Reference:
Karpovich O.G..
World politics and non-state actors of international relations
// World Politics. – 2017. – ¹ 3.
– P. 119-128.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8671.2017.3.22927.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8671.2017.3.22927
Read the article
Abstract: The article studies the role and place of non-state actors within the international relations system and world politics. The research object is the system of world politics, the research subject is the role and place of non-state actors of international relations – “actors beyond sovereignty” in world politics. The purpose of the research is to define the role and place of non-state actors (including special subjects of world politics – non-governmental organizations and trans-national corporations) within the system of world politics. The research methodology is based on the system, structural-functional, comparative-political approaches, the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction and observation. The author gives attention to the fact that in contemporary world politics, non-state actors play a special role: their “intervention” into the international relations sphere has led to complete transformation of fundamental principles of international politics, emergence of global politics, erosion of sovereignty and borders of nation-states and their loss of monopoly on relations between nations and peoples. Trans-national corporations are among the most active non-state actors. In their form and mode of existence they are not specialized actors: they can successfully embed into any vacant political niches and play any roles using the support of nation-states. TNCs create specialized subordinate branches – political movements, parties, fractions, blocks, which they use to solve particular problems. Contemporary TNCs consider political activity as a natural continuation of project activity, which is a natural component of any business. Solution of political problems via bargaining based on equivalent exchange is a typical style of TNCs, which they stick to in the sphere of political relations. In response to non-state actors “intervention” into world politics, the system of conventional actors of international relations dynamically transforms begetting new forms of participation of nation-states in global political processes and new forms of inter-state interaction, which suit the changed conditions of competition and the international relations system’s evolution trends.
Keywords: diplomacy, international relations, U.S. foreign policy, world politics, global information space, political system, interests, state, señurity, risks
References:
Tsygankov P.A. O soderzhanii termina «mezhdunarodnyy aktor»: vklad sotsiologii // Prostranstvo i vremya v mirovoy politike i mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh. Materialy 4-go Konventa Rossiyskoy assotsiatsii mezhdunarodnykh issledovaniy. V 10 t. Tom 1: Aktory v prostranstve i vremeni mirovoy politiki / Pod obshchey red. A.Yu. Mel'vilya; red. toma M.M. Lebedeva.-M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2007.
Tsygankov P.A. Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy. M., 2002.
Tsygankov P.A. Tsygankov A.P. Politicheskaya sotsiologiya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy. [Elektronnyy dokument] / Biblioteka Gumer. Politologiya. URL: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Polit/cugan/08.php (Data obrashcheniya: 12.05.2017)
Shagabieva E.M. Mezhdunarodnye nepravitel'stvennye organizatsii: ikh vidy, osobennosti, kategorii i kharakteristika // Vlast'. 2010. ¹ 9.-s. 94-96.
Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya: teorii, konflikty, dvizheniya, organizatsii. Izdanie 2-e, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe. / Pod red. Tsygankova P. A. — M. : Al'fa-M, Infa-M, 2007. S. 166.
Zakariya F. Postamerikanskiy mir. – M.: Iz
Reference:
Karpovich O.G..
Forms and methods of intervention of transnational corporations in the activities of intergovernmental organizations
// World Politics. – 2016. – ¹ 4.
– P. 72-83.
DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2016.4.21287.
DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2016.4.21287
Read the article
Abstract: The present article is devoted to the research of the modern forms and methods of intervention of a special type of non-state actors of international relations - transnational corporations - in the activities of intergovernmental organizations. The object of the research is the world politics in general and the activities of actors in the world politics, such as transnational corporations and intergovernmental organizations, in particular. The subject of the study is the forms and methods of interaction of transnational corporations and intergovernmental organizations in the sphere of the world politics. The purpose of the research is to identify the forms and methods of intervention of multinational corporations in the activities of intergovernmental organizations.The methodological base of the research includes the system, institutional, structural and functional, and comparative political approaches, the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction and observation.The author draws attention to the fact that the interaction of TNCs with intergovernmental international organizations is one of the most urgent problems of international relations and the world politics. Intergovernmental international organizations, created by states, unlike transnational corporations, possess international legal personality and, therefore, are the full participants of the system of international relations. TNCs do not have the same sovereignty and belong to the class of non-governmental actors of international relations. Intergovernmental organizations seek to regulate the activities of TNCs in the world politics and economics, considering the TNCs as their potential competitors. As for the TNCs, they tend to act on equal terms with intergovernmental organizations in the world politics, claiming the equal status and their part in the regulation of global political processes. It inevitably leads to tensions and conflicts between intergovernmental organizations and TNCs for the leadership in the world politics.
Keywords: security, interests, state, self-organization, international relations, world politics, U.S. foreign policy, global information space, political system, risks
References:
Aryamova A.D. Prakticheskaya realizatsiya tekhnologiy tsvetnykh revolyutsiy v Ukraine v 2004 i 2014 gg.: sravnitel'nyy analiz // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 4. - C. 439 - 442. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.17179.
Gusher A.I. Geopoliticheskie i strategicheskie aspekty operatsii Vozdushno-kosmicheskikh sil Rossii v Sirii // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2015. - 4. - C. 395 - 402. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2015.4.16967.
Karyakin V.V. Politicheskaya mediametriya: kniga o tom, kak chetvertaya vlast' pravit mirom. // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2016. - 1. - C. 86 - 89. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2016.1.17755.
Karpovich O.G. Osobennosti sovremennogo severoamerikanskogo federalizma (na primere SShA) // Pravo i politika. - 2016. - 2. - C. 158 - 166. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.2.17816.
Ivanov S.M. Separatizm – estestvennyy protsess ili ugroza natsional'noy i mezhdunarodnoy bezopasnosti? // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2016. - 1. - C. 62 - 71. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2016.1.17856.
Fel'dman P.Ya. Mekhanizmy politicheskogo sog