Reference:
Zaitsev A.V..
Institutionalization of the Dialogue Between a State Institution and Civil Society in Terms of a Normative Model of the Dialogic Democracy
// Sociodynamics. – 2014. – № 7.
– P. 64-82.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2014.7.12541.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2014.7.12541
Read the article
Abstract: The institutionalism is now one of the leading directions of scientific thought which unites the scientists studying practically any system (state and legal, economic, sociological, political, etc.) in development, in interaction with social, political, legal, psychological and other public institutes. The perspective of formation of institutional mechanisms of dialogue communication of the state and civil society is based on the theory and practice of their interaction as institutes and is considered within interdisciplinary approaches in the sphere of political science, sociology, social philosophy, political science and the right, political linguistics (lingvopolitologiya), kommunikavistika, conflictology, social psychology, cultural science, a mediyevistika, social management, a piarologiya and so on. At the same time, in modern social sciences there is quite motley picture in definition of basic fundamental concepts of the institutional theory, including even such concepts as "institute" and "institutionalization". Relying on mezhdistsiplinargy methodology and an institutional method of research, we set a research problem of a problem of a nstitutsionalization of dialogue of the state and civil society in the context of standard model of dialogical democracy. In political science and sciences and disciplines, adjacent to it, there is a huge number of works how there are institutes as they function as they keep stability as are transformed and, at last, as they deinstitutsionalizirutsya, die away and disappear. This circumstance induces to investigate in more detail both process of an institutionalization in general, and conditions, factors and prospects of an institutionalization of dialogue of the state and civil society in the context of dialogical (diskursivny, deliberativny) standard model of democracy. In this article, continuing a series of articles about a dialogue institutionalization, for the first time brings up a question of dialogical democracy.
Keywords: dialogue, state (institution), civil society, institutionalization, communication, democracy, power, interaction, politics, model
References:
Zaytsev A.V. Dialog gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva kak peregovornyy protsess: lingvo-politologicheskiy aspekt// NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. Elektronnyy zhurnal. 2012, № 3, s. 34-47. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2012.3.120. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_120.html.
Zaytsev A.V. Lingvopolitologiya vs politicheskaya lingvistika: vozmozhen li dialog? //NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya. Elektronnyy zhurnal.-2012, №1, c. 25-81. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fil/contents_2012_1.html. http://www.e-notabene.ru/fil/article_150.html.
Zaytsev A.V. Dialogika Yurgena Khabrmasa: ponyatie i sushchnost'//NB:Filosofskie issledovaniya. Elektronnyy zhurnal. – 2012, №2, c. 75-98. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.2.148. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/contents_2012_2.html.
Zaytsev A.V. Novaya Agora: grazhdanskiy dialog v Evrosoyuze // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-2.-C. 62-89. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_123.html
A.V. Zaytsev Grazhdanskiy dialog v ES i dialog gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva v sovremennoy Rossii: opyt