Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice
Reference:

The concepts of "security" and "national security": some problems of legal terminology

Kuznetsov Mihail Sergeevich

Student; Faculty of Economics and Law; St. Petersburg University of the State Fire Service of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia named after Hero of the Russian Federation Army General E.N. Zinichev

194356, Russia, Saint Petersburg, 52 Lunacharsky Ave., 1, sq. 196

mike_seckret@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2306-9945.2024.4.72665

EDN:

TMIOCW

Received:

10-12-2024


Published:

03-01-2025


Abstract: In the current global environment, a clear understanding and definition of the terms "security" and "national security" are becoming critically important for the development of effective public policy and legal mechanisms. Inconsistencies and uncertainties in legal terminology lead to legal conflicts and difficulties in interagency cooperation. In addition, ambiguity and blurring of terms can negatively affect public understanding and trust in public authorities and their actions in the field of security. The article examines the key aspects of the legal definitions used in the legislation of the Russian Federation related to the concepts of "security" and "national security". The article analyzes the evolution of these concepts in legal and political contexts, as well as their interrelationship and influence on the formation of a state strategy in this area. Particular attention is paid to the differences in the interpretation of these terms in national law, as well as law enforcement practice. The methodological basis of the research is the universal dialectical method of cognition. Along with it, general scientific and private scientific methods were used: comparative legal, concrete sociological research, formal logical, systemic, structural and functional, formal legal, axiomatic. As a result of the conducted research, it is concluded that accurate and unambiguously understood terminology is important for effective security in modern conditions when the world is facing new challenges and threats. In this scientific work, new definitions of the concepts of "security" and "national security" are formulated, which fully reflect the distinctive features of each of them. The proposed formulations emphasize the importance of not only studying, but also critically analyzing these categories in the context of the dynamic changes taking place in the modern world. The definitions formulated by the author will certainly make it possible to take a significant step towards strengthening the legal understanding of the existing security system in the modern Russian state, which will allow the federal legislator, including better protection of the interests of citizens and the country as a whole, using competent definitions.


Keywords:

constitution, rights and freedoms, security, national security, national interests, state of security, threat, danger, emergency, legislation

This article is automatically translated.

In order to protect the human and civil rights and freedoms established by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and to comply with constitutional guarantees of such protection, the Federal Law "On Security" was adopted in 2010, replacing the Law of the Russian Federation "On Security", which had been in force since 1992.

Initially, the definition of "security" was contained in the Law of the Russian Federation "On Security", which defined it as "the state of protection of vital interests of the individual, society and the state from internal and external threats." The Federal Law "On Security" does not specify the content of this term, but it provides that the concepts of "security" and "national security" are synonymous.

Currently, the definition of national security of the Russian Federation is formulated in the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation, approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 400 dated July 2, 2021 (hereinafter also referred to as the National Security Strategy). It should be borne in mind that the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation, in accordance with the Federal Law on Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation, "is the basic document in the field of planning the development of the national security system of the Russian Federation, which defines the procedure and measures to ensure the national security of the Russian Federation."

According to this Strategy, the national security of the Russian Federation is "a state of protection of the national interests of the Russian Federation from external and internal threats, which ensures the realization of constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens, decent quality and standard of living, civil peace and harmony in the country, protection of the sovereignty of the Russian Federation, its independence and state integrity, socio-economic development of the country".

In the above definition, the key, in our opinion, is the protection of the national interests of the country. This includes not only protection from external threats and aggression, introduced back in the 1992 definition, but also an extensive list of security issues, including economic, information, environmental, and humanitarian security. In addition, starting in 2021, along with ensuring the realization of constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens, decent quality and standard of living, a new vector appears in the definition of national security: "civil peace and harmony in the country, protection of the sovereignty of the Russian Federation, its independence and state integrity, socio-economic development of the country."

In addition to legislative norms, there are interpretations of scientists and specialists in understanding the essence of national security.

Thus, O.A. Belkov defines national security as "the state, development trends (including latent ones) and living conditions of society, its structures, institutions and institutions, which ensure the preservation of their qualitative certainty with objectively determined innovations in it and free functioning corresponding to their own nature and determined by it" [1, c. 91].

N.D. Matrusov complements the above, who considers national security as "sufficient protection of national resources and values, as well as state, public and personal interests from internal and external threats" [2].

A similar definition is given by A.V. Vozzhenikov, who believes that security is "... a state of protection of vital interests of an individual, society and the state in all spheres of their life from internal and external dangers and threats, characterized by a country's position that ensures its integrity and internal stability, sovereign and progressive development.", the opportunity to act as an independent and full-fledged subject of international legal relations" [3]. There are also a number of authors who support this point of view, while simultaneously considering it from different aspects, namely: A.A. Galushkin [4, p. 8], G.A. Barzykina [5, p. 20-22], A.I. Gerasimova [6, p. 187-190].

Analyzing the above arguments of N.D. Matrusov and A.V. Vozzhenikov, it can be understood that these authors have similar opinions, paying special attention to the protection of "the interests of the individual, society and the state" from internal and external threats. At the same time, A.V. Vozzhenikov reveals more fully the idea of protecting the state, paying attention to its integrity, stability and development, while N.D. Matrusov focuses on the protection of national resources and values.

In addition to these authors, other scientists have been engaged in the study of the problems raised in the article. Thus, M.S. Savchenko in his scientific work examines the evolution, content and structure of the concepts of "security", "personal security", "state security", "national security" [7]; O.Y. Karpysheva analyzes the relationship between the concepts of "national security system" and "national security system" [8] N.G. Kutyin in his work explores the concept of "security", and also analyzes the types of security in modern Russian legislation [9].

In addition to the aforementioned National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation, approved by the act of the head of state, there are a number of legislative acts that provide their own definition of the concept of "security". For example, the Federal Law "On Fire Safety" interprets safety as "the state of protection of an individual, property, society and the state from fires." The Federal Law "On Road Safety" states that "road safety is the state of a given process, reflecting the degree of protection of its participants from road accidents and their consequences." Radiation safety of the population, as stated in the Federal Law on Radiation Safety of the Population, is "the state of protection of present and future generations of people from the effects of ionizing radiation harmful to their health." According to the definition set out in the Federal Law "On Industrial Safety of Hazardous Production Facilities," specified safety is "the state of protection of vital interests of the individual and society from accidents at hazardous production facilities and the consequences of these accidents." The security of critical infrastructure according to the Federal Law "On the Security of Critical Information Infrastructure of the Russian Federation" is considered to be "the state of security of critical information infrastructure, ensuring its stable functioning during computer attacks against it."

One of the latest laws that reveals the concept of safety in relation to a particular area is the Federal Law "On Biological Safety in the Russian Federation", which defines biological safety as "the state of protection of the population and the environment from the effects of dangerous biological factors, which ensures an acceptable level of biological risk."

We come to the conclusion that the presence of many definitions concerning, in fact, the same concept – security as a state of security (mainly the security of a person, people, and the population), indicates the imperfection of legislation in this area. When preparing draft laws concerning security in a particular area, the legislator tries to formulate a definition of security that is applicable exclusively to this area, which, in our opinion, is impractical. It is necessary to have a single definition common to all fields of activity, having fixed it in the Federal Law "On Security". This general rule will have to be used in other federal laws, possibly specifying individual features specific to a particular industry.

Let us turn to the concept of "national interests", the protection of which (along with other components) is mentioned in the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation. In addition, the said act defines the national interests of the Russian Federation as "objectively significant needs of the individual, society and the State for security and sustainable development" (paragraph 5).

In different parts of the Strategy, words are used that are different in spelling, but similar in meaning: personality, population, society, people, nation to one degree or another denoting the same thing – a person or people, their associations (groups).

For a correct understanding of the terms used in the definitions, let's turn to the explanatory dictionary. So, a "personality" is a person as a carrier of some properties, the concept of "population" refers to the inhabitants of a place or locality, and "people" is the population of a state, the inhabitants of a country (people and population in this case are synonyms); "society" is interpreted as a set of people united by historically determined social forms of living and working together; a "nation" is a historically stable community of people formed in the process of forming a community of their territory, economic ties, literary language, cultural characteristics and spiritual appearance.

Based on these interpretations, concepts such as "personality" and "society" should be used to define security, since the former concerns a specific person, while the latter is related to relationships between people (personalities) and is considered in conjunction with their history, interests, needs, desires, beliefs, behavior, and traditions. Undoubtedly, the concept of "security" should contain an indication of ensuring the security of the state, which is a political organization of society, which is designed to protect this society (population) in general and a particular person (personality) in particular, which corresponds to the constitutional norm (Article 2 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation).

The use of the phrase "national interests" literally means the interests of only those people who eventually formed the state, that is, exclusively citizens of the country. If we proceed from the policy pursued by the state, according to which "The Russian Federation encourages the acquisition of citizenship of the Russian Federation by stateless persons residing in the Russian Federation," then in this case, ensuring security in which national interests prevail is a conscious choice: first of all, the state provides protection to Russian citizens. This provision is vague, but corresponds to the norm of the Federal Law "On the Legal Status of Foreign Citizens in the Russian Federation", according to which "foreign citizens enjoy rights and duties in the Russian Federation on an equal basis with citizens of the Russian Federation, except in cases provided for by federal laws" (Article 4).

Security also includes protection from internal and external threats. However, the legislative acts do not contain information about what is included in this concept. It can be distinguished from a number of acts of the head of state that internal threats include the emergence and spread of terrorism in the Russian Federation and extremism, while external threats include military dangers and military threats.

In addition, there are other forms of understanding the "threat" in the scientific literature. When analyzing the legal component, a number of Russian scientists consider the concept in various aspects. All positions can be roughly classified into several categories: 1) threat is a type of mental violence [10, p. 7]; 2) threat is a type of mental coercion [11, p. 58]; 3) threat is a means of mental coercion [12, p. 13-14]; 4) a form of intent detection [13, p. 13]; 5) possible danger of criminal consequences [14, p. 645; 15, pp. 152-153].

Turning to the linguistic basis, we see that the word "threat" (in the meaning we are interested in) means a possible danger, and the concept of danger is interpreted as "an opportunity, a threat of something very bad, some kind of misfortune," that is, these terms are synonymous.

At the same time, the above interpretation allows us to attribute to the content of the concept of "danger" emergency situations resulting from an accident, a dangerous natural phenomenon, a catastrophe, the spread of a disease that poses a danger to others, a natural disaster or another disaster.

An accident, as defined in the Federal Law "Technical Regulations on the Safety of Buildings and Structures", is a dangerous man–made accident that creates a threat to human life and health at an object, a certain territory or water area and leads to the destruction or damage of buildings, structures, equipment and vehicles, disruption of the production or transport process, damage to the environment. and the concept of "catastrophe" is explained only in the national standard, according to which a catastrophe is "a major accident that caused human casualties and damage to human health. and also caused serious damage to the environment," which in meaning coincides with the interpretation of this term in the explanatory dictionary of the Russian language: "an event with tragic consequences."

Gorenje also considers fires to be emergencies, which are known to be uncontrolled burning that causes material damage, harm to the life and health of citizens, and the interests of society and the state.

Russian Russian is considered to be the official language of the Russian Federation, taking into account the conducted small linguistic analysis, as well as the requirements of the Federal Law "On the State Language of the Russian Federation", which stipulates that when using Russian as the official language of the Russian Federation, including in the activities of federal government bodies and when publishing laws, the norms of modern Russian literary language must be observed (Articles 1 and 3), we come to the following conclusions:

First, the concepts of "security" and "national security" cannot have the same legislative definition for both terms.;

Secondly, when developing definitions of the concepts of "security" and "national security", terms should be used that most accurately define the positions that the legislator refers to as security or national security, and at the same time be concise in external form and deep in internal content.;

Thirdly, the first item in the list of positions that the state provides as a state of security should indicate the individual (person), his rights and freedoms, then society as a whole and the state created by society.

Considering the above, it is proposed to introduce the following amendments and additions to the legislative acts of the Russian Federation:

1) in the Federal Law "On Security":

a) add the second and third paragraphs to article 1, stating them in the following wording:

"Security is the state of protection of a person and citizen in the Russian Federation, society and the state from external and internal threats, including emergencies, and their consequences.

National security is the state of protection of citizens of the Russian Federation, society and the state from external and internal threats and their consequences.";

b) add a new paragraph to article 2 as follows:

"Ensuring the national security of the individual is focused on the observance and protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens of the Russian Federation. Ensuring the security of foreign citizens and stateless persons is carried out in accordance with the international treaties of the Russian Federation.";

2) in federal laws that regulate security issues in various fields, rework the definitions of security, based on the concept of "security" proposed by the author.;

3) in the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation:

a) duplicate the proposed concepts of "security" and "national security", if they are included in the Federal Law "On Security", correcting the text of the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation accordingly;

b) add the following explanation to the paragraph defining the basic concepts:

"The state of protection of the state from internal and external threats means the protection of the sovereignty of the Russian Federation, its independence and state integrity, and the socio-economic development of the country."

The formulated proposals confirm the need to study and critically analyze the concepts of "security" and "national security", taking into account the dynamics of the modern world and new challenges, which will be an important step towards strengthening the legal framework and improving the effectiveness of the security system in the state. This work reveals the essence of safety, and therefore can be used in the study of issues of national, fire and other safety.

References
1. Belkov, O. A. (1994). Conceptual and categorical apparatus of the concept of national security. Security: Information Collection, 3(19), 91-94.
2. Matrusov, N. D. (1996). On the need to create an integral system of national security in Russia: Basic principles, approaches, elements. Security: Information Collection, 3-4.
3. Vozzhenikov, A. V. (2000). The national security paradigm of a reforming Russia (2nd ed., rev. and additional). Moscow: EDAS PAK.
4. Galushkin, A. A. (2015). On the question of the meaning of the concepts «national security», «information security», «national information security». Human Rights Defender, 2, 8.
5. Barzykina, G. A. (2014). Energy security as part of economic security in the country’s national security system. Electrics, 3, 20-22.
6. Gerasimova, A. I. (2023). Concepts “Security-I” and “Security-II” in technosphere security. In Information technologies for ensuring comprehensive security in a digital society: Collection of materials of the VI All-Russian youth scientific and practical conference with international participation (pp. 187-190). Ufa: Ufa University of Science and Technology.
7. Savchenko, M.S. (2024). On the issue of the evolution of the concept of “national security” and the place of “spiritual security” in the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg Law Academy, 2(63), 20-29.
8. Karpysheva, Y.O. (2018). On the issue of the relationship between the concepts of “national security system” and “national security system”. Baikal Bulletin of the DAAD, 1, 30-34.
9. Kut’in, N. G. (2013). Security: concept, types, definitions. Bulletin of the Academy of the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation, 1(33), 10-16.
10. Vardanyan, A. V. (2015). Violence and the threat of its use as a method of committing crimes against sexual integrity and sexual freedom of the individual. News of Tula State University: Economic and Legal Sciences, 3–2, 3-9.
11. Sharapov, R. (2006). Questions of qualification of criminal threats. Criminal Law, 1, 58-62.
12. Bezverkhov, A. (2014). The concept and types of violence in Russian criminal law: Issues of lawmaking and law enforcement. Criminal Law, 4, 11-18.
13. Pirozhok, E. D. (2013). Method of crime as the most important element of the forensic characterization of the threat of murder or causing grievous harm to health. Russian Investigator, 2, 11-14.
14. Ruzevich, O. R. (2015). Features of the legislative threat in the criminal law of Russia and foreign countries. Legal Technology, 9, 644-651.
15. Bogdanov, A. V., & Primakin, A. I., & Sineshchuk, M. Yu., & Sineshchuk, Yu. I. (2013). Main threats and directions for ensuring the security of a single information space. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2, 150-153.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the article submitted for review is, as follows from its name, the concepts of "security" and "national security". The author focuses on the analysis of individual problems of legal terminology. The declared boundaries of the study have been observed by the scientist. The methodology of the research is not disclosed in the text of the article. The relevance of the topic of the work chosen by the author is not justified. The scientist also needs to list the names of the leading experts involved in the study of the problems raised in the article, and reveal the degree of their study. The scientific novelty of the work is manifested in a number of conclusions of the author: "We come to the conclusion that the presence of many definitions concerning, in fact, the same concept – security as a state of security (mainly the protection of a person, people, population), indicates the imperfection of legislation in this area. When preparing draft laws related to security in a certain area, the legislator tries to formulate a definition of security that is applicable exclusively to this area, which, in our opinion, is impractical. It is necessary to have a single definition common to all spheres of activity, having fixed it in the Federal Law "On Security". This general rule will have to be used in other federal laws, possibly indicating certain features inherent in a particular industry"; "Taking into account the small linguistic analysis carried out, as well as the requirements of the Federal Law "On the State Language of the Russian Federation", which provides that when using Russian as the state language of the Russian Federation, in particular including in the activities of federal government bodies and when publishing laws, the norms of the modern Russian literary language must be observed (Articles 1 and 3), we come to the following conclusions: firstly, the concepts of "security" and "national security" cannot have one legislative definition for both terms; secondly, when when developing definitions of the concepts of "security" and "national security", terms should be used that most accurately define the positions that the legislator refers to the characteristic of security or national security, and at the same time be brief in external form and deep in internal content; thirdly, the first in listing the positions that the state provides as a state of security, the person (person), his rights and freedoms must be indicated, then society as a whole and the state created by society," etc. Thus, the article makes a certain contribution to the development of domestic legal science and, of course, deserves the attention of potential readers. The scientific style of the research is fully sustained by the author. The structure of the work is logical. In the introductory part of the article, the scientist substantiates the relevance of his chosen research topic. In the main part of the work, the author analyzes the legal and doctrinal definitions of the concepts of "security" and "national security", identifies their shortcomings and offers his vision of the existing problems. The final part of the work contains conclusions based on the results of the study. The content of the article corresponds to its title, but is not without drawbacks. So, the author writes: "For a correct understanding of the terms used in the definitions, let's turn to the explanatory dictionary" - a comma is superfluous. The scientist notes: "However, legislative acts do not contain what is included in this concept" - "However, legislative acts do not contain information about what is included in this concept" (stylistic errors). The author indicates: "In addition, there are other forms of understanding "threats" in the scientific literature" - "understanding". The scientist writes: "A number of domestic scientists, when analyzing the legal component, consider the concept in different aspects" - the proposal has not been agreed. Thus, the article needs additional proofreading - it contains typos, punctuation and stylistic errors (the list of typos and errors given in the review is not exhaustive!). The author notes: "In addition to legislative norms, there are interpretations of scientists and specialists in understanding the essence of national security. Let's consider them," however, does not carry out a critical analysis of the positions of scientists on this issue presented in the literature, does not identify their advantages and disadvantages. The same should be said about the following position of the work: "In addition, there are other forms of understanding "threats" in the scientific literature. A number of Russian scientists, when analyzing the legal component, consider the concept in different aspects. All positions can be conditionally classified into several categories: 1) threat is a type of mental violence [7, p. 7]; 2) threat is a type of mental coercion [8, p. 58]; 3) threat is a means of mental coercion [9, p. 13-14]; 4) a form of detection of intent [10, p. 13]; 5) the possible danger of criminal consequences [11, p. 645; 12, pp. 152-153]". The bibliography of the study is presented by 12 sources (monograph and scientific articles). From a formal point of view, this is enough, but some provisions of the work need to be clarified and deepened. There is an appeal to the opponents, but it is of a general nature. The author does not enter into a scientific discussion with specific scientists, referring to a number of theoretical sources solely to substantiate his judgments or to illustrate certain provisions of the work. Conclusions based on the results of the conducted research are available ("Taking into account the above, it is proposed to make the following amendments and additions to the legislative acts of the Russian Federation: 1) in the Federal Law "On Security": a) add paragraphs two and three to Article 1, stating them in the following wording: "Security is the state of protection of a person and citizen in the Russian Federation, society and the state from external and internal threats, including emergencies, and their consequences. National security is the state of protection of citizens of the Russian Federation, society and the state from external and internal threats and their consequences."; b) add a new paragraph to Article 2 as follows: "Ensuring national security of the individual is focused on the observance and protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens of the Russian Federation. Ensuring the security of foreign citizens and stateless persons is carried out in accordance with international treaties of the Russian Federation"; 2) in federal laws regulating security issues in various fields, rework the definitions of security, taking as a basis the concept of "security" proposed by the author; 3) in the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation: a) duplicate the proposed concepts of "security" and "national security", if they are included in the Federal Law "On Security", having adjusted the text of the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation accordingly; b) add the following explanation to the paragraph defining the basic concepts: "The state of protection of the state from internal and external threats means the protection of the sovereignty of the Russian Federation, its independence and state integrity, and the socio-economic development of the country." The formulated proposals confirm the need to study and critically analyze the concepts of "security" and "national security", taking into account the dynamics of the modern world and new challenges, which will be an important step to strengthen the legal framework and increase the effectiveness of the security system in the state. This work reveals the essence of safety, and therefore can be used in the study of issues of national, fire and other safety"), have the properties of reliability, validity and undoubtedly deserve the attention of the scientific community. The interest of the readership in the article submitted for review can be shown primarily by specialists in the field of constitutional law, administrative law, provided that it is finalized: disclosure of the research methodology, substantiation of the relevance of its topic, clarification and deepening of certain provisions of the work, introduction of additional elements of discussion, elimination of violations in the design of the article.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study. In the peer-reviewed article "The concepts of "security" and "national security": selected problems of legal terminology" the subject of the study is the norms of law governing public relations in the field of security (national security) in the Russian Federation. Research methodology. The methodological apparatus consists of the following dialectical techniques and methods of scientific cognition: analysis, abstraction, induction, deduction, hypothesis, analogy, synthesis, typology, classification, systematization and generalization. The use of modern methods (such as theoretical and legal, historical and legal, etc.) allowed the author to form his own reasoned position on the stated issues. The relevance of research. The relevance of the research topic is beyond doubt. The author correctly notes that "security implies both protection from internal and external threats. However, the legislative acts do not contain information about what is included in this concept. From a number of acts of the head of state, it can be distinguished that internal threats include the emergence and spread of terrorism in the Russian Federation and extremism, while external threats include military dangers and military threats." The lack of terminological clarity in the legislation of these significant legal categories creates difficulties in law enforcement. These circumstances necessitate the need for doctrinal developments on this issue in order to improve legislation and the practice of its application. Scientific novelty. Without questioning the importance of the scientific research conducted earlier, which served as the theoretical basis for this work, nevertheless, it can be noted that this article for the first time formulated provisions that are characterized by scientific novelty: for example, "when preparing draft laws concerning security in a particular area, the legislator tries to formulate a definition of security applicable exclusively to this area, which, in our opinion, is impractical. It is necessary to have a single definition common to all fields of activity, having fixed it in the Federal Law "On Security". This general rule will have to be used in other federal laws, possibly specifying individual features specific to a particular industry." The article contains other provisions: for example, "taking into account the small linguistic analysis carried out, as well as the requirements of the Federal Law "On the State Language of the Russian Federation", which stipulates that when using Russian as the official language of the Russian Federation, including in the activities of federal government bodies and when publishing laws, must be observed the norms of the modern Russian literary language (Articles 1 and 3), we come to the following conclusions: firstly, the concepts of "security" and "national security" cannot have one legislative definition for both terms; secondly, when developing definitions of the concepts of "security" and "national security", the terms, the most accurately defining positions that the legislator attributes to the characteristics of security or national security, and at the same time be brief in external form and deep in internal content; thirdly, the first in the list of positions that the state provides as a state of security, the individual (person), his rights and freedoms should be indicated, followed by society in as a whole, and the state created by society", which are not only distinguished by their scientific novelty, but also have practical significance, which can be regarded as a contribution to the national doctrine. Style, structure, and content. The topic is disclosed, the content of the article corresponds to its title. The author has met the requirements for the volume of the material. The article is written in a scientific style, using special legal terminology. The article is structured. The material is presented consistently, competently and clearly. The author not only identifies existing problems in legislation and law enforcement practice, but also offers solutions that deserve attention. There are no comments on the content. Bibliography. The author has used a sufficient number of doctrinal sources. References to sources are designed in compliance with the requirements of the bibliographic GOST. Appeal to the opponents. A scientific discussion is presented on controversial issues of the stated topic, and appeals to opponents are correct. All borrowings have links to the author and the source of the publication. As a suggestion, I would like to recommend that the author familiarize himself with the works of T.A. Polyakova on information security issues. Conclusions, the interest of the readership. Article "The concepts of "security" and "national security": selected problems of legal terminology" is recommended for publication. The article corresponds to the subject of the journal "Administrative Law and Practice of Administration". The article is written on a topical topic, is characterized by scientific novelty and has practical significance. This article could be of interest to a wide readership, primarily specialists in the field of general theory of law, state law, administrative law, criminal law, information law, and would also be useful for teachers and students of law schools and faculties.