Reference:
Korobov D.S..
Digital archaeology today: achievements and challenges
// Historical informatics. – 2023. – ¹ 3.
– P. 107-121.
DOI: 10.7256/2585-7797.2023.3.44036.
DOI: 10.7256/2585-7797.2023.3.44036
Read the article
Abstract: Over the last decade, the active use of various computer methods and digital technologies has had a profound impact on modern archaeological research. New methods of field recording have emerged, and modern tools such as laser total stations and scanners, GNSS receivers and unmanned aerial vehicles have become firmly embedded in archaeological practice. A whole trend of the Digital Archaeology has emerged within the framework of which many archaeologists are working. It seems relevant to summarize some of the results of the development of digital archaeology over the past decades and to highlight the main trends in the modern use of a number of technological techniques that have significantly affected the image of archaeological research at this stage.
The article highlights the main methods and approaches in digital recording, analysis and visualization of archaeological information: geographic information systems, digital archives and databases, field electronic diaries, photogrammetry and laser scanning methods of different spatial levels, as well as the first steps in the use of artificial intelligence in archaeological practice. Such an overview, although limited, covers for the first time all the major trends in digital archaeology of the last two decades. In addition to the achievements that are certainly present in the works cited, the author pays special attention to some of the challenges that arise in the process of implementing digital archaeology in everyday archaeological practice.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, laser scanning, photogrammetry, 3D-modeling, databases, digital archives, geographic information systems, digital archaeology, LiDAR technologies, UAVS
References:
Laflin, S. (2014). Computer Applications in Archaeology 1973-1995. Great Britain: Lulu Press.
Moscati, P. (2021). La raccolta bibliografica di «Archeologia e Calcolatori»: la formazione. In: Caravale A., Moscati P. La bibliografia di informatica archeologica nella cultura digitale degli anni novanta, 30-49. Sesto Fiorentino: All’Insegna del Giglio.
Archeologia e Calcolatori. Retrieved from http://www.archcalc.cnr.it/index.php
Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology (JCAA). Retrieved from https://journal.caa-international.org/
Djindjian, F. (2019). Archaeology and computers: a long story in the making of modern archaeology. Archeologia e Calcolatori, 30, 13-20.
Virtual archaeology. Retrieved from http://www.virtualarchaeology.ru/?lang=ru
Korobov D.S. (2011). Fundamentals of geoinformatics in archeology. Moscow: Moscow State University Publishing.
Vladimirov V.N. (2005). Historical Geoinformatics: Geoinformation Systems in Historical Resea
Reference:
Hookk D..
Documenting Archeological Excavations in the Digital Epoch
// Historical informatics. – 2018. – ¹ 2.
– P. 101-114.
DOI: 10.7256/2585-7797.2018.2.26811.
DOI: 10.7256/2585-7797.2018.2.26811
Read the article
Abstract: The study addresses documenting of field archeological research. Systematization of documenting methods in archeology at multiple levels and stages gives an opportunity to understand that modern computer-aided technologies are variants of traditional approaches that have gained new qualities. Special emphasis is laid on the issue of transition from traditional types of archeological records to digital ones as well as difficulties in technologies and special terminology. The problem of huge data and analytics is also in focus. The problem has been systematically analyzed. The research object is the ways to document archeological monuments at different research stages as well as the efficiency of a technology employed. The research novelty is two levels of archeological excavations documenting: the macro-level of an archeological monument and the micro-level of artifacts. All research methods of archeological explorations employed at both the levels differ as far as description of results is concerned. This description includes raw data storage formats and their visual presentation. The main conclusions state the opportunity to consider extra data on archeological monuments as the sources of objective information.
.
Keywords: dissemination, reliability, modelling, photogrammetry, digitization, digitizing, documentation, archaeology, analythics, management
References:
Leonov A.V. Virtual'noe 3D-modelirovanie v istorii nauki i tekhniki. Avtoref. diss. na soisk.uch. step. kand. tekh. nauk, 2018. 40 s.
Scopigno R., Callieri M., Dellepiane M., Ponchio F., Potenziani M. (2017) Delivering and using 3D models on the web: are we ready? Virtual Archaeology Review. 2017. ¹8(17). C.1–9.
Campana S.R.L. Mapping the Archaeological Continuum. Filling “Empty” Mediterranean Landscapes. Springer, Cham. 2018. S.31–42.
Franks B. The Analytics Revolution: How to Improve Your Business By Making Analytics Operational In The Big Data Era. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. 2014. 304 c.
Guk D.Yu., Dolukhanov P.M., Mazurkevich A.N. Ob effektivnom ispol'zovanii informatsionnykh tekhnologiy v gumanitarnoy sfere/D.Yu. Guk, P.M. Dolukhanov, A.N.Mazurkevich //Informatsiya dlya vsekh: kul'tura i tekhnologii informatsionnogo obshchestva: materialy mezhdunar. konf. EVA'2002, Moskva. M., 2002. S.5121–5122.
Cooper A., Green, C. J. Embracing the Complexities of ‘Big Data’ in Archaeology: the Case of the