Belousova N.O. The issue of enslavement of men by “universal” within dystopian genre Ðàñêðàñêè ïî íîìåðàì äëÿ äåòåé
Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Belousova N.O. The issue of enslavement of men by “universal” within dystopian genre

Abstract: The object of this article is the problem of correlation between universal and individual on the example of dystopian novels emerged within the framework of cultural modernity. Special attention is given to the interpretation of the stated topic through the problem of controversy of the social progress, which is evident in almost all dystopias. The author thoroughly examines such aspects of the topic as rejection of identity and freedom, individuality and independence, in subordination to the sacral “Universal”. The main conclusions of the conducted research consist in the ideas that social happiness and welfare society within the reality of dystopia is achieved via deindividuation of identity, and devaluing it to atom, just a “bolt” in the mass social organism. The author demonstrates that the absence of social harmony, its tilt towards “universal” to the detriment of individual, originates in dystopias antagonism as a “revolt of an individual” leading to destruction in its various forms.  


Keywords:

Individualization, Anthropological catastrophe, Depersonification, Freedom, Dystopia, Individuality, Universality, Unification, Totality, Social harmony



This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article




The article is published in the version approved by the reviewers (after receiving a positive review recommending the manuscript for publication) with corrections made by the author (after receiving the editor’s comments, if any).
Read all reviews on this article

References
1. Bredberi R. 451 gradus po Farengeytu: roman // O skitan'yakh vechnykh i o Zemle. M., Pravda, 1987. S. 7–152.
2. Konstantinov D.V. Antiutopii: budushchee bez cheloveka // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.-¹ 366.-2013-S. 42-48.
3. Pigulevskiy V.O. Ironiya i vymysel: ot romantizma k postmodernizmu: Rostov-na-Donu: «Foliant», 2002. – 418 s.
4. Khaksli O. O divnyy novyy mir // O divnyy novyy mir. Cherez mnogo let: romany / per. s angl. O. Soroki, V. Babkova ; prim. T. Shishkinoy, V. Babkova. SPb.: Amfora, 1999. S. 5–226.
5. Chalikova V.A. Utopiya i svoboda. M., 1994. 184 s.
6. Fromm E. Kommentarii k «1984» / per. s angl. A. Bogomol'skogo, 2004. http://www.orwell.ru/library/novels/1984/russian/rnt_ef.
7. Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Vosstanie mass // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. ¹ 3. S 32.
8. Petrikhin A.V. Antiutopiya kak sposob osoznaniya edinstva tseli i razlichiya putey ee dostizheniya gumanizmom i utopiey // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2009. T. 5. ¹ 6. S. 136–141.
9. Fromm E. Afterword to George Orwell’s «1984». N.Y., 1962. R. 258-259.
10. Ays de Treyn. Ob utopii i antiutopii //http://dugward.ru/publ/s12.html
11. Shishkina S.G. Literaturnaya antiutopiya: k voprosu o granitsakh zhanra. Ivanovo, 2009. 232 s.
We use cookies to make your experience of our websites better. By using and further navigating this website you accept this. Accept and Close