Abstract: The subject of this research is the modern state of foreign and Russian scholars in the area of argumentation theory (AT), considering the specificity of communication field of modern culture. The author assess the methodological potential of cognitive approach that centers around the argumentative discourse, as well as reveal the heuristic potential of Husserl’s phenomenology for understanding of the modelling mechanism by the recipient. The subject of this work is specified in the following chapters of the article: “addressing an issue”; “argumentation theory of reasoning of consciousness: main approaches”; “subject of argumentation: phenomenological approach”. The scientific novelty is substantiated by the subsequent conclusions:
 


Despite the prolonged research tradition, an extensive area of scientific research, generally called the “argumentation theory”, continues to remain the field of tense discussions regarding the advantages and flaws of the existing models, as well as creation of the universal AT that testifies to the need for further scientific research, the results of which will eventually conduce the mutual enrichment of methodological means developed by various disciplines dedicated to the argumentative discourse;


Phenomenological approach, due to the presence of intersubjective component, can be accepted as one of the methodological foundations in establishing of the AT. But at the same time, such approach cannon be the basis in searching for the universal normativity of AT because of its dependence.


Problem of formation of AT is a multifaceted problem, and thus, it requires more than a single phenomenological response to it. In addition, phenomenological analysis used for representation of argumentative interaction between the subjects, brings us back to the tradition of cognitive approach in the broadest sense of the word. Cognitivism as an optimist theoretical model of interdisciplinary nature, sets new prospects on the path for creation of AT.


Impact of culture upon the character of space of the submerged into it argumentative discourse, manifests as a systemic, prevalent, and constant. Each argumentative act is aimed at comprehension of the semantic component of the substantiated point of view, as well as its inscription into culture, which defines not only the personal meanings, but also the normative schemes.


 

Abstract: The subject of research in the article is a philosophical analysis of the socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia. Understanding the social and cultural space of post-Soviet Russia is presented in recognition of his phenomenological, geographical, social and anthropological bases. A significant aspect of the study is building a philosophical analysis of the socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia as a category and the phenomenon.The subject of the study is specified in the following sections of this article: Social and cultural space of post-Soviet Russia: an attempt categorical certainty "; "The structure and mechanisms of the dynamics of socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia: an attempt of modeling"; "The man in the socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russian system: the attempt to comprehend."Research methodology is defined by a combination of comparative aksiological, socio-cultural and socio-ontological approaches. Understanding the content and structural processes of socio-cultural dynamics of post-Soviet Russia space conducted by conjugation of philosophical research methodology with categorical apparatus and methods of social psychology, social cognitive science.The scientific novelty of the research is to identify some of the key characteristics of the socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia: 1) socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia can be defined as an integral phenomenon, ontologically centered on a geographical and social reality of our country, combining the key parameters of its cultural and social development; 2) in the hierarchy of social spiritual phenomena - social and cultural space is the primary and most far-reaching, including defining such cultural phenomena as language, social memory, mentality, social unconscious, social consciousness, social and cultural identity, habitus; 3) along with defining cultural phenomenon in the structure of the socio-cultural space includes significant images (for example, the image of a vast geographical area of Russia; the image of the Motherland) and the types of social and cultural interaction (eg installation on the perception of the head of state as the protector of the people, traditionalism structure of everyday life); 4) the main mechanisms of the dynamics of socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia are: fixation, conflict, integration, deactualization actualization; 5) significant ontological attribute socio-cultural space of post-Soviet Russia is its anthropological in nature, for it is man in his epistemological and social (in all aspects) activity is, firstly, the main actor of its constituent phenomena (images, types of interaction), and secondly - the main carrier these key parameters.

Abstract: The subject of research in the article is the philosophical analysis of the axiodynamics of social consciousness in post-Soviet Russia. Axiodynamic processes of social consciousness in post-Soviet Russia are presented in accordance with their phenomenological and mental grounds and social conditions. A significant aspect of the study is the philosophical analysis of the "diffusion of values": the loss of old values and the emergence of new values, distorted perception of westernized values, etc. The subject of the research is specified in the following sections of the article: "Social conditions of axiodynamics of social consciousness in post-Soviet Russia" and " Axiological crisis in terms of transformation of social consciousness in post-Soviet Russia. "The research methodology involves the combination of axiological, socio-cultural and socio-ontological approaches. The content and structural processes of axiodynamics of social consciousness in post-Soviet Russia are analyzed by using the combination of philosophical research methodology and the framework of categories and concepts and methods of social psychology and social cognitive science.The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the researcher identifies the following particula features of axiodynamics of social consciousness in post-Soviet Russia: 1) Axiological crisis has led to phenomenological, socio-gnoseogenic and structure-functional transformations of public consciousness in post-Soviet Russia those transformations in many respects reached crisis proportions; 2) all the basic axiological crises of modern Western culture were immanent for the post-Russian public consciousness although they gain the features of the socio-cultural environment and the cousrse of social transformations happening in post-Soviet Russia of those times; 3) from the point of view of structural and functional terms, the following four main processes occur in the axiological matrix: devaluation of traditional values; establishment of destructive values because of their roots in the unconscious mental formations; heavy structural assimilation of new values and fast adoption of new destructive values.