DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2022.2.37559
Received:
13-02-2022
Published:
20-02-2022
Abstract:
The subject of this research is the peculiarities of civil-political activity of youth. The relevance is substantiated by instability of meaning-forming ideals, loss of identity (including civil) by young people, change of values in public and individual consciousness in the conditions of social transformation and sociopolitical contradictions. Emphasis is places on people’s interaction with the dynamic and rapidly changing world in the era of digitalization, globalization, and sociopolitical instability, which entails the emergence of destructive manifestations in various forms of civil-political activity. The goal lies in determination of the peculiarities of civil-political activity and examination of the motives and methods of engaging youth in offline and online practices of civil-political activity. The empirical base of this research involves 639 university students in the city of Tomsk. The acquired result elucidate a range of important issues regarding the desire of young people to be engaged in political life of the country and show interest in political events. The article outlines the main forms of civil-political activity, most common of which are voting in elections, participation in online petitions and online protests. The article considers the most effective practices of online civil-political activity from the perspective of youth: creation of content on political topic, involvement of young influencers to political issues, inclusion of youth in solution of socially and politically important issues of society and rewarding them for being active, establishment of independent youth communities for free communication on political topics, etc.
Keywords:
civic and political activity, civic competence, civic position, youth, political attitudes, motives, values, Internet, digital environment, development ways
This article is automatically translated.
In the coordinates of an ever-changing social space (in the context of a pandemic, globalization and digitalization), young people are undergoing a transformation of ideas about the country and the world, socio-cultural and political orientations, citizenship. The problems of representation of civic-patriotic attitudes, value orientations and patriotic self-determination in the minds of young people are actively discussed, however, there is a lack of research related to the value-semantic and motivational sphere of a person actively involved in civil-political activity. Today, it is particularly relevant to study the response or emotional, cognitive, behavioral reactions of young people (including the forms of participation of young people in various socio-political events) to socio-political events / situations / decisions in society. In this regard, in various fields of scientific knowledge (sociology, political science, pedagogy, psychology), there is a variety of objects and subjects of research: political culture of youth (I.A. Tyutkova, A.V. Ivashchenko, A.A. Kazakov) [7-8]; political competence of youth (I.A. Batanina, A.A. Lavrikova, O.E. Shumilova) [3]; political behavior, activity and participation of citizens (A.V. Andreenkova) [2]; political identity and civic position. In foreign studies, civil-political activity and position are studied through the formation of service to society among young people [16] and social responsibility [20], the involvement of students in self-government [13], the development of universal values [18], consideration of cultural diversity and tolerance [15], the development of legal [9] and political culture [19], taking into account the national [11] and cultural characteristics of the country and region [14]. The study of the problem of civil and political activity of young people in the digital environment is becoming relevant to the issues of security, manipulative communication and destructive behavior. The authors consider the problem of the manifestation of destructive forms of civil and political activity under the influence of manipulative technologies, which are actively implemented by various media (Demyanenko N. V.) [6]. The problematization of the abuse of manipulative technologies in the digital space is raised by both domestic and foreign authors (N. Hara, M.R. Sanfilippo, S.V. Volodenkov, S.N. Fedorchenko, A.V. Vilovatykh) [4-5; 12]. Thus, studies of the relationship of digital media with political activism and large-scale social protests are becoming a popular agenda of the international scientific community (Chen, Chan, & Lee, 2016; Shmargad Y., Klar S, 2019) [10; 17]. Global changes and the complex and ambiguous situation in the world in all spheres of human life determine the transformation of value and semantic orientations, including political activity /activity of Russian youth, which, in turn, determines the need for research in this direction. The purpose of our research is to highlight the features of civil–political activity and to study the motives and ways of involving young people in offline and online practices of civil-political activity. Sampling and research methods The empirical base of the study was made up of students of higher educational institutions of Tomsk, a total of 639 (627 survey participants and 12 focus group participants) students of humanities, technical and natural science education profiles took part, of which female students made up 54%, male students - 46%. Data collection was carried out in 2021 through Internet platforms https://docs.google.com/forms / and Zoom, the average survey time took no more than 20 minutes, the focus group time was 2 hours. The study used qualitative and quantitative methods of data collection followed by mathematical processing. At the first stage of the study, a focus group was conducted, on the basis of which questions for the questionnaire were developed. At the second stage of the study, an online survey was conducted using the author's questionnaire. The focus group method. A focus group was organized, which was attended by 12 undergraduate students aged 17-19 who are active participants in civil and political activities at the level of their faculty/university/region. Group discussions were held online on the Zoom video conferencing platform and lasted 2 hours. The purpose of the focus group is to identify the features of the value-semantic and motivational spheres of youth that demonstrate pronounced civil and political activity, as well as to identify the ideas of young people about effective ways and difficulties of involving young people in constructive civil and political activities in modern realities of life. Questionnaire survey. The questionnaire was developed according to the purpose and objectives of the study, included 35 questions that were aimed at studying the characteristics of civil and political activity of young people. The questionnaire included closed, semi-closed, open questions and questions-scores on the Likert scale. Research results General characteristics of civil and political activity of young people
As a result of the analysis of the focus group materials, it was revealed that for young people, civic and political activity is an opportunity, first of all, to understand and critically comprehend "the reality of political life and socio-political events/processes", "their rights and interests", "predict the consequences of their actions/choices". Secondly, it is an opportunity to perform actions of a socio-political nature: "to attract the attention of the state to solving various problems", "to promote their ideas /solutions in the context of improving the quality of life of the population". Thirdly, "involvement in various forms of political activity is the key to the formation of civic identity/unity." Young people associate the motives of civil and political activity with the opportunity to: change and improve the existing political situation in the country; resist the existing political regime; bring "necessity", "benefit" to people (change the quality of people's lives); gain status, influence, importance; become a political leader, deserving people's recognition. Young people associate difficulties of involvement in civil and political activities with insufficient formation of cognitive and motivational components. Among the main difficulties were highlighted: low involvement of young people in political life (the impossibility of real participation in the political life of the country and evaluation of the results of this participation); poor awareness of youth about events of a socio-political nature; weak interest and lack of understanding of the goals and importance of participation in the socio-political life of the country; weak awareness of the ideas of patriotism. Next, a survey of young people was conducted. The study of the civil and political activity of young people from the perspective of political involvement and the manifestation of citizenship allowed us to identify the features of the activity of the survey participants, the forms of its manifestation, the motives of participation and the significance of civil and political activity for respondents. The majority of students (64%) are interested in the political life of Russia, but 48% of respondents accidentally learn about current political events through news and subscriptions. Figure 1 shows the frequency of responses from young people about self-assessment of their civic competence, position and activity, as well as real involvement in various forms of civic and political activity (the upper column reflects positive responses, the lower – negative). Figure 1 – Civil and political activity of young people Slightly more than half of the survey participants rate themselves as citizens with developed civic competence and position, but the majority remain passive (66.5%). The most common form of participation in political life and the manifestation of their civic position are elections (47.5%), the second most popular choice of the answer is participation in youth movements (22%), participation in public organizations – 11% of young people, the least involvement was in political parties – only 7%. The protest potential of the study participants is within the values (12%) that have been recorded in recent years by various researchers [1]. In general, the survey showed a low level of civic and political activity of students (less than a third of respondents), while most noted the importance of its development among young people (89%). Noting the need to develop and implement programs aimed at involving young people in various forms of civic and political activity, students identify the most relevant institutions through which such programs can be implemented: 80% believe that educational institutions should be engaged in this, half of the participants believe that civil and political activity should be formed in the family or through specialized state organizations (53.5% and 51.5%, respectively), 40% of young people are ready to entrust such a function to opinion leaders and 34% to non-governmental structures. According to the survey participants, the meanings of the development of civic and political activity for young people is the need for conscious participation in the political life of the country "to understand the political situation in the country; the opportunity to have an idea of the political situation in the country, to be able to analyze political meetings and events." And the motivation of civil and political activity of young people is determined mainly by romantic motives and patriotism "to help everyone in need; I want to be useful to my country and people; to do good, the main thing is to see people's smiles, patriotic feelings and hope for improving the lives of people in my country" and aspirations (needs) for changes "the opportunity to influence development cities and regions; bring certain changes to the country." The meanings of civic and political activity and the motives for participation in it are characterized by young people quite positively, the reverse situation is observed in determining the attitude to the political system and its role in the life of the younger generation. Thus, the attitudes of the study participants towards politics are characterized by low trust and a critical attitude: "a dirty sphere where money decides everything; an intricate, complex and corrupt system; a way of tightening the screws; unfair play", neutral characteristics are associated with an attempt to determine what politics is: "science that studies the laws of government; state actions; the art of governing the state; the form of relations and communication between the state and its citizens," and the third group of answers reflects the complexity and uncertainty of the political structure: "a complex area, something incomprehensible, an abstract concept, a very confused system." Civil and political activity of young people on the Internet The growing importance of the Internet space of social media and social networks for young people also determines the growth of their influence on the values, meanings and attitudes of young people, this is also legitimate in relation to the civil-political position or activity. This fact determined the second focus of our research. Figure 2 shows the usual practices of civil and political activity of young people in the Internet environment. Figure 2 – Civil and political activity of young people in the Internet environment
Despite the fact that almost half of the respondents (56.6%) use forums, groups of political content in order to keep abreast of the latest developments, they take a passive position, which is characterized mainly by obtaining information (consumption). Thus, only 24.3% are interested in the election campaign, 28.3% of young people are interested in political figures, while 47.5% of respondents participate in the elections. Almost a third of the study participants (28.3%) use social networks to attract other users to problems of political content through posts and reposts of relevant articles, 34.4% of respondents agitate other users to take part in certain political events. There is an increase in popularity among young people of such forms of civil and political activity as online petitions (38.4% of respondents participated) and online rallies, protests, boycotts (28.4%). For comparison, only 12% of respondents participated in such forms offline. The correlation of answers to questions about the assessment of their civil-political position and competence with various forms of civil-political activity has shown that those who considered themselves with a developed civil-political position/competence are more likely to monitor political events, unlike young people with an "undeveloped" civil-political position/competence (31% and 20%, respectively, ?2 = 19.69, p=0.05). Young people with an "undeveloped" civil-political position/competence are less likely to make posts and reposts with political content (37% vs. 26%, ?2=58.6245, p= 0.00); less likely to participate in signing online petitions (35% vs. 19.6%, ?2= 59.3313, p=0.00). The survey participants see stimulating the interest of young people in civil and political activities and involving young people in it through the popularization of political life and events in the Internet environment. The digital space has the necessary conditions and is the most preferred platform for communication, information notification and the manifestation of new forms of civic and socio-political activity. Figure 3 shows the main ways of developing civil and political youth through Internet resources. Figure 3 – Ways to develop civil and political activity on the Internet The survey participants referred to the most effective ways of involving young people in civil and political activities through the Internet space: – creation of modern youth content that will be accessible and interesting to position the values of inclusion in the political life of the country and the formation of a civic position; – involvement of youth opinion leaders/well-known bloggers in the political problems of society and civil initiatives; – creation of platforms (for) and mechanisms of communication between government representatives and young people, where the latter will have the opportunity to express their opinions and take part in the implementation of real state projects (for example, at the volunteer level); – development of a system of encouragement in schools/universities for participation in civil and political activities; – creation of platforms (forums/communities) for free discussion of current civil and political problems of society with the possibility of uniting young people into communities without strict regulation "from above". Main conclusions The civic and political activity of youth is one of the urgent research problems that is directly related to the development of negative (destructive) orientations of youth as a result of socio-economic changes and aggravation of social contradictions as a result of instability of sense–forming ideals, loss of identity (including civil), change of values in public and individual consciousness. This problem has become especially relevant in the light of recent events in Russian (and world) reality (unauthorized rallies, the use of children and youth in political games, increased interest in protest actions). The results of the study made it possible to clarify a number of significant issues: there is a rather positive picture regarding the understanding by young people of the importance of being involved in socio-political events and decisions in their country; to understand the determining grounds of political processes, but at the same time, young people demonstrate insufficient readiness for various socio-political activities, for example, the most common form of activity continues remain voting in the elections. Although in the realities of large-scale digitalization in all spheres of life, it is the Internet environment that seems to be a serious platform for the manifestation of various forms of civil and political activity. According to the results obtained, only 20 to 30% of all study participants show various civil and political activity in the digital space, the rest demonstrate a passive position. The factors (barriers) that prevent the expression of civil and political activity of young people are: negative attitudes towards the political situation and the real possibility of changing something, the closeness (inaccessibility and inaccessibility) of representatives of real political power for young people, the lack of accessible and reliable information about the political institution, the lack of mechanisms for communication and interaction between politicians and youth.
References
1. Azarov A.A., Brodovskaya E.V., SHatilov A.B. Grazhdanskij aktivizm rossijskoj molodezhi v cifrovoj srede kak prediktor aktivnosti oflajn: rezul'taty massovogo oprosa i mul'tiagentnogo modelirovaniya // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny. 2021. ¹ 6. P. 296—318. https:// doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2041.
2. Andreenkova A.V. Politicheskoe povedenie rossiyan (chast' 1) // Monitoring. 2010. ¹3 (97). P. 47-59.
3. Batanina Irina Aleksandrovna, Lavrikova Anastasiya Aleksandrovna, SHumilova Ol'ga Evgen'evna Politicheskaya kompetentnost' rossiyan kak faktor politicheskogo uchastiya // Srednerusskij vestnik obshchestvennyh nauk. 2014. ¹1 (31). P. 50-56.
4. Volodenkov S. V., Fedorchenko S. N. Cifrovye infrastruktury grazhdansko-politicheskogo aktivizma: aktual'nye vyzovy, riski i ogranicheniya // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny. 2021. No 6. P. 97—118. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2014.
5. Vilovatyh A.V. Faktor cifrovyh tekhnologij v razvitii protestnyh dvizhenij // Problemy nacional'noj strategii. 2020. ¹ 2 (59). P. 174-185.
6. Dem'yanenko N.V. Ispol'zovanie manipulyativnyh tekhnologij v SMI, kak real'naya problema // Rossijskij akademicheskij zhurnal. 2012. T. 19, ¹ 1. P. 20-27.
7. Ivashchenko A.V., Tyut'kova I.A. Politicheskaya kul'tura uchashchihsya v sovremennom rossijskom obshchestve // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psihologiya i pedagogika. 2009. ¹2. P. 62-72.
8. Kazakov A.A. Politicheskaya kul'tura sovremennoj rossijskoj molodezhi v kontekste medijnoj gramotnosti i vliyaniya SMI // Izv. Sarat. un-ta Nov. ser. Ser. Sociologiya. Politologiya. 2018. ¹2. P. 205-211.
9. Malkova I.YU., Fahretdinova A.P. Osobennosti grazhdanskogo obrazovaniya v Evrope // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo ped. un-ta. 2016. ¹ 4. S. 126–130.
10. Chan M., Chen H.T., Lee F.L.F Examining the roles of mobile and social media in political participation: A cross-national analysis of three Asian societies using a communication mediation approach // New Media & Society. 2016. Vol. 19. Iss. 12. P. 2003-2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816653190
11. Hanson L. Global citizenship, global health, and the internationalization of curriculum: A study of transformative potential // Journal of Studies in International Education. 2010. ¹14. P. 70–88.
12. Hara N., Sanfilippo M.R. Co-constructing controversy: content analysis of collaborative knowledge negotiation in online communities // Information, Communication & Society. 2016. ¹19 (11). P. 1587-1604
13. Miedema S., Bertram-Troost G. The Challenges of Global Citizenship for Worldview Education. The Perspective of Social Sustainability // Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability. 2015. ¹17(2). p. 44-52.
14. Mossberger K., Wu Y., Crawford J. Connecting Citizens and Local Governments? Social Media and Interactivity in Major U.S. – Cities Government Information Quarterly. 2013. Vol. 30. ¹4. P. 351-358.
15. Pais A. An ideology critique of global citizenship education // Critical Studies in Education. 2020. Vol. 61(1). P. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1318772.
16. Schulz W., Ainley J. et al. Becoming Citizens in a Changing World / IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 International Report. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73963-2.
17. Shmargad Y., Klar S. How partisan online environments shape communication with political outgroups // International Journal of Communication. 2019. ¹13. P. 2287–2313.
18. Tarrant M.A., Rubin D.L., Stoner L. The added value of study abroad: Fostering a global citizenry // Journal of Studies in International Education. 2014. ¹18. P. 141–161.
19. Tarozzi M., Inguaggiato C. Implementing global citizenship education in EU primary schools: The role of government ministries // International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning. 2018. ¹10 (1) P. 21–38. https://doi.org/10.18546/IJDEGL.10.1.03.
20. Zembylas M., Charalambous P., Charalambous C., Lesta S. Toward a critical hermeneutical approach of human rights education: Universal ideals, contextual realities and teachers' difficulties // Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2017. ¹49 (4). P. 497–517, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1188156.
First Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.
The topic of civic and political activity of young people is relevant for interdisciplinary research and relevant generalizations. Obviously, the article should be based on the results of an empirical analysis of the problem, and the methodological perspective of the consideration of the designated problem is also important. Along the way, I will note the controversy of writing the combination "Internet environment" (I think that a hyphen is still needed here). In terms of content, the article reveals the author's attention to the value-semantic and motivational sphere of a person actively involved in civil and political activities. The logic of scientific search is built accordingly, an analysis of scientific discourse is provided, in which the political aspect of human activity mainly appears and the civil aspect is almost not affected in any way, which can be regarded as a certain flaw in the work, causing the need to eliminate it. It is important to identify areas of research specifically on civil and political activity and to present an interpretation of the concept of "activity" in relation to this issue. Moreover, such a need is also connected with the purpose of the article – "to highlight the features of civil and political activity and to study the motives and ways of involving young people in offline and online practices of civil and political activity." In this regard, the vector of digital communication or digital interaction is not sufficiently developed methodologically. If there is still more or less clarity with civil and political activity, then as for the digital context, the author does not disclose it in any way, therefore the author's message associated with the peculiarities of manifestation in the Internet environment is questionable. It is unclear what kind of Internet environment this is, and how methodologically the author intends to link together the Internet environment and the actual activity of young people. All these points need reflection. By sampling and methods. It is necessary to name the universities of Tomsk, determine the role of the author in conducting the study, as well as the base on which it was conducted, and then the empirical data obtained were interpreted. The factor of correlation between the results of a quantitative study (survey) and a qualitative one (focus group) has not been determined. The wording of the choice of informants for the focus group is questionable: "12 undergraduate students aged 17-19 who are active participants in civil and political activities at the level of their faculty/university/region." It is necessary to specify what kind of activity this is specifically, otherwise the head of the student group can also be attributed to activists, although, of course, this may not be the case. The type of sample was not determined for the survey of students, the aggregate of respondents was not reflected, etc. The author thus demonstrates a superficial knowledge of the research methodology and the possibilities of its description. In the presentation of the research results, the author does not achieve correlation (conjugacy) of the results of the survey and the focus group. It is not entirely clear on what basis (or on what grounds) they are compared and what can ultimately be counted on during such a comparison. This is perhaps the weakest point in the article. The author does not separate the concepts of "influencing the values, meanings and attitudes of youth": it is obvious that there is some confusion in such an enumeration; some authors do not differentiate these concepts, but the author of the article needs to do this if he names them. Data on the civil and political activity of young people on the Internet are presented rather sparingly, it is impossible to draw the conclusions that the author makes at the end of his work. Thus, the article has shortcomings that need to be addressed.
Second Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.
The research of the digital space of politics, as well as the problems of virtual identity, is the leading trend of modern political science both abroad and in Russia. The presented publication is devoted to one of the topics that has recently attracted increasing attention from scientists, namely the civic and political activity of young people, innovative forms of its implementation in the Internet space. The relevance of the research is due to the fact that in recent years a large number of digital platforms and resources have appeared in which young people are able to accumulate civil and political values and show various forms of social activity: in educational, political, cultural fields, etc. The author in the introduction cites existing studies on both positive and destructive forms of political activity of youth which raise issues of ideological security. This study was carried out based on empirical data obtained during a survey of Tomsk student youth. The sample included more than 500 respondents who answered questions from a questionnaire on civic engagement and various forms of political participation, and a series of focus groups were conducted, which allowed to strengthen expert conclusions about existing trends in youth policy. The study is well structured and provides a comprehensive overview of the leading civic and political attitudes and values of youth, the main forms of participation in public life: elections, online petitions, protests, civic activism, etc. The structure of the article is designed as follows, there are thematic blocks, an introduction, a conclusion containing the key conclusions of the study – all this allows the reader to easily navigate the research material. There is no doubt that the article will find a lively response from a wide readership, not only among specialists researching youth civic and political activism. The list of references is presented by an extensive list of Russian and foreign literature, covers a complete list of both theoretical and practical works on the subject presented. However, the controversy with researchers who turned to the study of the digital space of Russian politics is not fully reflected, among them are V.V. Titov, O.V. Popova, S.I. Kaminsky, D.A. Fedotov, etc. The author should focus more on existing theoretical discussions, since in the context of the emergence of new digital phenomena of politics, the conceptual framework of such studies requires high-quality study. In general, the presented publication has the character of a completed study, thematically fully correlates with the topic of the publication "Sociodynamics" and therefore can be recommended for publication without significant corrections. The article is written in a good scientific language, is made on relevant topics and sets a high level of potential scientific discussion.
|