Abstract: This article contains an attempt to provide definition and contents of the category “constructive protest” as a mechanism for the implementation of the right to participate in the affairs of the state, as guaranteed by Art. 32 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. According to her concept the protest should be aimed at achievement of the final result: provision of a specific request to the public government bodies or a possible solution of a specific public law problem. The author recognizes only peaceful actions as legitimate protest, considering any violations of public and legal order in the process of expressing disagreement to be unlawful and to be punished by the law. She makes a conclusion that the sanctions for the violation of the procedure for the protest expression cannot serve as the only stimulating means for the citizens to express constructive protest. The goal to improve legal culture of the citizens is one of the most important issues in the path of optimizing the dialog between the state and civil society.

Keywords: constructive protest, political rights, participation in government, gatherings of persons, legal culture, abuse of right, petitions, expressing disagreement, the Constitution of the Russian Federation, democratic state.

References:
Jon Elster, Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998). Jon Elster, Reason and Rationality (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009). Jurgen Habermas, Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, Massachusetts: the MIT Press, 1996. Wheatley, Steven, The Democratic Legitimacy of International Law (the United Kingdom: Hart Publishing, 2010). Informatsiya na ofitsial'noi stranitse FSGS v seti Internet: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/urov/urov_52.htm. Varlamova N. V. Chelovecheskii faktor v razvitii sotsialisticheskogo samoupravleniya naroda // Politicheskaya sistema: voprosy demokratii i samoupravleniya (Moskva IGPAN, 1988). A.V. Klyuev, Politicheskaya aktivnost' i formirovanie garmonichno razvitoi, obshchestvenno aktivnoi lichnosti (Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1987). D. Lyons, Constitutional Principles, in: 92 Boston University Law Review (2012). D.A. Kerimov, V.E. Chirkin, Politicheskie

Abstract: The article concerns conceptual bases of the service delict law, and the author connects its analysis with the characteristics of the latter as a scientific category, which presupposed the need to study the history of its formation, to formulate its definition, to uncover its substantial qualities and its place within the system of law. Revealing its nature includes the study of the contents of the basic term “service delict”, establishing the institutional element within this legal institution, and the author also singles out the sub-institutions of service disciplinary and service material responsibility. Defining its place within the legal system is performed in its correlation with the administrative law as an independent branch of law, administrative delict law, and service law, as sub-branches of administrative law, as well as with the labor law as an independent branch of law. Additionally, the author substantiates the complex character of service delict law as a legal institution of administrative law, analyzing specific factors in support of this statement.

Keywords: service delict law, legal institution, administrative law, administrative delict law, service law, state (public) servants, municipal servants, service disciplinary delict, service disciplinary responsibility, service material responsibility.

References:
Administrativnoe pravo Rossii / pod red. N.M. Konina, Yu.N. Starilova. – Saratov, 2006.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii. – M., 2011.
Bakhrakh D.N. Sostav administrativnogo prostupka. – Sverdlovsk, 1987.
Bakhrakh D.N., Rossinskiy B.V., Starilov Yu.N. Administrativnoe pravo. – M., 2005.
Volkov G.I. Klassovaya priroda prestupleniy i sovetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. – M., 1935.
Galliy Avl. Atticheskie nochi. Izbrannye knigi / per. s lat. – Tomsk, 1993.
Gertsenzon A.A. Ponyatie prestupleniya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. – M., 1955.
Golovko S.A. Protivodeystvie korruptsionnoy prestupnosti v Rossii: retrospektiva, so-vremennost' i perspektivy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Tyumen', 2006.
Gurlyand I. Rimkiy yurist Gay i ego sochineniya. – Yaroslavl', 1894.
Digesty Yustiniana / otv. red. L.L. Kofanov. Tom VIII: Stat'i i ukazateli. – M., 2006.
Dobrobaba M.B. Otraslevaya prinadlezhnost' distsiplinarnoy otvetstvennosti gosudar-stvennykh sluzhashchikh Rossiyskoy Federa

Abstract: Liberalization of sexual morals and legitimating of homosexual marriage and raising children in the same-sex families were natural results of the general social and psychological changes in Europe. The authors of the article offer a complex of measures, which is aimed to protect psychosexual development of children, traditional marital and family values. The author offer to use administrative legal measures on prohibition of sexual deviation propaganda. The authors also provide formulae for the amendments to the Family Code of the Russian Federation and the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on prohibition of adoption of children by the citizens of the states, which currently permit same-sex marriages, as well as prohibition of pedagogical activities for the persons with deviant sexual behavior. The authors offer to amend the provisions of Art. 134-135 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on compulsory correctional measures towards pedophiles.

Keywords: jurisprudence, social control, deviant sexual behavior, homosexual, propaganda, administrative responsibility, criminal responsibility, family legislation, administrative supervision, recidivist prophylactics.

References:
Mirovye religii o prestuplenii i nakazanii. — M., 2013.
Osnovy sotsial'noy kontseptsii Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi (9 iyunya 2008 g.)

Abstract: In order to fight migration offences in the territory of Russian Federation, it is important to improve and Implement migration legislation in the sphere of migration processes regulation: immigration, emigration, forced migration, voluntary movement to the Russian Federation by the compatriots from abroad, labor migration and resettlement. Absence of permanent sources of income of illegal migrants serves as a key criminogenic factor, which influences the number of crimes by illegal migrants and supports the influx of illegal migrants into the ethnic criminal groups and mixed criminal groups, as comprised of persons from different states. In order to prevent social migration-related conflicts it is extremely important to curtail the number of illegal migrants outside of scope of government social policy, since illegal migration serves as breeding grounds for organized crime and international terrorist and extremist organizations. Based on the statistical data for 2012, the article includes analysis of theoretical legal characteristic features of modern illegal migration within the framework of administrative legal responsibility for the most typical offences in this sphere.

Keywords: jurisprudence, illegal migration, administrative offences, migration, legal responsibility, migration sphere, migrant workers, fighting, Federal Migration Service of Russia, security, migration legislation.

References:
Baranov V.M. Nezakonnaya migratsiya v sovremennoy Rossii: ponyatie, vidy, effektiv-nost' protivodeystviya // Migratsiya, prava cheloveka i ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' sovre-mennoy Rossii. — N.Novgorod, 2004.
Gom'en D. Evropeyskaya konventsiya o pravakh cheloveka i Evropeyskaya sotsial'naya khartiya: pravo i praktika / D. Gom'en, D. Kharris, L. Zvaak. — M., 1998.
Kommentariy k KoAP RF / pod obshch. red. N.G. Salishchevoy. — M.: Prospekt, 2013.
Mironov A.L., Akimova S.A. Osnovnye napravleniya deyatel'nosti Federal'noy migratsi-onnoy sluzhby Rossii. — M., 2013.
Prudnikov A.S., Samoylov V.D. Pravonarusheniya v sfere migratsii. — M., 2007.
Redkous V.M., Akimova S.A. Administrativno-pravovoy status organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti. — M., 2012

Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of two directions within the process of genesis of the Russian parliament: the pre-Parliamentary bodies of state government, their structure and forms of activities and the project of formation of Parliament in the Tsarist Russia. The multi-stage, contradictory process of formation of the Russian parliament includes formation, organization of work the pre-Parliamentary bodies of state government, as well as formation and development of the ideas of parliamentarism. At the time of its formation in IX century, the Russian (Kyiv) state, represented a type of an early feudal monarchy, and the popular assembly (veche) was one of the state government bodies. Veche was a gathering of the fully legitimate male city dwellers, which was regarded as a legally superior government body in Novgorod. It performed legislative, executive and judicial functions. The Novgorod veche gave power and competence to other bearers of public power (the prince, the eminence, posadnik (mayor) and tysyatskiy (captain of the thousand). the Council of Boyars is also of much interest to those studying the first elements of formation of the representative (legislative) government bodies in Russia. From the middle of XVI century to the middle of XVII century the activities of the Council of Boyars were complemented by the Assemblies of the Land (Zemskoy Sobor). From the start of the era of «enlightened absolutism» of the Empress Catherine the Great the liberal ideas, the theory of separation of powers, natural law, social pact, etc. start entering Russia from the West. The state government bodies, the pre-Parliamentary forms, the ideas of formation of a Parliament in Russia were the streams and sources, which after many centuries of evolution lead to the formation of the Parliament of the Russian Federation and the formation of the Russian parliamentarism.

Keywords: jurisprudence, legislative process, state, Duma, Zemskoy Sobor, Council Code, the Prince, parliament, draft Constitution, state government, bodies.

References:
Dokumenty po istorii vosstaniya dekabristov. T. VII. — M., 1958.
Zenin S.S. Rol' i znachenie Zemskogo Sobora 1613 g. // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. — 2013. — ¹ 3.
Istoriya otechestvennogo gosudarstva i prava / otv. red. I.A. Isaev. — M., 2012.
Karamzin M.N. Istoriya gosudarstva Rossiyskogo. Kn. 4. T. 10. — M., 1997.
Man'kov A.G. Ulozhenie 1649 g. — kodeks federal'nogo prava Rossii. — L., 1980.
Martyshin O.V. Vol'nyy Novgorod. Obshchestvenno-politicheskiy stroy i pravo feodal'-noy respubliki. — M., 1992.
Materialy k istorii drevnikh slavyan // Vestnik drevney istorii. — 1941. — ¹ 2 (14).
Parlamentskoe pravo Rossii / otv. red. A.A. Kokotov. — Ekaterinburg, 2008.
Petrov A.V. Vechevoy Novgorod / Istoriya Rossii: narod i vlast'. — SPb., 1997.
Pushkarev S.G. Obzor russkoy istorii. — M., 1991.
Sitnikova A.I. Sobornoe ulozhenie 1649 g. kak zakonodatel'nyy pravovoy pamyatnik // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. — 2010. — ¹ 22.
Solov'ev S.M. Chteniya i rasskazy po istorii Ros

Abstract: The article includes analysis of the topical issues regarding the correlation of the terms administrative process and arbitration process The categories of cases, which are dealt with by the arbitration courts, fall within either administrative or arbitration procedural orders of adjudication. Such a division causes certain problems with the competence over the cases. The specific features for the adjudication of cases under Art. 24 of the Arbitration Procedural Code is that these disputes have public legal character, which is in turn based upon the inequality of parties to the dispute. The Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation defines the adjudication in the arbitration courts on the disputes arising from administrative relations as administrative procedure. Taking into account the specific features of such cases, it seems necessary to include special procedural provisions for it, namely the Administrative Judicial Procedural Code, which shall serve as a basis for the specific administrative procedural form of resolution of administrative legal disputes. The author expresses her opinion on the development of administrative judicial procedure.

Keywords: jurisprudence, administrative judicial procedure, arbitration court, judicial power, cases, arising from administrative and other public relations, economic dispute, specialized courts, administrative dispute, economic court, the draft Code for the Administrative Judicial Procedure, public law.

References:
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo, administrativnaya yustitsiya i admini-strativnyy protsess // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2005. — ¹ 2.
Vasil'eva E.S., Nekhaychik V.K. Kontseptsiya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v mekha-nizme administrativno-pravovogo vozdeystviya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. — 2011. — ¹ 10.
Vakhitov R.R. Protsedura razresheniya nalogovykh sporov v Niderlandakh // www.nalogoved.ru
Davydenko D.L. K voprosu o mirovom soglashenii // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. — 2004. — ¹ 4.
Eliseykin P.F. Sudebnoe mirovoe soglashenie // Sov. yustitsiya. — 1968. — ¹ 7.
Zakharova (Rogacheva) O.S. Ponyatie administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva po delam ob ad-ministrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. — 2008. — ¹ 7.
Zelentsov A.B., Zelentsov A.B. Administrativno-pravovoy spor: voprosy teorii. — M., 2005.
Zelentsov A.B., Yakhin F.F. O predmete administrativno-pravovogo spora // Yurist. — 2003. — ¹ 11.
Il'inskaya N.G. Sovremennaya

Abstract: The article includes analysis of the social relations within the sphere of criminal law regulation in their interdisciplinary aspect. The author expresses an opinion that the structures of objects of regulation of material and procedural criminal law allow to single out the common element — the social relations between a person, who has committed the act which is prohibited by criminal law and the victim, whose interests are represented by the state via its competent bodies. This group of social relations is one of factual relations. in turn, the «nucleus» of the object of regulation of the criminal law is a material aspect of these relations, while the «nucleus» of the regulation of the criminal procedural law is its procedural aspect. Each of the aspects within the same group of factual social relations may and has to be interpreted as criminal law and criminal procedural relations, that is, as the relations, which serve as means for the legal regulation of real social relations, and in some sense disciplinary legal constructions. The said correlation presupposes the presence of some general interdisciplinary construction, which is a mechanism for the criminal law regulation.

Keywords: jurisprudence, object of regulation, method of regulation, mechanism of criminal law regulation, correlation of material and procedural criminal law, crime, criminal proceedings, criminal responsibility, criminal law complex, «nucleus» of the object of regulation, interdisciplinary legal construction.

References:
Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. — M., 2009.
Vetrov N.I. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'. — M., 1999.
Daev V.G. Vzaimosvyaz' ugolovnogo prava i protsessa. — L., 1982.
Zharikov Yu.S. Ugolovno-pravovoe regulirovanie i mekhanizm ego realizatsii. — M., 2009.
Ignatov A.N. Vvedenie v izuchenie ugolovnogo prava. Ugolovnyi zakon. — M., 1996.
Ignatov A.N., Krasikov Yu.A. Kurs rossiiskogo ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast': v 2 t. T. 1. — M., 2001.
Kovalev M.I. Sovetskoe ugolovnoe pravo: kurs lektsii. Vyp. 1. Vvedenie v ugolovnoe pra-vo. — Sverdlovsk, 1971.
Kozubenko Yu.V. Ugolovnoe presledovanie: opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya. — SPb., 2006.
Kropachev N.M. Ugolovno-pravovoe regulirovanie: mekhanizm i sistema. — SPb., 1999.
Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava: v 5 t. T. 1. — L., 1968.
Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava: v 6 t. T. 1. — M., 1970.
Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: v 3 t. / pod red. V.A. Mikhailova. T. 1: Obshchie polozheniya ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. —

Abstract: The article contains analysis of different approaches towards the personality of a criminal. The author analyzes anthropological, biological, social and psychological explanations for the criminal behavior of a person. Then the author provides an original version of the type of personality of a violent criminal. It is proven that the mechanisms for the unlawful and law-abiding behaviors are the same. It is stated that any person is able to commit a crime, and the society is the one which may prevent crimes, and it is to blame for each criminal.

Keywords: jurisprudence, criminal type, mechanism for the personality formation, the due measure of prohibitions, personality of a criminal, criminal behavior, law-abiding behavior, criminal privatization, mechanism of human behavior, the psychological sub-structure of a person.

References:
Antonyan Yu.M. Arkhetip i prestupnost'. — M.: Veche. 2009.
Antonyan Yu.M. Mnozhestvennye ubiystva: priroda i prichiny. — M.: Logos. 2012.
Vidonov L.G., Selivanov N.A. Tipovye versii po delam ob ubiystvakh. Spravochnoe poso-bie. — Gor'kiy, 1981.
Dubinin N.P., Karpets I.I., Kudryavtsev V.N. Genetika, povedenie, otvetstvennost'. — M.: Politizdat, 1989.
Kristi N. Bor'ba s prestupnost'yu kak industriya. — M., 2001.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Bor'ba motivov v prestupnom povedenii. — M.: Norma, 2007.
Kurtashev V.N. Psikhologicheskiy mekhanizm yuridicheskoy deyatel'nosti (lichnostnyy aspekt). — Yaroslavl', 2010.
Lenin V.I. Gosudarstvo i revolyutsiya // Polnoe sobr. soch. T. 33.
Lombrozo Ch. Prestupnyy chelovek — M.: Midgard. 2005.
Noy I.S. Metodologicheskie problemy sovetskoy kriminologii. — Saratov, 1975.
Ol'kov S.G. Absolyutnoe i otnositel'noe napryazhenie lichnosti i gradient schast'ya v issle-dovanii prestupnogo povedeniya // Aktual'nye problemy pravovedeniya. — 2012. — ¹ 2–3.

Abstract: The article includes brief analysis of history and objective prerequisites for the formation of the theory of judicial disciplines as an interdisciplinary theory in 1980s — 1990s. it is noted that the growing value of special knowledge In the judicial procedure, development of theory and practice of the judicial expertise in the XXI century requires the reevaluation of the concept of the judicial expertise and raises it to the level of science. Based on the retrospective analysis of the theoretical scholars of judicial expertise in the last 20 years, the author offers her own definition of the object of the judicial expertology, which is based upon the key patterns, studied by this science, as well as the four-level system of science, including the general theory of judicial expertology, legal guarantees of judicial expert activity, organizational guarantees of judicial expert activity, judicial expert technologies.

Keywords: jurisprudence, judicial expertise, expert, judicial expert activity, theory of judicial expertise, method of judicial expertise, judicial expertology, expert technologies, judicial expert institutions, competence of expert.

References:
Eysman A.A. Ekspertologiya v sisteme nauchnogo znaniya // Ekspertnye zadachi i puti ikh re-sheniya v svete NTR. — M., 1980. Footnotes: 1. Korukhov Yu.G. Formirovanie obshchey teorii sudebnoy ekspertizy. Material dlya Uchenogo soveta VNIISE. — M., 1989; Osnovy sudebnoy ekspertizy. Ch. 1. Obshchaya teoriya. — M., 1997. — s. 59–60. 2. Aliev I.A., Aver'yanova T.V. Kontseptual'nye osnovy obshchey teorii sudebnoy ekspertizy. — Baku, 1992. — s. 86. 3. Bychkova S.F. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: nauchnye, organizatsionno-pravovye i metodicheskie voprosy. — Almaty, 2002. 4. Sudebnaya ekspertologiya: ob'ekt, predmet, priroda i sistema nauki // V zb. “Teor?ya ta prak-tika sudovo? ekspertizi ? krim?nal?stiki”. Vip. 3. — Khark?v: Pravo, 2003. 5. Shakirov K.N. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: problemy teorii i praktiki. — Almaty, 2002. — s. 86. 6. Dzhavadov F.M. Ekspertnaya deyatel'nost' i razvitie nauki o sudebnoy ekspertize. — Baku, 1998. 7. Zinin A.M., Maylis N.P. Sudebnaya ekspertiza. — M., 2002. 8. Kornoukhov V.E., Orlov Yu.K., Zhuravleva I.A. Sudebnaya ekspertiza. ch

Abstract: For the several decades the global community has been actively discussing the possibility for the legalizing euthanasia. As for the Russian legal doctrine, the problem of euthanasia is being concealed. Only the people who face the horror of incurable illness and the suffering that it brings try to find the way out from such a situation on their own, and usually nothing good comes out of it. Taking the above-mentioned issues into account, the author analyzes the legal issues regarding euthanasia. The author provides the brief analysis of the history of the problem, as it was regarded by Thomas Moore and Francis Bacon. The author then analyzes the points of view on active and passive euthanasia by Russian and foreign authors, and he provides the arguments «pro et contra» its decriminalization and legalization in Russia. The author provides detailed analysis of the solutions of the euthanasia problem, which were found in the USA, in the Great Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Holland, Belgium, and other foreign states. He provides detailed analysis of the Nancy Cruzan case, when she was for a long time in coma, being connected to the life-sustaining machinery, as a judicial precedent in the USA. He also pays attention to the conditions of death of Sigmund Freud. He provides examples of illegal euthanasia and arguments against its legalization in Russia, regarding imperfections of medical diagnosis, lack of studies of the bordering conditions between life and death, development and progress of medicine and pharmacology, the impossibility of making «death angels» out of doctors, as well as negative consequences of commercialization of medical services. The author comes to a conclusion that legalization of euthanasia in Russia shall lead to the irreversible criminalization of the medical system, lowering the dignity of medics, perversion of their professional duty and the greater social, spiritual and moral degradation of person and society. To permit euthanasia is to finally destroy feelings and connections among the relatives.

Keywords: jurisprudence, euthanasia, «kind death», types of euthanasia, legislative regulation, problem, definition, experience of the foreign states, cases of euthanasia.

References:
Nikol'skiy E.V., Panishchev A.P. Evtanaziya — kak fenomen antropologicheskoy katastrofy // Sotsial'no-politicheskie nauki. 2011. ¹1. S. 89–90.
Bareboym P., Zakharov A. Florentiyskaya utopiya: gosudarstvo kak proizvedenie iskusstva / Filosofsko-pravovye esse. M.: Izd-vo LUM, 2012. S. 38, 89.
Maleina N.M. Pravo na zhizn' // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1992. ¹2.
Lavrin A.P. Khroniki Kharona. Entsiklopediya smerti. Novosibirsk, 2009. S. 45.
Nikol'skiy E.V., Panishchev A.L Ukaz. rab. S. 91–93.
Kapinus O.S. Evtanaziya kak sotsial'no-pravovoe yavlenie. M.: Bukvoved, 2006. S. 141.
Glukhova A.A. K voprosu o kriminologicheskoy obuslovlennosti ugolovnoy politiki // So-vremennye problemy ugolovnoy politiki: materialy II Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf.: v 2 t. / pod red. A.N. Il'yashenko. Krasnodar: Krasnodar. un-t MVD Rossii, 2011. T. 1. S. 162–169

Abstract: The cognition of legal science can be achieved with various methodologies, from the abstract metaphysics to the all-permeating empiric studies. The most acceptable general systemic approach allows to integrate the strengths of the all known methods of theoretical and practical analysis. This approach allows to single out the historic periods of development of science. The author attempts to view inner and outer factors of development of the Russian legal science, which allow to characterize its ontology and gnoseology through the prism of its challenges.

Keywords: jurisprudence, science, condition of science, reflection, methodology, challenges, scientists, lawyers, perspectives of science, branches of sciences, scientific institutions.

References:
Vedeneev Yu.A. K voprosu o teorii teorii gosudarstva i prava. Materialy IV Mezhduna-rodnoy konferentsii «Kutafinskie chteniya»: sbornik tezisov. M., 2012.
Problemy obshchey teorii prava i gosudarstva: uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzov / pod obshch. red. V.S. Nersesyantsa. M., 1999.
Lazarev V.V., Lipen' S.V., Saidov A.Kh. Problemy obshchey teorii Jus. Uchebnik dlya magi-strantov yuridicheskikh vuzov. M.: Izd-vo Norma , 2012.
Chestnov I.L. Postklassicheskaya teoriya prava. SPb.: Izdatel'skiy Dom «Alef-Press», 2012.
Beglova N.S. Moskovskaya sem'ya ryazanskogo razliva. M.: Novyy Khronograf, 2012.
Erlikh O. Osnovopolozhenie sotsiologii prava. Per. s nem. M.V. Antonova / pod red. V.G. Grafskogo, Yu.I. Grevtsova. SPb., 2011.
Sorokin P. Prestuplenie i kara, podvig i nagrada. SPb., 1999.
Lazarev V.V. Pravomernoe povedenie kak ob'ekt yuridicheskogo issledovaniya // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1976. ¹10.
Lazarev V.V. Vyyavlenie zakonomernostey pravomernogo povedeniya // Sovetskoe