Reference:
Demenev D.N..
Interaction Between 'Taste', 'Measure' and 'Harmony' in Artwork
// Philosophical Thought. – 2014. – № 8.
– P. 109-139.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13400.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13400
Read the article
Abstract: The main question considered in article is the question of interaction in works of painting of three structural components: taste, measure and harmony. Building structure of a work of art on the basis of this triad, the author proves that art taste is not simply esthetic category, but such active structural component of art creativity which, being inherent initially in its carrier artist, subsequently finds itself in the finished work of art. This structural component, along with "measure" and "harmony" is, according to the author, one of the main (main) form-building structural components of a work of art. At the end of research, the author unexpectedly comes to a conclusion about similarity of a functional purpose of a measure and taste, but parts these categories by identification of the nature of their functioning.Methodological base of this research is the method of the structurally functional analysis; dialectic method; method of a germenevtichesky reduction; method of intellectual speculation, and also general scientific (general-logical) methods: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, analogy, modeling. As a result of the conducted research, the author comes to the following conclusions: 1. The great guess of I. Kant about social background of antinomy, remains an actual problem and today.
2. In art and creative process, the artist, creating a work of art, deals not with judgments of taste, and with an embodiment of the flavoring judgments in a work of art. And the conclusions about the acceptability and applicability of this or that flavoring preference (i.e. judgments) for concrete work separately, are taken out by reason of the artist.
3. The unity of a work of art, is approved by a triad: first of all – a sozdannost of a work of art, then presentation and an oshchushchayemost. This triad which is esthetic installation of the author, in turn, reveals through the following triad - a triad of structural characteristics of a work of art: measure, harmony, taste.4. The measure and taste, is more subjective structural components whereas harmony, having been born as a result of merge of the first of two, is objective education.5. As a result of existence at art of function not only esthetic, but also psychological, substantial, communicative and, is wider – world outlook – disharmony as an art composition method, is quite proved to put perhaps in one row with harmony. 6. The measure will be necessary until original, that is creative works of painting which, in turn, will depend on novelty of a context are created.
Keywords:
References:
Sedlmayr, H. Verlust der Mitte / H. Sedlmayr. – Salzburg, 1953. – p. 150-151.
Zedl'mayr, Kh. Iskusstvo i istina / Kh. Zedl'mayr // O teorii i metode istorii iskusstva. – M. : Iskusstvoznanie, 1999. – 367 s. – S. 117.
Philipp Lersch. Der Aufbau des Characters / Philipp Lersch. – 1938. – S. 23.
Aristotel'. Metafizika. Kniga I // Sochineniya : v 4 t. – M. : Mysl', 1975. – T. 1. – S. 65-93.
Gegel', G. V. F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk : v 3 t. / G. V. F. Gegel'. – M. : Mysl', 1975. – T. 1 – 452 s.
Losev, A. F. Istoriya esteticheskikh kategoriy / A. F. Losev, V. P. Shestakov. – M. : «Iskusstvo», 1964. – 376 s. – S. 32.
Demenev D.N. Ratsional'nyy uroven', kak odno iz vazhneyshikh ontologicheskikh osnovaniy khudozhestvennogo protsessa. // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 11. S.1-49. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.11.9505. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_9505.html.
Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti / sost., obshch. red. V. F. Asmus. – M.: Mysl', 1999. – 1472 s.
Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstve