Library
|
Your profile |
Litera
Reference:
Alhaded H.H., Shavtikova A., Merai M.
Possibility of using a cognitive approach to directive speech acts: case of study of English and Arabic academic discourses
// Litera.
2022. ¹ 5.
P. 43-54.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8698.2022.5.37801 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=37801
Possibility of using a cognitive approach to directive speech acts: case of study of English and Arabic academic discourses
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8698.2022.5.37801Received: 05-04-2022Published: 29-04-2022Abstract: The purpose of the study is to determine the role and degree of use of the cognitive approach in the study of directive speech acts. The article provides an overview of modern theoretical research in the field of speech acts, and also substantiates the use of a cognitive approach in the study of directive speech acts. The relevance of this study lies in the fact that the widespread use of the cognitive approach for the analysis of speech acts in different language groups has not been sufficiently studied, which leads to communication failures between communication participants. The subject of this article is the functioning of the cognitive approach in the study of directive speech acts. The object is the study of directive speech acts on the example of English and Arabic academic discourses using a cognitive approach. Descriptive, contextual, comparative-historical methods are used as the main research methods. The novelty of our research lies in the fact that the widespread use of the cognitive approach for the analysis of speech acts in different language groups has not been sufficiently studied, which leads to communication failures between communication participants. The study of ways to prevent these communication failures is an important component in building global interaction between communication participants both in linguistics and in the world as a whole. Therefore, the relevance of the study of the use of the cognitive approach lies in the need of society to build adequate interaction at various levels. As a result of the conducted research, it is proved that the use of a cognitive approach in the analysis of directive speech acts helps to reduce the number of communicative failures of representatives of the English-speaking and Arabic-speaking academic discourses. The research materials can be used in universities of the humanities in the study of special courses in comparative linguistics and intercultural communication, as well as the data obtained can be applied in the process of educational and methodological activities in the creation of specialized textbooks. Keywords: cognitive approach, academic discourse, theory of speech acts, English language, Arabic language, communicative failure, Modern Standart Arabic, dialect, comparative analysis, eye-tracking experimentThis article is automatically translated. Moreover, after analyzing modern theoretical research in the field of speech acts, we conclude that much attention is paid to the study of speech acts from the point of view of a structural and functional approach, which is close to pragmatic and cognitive approaches. It should also be noted that within the framework of studying the theory of speech acts, the cognitive approach is mainly studied from the point of view of the reaction of human consciousness to indirect and directive speech acts in different linguistic cultures. We see prospects for further research of the problem in a more detailed and narrowly focused study of the application of the cognitive approach to the analysis of directive language acts in multilingual academic discourses through the prism of comparative analysis. References
1. Balaganov D. V., Davydova T. Yu. Cognitive mechanisms in simultaneous translation // Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University. ON Dobrolyubov. – 2019. – no. 47.-ðð. 19-32.
2. Bastrakova E. A. The theory of speech acts through the prism of teaching the Russian language in a foreign language audience // Philological aspect. – 2021. – no. S4.-ðð. 11-15. 3. Belyaeva-Standen E. I. Gender features of the compliment of Russians // Issues of psycholinguistics.-2006.-no. 4.-ðð. 155-170. 4. Bryukhanova E. S., Pavlova O. A. SPEECH ACT OF GREETINGS IN GLAMOR ENGLISH DISCOURSE //VII Avdeev Readings.-2019.-ðð. 124-128. 5. Vorobieva N. V. Indirect Directive Speech Acts in an Interview // Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanitarian sciences. – 2010. – no. 596.-ðð. 156-165. 6. Gurova E. A. The speech act of gratitude in the Danish language // In the footsteps of the teacher. Studies in Scandinavian and Germanic studies. To the 90th anniversary of the birth of Professor VP Berkov.-2021.-S. 99. 7. Ermakova O. M. Some gender features of the expression of the speech act of threat in the Russian language. – 2013. ðð. 113-117. 8. Ivanchenko A. A. GENDER FEATURES OF SPEECH BEHAVIOR IN RUSSIAN LINGUISTIC CULTURE // Forum of Young Scientists. – 2018. – no. 5-1.-ðð. 1304-1308. 9. Larina T. V., Shchelchkova E. B. Speech act of invitation and problems of understanding: intercultural aspect // Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State University. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication.-2013.-T. 11.-No. 2.-ðð. 73-79. 10. Mayorova E. V. Structural-cognitive analysis of advertising text // Linguistics: Bulletin of the Ural Linguistic Society. T. 9. 2003.-2003.-ðð.113-117. 11. Mukhametzyanova D. R. FEATURES OF TRANSFER OF EMOTIONALITY IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE // Fifth floor. – 2021. – no. 7.-ðð. 13-18. 12. Naiman E. A. The theory of speech acts in the critical mirror of linguistic anthropology and sociolinguistics // Language and culture. – 2015. – no. 4 (32).-ðð. 53-62. 13. Obdalova O. A., Kharapudchenko O. V. Cognitive-pragmatic and linguo-stylistic characteristics of the English oral scientific and academic discourse // Language and Culture. – 2019. – no. 46.-ðð. 102-125. 14. Poplevko A. V., Nadolskaya E. P. Gender difference between male and female speech. – 2017.-pp.213-234. 15. Stasyuk A. A. Communicative characteristics of a compliment as a speech act // World of Linguistics and Communication.-2009.-no.4.-pp.19 16. Fomicheva Zh. E. On the cognitive-stylistic approach to the analysis of modern English-language literary and artistic discourse // News of the Tula State University. Humanitarian sciences. – 2014. – no. 3.-ðð. 277-287. 17. Shilina A. V. Speech act of threat in the gender aspect // Future of science-2018.-2018.-ðð. 381-384 18. Cazden C. B. Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. – 1988.-pp.111-116 19. Clark H. H., Lucy P. Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests //Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior. – 1975. – Ò. 14. – ¹. 1. – ðð. 56-72. 20. Heath S. B., Heath S. B. Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. 21. Coulson S., Lovett C. Comprehension of non-conventional indirect requests: An event-related brain potential study //Italian Journal of Linguistics. – 2010. – Ò.– ¹. 1. – ðð. 107-124. 22. Ellis N. C. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition //Studies in second language acquisition. – 2002. – Ò. 24. – ¹. 2. 23. Ellis R. Introduction: Investigating form‐focused instruction //Language learning. – 2001. – Ò. 51.-pp.889-901. 24. Ertan G., Carkoglu A., Aytac S. E. Cognitive political networks: A structural approach to measure political polarization in multiparty systems //Social Networks. – 2022. – Ò. 68. – ðð. 118-126. 25. Eslami Z. R. Teachers' Voice vs. Students' Voice: A Needs Analysis Approach to English for Acadmic Purposes (EAP) in Iran //English Language Teaching. – 2010. – Ò. 3. – ¹. 1. – ðð. 3-11. 26. Gass S. M., Houck N. Interlanguage refusals: A cross-cultural study of Japanese-English. Mouton de Gruyter. – 1999. 27. Gass S. M., Houck N. Non-native refusals: A methodological perspective //Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in a second language. – 1996. – ðð. 45-63. 28. Ghazanfari M. Lexical Interference Viewed from the Perspective of Language Proficiency //Indian journal of applied linguistics. – 2003. – Ò.– ¹.1.– ðð. 109-25. 29. Gibbs J. C. Kohlberg’s moral stage theory //Human development. – 1979. – Ò. 22. – ¹. 2. – ðð. 89-112. 30. Gibbs Jr R. W. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated //Journal of pragmatics. – 2002. – Ò. 34. – ¹. 4. – pp. 457-486. 31. Hernandez A. E. et al. Language switching and language representation in Spanish–English bilinguals: An fMRI study //NeuroImage. – 2001. – Ò. 14. – ¹. 2. – pp. 510-520. 32. Hernandez L. P. Saying something for a particular purpose: Constructional compatibility and constructional families //Revista española de lingüística aplicada. – 2012. – ¹. 25. – pp. 189-210. 33. Iliadi P.L., Larina T.V. REFUSAL STRATEGIES IN ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN // RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics.-2017.-Vol. 8.-N. 3.-pp. 531-542. doi: 10.22363/2313-2299-2017-8-3-531-542 34. Khosh N. K., Khalil A. A. A., Alhaded H. H. S. CULTURAL VALUES AND NORMS OF COMMUNICATION: A VIEW FROM THE MIDDLE EAST //Proceedings of ADVED. – 2020. – Ò. 2020. – ¹. 6th.-pp.65-78. 35. Nicholas Ruitenbeck. Topical issues of ontology and forms of directive speech acts. international Review of Pragmatics, Brill, 2019, 11(2), pp. 200-221 36. Norris J. M., Ortega L. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta‐analysis //Language learning. – 2000. – Ò. 50. – ¹. 3. – pp. 417-528. 37. Panther K. U., Thornburg L. A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation //Journal of pragmatics. – 1998. – Ò. 30. – ¹. 6. – pp. 755-769. 38. Parola A., Bosco F. M. EXPRESS: An eye-tracking investigation of the cognitive processes involved in the comprehension of simple and complex communicative acts //Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. – 2022. – pp. 174. 39. Patterson R., Weideman A. The typicality of academic discourse and its relevance for constructs of academic literacy //Journal for Language Teaching= Ijenali Yekufundzisa Lulwimi= Tydskrif Vir Taalonderrig. – 2013. – Ò. 47. – ¹. 1. – pp. 107-123. 40. Rutherford W. E. The meaning of grammatical consciousness‐raising //World Englishes. – 1987. – Ò. 6. – ¹. 3. – pp. 209-216. 41. Smith M. S. Consciousness-raising and the second language Learner1 //Applied linguistics. – 1981. – Ò. 2. – ¹. 2. – pp. 159-168. 42. Spada N., Tomita Y. Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta‐analysis //Language learning. – 2010. – Ò. 60. – ¹. 2. – pp. 263-308. 43. Tawalbeh A., Al-Oqaily E. In-directness and politeness in American English and Saudi Arabic requests: A cross-cultural comparison //Asian Social Science. – 2012. – Ò. 8. – ¹. 10. – pp. 85. 44. Yin, C.P., Kuo, F. Y. A study of how information system professionals comprehend indirect and direct speech arts in project communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 56(3).-2013.-pp. 226–241. doi:10.1109/TPC.2013.2263648
First Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
Second Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
|