Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Serov, A.S. Administrative procedural legal personality of participants of the proceedings on administrative offence cases

Abstract: The studies of administrative legal position of participants of the administrative offence cases shows that the problem of guaranteeing rights and lawful interests of a person in the proceedings on administrative offence cases has several main aspects regarding proceedings on administrative offence cases, application of administrative coercion measures, activities of the state in the sphere of guaranteeing rights and lawful interests of natural persons and legal entities in the administrative legal sphere. The author of the article notes importance of the improvement of the procedural status of the participant of the proceedings on administrative offence cases. The methodological basis for the studies was formed by the modern achievements of cognition theory. In the process of preparation of this article the authors used general philosophical, theoretical and empiric methods (dialectics, systemic method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), traditional legal methods (formal logic method), and methods typical for specific sociological studies (statistical, expert evaluation, etc.). The studies of administrative procedural status of the participants of proceedings on administrative offence cases are quite topical. It is due to a number of circumstances, one of which is the fact that for all of the branches of law “legal position of the subject of law” is a key category, revealing a number of substantial legal institutions. Additionally, the development of Russian legislation on administrative offenses may be characterized by a number of contradictions in the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, which form obstacles for the achievement of all of the goals of the proceedings on administrative offences cases.


Keywords:

delict, delictual dispositive capacity, legal personality, transactional capacity, sanction, responsibility, status, participant, punishment, sanction.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya sovetskogo prava.-M., 1982. T.
2. Aleksandrov N.G. Zakonnost' i pravootnosheniya v sovetskom obshchestve.-M., 1985.
3. Bratus' S.N. Sub'ekty grazhdanskogo prava.-M., 1950.
4. Blazhko A.K. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya, primenyaemaya v sudebnom poryadke: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-L., 1970.
5. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / Pod red. V.K. Babaeva.-M., 1999.
6. Gatinyan A.A. Pravovoy status i osushchestvlenie strukturnykh elementov norm // Problemy pravovogo statusa sub'ektov prava.-Kaliningrad, 1976.
7. Galagan I.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR (protsessual'noe regulirovanie).-Voronezh, 1976.
8. Gavrilenko D.A., Podupeyko A.A. Problemy administrativnoy otvetstvennosti spetsial'nykh sub'ektov // Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'. Problemy teorii i praktiki.-Minsk, 1996.
9. Denisov Yu.A. Obshchaya teoriya pravonarusheniya i otvetstvennosti.-L., 1983.
10. Zheruolis I.A. Sudoproizvodstvo po administrativnym delam // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo.-1970.-¹ 2.
11. Ispolnitel'naya vlast' v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Problemy razvitiya / Pod red. I.L. Bachilo.-M., 1998.
12. Kotlyarevskiy G.S., Nazarov B.L. Problemy teorii prava: Vyp. 1.-M., 1973.
13. Koval' L.V. Administrativno-deliktnoe otnoshenie.-Kiev, 1979.
14. Kozlov Yu.M. Sushchnost' i vidy administrativnogo protsessa // Administrativnoe pravo Rossii / Pod red. Yu.M. Kozlova, L.L. Popova.-M., 1999.
15. Lazarev B.M. Kompetentsiya organov upravleniya.-M., 1972.
16. Matveev S.I. Ponyatie i vidy spetsial'nykh sub'ektov administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Kodeks RSFSR ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: voprosy okhrany sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti i obshchestvennogo poryadka.-Gor'kiy, 1985.
17. Mikhaylov A.A. Litsa, uchastvuyushchie v proizvodstve po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Kodeks RSFSR ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: voprosy okhrany sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti i obshchestvennogo poryadka.-Gor'kiy, 1985.
18. Mishkinis A.P. Uchastniki proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 1986.
19. Maslennikov M.Ya. Polnomochiya sud'i rayonnogo suda pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2002.-¹ 7.
20. Novikov V.P. Novikov V.P. Fizicheskie i yuridicheskie litsa kak poterpevshie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2004.
21. Sorokin V.D. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo.-M., 1972.
22. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Teoriya kompetentsii.-M., 2001.
23. Shergin A.P. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya.-M., 1979.
24. Yakimov A.Yu. Status sub'ekta administrativnoy yurisdiktsii i problemy ego realizatsii.-M., 1999.
25. Kupreev S.S. Pravovaya otvetstvennost' gosudarstva pri primenenii mer obespecheniya proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 4. - C. 70 - 75.
26. Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html