Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

LEX RUSSICA (Russian Law)
Reference:

Antonova, E.Y. Theoretical model for the corporate (collective) criminal responsibility

Abstract: The article concerns an issue of theoretical model of corporate (collective) criminal responsibility. The author defines the factors, which socially provide for the corporate (collective) criminal responsibility, she analyzes the correlation between collective civil, administrative and criminal responsibility, as well as the mechanism of criminal activities of corporate (collective) entities. The article contains a conclusion that corporate (collective) criminal responsibility should only be applied in cases, when other means (civil or administrative) applicable to collective entities fail to restore social justice and prevent new harmful acts towards the social relations protected by criminal law. The mechanism of unlawful acts of corporate (collective) entities arises from the criminal corporate culture, which may be understood as a policy, means of management, course of activities or practice of a corporate (collective) entity as a whole or of its structural divisions, within the process of which the unlawful activities in the name of (or in the interests of) a corporate (collective) entity is allowed, supported or neglected by the managing persons. Additionally, the article provides for the conditions for the corporate (collective) criminal responsibility, and the conditions eliminating criminal character of activities of legal entities and other collective entities, punishments and other means of criminal legal character, which may be applicable to a collective entity.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, criminal responsibility, corporate culture, corporate entity, legal entity, collective subject, corporate guilt, subject of responsibility, social prerequisites, public danger, comparative analysis.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Bezverkhov A.G. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomiki i ugolovnyy zakon // Prestupnost' i pro-blemy bor'by s ney / pod obshch. red. A.I. Dolgovoy, V.I. Kanygina. — M., 2007.
2. Biryukov P.N. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits za prestupleniya v sfere eko-nomiki (opyt inostrannykh gosudarstv). — M., 2008.
3. Bor'ba s deyatel'nost'yu yuridicheskikh lits kak sub'ektov organizovannoy prestupnoy deya-tel'nosti (postanovka problemy) // Sayt Vladivostokskogo tsentra issledovaniya organi-zovannoy prestupnosti pri Yuridicheskom institute DVGU // URL: www.crime.vl.ru
4. Gaponenko V.F., Mel'nikov A.B., Eriashvili N.D. Finansovo-pravovye osobennosti kri-minalizatsii kholdingovykh korporatsiy. — M., 2003.
5. Gorbuza A.D., Sukharev E.A. Struktura prestupnosti // Voprosy sovershenstvovaniya ugolov-no-pravovykh norm na sovremennom etape. — Sverdlovsk, 1986.
6. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik: v 2 t. / pod red. E.A. Sukhanova. — M., 1998. T. 1.
7. Zhalinskiy A.E. Sovremennoe nemetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. — M., 2006.
8. Zhevlakov E. K voprosu ob otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits za sovershenie ekologiche-skikh prestupleniy // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2002. — ¹ 1.
9. Ivanov L. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits // Zakon. — 1998. — ¹ 9.
10. Kelina S.G. Otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits v proekte UK RF // Ugolovnoe pravo: novye idei / otv. red. S.G. Kelina, A.V. Naumov. — M., 1994.
11. Klepitskiy I.A. Sistema khozyaystvennykh prestupleniy. — M., 2005.
12. Kruglikov L.L., Vasil'evskiy A.V. Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave. — SPb., 2002.
13. Krylova N.E. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits (korporatsiy): sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz // Vzaimodeystvie mezhdunarodnogo i sravnitel'nogo ugolovnogo prava / nauch. red. N.F. Kuznetsova; otv. red. V.S. Komissarov. — M., 2009.
14. Kuznetsova N.F. Kodifikatsiya norm o khozyaystvennykh prestupleniyakh // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 11. Pravo. — 1993. — ¹ 4.
15. Kul'kov M. Metody protivodeystviya proizvodstvu i rasprostraneniyu kontrafaktnoy produktsii // Korporativnyy yurist. — 2006. — ¹ 8.
16. Naumov A. Predpriyatie na skam'e podsudimykh? // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. — 1992. — ¹ 17–18.
17. Obzor po voprosam sudebnoy praktiki, svyazannoy s naznacheniem administrativnogo naka-zaniya yuridicheskim litsam i individual'nym predprinimatelyam // Ekonomicheskoe pravo-sudie na Dal'nem Vostoke. — 2008. — ¹ 4.
18. Otkliki na proekt opublikovannogo UK Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1992. — ¹ 6.
19. Petrov V.V. Ekologicheskie prestupleniya: ponyatie i sostavy // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1993. — ¹ 8.
20. Sergeevich V.I. Lektsii i issledovaniya po drevney istorii russkogo prava. — M., 2004.
21. SShA: ushcherb ot korporativnoy prestupnosti — $ 200 mlrd v god // URL: http://www.oxpaha. ru/view.asp?15077.
22. Frolov S.S. Sotsiologiya organizatsiy. — M., 2001.
23. Simpson S.S. Corporate crime, law, and social control. Cambridge University Press, 2002