Abstract: The goal of this article is the analysis of institutional factors influencing the effectiveness of state identity politics. The subject of this research is the assessment of the role of elite and institution of leadership in implementation of the state politics. The state identity politics is one of the strategic directions of domestic policy, which is focuses on the establishment and maintenance of sustainable and symbolic space in the society. The article generalizes the interim results of the study, which purpose consisted in determination of the most significant institutional factors contributing to a successful implementation of the state projects and programs of identity politics. Methodology is based on the constructivist approach that allows including the political elites, social groups and institutions into the analysis context. Expert interview served as the method of collecting information. The analysis of obtained data allowed determining a set of basic factors that specify the vector and define the dynamics of the course of identity politics. The scientific novelty lies in the suggestion to view institutional factors as the effectiveness criteria. The author gives recommendation on structuring the index for interregional assessment of the performance of state policy.

Keywords: institutional factors, consolidation of society, efficiency criteria, elite consensus, leadership institution, elite, public identity policy, identity, symbolic unity, expert assessment

Abstract: The institutionalism is now one of the leading directions of scientific thought which unites the scientists studying practically any system (state and legal, economic, sociological, political, etc.) in development, in interaction with social, political, legal, psychological and other public institutes. The perspective of formation of institutional mechanisms of dialogue communication of the state and civil society is based on the theory and practice of their interaction as institutes and is considered within interdisciplinary approaches in the sphere of political science, sociology, social philosophy, political science and the right, political linguistics (lingvopolitologiya), kommunikavistika, conflictology, social psychology, cultural science, a mediyevistika, social management, a piarologiya and so on. At the same time, in modern social sciences there is quite motley picture in definition of basic fundamental concepts of the institutional theory, including even such concepts as "institute" and "institutionalization". Relying on mezhdistsiplinargy methodology and an institutional method of research, we set a research problem of a problem of a nstitutsionalization of dialogue of the state and civil society in the context of standard model of dialogical democracy. In political science and sciences and disciplines, adjacent to it, there is a huge number of works how there are institutes as they function as they keep stability as are transformed and, at last, as they deinstitutsionalizirutsya, die away and disappear. This circumstance induces to investigate in more detail both process of an institutionalization in general, and conditions, factors and prospects of an institutionalization of dialogue of the state and civil society in the context of dialogical (diskursivny, deliberativny) standard model of democracy. In this article, continuing a series of articles about a dialogue institutionalization, for the first time brings up a question of dialogical democracy.

Keywords: dialogue, state (institution), civil society, institutionalization, communication, democracy, power, interaction, politics, model