Abstract: This article analyzes the representation of state regulatory bodies on distribution of harmful information and measures aimed at minimization harm caused by information to children's health and development. Examination is conducted on the arguments of the law enforcement officers and the court contained in the texts of court ruling, viewed as implementation of formal social control over distribution of information and expression of formal position with regards to social conflict. Attention is given to the analysis of positions of the state authorities on the effects of risk, understanding of social danger of these effects, and governmental decision on the essence of a social conflict. The groups of harmful content and the dynamics of their identification are determined. The author reveals and classifies the motives of the distributor of harmful information and the motives of information consumers. A significant excess of the actual audience of consumers of harmful information over the audience designated by the distributor (i.e. addressee) is observed. The conclusion is made on the position of the actors of formal social control in relation to risks, their identification, mitigation, prevention and forecasting, validity of the arguments of the law enforcement and the court. Failure to establish responsibility of the actor is one of the key difficulties. The author outlines the prospects for improving the mechanism of ensuring information security of the children, as well as underlines the need for revising the principles and approaches towards interpretation of harm.

Abstract: The scientific research of the problem of personal dignity is widely spread. This article reviews dignity as the origin of the majority of legal principles, including the principle of personal autonomy, which to the most extent reflects the essence of the aforementioned anthropological phenomenon. The author suggest to review autonomy, which is generally understood as self-regulation of a person based on the moral and ethical dogmas and ability to make independence choice, as a main idea of the concept of interrelations between person and state. Ensuring the security of personal autonomy, by analogy with dignity, is proposed to acknowledge as responsibility of government. The article contains conclusions about the existence of a serious issue of personal realization in the modern society, threats to the inner self-identification of an individual, as well as development and application of volitional qualities with regards to free choice. The author suggests accepting the principle of personal autonomy that is directly based on dignity, and at the same time concretizes its separate types of state legal influence, the goal of which is to secure the personal development and protection of its psychological resources for the unsanctioned influence.