Abstract: In article the problem connected with prospects of development of the Russian culture rises. The emphasis is placed on the importance of a postmodernism which in the categories tries to comprehend the process of transformation of state and educational ideology of an era of a modernist style which began at the end the XX beginning of the XXI centuries. Events of the last years in Russia show that the begun process of reconsideration of cultural policy of an era of a modernist style which was based on the totalitarian principles of the management of culture, can be suspended. The author raises a question of possibility of further continuation of this process. The analysis of development of the Russian culture, starting with Petrovsky is carried out and, finishing with the Soviet era which allows to reveal its educational orientation which is closely connected with the state ideology directed on introduction in mass consciousness of a cult of the strong personality, creation of bureaucratic machinery, the monitoring system and a regulation of all spheres of activity. In the conditions of transformation of educational values of an era of a modernist style, the postmodernism becomes one of the most adequate directions reflecting a condition of modern culture. The author focuses attention that for modern Russia manifestation in cultural policy of lines of state and educational ideology of an era of a modernist style, establishment of rigid control of creative activity, becomes rather actual problem.

Keywords:

References:
Anisimov E. V. Podatnaya reforma Petra I.-L.: Nauka, 1989. – 496 s.
Berdyaev N. A. O russkoy idee. Mysliteli russkogo zarubezh'ya o Rossii i ee filosofskoy kul'ture // O Rossii i russkoy filosofskoy kul'ture.-M.: Nauka, 1990.-S.5-271.
Berg M. Literaturokratiya. Problema prisvoeniya i pereosmysleniya vlasti v literature. – Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2000. – 352 s.
Berkhgol'ts F. V. Dnevnik kamer-yunkera F.V. Berkhgol'tsa. 1721-1725. V 4-kh ch.-M.: Universitetskaya tipografiya, 1902-1903. – 783 s.
Golomshtok I. Totalitarnoe iskusstvo.-M.: Galart, 1994. – 296 s.
Gorbunov V. V. Iz istorii bor'by Kommunisticheskoy partii s sektantstvom Proletkul'ta // Ocherki po istorii sovetskoy nauki i kul'tury.-M.: izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1968.-S.29-68
Gordin M. Vladislav Orlov. – SPb.: Iskusstvo, 1991. – 208 s.
Dianova V. M. Postmodernizm kak fenomen kul'tury // Vvedenie v kul'turologiyu. Kurs lektsiy / Pod red. Yu.N. Solonina, E.G. Sokolova.-SPb., 2003.-S.125-130.
Zhivov V. M. Gosudarstvennyy mif v epokhu

Abstract: The article presents the results of the research of a problem of the invention of the Cyrillic alphabet – contains the short historical background, analyzes a graphic component of a phenomenon of formation of alphabetic and tsifirny writing in Russia and offers and illustrates the version differing from existing by completeness and visual unambiguity.The version gives the exact answer to a question: why our letters on the tracing the such. It reveals that circumstance that graphemes of letters and figures are related, and so, there is a right to believe one phenomenon generation and development of another. Making a start from the fact of minimization of a set of elements of any digital sign and the general completeness of a digital row as closed system, the version determines tsifirny graphemes by legislative base (style) in logic of construction new, alphabetic. Using a priority, most extended, duodecimal digital order as shows research, inventors of the alphabet designed a sign for a necessary sound and their necessary quantity by means of the minimum transformations of graphemes to the affiliated. I fell work of creation of three new, truly Russian signs to lot of authors of Cyrillics; value of the last in many respects key, and in article about it is told separately. Authors knew or opened for itself a code of the European alphabets, - a question insignificant and not large-scale in the light of globality of consequences carried out by them. It is important to us who in many respects have lost communication with meanwhile, to be sure that the creation of the minds which have created so perfect system, - and Cyrillics certainly such is, - isn't inexplicable spontaneous, but on the contrary: in each detail it is reasonable, logical, strong.
The method, in a popular statement of research a little polemic, occurs from that circumstance that interest to so important problem didn't lead while to clear idea of it though to permission her experts of the different directions there is many approach attempts. The offered material by definition and also because touches on issues of history of creation of the Latin directly connected with the Russian Cyrillic alphabet, can't have any accurately outlined and, especially, limited address or quantitative audience. Reference of this subject to sections of Historical researches or Pedagogics and educations will be also pertinent, as well as to the section Culture and art.

Keywords: alphabetic order, creators of the alphabet, alphabetic-numeric, dozen, digital alphabet , alphabet, duodecimal notation, Cyrillic alphabet , grapheme, 'alphabet' (commonplace) truth

References:
Yu. Gordon. Kniga pro bukvy ot Aa do Yaya. M. Izdatel'stvo Studii Artemiya Lebedeva, 2006
R.A. Simonov. O greko-vizantiyskoy osnove «bukvennykh tsifr» kirillitsy. Drevnyaya Rus', ¹10. M.: RFK—Imidzh Lab, 2002
L.I. Pronenko. Kalligrafiya dlya vsekh. M.: Kniga, 1990
E.A. Knyazev. Rodnaya starina. Slova, terminy, obrazy. M.: Ostozh'e, 1996
V.Z. Chernyak. Stroitel'nye uroki russkikh masterov. M.: Stroyizdat, 1987
S.I. Smirnov. Shrift v naglyadnoy agitatsii. M.: Plakat, 1987
A.A. Tits. Zagadki drevnerusskogo chertezha. M.: Stroyizdat, 1978
M.V. Bol'shakov, G.V. Grechikho, A.G. Shitsgal. Knizhnyy shrift. M.: Kniga, 1964
Bukvar'. Slavyanskiy i tserkovnyy bukvar'. Spb: TITUL, 1992. Reprint 1908 g.
N.M. Bubnov. Abak i Boetsiy. Izd. Ministerstva Narodnogo Prosveshcheniya, 1907, 1908
Ya.B. Shnitser. Illyustrirovannaya vseobshchaya istoriya pis'men. Obninsk: Prava cheloveka, 1995. Reprint 1903 g.
Ya.K. Grot. Russkoe pravopisanie. Rukovodstvo. Spb: Imperatorskaya Akademiya nauk, 1894
V.I. Klassovskiy. Grammatika slavyano-tserkovnogo yazyka n