Amgalanova M.V. —
Peculiar Features of the Development of the Buryat Literature in the 1920 - 1930s Based on the Example of Z. Batotsyrenov, Ts. Don, S. Tuy and B. Baradin
// Culture and Art. – 2018. – ¹ 10.
– P. 23 - 35.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2018.10.25517
URL: https://en.e-notabene.ru/camag/article_25517.html
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to the literature that played the leading role in the development of socialist culture. Base on the analysis of creative writing by Z. Batotsyrenov, Ts. Don, S. Tuy and B. Baradin the researcher demonstrates peculiarities of the development of the Buryat literature in the 1920 - 1930s. Amgalanova emphasizes that the artistic movement of the after-revolutionary decade generally tried to fundamentally change the cultural life of the society by the means of re-evaluation of aesthetic vlues of traditional arts. Those changes included psychological realism, everyday writing style, and drawing from nature. In the 1930s ideological and political beliefs played the leading role in the development of artistic culture. The methodological basis of the research implies historical cultural approach, the main methods of the research are axiological, retrospective, and narrative methods. In conclusion, the author states that the main purpose of socio-humanitarian research is to perform an objective analysis of the repressive policy of the Soviet state, mainly reconstruction and return of the names of the workers of culture and science and their heritage to the artistic and academic environment.
Amgalanova M.V. —
Historical Fates of Culture and Literature Activists and Their Works in the Second Half of the 20th - Beginning of the 21st Centuries: 'Rehabilitated' Culture
// Culture and Art. – 2018. – ¹ 4.
– P. 1 - 7.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2018.4.25541
URL: https://en.e-notabene.ru/camag/article_25541.html
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to activity of repressed Buryat writers of the 1920 - 1930's viewed from the new methodological positions. Practically to the end of the 1980's, the main criterion for evaluating their social and creative activity was 'political' accusations. The author of the article pays special attention to the process of rehabilitation when culture activitists whose names were eliminated from the history as a result of repressive policies return to the academic literature. The methodological basis of the research is the axiological approach, the main research methods include historical-cultural, retrospective, descriptive methods and analysis. The objective analysis of social-political and national-cultural activity of Buryat intelligentsia should include full and, if possible, completely new reconstruction and interpretation. This, in its turn, provides big opportunities for methodological experiments and allows to restore historical justice in relatin to Buryat culture activisits who tried to preserve national values when the socialist culture was developing.
Amgalanova M.V. —
Traditions and Development of Buryat National Literature at the Crossing of Eras
// Culture and Art. – 2018. – ¹ 2.
– P. 1 - 11.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2018.2.25082
URL: https://en.e-notabene.ru/camag/article_25082.html
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of that special role that was assigned to the development of national literature and writers as part of the cultural construction of regions. The subject of the research is the main trends in the development of the national Buryat literature of the 1920s which had been considered to be the literature with a recent system of writing for quite a long time. The author emphasizes the being one of the most important forms of social conciousness, literature has always reflected live styles and world views of people in this or that historical period. The author focuses on the development of the genre system of the Buryat literature. The methodological basis of the research includes the historical cultural approach, the main methods are axiological and narrative. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that Buryat researchers mostly focus on the descriptive analysis of literary works without focusing on visions, thoughts and feelings of writers that reflected social, political, economic and historical-cultural trends in the development of the 'new' Buryat culture. The main conclusion of the research is that the first after-revolution decade of the history and culture of Buryatia was one of the most dynamic periods when conditions for formation and development of the national literature were created.