Library
|
Your profile |
History magazine - researches
Reference:
Vinokurov A.D.
Betyuns-wolves: structure, settlement and totemic representations of the wolf clans of Yakutia in the 1632-1917's
// History magazine - researches.
2024. № 6.
P. 179-187.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0609.2024.6.72774 EDN: XOMRRO URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=72774
Betyuns-wolves: structure, settlement and totemic representations of the wolf clans of Yakutia in the 1632-1917's
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0609.2024.6.72774EDN: XOMRROReceived: 13-12-2024Published: 20-12-2024Abstract: The subject of the study is the generic composition, places of settlement and totemic representations of the Betyunsky clans of Yakutia. The purpose of the study is to study the ethnic history and the formation of the Betyun people as a tribal group. The following tasks have been solved within the framework of the study: 1) to determine the history of the settlement of the Betyun people; 2) to consider the features of the tribal structure; 3) to identify totemic representations, their plot orientation and changes; 4) to characterize the economic structure. The source base is based on previously published, but also on a significant number of unpublished archival sources. Folklore material made it possible to systematize genealogical information and totemic representations. Cartographic material was used to clarify the issue of the settlement area. The research methodology is based on the principles of historicism, dialectics and objectivity. The method of source analysis made it possible to establish the information potential of the identified documents, to assess and use them. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that, based on the involvement of a wide range of sources, an attempt has been made to reconstruct the ancestral composition, places of settlement and totemic representations of the Betyun people. The results of the study will help to organize information about the process of division and separation from indigenous tribes and clans and the formation of new administrative-territorial units among the Betyunsky Yakuts. Based on the results of the work, it was concluded that further research is necessary due to the presence of a large number of unpublished documents. The research materials can be used in the process of teaching historical disciplines, developing textbooks, conducting separate and generalizing studies on the history of Yakutia. Keywords: Yakutia, Namsky ulus, Amginsky ulus, betyuns, yakuts, nasleg, clans, administrative-territorial structure, totemism, review of documentsThis article is automatically translated. The Betyunts are one of the key ethnic components that had a significant impact on the formation of the modern Sakha people. As a result of the events of the 17th century . They were forced to settle in vast territories, from the Lena-Aldan interfluve to the northeastern regions of Yakutia and Lake Essey. The question of the early ethnic origin of the Betyunans remains open. Ethnographer V.V. Ushnitsky connects the Betyunts with the Mongolian tribe "Chino" (Shono) [20, p.49]. In the course of the study, the nomenclature of the ancestral composition of the Mongols of Outer (Khalkha) and Inner (PRC) Mongolia was analyzed, presented in the work of A. Ochira. Representatives of the genus "Biduun" (Bidegun) live in the Bayanbulag and Buutsagaan somons of the Bayankhongor aimag of the Republic of Mongolia, as well as in the Ordos of Inner Mongolia of the People's Republic of China. The same study mentions that the Biduuns were not of Mongolian origin and were part of the Dayan Khan naimans [16, pp.34-35]. Currently, there is no single point of view regarding the ethnic origin of the Naimans. By the time Yakutia joined the Russian state, the Betyunts were a single tribal group divided into clans of the "patron-client" type [1, p.11]. The Betyun people of Yakutia are characterized by the cult of the ancestor, the wolf, which became the basis for the formation of the ethnonym "Boro Botu" (translated from Yakut, boro means "wolf"). Thus, the name can be interpreted as "Wolf clan" or "Betyunts wolves". Perhaps the mythological relationship with the wolf reflects the belligerence of the Betyunsky clans of Yakutia, which is confirmed by early archival documents and folklore data. To clarify the generic nomenclature and places of settlement, archival sources were used from the fund of the Yakut District Police Department (F.I15) [9], Nam Foreign Administration (F.I44) [10], the Yakut Statistical Office (F.I343) [12], the Yakut Treasury Chamber (F.I349) [13] and the Census Area No. 2 on Baturussky ulus (F.I570) [15]. The final data presented in the table reflect the state of 1917. Topographic sources on the administrative-territorial settlement have practically not been preserved, therefore, maps of the Yakut district (1896), Vilyuysky district (1932) and the settlement scheme of the northern Yakut reindeer herders (1926-1927), compiled by I.S. Gurvich, were used to visualize the settlement sites of the Betyunsky clans [3, p. 27]. Namsky ulus Historically, the Betyunians occupied the northern part of the territory of Namsky ulus, living on both banks of the Lena River and the mouth of the Aldan River (see Fig. 1). In the acts of the 17th century, the independent Betyunsky parish was localized near the mouth of the Aldan, on the right side of the river, in the area of Lake Taragana. In 1642, the governor sent an envoy to convince the Bethune people to "live in their former places on Taragan" [19, p. 40]. According to F.G. Safronov, in the 1720s, with the beginning of the introduction of a two-level management system, Betyunskaya volost became part of the newly formed Namsky ulus [18, p. 13]. Unfortunately, the exact date of the separation of the Kobekonsky nasleg from the indigenous Betyunsky nasleg has not been established at the moment. Figure 1. The Bethune villages of Namsky ulus as of 1896 As of 1917, there were three villages of Bethune origin in Namsky ulus (see Table.1): 1) Betyunsky (7 genera); 2) Tyubyatsky (7 genera); 3) Kobekonsky (6 genera) (see Table 1). According to the revision tale of Namsky ulus for 1768, Kobekonsky volost was marked as an independent unit, which indicates the separation of Kobekontsy from Betyuntsy in the first half XVIII century [14]. In 1910, seven clans of the Betyunsky nasleg expressed a desire to separate into an independent Tyubyatsky nasleg, and this process was completed by 1917 [11]. According to the documents on the separation and the 1917 census, part of the siblings of the Setet and Haryalakh families remained in the indigenous Bethune region. The majority of the names of the clans of the Namsky Betyunts shown in the table indicates the geographical nature of the genus name and names formed from the personal names of the clan leaders, which indicates the late nature of the disintegration of the indigenous Betyunsky clan into a number of small ones. The Arbyn region separated from the indigenous Bethune region after 1917. Table 1.
The famous folklorist and ethnographer A.A. Savvin, according to P.F. Savvin, a resident of the 2nd Sittinsky village of Kobyai district, recorded the legend "The Wolf God": "In the old days, the inhabitants of the village of Namsky district told about the Betyunts: the Betyunts who walked around the abandoned pit seven times and had a wolf" [17, l.46]. The plot was dedicated to the discovery of a large cache of food supplies on one of the Lena River islands by hungry ancestors of the Bethune people. The above–mentioned text of the legend points to the plot group "zoomorph - savior (plots of one-time help)" and indicates the presence of remnants of totemism, commercial cult and fear of animals among the Bethune people. Amginsky (Baturussky) ulus In the first half of the 17th century, there were no written references to the presence of Betunian genera in the basins of the Amga River and the Aldan River. However, folklore evidence suggests that the Betyunans lived along the Amga River before the arrival of the Russians. The first mention of the Betunsky volost of the Yakuts living on the Amga River dates back to 1653 [4, p. 364]. In the 18th century, the Amginsky betyunts became part of the Baturussky ulus, which existed until 1911 (see Fig. 2). On December 12, 1911, the Amginsky ulus was separated from the Baturussky (Churapchinsky) ulus. As can be seen from the map, the Betyunians had land plots between the rivers of Amga and Aldan. Figure 2. The Bethune villages of Amginsky ulus as of 1896. In 1917, there were three villages of Betyunsky origin in Amginsky ulus: Betyunsky (4 genera), Kennyansky (5 genera) and Uranai (3 genera) (see Table 2). Perhaps the reason for the rapid division of the old genera into a number of smaller genera is the principle of geographical remoteness from the indigenous genus and the presence of a gap with other genera of the nasleg and other nasleg. In 1912, the Uranai and Badaran clans were separated into a separate Uranai family [6]. Kennyansky nasleg was approximately formed in the period 1913-1915 [8]. Table 2.
The central storyline of the Amga Betyunts is the clash with the Nahars over land, reflected in the legend "Wolves-Betyunts with wolf luck" [5, p.15]. Of course, the legend traces the remnants of the cult of the wolf that existed among the Bethune people and strong military traditions. Unlike the Nam Betyunts, the Amgins have preserved a cycle of legends about legendary ancestors, which has the following scheme: 1. Augustakh Serguy (Augustakh Sorguy) 2. his son Kogas Bachchy (Kuoҕas Bachchy); 3. My grandson, I will Run (Egey Luglu); 4. the grandson's sons, the progenitors of the Betyunsky Amgins families. Betyunts of other uluses and regions The settlement of the Bethune clans (see Fig. 3) outside the Nam and Amga local groups was associated with forced migration during the period of armed uprisings against peasant arbitrariness and repressive measures of the first voivodes. Figure 3. Betyunsky (Chordunsky) forests of the North-West of Yakutia as of 1926-1927. In the books of yasak collection and investigation, there is information about the Betyunsky Yakuts who paid yasak in the middle of the 17th century. In the Olekminsky, Butalsky, Verkhnevilyuysky, Ust-Vilyuysky and Zhigansky winter quarters [4, p.455]. By 1917, the Betyunsky (Chordunsky) family of northern Yakut reindeer herders, who roamed within the Vilyuysky and Zhigansky districts, and the Bekcheginsky (Betyunsky) nasleg of Srednevilyuysky ulus, which had previously been part of the 2nd Chochunsky nasleg of Verkhnevilyuysky ulus, were independent administrative-territorial units. In 1914, an attempt was made by foreigners of the Betyunsky family of the Malzhegar rural society of the Olekminsky ulus to separate into an independent Betyunsky rural society, unfortunately, the petition was rejected by the Olekminsky district police officer in 1916 [7]. There were Chordun (Betyunsky) clans among the Essene Yakuts of the Turukhansk department and the Yugyulyat Tunguska clan of the Vilyui district (see Table 3). Table 3.
Let us take a closer look at the totemic beliefs among the Betyunts of other uluses. The Olekmin and Middle Vilyui Betyunts retained their ideas about belonging to the wolf clans (Boro BotuҥNer). The geographical distance from the indigenous Betyunsky villages, the change in the type of economic activity caused the replacement of the totem with an eagle among the Betyunsky reindeer herders (Chordunsky) Zhigansky and Oleneksky districts, lake. Essenes [2, p.129]. As a result of the conducted research, based on a set of archival documents, it was possible to recreate the nomenclature of the Betyunts' ancestral composition, places of settlement, and identify the features of the genus names. Along with this, folklore data on the totemic beliefs of the Bethune people about the relationship with wolves were studied, and a conclusion was made about their belonging to the zoomorph – savior story group (one-time help stories). References
1. Everstov G.K. (2015). (Ed.). (Betun (Nam uluuha). Yakutsk, Russia: Media Holding Yakutia.
2. Gurvich I.S. (1948). Cosmogonic representations and remnants of the totemic cult among the population of the Oleneksky district. Soviet ethnography. 3. 128-131 3. Gurvich I.S. (1977). Culture of the northern Yakut reindeer herders. On the question of the late stages of the formation of the Yakut people. Moscow, USSR: Nauka. 4. Dolgikh B.O. (1960). The tribal and tribal composition of the peoples of Siberia in the XVII century. Moscow, USSR: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. 5. Yemelyanov N.V. (1962). Yakut proverbs and sayings. Yakutsk, USSR: Yakut Book Publishing House. 6. National Archive of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). F. I12 Op.2 vol.2 d.6241 7. National Archive of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). F.I12, Op.2, vol. 8, d.7915 8. National Archive of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). F.I12 Op.2 vol.9 d.9243 9. National Archive of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). F.I15 10. National Archive of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). F.I44 11. National Archive of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). F.I99 Op.1 D.380 12. National Archive of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). F.I343 13. National Archive of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). F.I349 14. National Archive of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). F.I349 Op.1 D.5995 15. National Archive of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). F.I.570 16. Ochir A.T. (2016). Mongolian ethnonyms: issues of origin and ethnic composition of the Mongolian peoples. Elista, Russia: KIGI RAS. 17. RAS SB IGIiPMNS Manuscript department. F.4. Op.12. D.69 18. Safronov F.G. (1987). Yakuts. Secular governance in the XVII-beginning XX century. Yakutsk, USSR: Yakut Book Publishing House. 19. Tokarev S.A. (1945). The social system of the Yakuts of the XVII-XVII centuries. Yakutsk, USSR: Yakut State Publishing House. 20. Ushnitsky V.V. (2019) Participation of the Mongolian component in the formation of the ethnocultural landscape of Yakutia. Northeastern Humanitarian Bulletin. 3 (28). 46-54
Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
|