Reference:
Kuparashvili M.D., Vetrova-Deglan M.S..
Gender and love in Russian philosophy
// Philosophical Thought. – 2018. – ¹ 4.
– P. 1-9.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2018.4.25656.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2018.4.25656
Read the article
Abstract: The determination of peculiarities of comprehension of gender in the Russian philosophy and its inclusion into the philosophy of love is the main subject of this study. Specificity of Russian interpretation of gender problems has a more fundamental appearance and substantial anthological tone. The terminological apparatus for analyzing the issues of gender defines the crucial otherness of the Russian philosophy. The factors, revealing the Orthodox sounding of questions, that are associated with the gender and love, provide a more in-depth analysis of the topic. The authors examine the various aspects of love: as a universal law, passion, and eros. Methodology contains the historical approach and method of conceptual analysis of the authors who dedicated their works to the subject of gender and love. A profound ethical analysis of the key notions along with the extensive attention to the bio-physiological aspect of the phenomenon of love sublime it to joy, compassion, and sincere desire of the good. Comprehension of love as the universal virtue or cosmic greatness can become a moral foundation of the revival and preservation of humaneness.
Keywords: passion, aestheticism, morality, eros, gender, theology of sex, philosophy of love, sex, space value, androgyne
References:
Berdyaev N. A. Samosoznanie. M.: Kniga, 1991. 446 s.
Rozanov V.V. Uedinennoe // Uedinennoe. M.: Pravda, 1990. T.2. S. 195-276.
Berdyaev N. Eros i lichnost'. Filosofiya pola i lyubvi. M.: Prometey, 1989. 160 s.
Bem S. L. Linzy gendera. Transformatsiya vzglyadov na problemu neravenstva polov. M.: ROSSNEP 2004.336 s.
Leont'ev K. N. Vizantizm i slavyanstvo // Leont'ev K. Vizantizm i slavyanstvo. Sbornik statey. M.: AST MOSKVA: KhRAEITEL', 2007. 571s.
Kimmel M. Gendernoe obshchestvo. M.:ROSSNEP, 2006. 464 s.
Solov'ev V. S. Smysl lyubvi // Sochineniya v 2 t. T.2. M.: Mysl', 1990. 493-546 s.
Sedzhvik iv Kosofski. Epistemologiya chulana. M.:Ideya-Press, 2002.272 s.
S.26-58. 5. Bulgakov S. Uteshitel'. M.: Obshchedostupnyy pravoslavnyy universitet, 2003. 464 s.
Fedorov N.F. Sochineniya. M.: Mysl', 1982. 709 s.
Florenskiy P. A. Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny (I). M.: «Pravda», 1990. 837 s.
Khoruzhiy S.S. Filosofskiy protsess v Rossii kak vstrecha filosofii i pravoslaviya // Voprosy filosofii. 1991. ¹
Leont'ev K. N.
Reference:
Chugunova I..
To the problem of love in Nietzschean philosophy
// Philosophical Thought. – 2017. – ¹ 1.
– P. 57-66.
DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2017.1.18833.
DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2017.1.18833
Read the article
Abstract: The theme of love in Nietzsche’s works sounded revolutionary for his contemporaries, as well as in sharp contrast with the dominant at that time ethical views. However, even in our time, having experienced the impact of existentialism and philosophical postmodernism, Nietzschean perception of love, remains paradoxical and dialectically complicated. In his doctrine, Nietzsche expresses the challenging antitheses: he replaces the evangelical love to the “neighbor” with love to “others”; altruism – with love to “yourself”; and the very notion of love is tightly intertwines with hatred and war. Nietzschean category of love becomes the subject of a peculiar conceptual interpretation, requiring a certain transformation of thinking, as well as value co-readiness with the philosophical assertions of Nietzsche. The author examines the meanings of Nietzschean understanding of love in the context of human nature, reveals the questions of axiology of love, and reviews its relationship with the notion of hatred. The work demonstrates the in the foundation of pathos of Nietzsche’s doctrine is love namely to the highest beginnings in human being, which dominates over utilitarianism.
Keywords: Morality, Love to neighbor, Christian virtues, Altruism, Selfishness, Ressentiment, Hatred, Love, Nietzsche, Human nature
References:
Gurevich P.S. Eros: Antologiya. Filosofskie marginalii prof. P.S. Gurevicha. M., 2014. 415 s.
Prokof'ev A.V. Voyna vsekh protiv vsekh // Etika: Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M.: Gardariki, 2001. S. 72-73.
Nitsshe F. Po tu storonu dobra i zla // Nitsshe F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T.2. M., 1990. S. 238-406.
Berdyaev N. Metafizika pola i lyubvi. Samopoznanie. M., 2014. 400 s.
Berdyaev N. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka. M., 2006. 320 s.
Sheler M. Ordo Amoris // Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya / Pod red. A.V. Denezhkina. M., 1994. S. 339–376.
Nitsshe F. Tak govoril Zaratustra // Nitsshe F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T.2. M., 1990. S. 5-237.
Sheler M. Resentiment v strukture moraley /Per. s nem. A.N.Malinkina. SPb., 1999. 231 s.
Nitsshe F. K genealogii morali // Nitsshe F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T.2. M., 1990. S. 407-524.
Nitsshe F. Veselaya nauka // Nitsshe F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T.1. M., 1990. S. 491-719.
Chugunova I.O. Liki nenavisti: filosofsko-antropologicheskie razmyshleniya // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. ¹ 4 (79),
Reference:
Byrdin V.M..
Interpersonal Philogenesis
// Philosophical Thought. – 2014. – ¹ 6.
– P. 183-216.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.6.12168.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.6.12168
Read the article
Abstract: The concept of the interpersonal birth and development of sexual love is offered. As a whole in genesis of love interpersonal, ontogenetic and sociocultural subgenesis is allocated. Love is naturally viewed as the attraction and positive feeling of the spiritual, esthetic and sexual nature. Ontogenetic roots generate the objectless love or a so-called philopotential of a person (from a Greek 'phileo' which means 'love'). The basis of these roots is a psychosexual maturity. Spiritual and esthetic components of the philopotential of a mature personality are also important. Interpersonal philogenesis is the proces of objectification of love as a result of a meeting, communication and relationship of a diad. The supremacy of a psychological factor in the objectification of love, especially in reciprocal and mutual philogenesis is established. The esthetic inclination naturally advances spiritual (the phenomenon of an esthetic advancing), its ultra - a phenomenon – love at first sight ("the genius of pure beauty" – at Pushkin, an arrow of Cupid – in religion, etc.) . In mutual philogenesis the following factors are essential: 1) equality of philopotentials; 2) compliance of esthetic mutually estimates; 3) mutual adequacy to the personified stereotype and individual idea of love. The scheme of a typical philogenesis is offered. For the birth of love the beginning of the relation to the individual as to object of love in unconscious, emotional, informative and behavioural aspects is accepted. Alternativeness (choice problem) in love is studied. Unconscious mechanisms in alternativeness and in philogenesis are discussed. The author also views the phileo-appertception and phileo-catharsis and their communication with alternativeness. Non-reversability of mature, moral love and its ethic and psychological importance, making a basis of advanced marriage and family is proved.
Keywords: stages of the development of love, philo- and interpersonality genesis, moral non-reversibility, supremacy of spiritual and psychological factors, phileo-apperception and phyleo-catharsis, alternative (choice), unconscious, esthetic anticipation, objectification of love, objectless philopotential, Genesis of sexual love
References:
Sm. takzhe vyshe Primechanie 10 stat'i.
Tillikh P. Ontologiya lyubvi.// Chelovek, 1990. ¹ 2.
Ushakin S. Pole pola: v tsentre i po krayam.// Voprosy filos. 1999. ¹ 5. S. 71–85.
Filosofiya lyubvi. V 2 ch./ Gorskiy D.P., Ivin A.A., Chanyshev A.N. i dr.; Platon, Aristo-fan, Li Tszi i dr. M. : Politizdat, 1990. – 510 s., 605 s.
Fromm E. / Fromm Erikh. Iskusstvo lyubvi./ per. s angl. M., 1990 (L., 1964).
Solov'ev V.S. Smysl lyubvi.// Solov'ev V.S. Soch. T. 2. M., 1990, ili dr. izd.
Sorokin P.A. Tainstvennaya energiya lyubvi.// Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 1991. ¹ 8–9. (po ego zhe knige 1964 g/izd.)
Ryabov O.V. Russkaya filosofiya zhenstvennosti (XI – XX veka). – Ivanovo: Yunona, Ivanov-skiy gos. un-t, 1999. 359 s./ Runet, 01.2014.
Rozin V.M. Priroda seksual'nosti.// Vopr. filos., 1993. ¹ 4. S. 79–88.
Rubin Z. From liking to loving.//Foundations of interpersonal attraction. Ed. T. Huston. N.Y., 1974.
Levkovich V.P. Osobennosti dobrachnykh otnosheniy suprugov kak faktor stabil'nosti se-m'i.// Psikhol. zh. 2009. T. 30. ¹ 2. S. 87