Abstract: According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, administrative and administrative procedural law are jointly administered by the Federation and its regions. The article, based on the analysis of the practice of consideration by courts of administrative cases on challenging normative legal acts adopted by legislative bodies of state power at the regional level, highlights the features of consideration, identifies problematic issues and prospects for the rule-making of state bodies of public authority of the subject of the Russian Federation. The laws of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation on administrative offenses are also joint issues of federal and regional legislative authorities. When appealing against such regulations, the courts are guided by both the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation. The main conclusion of the study is that there is currently a judicial practice on challenging the laws of the regions of the Russian Federation on administrative offenses that contradict federal legislation. Despite detailed checks of the laws before adoption, the problem of the existence of illegitimate regional laws remains relevant. Specific examples are given on the adoption of regional acts on administrative offenses with exceeding the powers of a subject of the Russian Federation. The novelty of the research lies in the assessment of the current state of legislation and judicial practice of its implementation. The author's special contribution to the research of the topic is to identify ways to further improve and prospects for the development of the procedure for adopting and challenging regional laws on administrative offenses. The practical significance of the research lies in the development of scientifically-based proposals for additional in-depth understanding and development of legal relations in the field of rulemaking at the regional level, including from the point of view of judicial norm control.

Keywords: court, administrative proceedings, police, Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, judicial control, administrative fine, administrative responsibility, authorized bodies, legislation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, laws

References:
"Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses" dated 30.12.2001 No. 195-FZ (ed. dated 04.11.2022) // Source-SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 25.12.2018 No. 50 "On the practice of consideration by courts of cases on challenging Regulatory Legal Acts and Acts containing Clarifications of Legislation and having regulatory properties" // Source – SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Decision of the Arkhangelsk Regional Court of 06.02.2019 No. 3a-85/2019. // Source-SPS "ConsultantPlus".
Decision of the Kostroma Regional Court of 28.02.2020 in case No. 3a-16/2020; Cassation ruling of the Judicial Board for Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 04.08.2021 No. 87-KAD21-1-K2; Decision of the St. Petersburg City Court of 26.09.2018 in case No. 3a-152/2018; Appeal ruling of the Judicial Board for Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 04.08.2021 No. 87-KAD21-1-K2; Decision of the

Abstract: The article concerns the problem of state administration, various points of view regarding this category are analyzed and the conclusion is made that state administration is varied in its character and its quality is defined by the methods of administrative legal regulation. That is why their improvement may improve the quality of the public administration regime. The article also contains analysis of the fucionts of public administration, defining its strategic directions. The authors single out the general functions of public administration. Within the mechanism of public administration every function is used to greater or lesser degree, and it is with the use of all of the functions as a complex, which allows to refer to the activities on implementation of public administration.  The authors define the main goals of the term "state regulation", study administrative legal methods of public administration and their classification, single out characteristic features of administrative methods for state regulation, flowing from the very nature of public administration activities and the immediate object of administrative law.

Keywords: administration, method, control, means, state, law, competence, subject, participant, administration

References:
Chetverikov V.S. Administrativnoe pravo. – Rostov-na-Donu, 2004.
Tikhomirov Yu.A. Pravovoe obespechenie upravleniya. – M., 1987.
Soldatov A.P., Mel'nikov V.A. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – M., 2006.
Starilov Yu.N. Kurs obshchego administrativnogo prava. – M., 2002.
Suslikov V.N Funktsii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya i ekonomika // Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Problemnye voprosy razvitiya otrasli pravovoy sistemy i prepodavaniya kursa. – Novgorod, 1999.
Starilov Yu.N. Administrativnoe pravo. – Voronezh, 2001.
Studenkin S.S. Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo. – M., 1959.
Administrativnoe pravo / Pod red. L.L. Popova. – M., 2002.
Ovsyanko D.M. Administrativnoe pravo. – M., 2000.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / Pod red. M.N. Marchenko. – M., 1996.
Lapina M.A. Administrativnoe pravo. – M., 2007.
Kurakin A.V. Predmet administrativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya v mekhanizme protivodeystviya korruptsii. – Domodedovo, 2013.
Kurakin A.V. Administrativnoe pravo: problemy teorii

Abstract: The article is devoted to the problems of formation of criminal oligarchy model of raw materials economy. The economic losses of Russia due to the shock therapy of 1990s are comparable to the losses of the Civil War and the Hitler’s invasion.  These losses are formed by  devastation of enterprises  due to criminal privatization, outflow of capital, and loss of opportunity for reproduction of capital   stock due to termination of long-term credit. These losses keep growing under the influence of mechanism of non-equivalent economic exchange, which is supported by the policy of accumulation of currency reserve abroad with an insignificant interest rate, while acquiring much more expensive foreign credits.  These losses are also complemented by the loss of national control over the large-scale enterprises, which are taken to off-shore zones, making the independent development of Russian economy impossible  and threatening the sovereignty of the state. The XVII World Russian People's Council states that only by following the declared goals we may overcome the ethnic discord, social inequality, psychological and information dependency from foreign influence.

Keywords: crisis, science, Council, Russian, state, law, document, economics, society, dependency

References:
V.V. Kochetkov —Philosophy of the Russian Constitution: Russian Values and Democracy // Sententia.-S. 19-31, №2, 2013, DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.2.10376.
Uvarov A.A. O roli gosudarstva v formirovanii grazhdanskogo obshchestva // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-7.-C. 1-40. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.8782. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_8782.html.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Arkhetipy pravosoznaniya v sisteme pravovoy kul'tury lichnosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2014.-1.-C. 54-74. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.1.10486. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10486.html
Gulyaikhin V.N. Pravovaya kul'tura kak ob'ekt nauchnogo issledovaniya: metodologicheskie podkhody, struktura i kriterii otsenki // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-4.-C. 135-158. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.4.635. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_635.html
Trofimov V.V. Uchastie struktur grazhdanskogo obshchestva v pravoobrazuyushchikh pravootnosheniyakh kak forma vyrazheniya narodovlastiya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-5.-C. 14

Abstract: The article is devoted to the specific features of the legal regime for the stay of foreigners in the Russian Federation in the conditions of the Winter Olympic Games in 2014 in the city of Sochi.  The author analyzes norms, regarding the procedure for entering the Russian Federation, stay in the territory of the Russian Federation, and leaving the Russian Federation, as well as the norms regulating labor, volunteer, and temporary personnel activities, and the measures for migration reporting on foreigners. It is noted that in accordance to their status most of the foreign citizens, who are coming to Russia in order to organize and hold the Olympic Games of 2014, including the representatives of the IOC, international and national sports federations, are within the scope of legal regulation of status of foreigners, and they have no special privileges and immunities. The norms regarding easing the legal procedures for the participants of the Olympic Games are part of the system of measures for the simplification of the legal formalities for the foreign guests at this time.

Keywords: foreigners, legal regime, entry, visa, the Olympic Games, Sochi, stay, territory, legislation, violation of rules

References:
Boguslavskiy M.M., Rubanov A.A. Pravovoe polozhenie inostrantsev v SSSR. M.: Izdatel'stvo instituta mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy, 1959.
Galenskaya L.N. Pravovoe polozhenie inostrantsev v SSSR. M., 1982.
Ganyushkina E.B. Usloviya v'ezda inostrantsev na territoriyu gosudarstva // Pravo. 2010. №
Kurakin A.V. Inostrannye grazhdane i litsa bez grazhdanstva kak sub'ekty administrativnogo prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2001. № 6.
Lazarev L.V., Marysheva N. I., Panteleeva I. V. Inostrannye grazhdane: pravovoe polozhenie / pod redaktsiey N. I. Maryshevoy. M.: Rossiyskoe pravo, 1992.
Mikul'shin A. I. O ponyatii i vidakh rezhimov inostrantsev // Sovetskiy ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. 1972.
p. 4 st. 11 Zakona ob organizatsii i provedenii Olimpiyskikh igr.
p. 5 st. 11 Zakona ob organizatsii i provedenii Olimpiyskikh igr.
Utverzhden postanovleniem Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 oktyabrya 2008 goda № 758.
st. 12.1 i st. 12.2 Zakona ob organizatsii i provedenii Olimpiyskikh igr

Abstract: The article concerns current legal and organizational problems of implementation of administrative responsibility measures, and it is noted that the current legislation on administrative offence lacks the definition of administrative responsibility, which is not a positive thing.  It is noted that the will of the legislator and public government to make administrative sanctions stricter shows the absence of political will for public sanation and dialog between the government representatives and civil society regarding disagreement to the current political course or constructive criticism of government.  The scientific literature defines administrative responsibility as a measure of administrative coercion applied to natural persons and legal entities.  The administrative responsibility measures are administrative punishments, including proprietary and non-proprietary limitations of rights, implemented in an established procedural order. The article provides detailed description of political and legal factors, defining in the sphere of public sanation and concentration of efforts of the government towards the universal socialization of social and political life.

Keywords: public, responsibility, offence, punishment, guilt, guilty, sanction, sanation, coercion, danger

References:
Kostennikov M.V. K voprosu o nekotorykh aktual'nykh problemakh administrativnogo prava // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-4.-C. 71-95. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8840.html
Gulyaikhin V.N. Pravovoy mentalitet rossiyskikh grazhdan // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-4.-C. 108-133. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.4.310. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_310.html
Gulyaikhin V.N. Strukturno-funktsional'nye osobennosti razlichnykh sostoyaniy pravosoznaniya cheloveka // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-2.-C. 90-116. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.2.153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_153.html
Khabrieva T.Yu. Administrativnye protsedury i administrativnye bar'ery: v poiskakh optimal'noy modeli sootnosheniya / V knige Administrativnye protsedury i kontrol' v svete Evropeyskogo opyta / Pod red. T.Ya. Khabrievoy i Zh. Marku. – M., 2011.
Kurakin A.V. Administrativnoe pravo: problemy teorii i perspektivy razvitiya. – M., 2013.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'