Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Police activity
Reference:

Lapina M.A., Karpukhin D.V., Buchenkov G.A. On the issue of the role of judicial practice for the determination of administrative offenñes as minor

Abstract: The subject of the article includes the current norms of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, regulating the concept of insignificance of an administrative offence, and the materials of judicial practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Arbitration Court and lower courts, containing the normative and causal interpretations of determination of minor administrative offences. At present, the administrative punishments, contained in the provisions of chapters 14 and 15 of the Code of Administrative Offences, for the violations in the sphere of the economy and finances, in the form of an administrative fine, disqualification and administrative suspension of activity, are very significant from the position of negative property consequences for the subjects of administrative responsibility – individuals, legal entities and persons possessing the official status. At the same time, the Code doesn't contain clear grounds for determination of minor offenses, what causes problems and ambiguous approaches of judicial authorities.The methodological basis of the study comprises recent achievements of epistemology. The authors apply general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), traditional legal methods (formal logical), and the methods used in specific sociological studies (statistical, expert evaluation, etc.).The authors conclude that it is necessary to ensure the legislative provision of the criteria of insignificance of administrative offences in the Code of Administrative Offences and to establish the list of compositions of administrative offences, which should not be determined as minor offences. The main contribution of the authors is the examination of the judicial practice and the revelation of ambiguity of interpretations of insignificance with respect to formal and material components of administrative offences.The novelty of the article lies in the proposals about the development of the criteria, regulating the insignificance of offenses.


Keywords:

minor offense, determination of offenses, punishment, administrative law, offence, administrative, officials, legal collision, act, right


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2005 ¹ 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF, ¹ 6, 2005.
2. Postanovleniya Plenuma VAS RF ot 02.06.2004 ¹ 10 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v sudebnoy praktike pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Vestnik VAS RF. 2004. ¹ 8.
3. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 19.12.2013 ¹ 40 «O vnesenii izmeneniy v postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 marta 2005 g. ¹ 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2014. ¹ 2.
4. Proekt Federal'nogo zakona ¹ 703192-6 «Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (Obshchaya chast')» (red., vnesennaya v GD FS RF, tekst po sostoyaniyu na 20.01.2015) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
5. Podval'nyy Yu.I. K voprosam o maloznachitel'nosti administrativnykh pravonarusheniy, voznikshikh v praktike arbitrazhnykh sudov Severo-zapadnogo okruga // Arbitrazhnye spory. 2009. ¹1.
6. Didenko A.N. Maloznachitel'nost' po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v sfere valyutnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2013. ¹2.
7. Zatsepin A.M. Otgranicheniya nepravomernykh deystviy
8. pri bankrotstve ot smezhnykh deyaniy. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 10. - C. 73 - 77.
9. Konstantinova L.V. Zakonodatel'stvo ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh gosudarstv - chlenov Tamozhennogo soyuza v chasti proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, otnesennykh k kompetentsii tamozhennykh organov // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 11. - C. 1187 - 1194. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.11.13087.
10. Zatsepin A.M. Otgranicheniya nepravomernykh deystviy
11. pri bankrotstve ot smezhnykh deyaniy. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 10. - C. 73 - 77.
12. Konstantinova L.V. Zakonodatel'stvo ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh gosudarstv - chlenov Tamozhennogo soyuza v chasti proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, otnesennykh k kompetentsii tamozhennykh organov // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 11. - C. 1187 - 1194. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.11.13087.