradigms of science and the changes that have occurred in the last 10 years. And some of the references to textbooks and lecture notes are clearly superfluous when writing serious scientific work for a journal from the list of the Higher Attestation Commission and should be replaced by references to monographs and dissertations. The theoretical part does not make it possible to determine the scientific lacuna, the novelty of the research and the actual author's contribution to the development of the problem. Speaking of structure, the vast majority of the work is a set of references and citations on the theory of the concept, and the study of the structural model of the concept of "education" (which, in fact, is stated in the title) takes up a negligible fraction of the amount of work. We believe that it is necessary to verify the structure of the work, strengthen the theoretical component, removing from it the well-known truisms on the theory of the concept, but supplementing it with relevant versatile research on the stated topic. The general theoretical part contains definitions of the concept of abstract, but does not reflect the degree of elaboration of the problem stated in the title. The article presents a research methodology, the choice of which is quite adequate to the goals and objectives of the work. This work was carried out in compliance with the basic canons of scientific research. During the study, the authors used various methods. The postulated by the author is illustrated by practical material, which was the data of a free associative experiment, in which 79 respondents of three age categories (14-18 years old; 20-28 years old and 30-54 years old) took part. It is not entirely clear and appropriate to refer to the federal law without specifying the content in the context of the linguistic content of the article. What did the author want to demonstrate by this in terms of the conclusion? The conclusions of the article require clarification, since the author's statement is considered to be conclusions: "Thus, a concept is a mental formation that has a certain structure and typology. The concept forms a system of knowledge about the world, acts as a carrier of individual and collective consciousness." This statement seems trivial and self-evident, requiring no proof. The conclusions of the article require strengthening the scientific component, clarifying and reflecting the work carried out during the research. The bibliography of the article contains 17 sources, which include exclusively domestic works. The absence of references to foreign works indicates that the work is not included in the global scientific paradigm. Unfortunately, there are no references to fundamental works, which include PhD and doctoral dissertations on the subject under consideration. The sources are dated 1991-2004 in large part, which allows us to conclude that the author did not take into account the latest achievements of linguistics in his work. The article will undoubtedly be useful to a wide range of people, philologists, undergraduates and graduate students of specialized universities. In general, it should be noted that the article is written in scientific language, well structured, typos, spelling and syntactic errors, inaccuracies were not found. The overall impression after reading the reviewed article is rather positive, however, it can be recommended for publication in a scientific journal from the list of the Higher Attestation Commission only after revision.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study of the reviewed work is the structural model of the concept of "EDUCATION". The research was carried out within the framework of cognitive linguistics; the methodological outline of the work is relevant, new, and non-trivial. The author differentiates the essay into so-called semantic blocks, this helps the potential reader to follow the development of scientific thought. Parts of the work are proportionate, but in general the text is aimed at a scientific version of the typological layout of the issue. The author's judgments in the course of his work are consistent: for example, "in modern cognitive linguistics, the key concept is considered to be "concept", which is increasingly used by researchers considering the problem of linguistic expression of cognition as a process of cognition. Mental in nature, the concept reflects the content of an individual's opinions and knowledge about reality, the experience of interacting with it," or "within the framework of the linguistic and cultural direction (Karasik, Slyshkin, Vorkachev, Alefirenko, Voloshina, Maslova, Zimina, Radbil, Yevtushenko, Mizheguli), concepts are considered as elements of national linguistic culture in their interrelation with national the values and attitudes of this cultural community. The structure of the linguistic and cultural concept assumes the location of cognitive features at the following levels: conceptual (factual), metaphorical (figurative) and meaningful (value). At the same time, the core of the concept is invariably the value component," etc. The paper summarizes the theoretical material quite successfully, the main names of researchers in this field are fully derived (and this is both foreign and domestic level). The practical level concerns the decoding of the concept of "EDUCATION". The author notes that "modern researchers adhere to the field organization of the concept of "education". The structural model proposed by us is called the segment-field model, which captures not only the nuclear peripheral zone, but also the segments of this concept. Exploring the structure of the concept of "education", we, first of all, identified its basic layer (sensory-figurative core), additional cognitive layers (near, far and extreme periphery of the concept), as well as the interpretative field – individual and collective attitudes of consciousness that follow from the content of this concept in Russian culture." Moreover, the argumentation factor of the point of view is implemented in the mode of "conducted free associative experiment". The available data block is fully represented, an analytical layout of this part is given. I believe that the work has achieved its result, the goals / objectives have been achieved. The material can be used in the formation of new works of a related thematic focus. The result is built into a schematic format – the pictographic block is easy to understand. In the final part of the work, the author notes that "around the sensory-figurative core and periphery of the concept of "EDUCATION" there are several segments equal in degree of abstraction. This allows us to consider this concept from a more specific cognitive layer to a more abstract one." There were no serious factual contradictions in the work. Style / the language correlates with the scientific type itself. The formal requirements of the publication are taken into account, the expansion of the material, its edits / corrections are unnecessary, the bibliographic list is full and extensive. The work will be useful to all those who study the effective nature of "concepts". I recommend the peer-reviewed article "The structural model of the concept of education" for open publication in the journal "Litera".