Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International relations
Reference:

Karyakin V.V. The chaos and order dychotomy - an environment of self-organizing mechanisms of modern international systems formation

Abstract: The article is devoted to the synergetics as a theoretical basis of the political science. The author notes the appearance of the global information space, in which the technologies of info-physiological influence on human mentality are applied in the forms of people’s protest movement. Social medium obtained an absolutely new quality, transforming from the critical opposition to the functioning authority to the highly explosive substance. In this situation the external actors of international policy serve as a fuse, acting  with the aim to transform the political regime. The methodology of the research is based on the system, structural-functional, and comparative-political approaches, the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, and observation. The contemporary political processes, taking place in different regions, raise the topical task of synergetic vision of socio-political processes and development of the new methodology of analysis and forecasting its dynamics, based on the self-organization principles of societal systems and the creation of new and effective control mechanisms.


Keywords:

socio-political processes, synergetic vision, technologies, global information space, synergetics in political science, self-organization, interests, state, sequrity, USA


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Manoylo A.V. Ubit' kotenka, ili tekhnologii konfliktnoy mobilizatsii v sotsial'nykh setyakh. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, ¹ 2, ss. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.3.15973
2. Baily K.D. Social Entropy Theory: An Overview // Systems practices, 1990, v.3, ¹.4, pp.365-382.
3. Kastri Dzh. Bol'shie sistemy. Svyaznost', slozhnost' i katastrofy. Per. s angl. M.: Mir, 1982.
4. Codagnone S., Filippov V. Equity, exit end national identity in a multinational federation: the “multi-cultural constitutional patriotism” project in Russia. // Journal of ethnic and migration studies. 2000. V. 26. ¹ 2.. P. 263-288.
5. Manoylo A.V. Politicheskie konflikty v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh i mirovoy politike. //Mir i Politika. 2013. ¹2. S. 71-82
6. Karpovich O.G. Global'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy v kontekste formiruyushchegosya mnogopolyarnogo mira // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 5. - C. 620 - 629. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11787.
7. Shebzukhova T.A., Fedorchenko E.N. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo i gosudarstvo:
8. problemy vzaimootnosheniya
9. i perspektivy vzaimodeystviya // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 7. - C. 868 - 875. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.7.5225.
10. Brovko V.Yu. Osnovnye podkhody k kontseptualizatsii informatsionnoy politiki // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 4. - C. 441 - 449. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.4.13231.
11. Di Gregorio A. Vetting in post-authoritarian societies: a proposal of classification from the point of view of comparative law // . - 2014. - 1. - C. 7 - 27. DOI: 10.7256/.2014.1.12941.
12. Vinogradova E.A. Informatsionnye voyny v Latinskoy Amerike // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 4. - C. 372 - 384. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.4.13080.
13. Kalachev D.N. Bezopasnost': evolyutsiya ponyatiya // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 4. - C. 385 - 391. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.4.13232.