Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

LEX RUSSICA (Russian Law)
Reference:

Kruglikov, L.L. Definition, bases and types of differentiation of responsibility for crimes and other offences

Abstract: The article provides the definition of differentiation of legal responsibility, regarding the matter of its types, discussing the problem of its bases. Special attention is given to the goal of guaranteeing the succession of various types of responsibility in law, provision of demarcation lines between them by the law. The author understand differentiation of legal responsibility as establishing its various types (forms) by the law depending on the most typical characteristic features, providing for general characteristics of various groups of offences. The basis for the interdisciplinary legal differentiation is first of all the character of danger of the relevant type of behavior or the character of its public danger, harmfulness. In this respect, there is need to follow certain rules, including succession in the process of interdisciplinary differentiation, including the sphere of legal responsibility. From the “vertical” standpoint, the article singles out the following types of responsibility differentiation of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: a) legal; b) interdisciplinary; c) within a single branch of law (criminal law, criminal responsibility); d) institutions of criminal law; e) within a group or sub-group of norms; f) within a specific norm. Within a branch of law, it is acceptable to differentiate among: 1) the bases for legal responsibility; 2) forms (types) of responsibility; 3) amount of criminal responsibility and criminal punishment.


Keywords:

crime, other offence, legal responsibility, differentiation of responsibility, characteristic features of differentiation, bases for legal differentiation, classification of responsibility differentiation, interdisciplinary legal differentiation, differentiation of criminal responsibility, criminal legislation.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Korobeev, A.I., Uss, A.V., Golik, Yu.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya politika: tendentsii i perspektivy.-Krasnoyarsk, 1991.-S.91.
2. Kratkiy slovar' inostrannykh slov / Sost. S.M.Lokshina. M., 1978.-S.99.
3. Mel'nikova, Yu.B. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost': sushchnost', ponyatie, differentsiatsiya / Yu.B. Mel'nikova // Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave i protsesse.-Yaroslavl', 1994.-S.12.
4. Korobov, P.V. Ponyatie differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti / P.V. Korobov Ponyatie differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Differentsiatsiya formy i soderzhaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve.-Yaroslavl', 1995.-S.3,4.
5. Lesnievski-Kostareva, T.A. Differentsiatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti. Teoriya i zakonodatel'naya praktika. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop.-M., 2000.-S.63, 368.
6. Alekseev, N.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie polozheniya seksual'nykh men'shinstv: Rossiya v svete praktiki mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy i natsional'nogo zakonodatel'stva stran mira.-M., 2002.-S.42-43.
7. Kurlyandskiy, V.I. Ugolovnaya politika, differentsiatsiya i individualizatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti / V.I. Kurlyandskiy //Osnovnye napravleniya bor'by s prestupnost'yu.-M., 1975.-S.78.
8. Mel'nikova, Yu.B. Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti i individualizatsiya nakazaniya.-Krasnoyarsk, 1989.-S.17.
9. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002. ¹44. St.4298.
10. Sbornik postanovleniy Plenumov Verkhovnogo Suda RF (RSFSR) i Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR po ugolovnym delam /sost. G.A. Esakov. – M., 2010.-S.58.
11. Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF.-2008. ¹1.-S.3.
12. Lopashenko, N.A. Prestuplenie v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti i administrativnoe pravonarushenie v etoy zhe sfere: problemy sootnosheniya / N.A. Lopashenko // Aktual'nye problemy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti za narusheniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti i nalogooblozheniya: Materialy vtoroy nauch.-prakt. konf.-Yaroslavl', 2002.-S.14-18.
13. Perch, N.V. Nepoluchenie dolzhnogo kak vid imushchestvennogo ushcherba (na primere st.165 UK RF): ponyatie, vliyanie na otvetstvennost' i na kvalifikatsiyu: Avtoref. diss. …kand. yurid. nauk. / N.V. Perch-M., 2003.-S.16.
14. Kurs ugolovnogo prava v 5 t. T.4: Osobennaya chast' /Pod red. G.N. Borzenkova i V.S. Komissarova.-M., 2002.-S.322.
15. Rossiyskoe zakonodatel'stvo Kh-KhKh. vv. V 9 t. T.6: Zakonodatel'stvo pervoy poloviny KhIKh v.-M., 1988.-S.172.
16. Kruglikov, L.L., Vasil'evskiy, A.V. Rets. na kn. Lesnievski-Kostarevoy T.A. Differentsiatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: Teoriya i zakonodatel'naya praktika. M., 1998. 287 s. //Normotvorcheskaya i pravoprimenitel'naya tekhnika v ugolovnom i ugolovno-protsessual'nom prave.-Yaroslavl', 2000.-S.171.
17. Kruglikov, L.L., Kostareva, T.A.. Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti kak ugolovno-pravovaya kategoriya //Kategorial'nyy apparat ugolovnogo prava i protsessa.-Yaroslavl', 1993.-S.110-111.
18. Vasil'evskiy, A.V. Differentsiatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya v Obshchey chasti ugolovnogo prava: Avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk. /A.V. Vasil'evskiy.-N.Novgorod, 2000.-S.4.
19. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Chast' Osobennaya /Otv. red. L.L.Kruglikov.-M.,2012.-S.55-58.