To be liberated the Vaisheshika way, or the Vaisheshika attempt at a «Negative Soteriology» by the Indian school of philosophy

Лысенко В.Г.

doi:10.25136/2409-8728.2021.12.37003

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Back to contents

Philosophical Thought

Reference:

Lysenko V. To be liberated the Vaisheshika way, or the Vaisheshika attempt at a «Negative Soteriology» by the Indian school of philosophy // Philosophical Thought. 2021. № 12. P. 8-14. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2021.12.37003 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=37003

To be liberated the Vaisheshika way, or the Vaisheshika attempt at a «Negative Soteriology» by the Indian school of philosophy

Lysenko Viсtoria

ORCID: 0000-0002-6069-3502

Doctor of Philosophy

Chief Scientific Associate, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, of. str.1

vglyssenko@yandex.ru

Other publications by this author

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2021.12.37003

Received:

30-11-2021

Published:

11-12-2021

Abstract: The article examines the original concept of the Vaisheshika school, criticized by other Indian philosophers, according to which Self (Atman), freed from the bonds of rebirth (saṃsāra), is a pure substance (dravya), devoid of consciousness, which is believed to be its impermanent quality (guna); the opponents compared the Vaisheshika's liberated Self with a stone or a log. The author proposes an explanation of the Vaisheshika liberation doctrine (soteriology) within the framework of its categoriology, in which consciousness and Atman belong to different categories, respectively, guna and dravya. Vaisheshika proclaims knowledge of the six categories to be the highest spiritual goal (nihshreyasa), which, in turn, comes from the pure Dharma (Merit). The reason why the Vaisheshikas felt obliged to add a pure Dharma as the final step towards liberation (which distinguishes Vaisheshika from other schools, emphasizing the soteriological value of knowledge) is explained by assuming the Dharma's capacity to overcome a dichotomy of merit-demerit (dharma-adharma) as the main factor responsible for the rebirth of an embodied ātman. The pure Dharma, due to all the positive karmic energy accumulated during countless reincarnations of the soul, arises at the very last moment in a person's life to purufy his/her true Atman from the law of karma and rebirth. Since nothing can be said about Atman's future, it is not a "liberation for", but a "liberation from", which can be called a "negative soteriology".

Keywords:

Vaisheshika, Prashastapada, Shridhara, moksha, pada-artha, Dharma, dharma-adharma, liberation, merit, negative soteriology

References

1. Miyamoto, Keiichi. The Metaphysics and Epistemology of the Early Vaiśeṣikas with an Appendix: Daśapadārthi of Candramati (A Translation with a Reconstructed Sanskrit Text, Notes, and a Critical Edition of the Chinese Version). Pune: Bhandarkar Oriental Series, 28. – Pune 1996. – 318 p.
2. Praśastapādabhāṣya with the Commentary Nyāyakandalī of Śrīdhara. Ed. by Vindhesvan Prasad Dvivedin. – Delhi. 1984: Sri Satguru Publications. (reprint of 1895).
3. Tarkasāgara (Kaṇādasūtranibandha). Thakur, A., ed. – Mithila Institute: Darbhanga. 1985.
4. Vaiśeṣikasūtravyākhyā. Thakur, A., ed., Mithila: Darbhanga, Mithila Institute. 1957.
5. Vaiśeṣika Sūtras of Kaṇāda with the Commentary of Candrānanda. Ed. by Muni Sri Jambuvijayaji. - Baroda: Oriental Institute. 1961 (GOS 136).
6. Word Index to the Praśastapādabhāṣya. A Complete Word Index to the Printed Editions of the Praśastapādabhāṣya. Ed. by J. Bronkhorst and Y. Ramseier. - Delhi etc.: Motilal Banarsidass. 1994. - 169 p.
7. Bronkhorst, Johannes. The Vaiśeṣika Vākya and Bhāṣya // Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. Vol. 72/73, No. 1/4, Amrtamahotsava (1917-1992), Volume 1991-1992, pp. 145-169.
8. Frauwallner, Erich. Geschichte der indischen Philosophie, vol.II: Die naturphilosophischen Schulen und das Vaiśeṣika System, das System der Jaina, der Materialismus. - Salzburg: Otto Müller Verlag. 1956.- 348 p.
9. Halbfass, Wilhelm. On Being and What There Is: Classical Vaiśeṣika and the History of Indian Ontology. - Albany: SUNY Press. 1992.- 303 p.
10. Houben, Jan. “Liberation and Natural Philosophy in Early Vaiśeṣika: Some Methodological Remarks”// Asiatische Studien : Zeitschrift der Schweizerischen Asiengesellschaft = Études asiatiques : revue de la Société Suisse-Asie, Proceedings of the Panel on Early Vaiśeṣika , Hong Kong, August 1993. Band 48/2. - 1994, pp. 711-748.
11. Kano, Kiyo. “On the Liṅgas of Ātman” // From Vasubandhu to Caitanya: Studies in Indian Philosophy and Its Textual History. J. Bronkhorst & K Preisendanz, eds. (Papers of the 12th World Sanskrit Conference, Helsinki, 2003).- Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. 2010, pp. 3-28.
12. Lysenko Victoria. "Atomistic mode of thinking’ as exemplified by the Vaiśeṣika philosophy of number” // Asiatische Studien : Zeitschrift der Schweizerischen Asiengesellschaft = Études asiatiques : revue de la Société Suisse-Asie, (Proceedings of the Panel on Early Vaiśeṣika, Hong Kong, August 1993). Band 48. - 1994, pp. 781-806.
13. Lyssenko, Victoria. “La connaissance suprarationelle chez Prashastapàda”// Asiatische Studien / Études Asiatiques. LII/1.1998, pp. 85–116.
14. Lyssenko, Victoria. “Le principe de correspondence: la version de Praśastapāda”// Categories de langue et categories de pensee en Inde et en Occident. L’Harmattan Paris, 2005, pp. 79–90.
15. Lysenko, Victoria. 2011. “Buddhist Motives in Some Doctrines of Praśastapāda”. Vacaspativaibhavam. A Volume in Felicitation of Professor Vacaspati Upadhyaya. - Delhi etc.: D.K.Printworld. 2011. - P.1223–1233.
16. Oberhammer, Gerhard. “Pakṣlasvāmin's Introduction to his Nyāyabhāṣyam”// Asian Studies 2(3). 1964, pp. 302-322.
17. Preisendanz, Karin. “On ātmendriyamanorthasannikarṣa and the Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika Theory of Vision.”// Berliner Indologische Studien 4/5.1989, pp.141-213.
18. Preisendanz, Karin. “Debate and Independent Reasoning vs. Tradition: On the Precarious Position of Early Nyāya.” // Harānandalaharī. Volume in Honour of Professor Minoru Hara on his Seventieth Birthday. Ryutaro Tsuchida and Albrecht Wezler (eds.). - Reinbek: Dr. Inge Wezler Verlag für Orientalistische Fachpublikationen. 2000, pp. 221-251.
19. Preisendanz, Karin. “Vaiśeṣika”. Brill’s Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Knut A. Jacobsen et al. (eds.) Vol. 3. - Leiden: Brill, 2011, pp. 699-718.
20. Ui, Hakuju. The Vaiśeṣika Philosophy According to the Daśapadārtha-śāstra. Translated and edited by F. W. Thomas. Chinese Text with Introduction, Translation and Notes. - London: Royal Asiatic Society, 1917. – 318 p.References (transliterated)
21. Lysenko, Viktoriya. Filosofiya prirody v Indii. Atomizm shkoly vajsheshika. -Moskva: Nauka Publishers, Vostochnaya Literatura. 1986. – 198 p.
22. Lysenko, Viktoriya . Prashastapada. «Sobranie harakteristik kategorij» s kommentariem «N'yayakandali» Shridhary. Perevod s sanskrita, vstupitel'nyj razdel, istoriko-filosofskij kommentarij, primechaniya, bibliografiya i indeksy V.G.Lysenko.(Padārthadharmasaṃgraha of Praśastapāda with Extracts from Nyāyakandalī of Shrīdhara. Translation from Sanskrit into Russian, Preface, Introduction, Historico-philosopical commentary, Notes and Indexes by Victoria Lysenko). - Moscow: Izdatel'stvo «Vostochnaya literatura», 2005. – 638 p.

Journals

Books

To be liberated the Vaisheshika way, or the Vaisheshika attempt at a «Negative Soteriology» by the Indian school of philosophy