Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

History magazine - researches
Reference:

Solovey T.D. Between intuition and reason: research strategies in ethnological studies

Abstract: Although the structure and content of the “ethnography field” has radically transformed and the science of ethnography itself, clearly, is reorienting from the ethnic to the cultural-anthropological sphere, the myth of ethnography as a predominantly field discipline maintains its inertial influence in the professional environment. However, scientific practices – in the past and currently – attest to a multitude of research strategies (including their diverse combinations), rather than to the domination of a single one. The efficacy of one or another strategy is defined by its scientific fecundity. In the author’s hypothesis, empiricism and theoretical generalisation are not different stages, but are qualitatively diverse forms of scientific activity. Facts do not precede theory, but exactly the opposite: theory, setting forth an observation angle and structuring our perception of reality, shapes the subject field of science. Facts outside of theory do not exist. Yet the theory itself also has a starting point, which is based on a scientist’s pre-theoretical experience. Our ideological and political beliefs, our cultural baggage, and even our individual psychological profile and personal temperament, if do not strictly define, at least predispose towards the choice of a particular research position. Thus, a scientist’s chosen strategy is not so much a projection of rational calculations, as much as an intuitive (unconscious) inclination. Objective circumstances – ideological and political context, cultural and moral backgrounds, development level of the scientific discipline, type of socialisation – inevitably pass a succession of mediations through the human mentality. Only in this case can they have an influence on a researcher’s scientific priorities.


Keywords:

Dmitry Nikolaevich Anuchin, Nikolai Nikolaevich Miklouho-Maclay, , nationality discourse, strategies in ethnography, ethnographic field, history of Russian ethnological studies, Siberian “regionalism”, Yulian Vladimirovich Bromley, collecting ethnography, functionality in ethnography


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Bunak V. V. Deyatel'nost' D. N. Anuchina v oblasti antropologii // Russkii antropologicheskii zhurnal. 1924. T. 13. Vyp. 3–4. S. 3–11.
2. Devlet M. A. A. V. Adrianov kak etnograf // Repressirovannye etnografy. M.: «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 1999. S. 9–57.
3. Zhuravleva L. S. K istorii publikatsii «Programmy» V. N. Tenisheva // Sovetskaya etnografiya. 1979. ¹ 1. S. 122–123.
4. Krupnik I. I. Kul'turnye kontakty i ikh demograficheskie posledstviya v raione Beringova proliva // Amerika posle Kolumba: vzaimodeistvie dvukh mirov. M.: Nauka, 1992. S. 30–47.
5. Maksimov A. N. «Razbrosannost'» v nauke // Russkie vedomosti. 1913. ¹ 197. S. 3–5.
6. Markov G. E. Ocherki istorii nemetskoi nauki o narodakh. Chast' I. Nemetskaya etnologiya. M.: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN, 1993. 253 s.
7. Markov G. E. Nemetskaya etnologiya: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. M.: Akademicheskii proekt; Gaudeamus, 2004. 576 s.
8. Pimenov V. V. Ponyatie «etnos» v teoreticheskoi kontseptsii Yu. V. Bromleya // Akademik Yu. V. Bromlei i otechestvennaya etnologiya. 1960–1990-e gody / Otv. red. S. Ya. Kozlov; Institut etnologii i antropologii im. N. N. Miklukho-Maklaya. M.: Nauka, 2003. S. 12–18.
9. Pimenov V. V. Trud radi nauki // Blagodarim sud'bu za vstrechu s nim. (O Sergee Aleksandroviche Tokareve – uchenom i cheloveke). M.: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN, 1995. S. 70–83.
10. Putilov B. N. Nikolai Nikolaevich Miklukho-Maklai. Stranitsy biografii. M.: Nauka, 1981. 213 s.
11. Pypin A. N. Istoriya russkoi etnografii. T. I. Obshchii obzor izuchenii narodnosti i etnografiya velikorusskaya. SPb.: Tipografiya M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1890. 424 s.
12. Repressirovannye etnografy. Vyp. I. Sost. D. D. Tumarkin. M.: «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 1999. 343 s.
13. Semenov Yu. I. O moem «puti v pervobytnost'» // Akademik Yu. V. Bromlei i otechestvennaya etnologiya. 1960–1990-e gody / Otv. red. S. Ya. Kozlov; Institut etnologii i antropologii im. N. N. Miklukho-Maklaya. M.: Nauka, 2003. S. 164–212.
14. Solovei T. D. Vlast' i nauka v Rossii. Ocherki universitetskoi etnografii v distsiplinarnom kontekste (XIX – nachalo XXI vv.). M.: Prometei, 2004. 498 s.
15. Solovei T. D. Sovetskii mif o «kul'turnom geroe» // Rodina. 2011. ¹ 8. S. 125–129.
16. Solovei T. D. Ob''ektivnost' istoricheskoi nauki kak kul'turnyi mif // Mozhet li istoriya byt' ob''ektivnoi? Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, g. Moskva, 2 dekabrya 2011 g. / Trudy istoricheskogo fakul'teta MGU (54). Istoricheskie issledovaniya (19). M.: MGU, 2012. S. 179–189.
17. Solovei T. D. Mezhdu politikoi i naukoi: etnograficheskoe znanie v XVIII veke // Etnokul'turnye protsessy v proshlom i nastoyashchem. K yubileyu doktora istoricheskikh nauk, professora Klavdii Ivanovny Kozlovoi. Sb. nauchnykh statei. Trudy istoricheskogo fakul'teta MGU (57). Seriya 2. Istoricheskie issledovaniya (22). M.: MGU, 2012. S. 322–336.
18. Tishkov V. A. O Yu. V. Bromlee // Akademik Yu. V. Bromlei i otechestvennaya etnologiya. 1960–1990-e gody / Otv. red. S. Ya. Kozlov; Institut etnologii i antropologii im. N. N. Miklukho-Maklaya. M.: Nauka, 2003. S. 5–10.
19. Tokarev S. A. Istoriya russkoi etnografii. (Dooktyabr'skii period). M.: Nauka, 1966. 454 s.
20. Firsov B. M. Teoreticheskie vzglyady V. N. Tenisheva // Sovetskaya etnografiya. 1988. ¹ 3. S. 15–27.
21. Firsov B. M. Krest'yanskaya programma V. N. Tenisheva i nekotorye rezul'taty ee realizatsii // Sovetskaya etnografiya. 1988. ¹ 4. S. 38–48.