Abstract: The object of the research is the currency relations arising in the process of currency regulation and control in the Eurasian Economic Union. The authors of the article focus on the relationship between currency regulation and currency control as the whole and the parts and point out the main directions for currency control. They also conclude that currency control is one of the means to guarantee and defend economic intersts of the country. The authors of the article set forth the main tasks and goals of currency control at the modern stage and these are the tasks and goals that need an immediate solution. The authors also emphasize the importance of licensing as the main administrative means of control over banking activity in the fields of currency exchange operations and international economic activity. The main research method used by the authors is the dialectical approach combined with the authors' critical evaluation of imperfections and gaps in the current currency legislation. In addition, the authors have also applied the methods of comparative analysis, deduction, formal logic and others. The authors' special contribution to the topic is their description of the main tasks and targets that need an immediate solution, in particular, bringing the currency and international economic laws of the Russian Federation into compliance with the international treaties of the Eurasian Economic Unioni; preparation of a draft law on currency regulation and currency control. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the authors offer their own understanding of currency regulation and currency control as administrative measures to influence international economic relations. At the end of their research, the authors conclude that being part of state currency policy, currency control is an instrument for implementation of protective and regulatory functions of the state that guarantees economic security and economic independence of the state. 

Abstract: The subject of the research of the criminal law, administrative law and civil law provisions that serve as the legal measures to fight against drug abuse of the most vulnerable part of the society, the underaged. The object of the research is the social relations between law enforcement authorities, social organisations, minors and their legally authorized representatives that may arise in the field of prevention of drug and substance abuse of minors. The authors of the article underline the importance of not only legal measures of drug abuse prevention but also pedagogical measures that should be performed in combination with legal measures. Apart from coercive measures, such issues as persuasion measures and special training of officials are also growing important. The research methodology implies a combination of general and special research methods such as dialectical analysis, formal law, comparative law and content-analysis. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the authors have attempted to offer a number of rules for creating drug and substance abuse preventive programs for minors. In addition, the novelty of the research also lies in the authors' discussion about the need to apply all legal measures available, i.e. criminal law, administrative law and civil law measures. The authors prove that one should not focus on crimina law measures only and associated measures of official enforcement. The main conclusion of the research is that it is impossible to achieve the proper efficiency of drug abuse prevention, especially of minors, by using only legal enforcement and prohibitions.  

Abstract: The research object is the range of social relations in the sphere of residence registration of the citizens of the Russian Federation and administrative liability for the absence of the residence registration in the living accommodation. The research subject covers the provisions of the article 19.15.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, and the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Federal Law of 25 June 1993 № 5242-1 (version of 31 December 2014) “On the right of citizens of the Russian Federation to the freedom of movement and residence within the territory of the Russian Federation”. The leading research method is the dialectical approach together with the critical vision of the gaps and the drawbacks of the legislation in the sphere of registration, and the liability for its violation. The author offers to limit administrative liability for residing without a registration, and to impose it only on the potentially dangerous citizens of the Russian Federation. The residence registration and the liability for its absence should be abolished for law-abiding citizens. The necessity to have a residence registration for law-abiding citizens hampers the implementation of the right to the freedom of movement and residence. The residence registration should be obligatory for the citizens having a criminal record for intentional crimes, having asocial way of life, registered in narcological or psychoneurologic dispensaries, or other socially dangerous persons. 

Abstract: The research object is the range of social relations appearing in the sphere of registration of citizens of the Russian Federation. The research subject includes the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation related to the right of citizens of the Russian Federation to freedom of movement and choice of place of stay and residence within the Russian Federation and the provisions of the Federal Law “On the right of citizens of the Russian Federation to freedom of movement and choice of place of stay and residence within the Russian Federation” which, in the author’s opinion, restrict the abovementioned right. The purpose of this article is to define the essence and the social function of registration, to analyze administrative-legal regulation of registration as a government activity aimed at fixation and generalization of notifying information about the citizens for the purpose of ensuring the necessary conditions for exercising of rights and freedoms by the citizens and fulfilling their duties to other citizens, the state and the society, and clarifying the reasonability of registration as a form of the citizens’ constitutional rights to freedom of movement and choice of place of stay and residence restriction. The research methodology is based on the dialectical approach together with the critical analysis of the imperfections of the current legislation in the sphere of registration. Moreover, the author applies the comparative-legal and the formal-logical methods. The scientific novelty of the study consists in the attempt at a complex analysis of the provisions of the current legislation in the sphere of registration. The author concludes that registration in democratic states, which Russia according to its constitution belongs to, shouldn’t be a form of restriction of the right of law-abiding citizens to freedom of movement and choice of place of stay and residence within the country. A notifying character of registration should exclude administrative liability for the absence of registration for law-abiding citizens and at the same time it should oblige the persons of no fixed abode and the persons potentially dangerous for the society and the state to register at their place of stay without any delay. The control over the performance of this obligation should be carried out by the Federal Migration Service bodies and the internal affairs bodies.