Abstract: The article is prepared in the process of scientific research work within the framework of the Federal Targeted Program “Scientific and Scientific – Pedagogical Cadres of the Innovative Russia” for 2009-2013. The article is devoted to the specific features of the judicial proceedings when the criminal case is tried by a jury. First specific features concerns “separation” of the position of the prosecution into elements, which have to be evaluated by the jury and which are examined by the court only after the verdict. The second specific feature involves a special procedural document – a questionnaire, which presents the factual basis for the accusation (and often for the defense as well). The second range of problems regards provisions in the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation allowing the parties to provide specialized and alternative questions for the jury, which may alter the contents of the accusation. The article is completed by the analysis of the problems regarding correspondence between the formulation and legal qualification of the crime in the court decisions based upon the factual circumstances established by the jury verdict.

Keywords: jurisprudence, limitations to the judicial proceedings, trial by jury, verdict, court decision, altering the accusation, questionnaire, accused, accusation, jury.

References:
Borzenkov G.N. Sud prisyazhnykh i ugolovnyy zakon // Vestnik MGU. Seriya «Pravo». – 1994. – ¹ 4.
Gue-Glunek. O sude prisyazhnykh. – SPb., 1865.
Karnozova L.M. Vozrozhdennyy sud prisyazhnykh: zamysel i problemy stanovleniya. – M., 2000.
Karnozova L.M. Ugolovnaya yustitsiya i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo. Opyt paradigmal'nogo ana-liza. – M., 2010.
Murav'ev N.V. Iz proshloy deyatel'nosti. – T. 1. – SPb., 1900.
Nasonov S.A., Yarosh S.M. Verdikt prisyazhnykh zasedateley. – M., 2003.
Nemytina M.V. Rossiyskiy sud prisyazhnykh. – M., 1995.
Pashin S.A. Stanovlenie pravosudiya. – M., 2011.
Khrulev S. Sud prisyazhnykh : Ocherk deyatel'nosti sudov i sudebnykh poryadkov. – SPb., 1886.
Foynitskiy I.Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – T. 2. – SPb., 1996

Abstract: The article contains analysis of mitigating circumstances, which are of importance for the application of rules provided for by part 2 and 4 of Art. 62 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The author analyzes the issues of correlation between these circumstances and the grounds for providing exceptionally light punishment under Art.64 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as some other aspects for the application of mitigating circumstances according to the relevant legislative list. It is stated that the purpose of the pre-trial cooperation settlement is not only (and maybe not so much in) providing an additional stimulus for the more active attitude from a person, who has committed a crime, towards assistance to the investigative bodies, but also in making these activities target-oriented and efficient, usually by providing a requirement to cooperate for the purpose of revealing or investigation of crimes of other persons (part 1 of Art. 317.6 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation). Based upon a number of assumptions, which are also supported by the judicial practice, the author draws a conclusion that part 2 of the Art. 62 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation should be formulated as follows: “The period or amount of punishment to a person, who has previously concluded a cooperation settlement and took all measures depending on him in order to fulfill his obligations may not exceed (further provide the option for lighter punishment), if it is shall be proven that this person has also acknowledged his guilt or actively facilitated revealing (investigation) of the crime committed with his participation or of the crime committed by other person (persons)”.

Keywords: mitigating circumstances, list of mitigating circumstances, consideration of mitigating circumstances, facilitating revealing of a crime, guilty plea, exceptional lightening of punishment, pretrial agreement, rules for lighter punishments, lighter punishment, pretrial cooperation.

References:
Rubnikovich O. Pravosudie predlagaet massovuyu sdelku / O. Rubnikovich // Kommersant. 2012. 6 iyunya.
Sarkisyants, R. Rol' prokurora v dosudebnom soglashenii o sotrudnichestve / R. Sarkisyants // Zakonnost'. 2012. ¹ 8. – S. 16-22.
Nikolaeva T., Larkina E. Nekotorye voprosy zaklyucheniya dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009. ¹ 6. – S. 85-88.
Myasnikov, A.A. Institut smyagcheniya nakazaniya: problemy zakonodatel'noy reglamentatsii i pravoprimeneniya: avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk / A.A. Myasnikov. – Krasnodar, 2011. – 24 s.
Kruglikov L.L. Problemy teorii ugolovnogo prava: izbrannye stat'i, 2000-2009 g.g. – Yaroslavl': YarGU, 2010.
Zvecharovskiy, I. Institut naznacheniya bolee myagkogo nakazaniya, chem predusmotreno za dannoe prestuplenie / I. Zvecharovskiy // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. ¹ 2. – S. 35-44.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 8 aprelya 2010 goda po delu M.M. Kubareva. Delo ¹ 4-010-33.
Kolokolov, N.A. Praktika

Abstract: The appearance of conflict situations in the corporate relations requires that a lawyer should find a norm of law, which would allow to solve the dispute (conflict). The methodological value of classification of corporate conflicts is that it allows to single out specific types of corporate conflict and to distinguish them from the other types. Classification of corporate conflicts (disputes) may be provided based on their object (disputes, related to the formation, reorganization and liquidation of a legal entity, the disputes regarding the ownership of stocks and shares in the charter capital of the economic partnerships and companies, disputes on the claims of founders, members, investors of a legal entity on compensation for the losses, etc. They may be provided based on the initiating subject of the corporate conflict (inner and outer), on the forms of their appearance or initiation (buy-in, or stripping of large packets of shares, blocking the rights of share-holders, participants or members to manage the corporation, etc.), or based on the subjects and character of the legal relations (disputes between the entity and the share-holders, or participants, disputes among the share-holders or participants, disputes between the main and affiliate companies, etc.). The understanding of classification of corporate conflicts may be useful in order to form the unitary practice of application of the corporate law norms by the arbitration courts and practicing lawyers. The analysis of objective and subjective causes for the formation of corporate conflicts allow to avoid them in many cases. The article also includes analysis of the methods of uncovering the corporate conflicts, namely the analysis of actions (lack of action), which allow to suppose that the conflict situation is arising.

Keywords: law, Corporation, corporate relations, corporate disputes, corporate disputes, business companies, corporate disputes, corporate ownership, enterprise security, corporate lawyer.

References:
Belykh V.S. O korporatsiyakh, korporativnykh otnosheniyakh i korporativnom prave // Biznes. Menedzhment. Pravo. Ekaterinburg, 2006. ¹2.
Gushchin V.V., Poroshkina Yu.O., Serdyuk E.B. Korporativnoe pravo. M., 2006.
Dobrovol'skiy V.I. Zashchita korporativnoy sobstvennosti v arbitrazhnom sude. M.: Volters Kluver, 2006.
Dobrovol'skiy V.I. Korporativnoe pravo dlya praktikuyushchikh yuristov. M.: Volters Kluver, 2009.
Dobrovol'skiy V.I. Ponyatie «korporatsiya» v sovremennom rossiyskom prave // Sovremennoe pravo. M.: Novyy Indeks. 2008. ¹11.
Dobrovol'skiy V.I. Rassmotrenie sporov, kasayushchikhsya vneseniya nalogovym organom za-pisey v EGRYuL // Arbitrazhnaya praktika. M.: Izd. Dom «Arbitrazhnaya praktika». 2007. ¹8.
Dobrovol'skiy V.I. Sudebnaya zashchita aktsionera (uchastnika) — voprosy pravoprimene-niya. (Nachalo) // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. M.: YuRIT-Vestnik, 2005. ¹4.
Dolinskaya V.V. Aktsionernoe pravo: osnovnye polozheniya i tendentsii. M.: Volters Kluver, 2006.