Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Space Research
Reference:

Îñîáåííîñòè êîììåðöèàëèçàöèè ðåçóëüòàòîâ èññëåäîâàíèé è ðàçðàáîòîê ÷àñòíîãî ñåêòîðà äëÿ NASA: îïûò Ïðîãðàììû èííîâàöèîííûõ èññëåäîâàíèé ìàëîãî áèçíåñà (SBIR)

Yanik Andrey Aleksandrovich

PhD in Technical Science

Leading Research Associate, Institute for Demographic Research of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

119333, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Fotievoi, 6, korp.1, of. 1

cpi_2002_1@yahoo.co.uk
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2453-8817.2017.2.22775

Received:

23-04-2017


Published:

01-07-2017


Abstract: The research subject is the analysis of the specificity of NASA’s interrelation with small and medium businesses in the sphere of scientific research and development. The research is based on the results of NASA’s public-private partnership programs in the sphere of space activities, primarily the long-term Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR). Special attention is given to the methods used for the evaluation of the progress of commercialization of the results of small businesses’ R&D for the aerospace agency. To solve the research tasks, the author uses general scientific research methods – formal-logical, comparative, transition from concrete to abstract, analysis, synthesis and others. Based on the results of the regular effectiveness audit of the SBIR program, conducted by national academies of sciences of the USA, the author concludes that the development of NASA’s management systems, including the level of its adaptability, ability to transform, and transparency, is a necessary condition, but it is not enough for the improvement of the research intensity of the related economic sector. The author concludes that within NASA’s area of responsibility, including its key state partners, general contractors, the academic community and other participants of scientific and innovation activities, the models of evaluation of the level of commercialization in terms of common economic activities (for example, the volume of sales or gross proceeds) have limited applicability. The main criteria are the broadening of the total volume of technological knowledge in space and missile sector, and the potential commercial value of R&D results, even if they haven’t entered the market yet. Another criterion is the development level of the information infrastructure of the sector, which is also the key instrument of functioning of the modern system of space activities. 


Keywords:

economics of space activities, Small Business, Science Policy, Space Policy, Innovation, Research and Development, Public-Private Partnership, Space Activity, Commercialization, NASA

References
1. Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982 // Public Law 97-219. July 22, 1982.
2. Small Business Research and Development Enhancement Act // Public Law 102-564. September, 30, 2000.
3. Small Business Reauthorization Act of 2000 // Public Law 106-554. September 30, 2008.
4. Small Business Administration, Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program Policy Directive. February 24, 2014. URL: https://www.sbir.gov/sites/default/files/sbir_pd_with_1-8-14_amendments_2-24-14.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.04.2017).
5. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program - Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004. – 124 p.
6. An Assessment of the SBIR Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008. – 402 p.
7. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007. – 366 p.
8. SBIR/STTR at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016. – 434 p.
9. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2009. – 334 p.
10. SBIR at NASA. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016. – 378 p.
11. Revisiting the Department of Defense SBIR Fast Track Initiative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009. – 212 p.
12. SBIR at the Department of Defense, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2014. – 444 p.
13. Makarova D.Yu. Razvitie chastnogo biznesa v raketno-kosmicheskoi otrasli: tendentsii i perspektivy // Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika. 2015. ¹ 25 (424). S. 57-71.
14. Paleev D.L., Simonov M.P. Ekonomicheskie mekhanizmy vovlecheniya chastnogo biznesa v kosmicheskuyu deyatel'nost' // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2014. ¹ 3. S. 166-170.
15. Zinov'eva E.S., Balyshev A.V. Gosudarstvennaya politika sodeistviya innovatsionnomu malomu biznesu v SShA: uroki dlya Rossii // Vestnik MGIMO. 2014. ¹ 1 (34). S. 164-171.
16. Osipov G.V., Klimovitskii S.V. Indikatory nauki i tekhnologii: istoriya, metodologiya, standarty izmereniya. M.: ISPI RAN, Ekonomika i sotsiologiya nauki i obrazovaniya, 2014.
17. Leont'ev V.V. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. V 3-kh tomakh. Tom 1. Obshcheekonomicheskie problemy mezhotraslevogo analiza. M.: Ekonomika, 2007. 407 s.
18. Miller R.E., Blair P.D. Input-output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions / 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, 2009. - 784 p.
19. Yanik A.A., Popova S.M. Otsenochnye metody v upravlenii gosudarstvennym sektorom nauki: opyt Soedinennogo Korolevstva // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik. 2014. ¹ 45. S.110-147.
20. Economic Impact Report 2016. NASA SBIR/STTR Programs. NP-2016-07-04-ARC. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2016. – 20 p.
21. Storm M., Stivenson G., Khovis F., Gavert U., Dan S., Darab A., Chuan T., Berns P. Lidarnye i lazernye tekhnologii dlya sistemy NASA po kontrolyu perenosa oblakov i atmosfernykh aerozolei, razmeshchennoi na Mezhdunarodnoi kosmicheskoi stantsii // Issledovaniya kosmosa. 2017. ¹ 1. S. 10-16.
22. Paison D.B., Popova S.M. Innovatsionnoe razvitie raketno-kosmicheskoi promyshlennosti v Rossii: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti // Issledovaniya kosmosa. 2017. ¹ 1. S. 36-45.