Abstract: This article presents the results of the 5th Siberian Anti-Corruption Forum “Anti-corruption security: determination of threats and strategy for counteraction, held in Krasnoyarsk on December 19-20, 2019. The dialogue was organized by the Center for Combating Corruption and Legal Expertise, Law Institute of the Siberian Federal University, Governor’s Office of Krasnoyarsk Krai, Procesutor’s Office of Krasnoyarsk Krai, Administration of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation for Krasnoyarsk Krai, Krasnoyarsk Regional Office of the Association of Lawyers of Russia, and the Union of Criminalists and Criminologist. The rich program of the event allowed representatives of the scientific-practical community to discuss the phenomenon of security within the applied anti-corruption aspect. The following were key topics of the scientific-practical dialogue: the concept and content of anti-corruption security as a scientific category; determination and classification of the threats to anti-corruptions security; system of ensuring anti-corruption security; improvement of federal anti-corruption policy for ensuring anti-corruption security; state and trends of corruption crimes; subjective and objective determinants of corruption crimes; anti-corruption behavioral standards as the main rules of anti-corruption security; reserves of civil society in ensuring anti-corruption security; identification and overcoming corruption stereotypes in mass consciousness; stimulation of anti-corruption behavior as an alternative to legal responsibility for commission of acts of corruption.

Abstract: The subject of the research is the regulations and laws of the Russian Federation that set forth an order of secondary employment at a higher educational organisation as well as researches, legal acts and law enforcement act devoted to the question of prevention and management of conflicts of interests. The authors focus on cases when a conflict of interests may arise because an individual works as a head of an educational organisation (rector or vice principal) and as a professor (department head) at the same time. In their research the authors have used the dialectical research method as well as structured-system, formal law and other methods of research. The results of the research cast light on the drawbacks of the legal regulation and methodological support of prevention and management of a conflict of interests in cases when an individual works as a head of an educational organisation and department head at the same time. The fact that there are no official explanations or recommendations of the federal authorities regarding the problem as well as contradictory judicial practice prove the importance of such analysis of corruption in social relations in cases of internal secondary employment at a higher education institution.