Reference:
Gerasimov G.I..
The past as an object of history
// Genesis: Historical research. – 2017. – ¹ 10.
– P. 1-19.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2017.10.24068.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2017.10.24068
Read the article
Abstract: The subject of the study is the historical past, which, depending on the historian's ideological position, is either absent or appears as an objectively existing reality.The work is based on the principles of historicism and reliability, a whole set of methods is the methodological basis, among which it is necessary to highlight study and generalization, deduction and induction, abstraction, understanding, etc.From the positions of the idealistic approach, which the author adheres to, there is no real past. The past is a subjective image of a reality that it could be without those changes that took place with it later.The past is the fundamental concept of human thinking, which regulates the chaos of the real world in consciousness, in accordance with the main ideological ideas of the historian. An ideology determines not only a theoretical approach to explaining historical facts, but also actively participates in the process of creating the facts themselves. The idea always precedes the facts and participates in their creation.The scientific novelty of the research is the author's approach: the past is viewed from the point of view of the idealistic approach, according to which the historian does not so much study how much the past creates, relying on certain methods and his own worldview.The main conclusion of the article is that history influences a person to the extent that he allows to do this, and since modern man shares belief in virtue of the power of the past, history is actively considered as a way of controlling people, manipulating their actions.
Keywords: ideology, historical fact, past and ideology, historical theory, subjective reality of the past, history, past, idea, idealistic approach, historical reality
References:
Savel'eva I.M., Poletaev A.V. Istoriya i vremya. V poiskakh utrachennogo. M.: «Yazyki russkoy kul'tury», 1997. 800 s.
Fevr L. Sud sovesti istorii i istorika /Boi za istoriyu. M. : Nauka, 1991. 629 s.,
Komar A., Khamayko N. Zbruchskiy idol: pamyatnik epokhi romantizma? // Ruthenica. Ki¿v, 2011. Tom X. C. 166-217.
Zaretskiy Yu.P. Strategii ponimaniya proshlogo: Teoriya, istoriya, istoriografiya. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2011. 384 s.
Marks K. i Engel's F., Nemetskaya ideologiya / Soch., 2-e izd., T. 3. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1955. S.7-544.
Karimskiy A. M. Filosofiya istorii Gegelya. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1988. 270 s.
Orudzhev 3. M. Sposob myshleniya epokhi i printsip apriorizma // Voprosy filosofii. 2006. ¹5. S.18-33.
Savel'eva I. M., Poletaev A. V. Teoriya istoricheskogo znaniya. SPb.: Aleteyya; M.: GU VShE, 2008. 523 s.
Idealisticheskiy podkhod k istorii. Sayt istorika G. I. Gerasimova. Rezhim dostupa: http://idealistic-history.ru/
Uitrou Dzh. Estestvennaya filosofiya vremeni. M.: E