Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Shcherbinin M.N. Russian philosophy in the determination of aesthetic anthropology

Abstract: This article is dedicated to the determination of the aesthetic anthropology as a specific philosophical direction, which most vividly asserted itself over the last 15 years. The object of this research is the space of the aesthetic-anthropological search, which was formed namely in Russia, based on the local cultural traditions. The subject is the specificity and regularity of the Russian “footprint” in the nature of such type of anthropology, which takes its roots in the depth of aesthetic experience. The author thoroughly examines this regularity, which is traced not only in the very ideas of the Russian philosophers over the last two centuries, but also in the peculiarities of the ethic and aesthetic “beginning” in the Russian art, first and foremost in the Russian literature. It is demonstrated that aesthetic anthropology owes its name and origin to Russian literature (N. V. Gogol) and Russian philosophy (V. V. Zenkovsky). The specific aesthetic-anthropological methods are the following: allegory, embodiment, creative intuition, principle of reflectiveness of self-consciousness, “exponentiation”, anticipation, self-discovery through creativity and adventure, and others. Among the main conclusions are the following substantiations: the philosophical theoretical synthesis, carried out in the form of aesthetic philosophy, required a lengthy preparation of the Russian philosophy and art culture; such platform became the synthesis of feelings, emotions, experience, thoughts, and actions, as well as the “axiological synthesis” of the most fundamental values of the Russian culture. The author suggests a quite deep insight into the Russian philosophical humanology, and justifies a thesis on the limitation of self-consciousness within the framework of a pure logical synthesis of mind. It is demonstrates that the Russian philosophy appeals to the prepared and inspired reason, that represents the pinnacle, but at the same time is in need of truths of moral and ethical culture.


Keywords:

Paphos, human essence, self-cognition, beauty, Sofia, beauty, axiological synthesis, vague knowledge, Logos, creative thought


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. S.V. Chernov Geniy kak khudozhnik, kak myslitel', kak tvorets. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2011.-1.-C. 34-44.
2. Chernyy A.A. Filosofskaya kartina mira A.Dovzhenka, kak khudozhestvennoe otrazhenie chelovecheskogo bytiya // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2013.-3.-C. 242-247. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2013.3.9209.
3. Glinchikova E.V. Postizhenie kak tvorcheskiy akt // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2014.-2.-C. 162-167. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2014.2.11470.
4. Murav'ev I.B. Rol' religii v formirovanii estetiko-antropologicheskogo ideala // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. ¹ 10. Seriya «Filosofiya». S. 84-89.
5. Esteticheskaya antropologiya: figurativnyy aspekt: Kollektivnaya monografiya / Pod red. M.N.Shcherbinina. Tyumen': Mandr i Ka, 2014. 192 s.
6. Mamardashvili M.K. Soznanie i tsivilizatsiya. SPb.: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2011. 288 s.
7. Yung K.G. Ob otnoshenii analiticheskoy psikhologii k poetiko-khudozhestvennomu tvorchestvu // Fenomen dukha v iskusstve i nauke. M.: Renessans, 1992. 320 s.
8. Zhukov V.N., Maslin M.A. V.V.Zen'kovskiy o Rossii, russkoy filosofii i kul'ture // Zen'kovskiy V.V. Russkie mysliteli i Evropa. M.: Respublika, 1997. S. 3-8.
9. Rans'er Zh. Esteticheskoe bessoznatel'noe. SPb.; Moskva: Machina, 2004. 128 s.
10. Shcherbinin M.N. Svoboda i neobkhodimost' v ratsional'nosti gumanitarnogo poznaniya kak vyrazhenie ee vozmozhnostey i predelov // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. ¹ 10. Seriya «Filosofiya». S. 37-45.
11. Khoruzhiy S.S. Isikhazm kak prostranstvo filosofii // Voprosy filosofii. 1995. ¹ 9. S. 80-94.
12. Dostoevskiy M.F. Polnoe sobr. soch. v 30 t. T.5. Leningrad: Nauka, 1973. 405 s.
13. Solov'ev V.S. Sochineniya v 2 tomakh. T.2. M.: Mysl', 1988. 824 s.
14. Bakunin P.A. Osnovy very i znaniya. SPb.: Izd-vo Tipografiya V. Bezobrazova i komp., 1886. 418 s.
15. Emel'yanov B.V. Russkaya filosofiya kak chelovekovedenie: izbrannoe. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo universiteta. 2014. 331 s.
16. Vysheslavtsev B.P. Serdtse v khristianskoy i indiyskoy mistike // Voprosy filosofii. 1990. ¹ 4. S. 55-62.
17. Yurkevich P.D. Filosofskie proizvedeniya. M.: Pravda, 1990. 420 s.
18. Kireevskiy I.V. Otryvok iz romana: Dve zhizni // Kireevskiy I.V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy v 2 tomakh. T.2. M.: Izd-vo Tipografiya Imperatorskogo Moskovskogo Universiteta, 1911. 300 s.
19. Gromov M.N. Obraz sakral'noy premudrosti // Gromov M.N., Mil'kov V.V. Ideynye techeniya drevnerusskoy mysli. Spb.: Izd-vo RKhGI, 2001. 960 s.
20. Uayl'd O. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: V 2 t. M.: Respublika, 1993. T.2. 543 s.
21. Zen'kovskiy V.V. Russkie mysliteli i Evropa. M.: Respublika, 1997. 368 s.
22. Spirova E.M. Vliyanie Gel'derlina na tvorchestvo Gegelya // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 58 - 64. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2014.1.10898.
23. Gurevich P.S. Nuzhna li pedagogicheskaya antropologiya? // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2013. - 4. - C. 284 - 287. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2013.4.10535.