Reference:
Rep'eva A.M..
Nation-building. Formation and substantial characteristics (the USA and Russia).
// World Politics. – 2013. – № 2.
– P. 68-79.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.2.8795.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.2.8795
Read the article
Abstract: The Russian state was historically formed as a poly-ethnical state throughout the centuries. That is why the problem of forming a united civil self-conscience has always been topical. The nation formation process is a complicated and contradictory matter, since in touches upon national identity of citizens due to which the state has to choose the principle for the nation formation. Among the basic principles one may single out the following: nation formation based on multi-cultural policy, based upon civil nation, or based upon a dominating ethnic group within the state, which is capable of uniting other ethnic groups around itself. Most of European and American states face the problem of nation formation, and this problem is also relevant for Russia,, since in two decades after the breakup of the Soviet Union it still is unable to form an efficient nation formation policy. Due to this fact the issue of formation of a general Russian identity becomes a topical goal for state and society. The author chooses Russia and the USA for the study, and she makes a comparison. The choice of these two states due to them being largest territorial states and having ethnical variety. Also, both Russia and the USA face problems related to the inflow of migrants, and nation building crisis.
Keywords: nation, nation-building, structuralism, primordialism, multiculturalism, unity, ideology, the USA, Russia, instrumentalism
References:
Tam zhe., str. 287–288.
Stalin I.V. Marksizm i natsional'nyy vopros, Soch., t. 2, M., 1954. s. 296
Tam zhe, str. 139.
Kautskiy K. Krizis v Avstrii, V sb.: «Ocherednye problemy mezhdunarodnogo sotsializma», SPb., 1906, str. 285
O.Baeur. «Natsional'nyy vopros v sotsial-demokratii», izd. «Serp», 1909 g., str. 2.
Tam zhe. (13)
State and Nation In: Ephraim Nimni (ed.), National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics, London: Routledge, 2005, str. 25
Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti: Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. M., 1995. S. 86.
Tishkov V.A. “Natsiya-eto metafora”., "Druzhba narodov", 2000, №7.
K.Doych. Natsionalizm i ego al'ternativy, 1969 (raspolozhen Shlomo Zendom, “Kto i kak izobrel evreyskiy narod,st.11). [Elektronnyy resurs] //Valeriy Tishkov [Sayt] URL http://www.scribd.com/doc/38252783/The-Invention-of-the-Jewish-People-by-Shlomo-Sand
G.Grotsiy "O prave voyny i mira". Reprint s izd. 1956 g. – M.: Ladomir, 1994. – 868 s. s.420
Tishkov V.A. Tishkov V.A. “Rossiys