Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Shashkova A.V. The mechanisms of counteracting corporate corruption

Abstract: The subject of this research is the analysis of interaction between the state and business on the matter concerning counteraction of corruption. The author thoroughly examines the models of interaction between those who give the bribes and those who receive the bribes, such as bilateral monopoly, stronger positions of bribe takers or bribe givers, as well as fragmentariness of bribe givers and bribe takers. The article presents the analysis of the political and economic components for the emergence of one or another model of interaction between the bribe givers and bribe takers. The substantiated conclusion is made on the necessity of increasing of the general and corporate legal awareness of the parties and corporations for the successful counteraction of corruption. Thus, the corporations consciously implement the principles of compliance in their corporate activity. This article conducts a research of the historical development of business practice in the United States regarding the application of the principle of compliance. The author compares the practices of counteracting corruption in the Unites States and Great Britain. Based on the report by Transparency International, the author examines the status and place of the Russian Federation with regards to corruption, as well as makes a conclusion on the need to implement the principle of compliance towards the Russian corporations. The scientific novelty consists in the in-depth analysis of the introduced in Russia court decisions, normative legal acts and good faith agreement, as well as their comparison with the implementation of the UK Bribery act on the question of counteracting corruption.  The scientific novelty consists in the author’s attempt to formulate a politological concept on the practice of counteracting corruption, international and domestic problems on the fight against laundering the illegal incomes, as well as the assessment of the foreign experience on this matter. The main conclusion lies in the concept of cooperation between the government and business to prevent the general and corporate corruption.


Keywords:

collaboration, counterracting corruption, political methods, bilateral monopoly, bribe taker, corporate corruption, bribe giver, law and business, FIFA, international problems


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Federal'nyy zakon ¹134-FZ ot 28 iyunya 2013 goda vnes izmeneniya v p.8 st.32.1. Zakona ob organizatsii strakhovogo dela v Rossiyskoy Federatsii ¹4015-1 ot 27 noyabrya 1992 goda.
2. Federal'nyy zakon ¹151-FZ «O mikrofinansovoy deyatel'nosti i mikrofinansovykh organizatsiyakh» ot 2 iyulya 2010 goda.
3. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ¹24 ot 9 iyulya 20013g.
4. Bribery Act 2010. URL: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/23/contents.
5. Vel'yaminov G.M. Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo i protsess. M., 2004. §734.
6. Kuvalin D.B. Ekonomicheskaya politika i povedenie predpriyatiy: mekhanizmy vzaimnogo vliyaniya // M.: MAKS Press,-2009.-S. 157.-?
7. Makarychev A.S. «Mozgovye tsentry» i issledovaniya korruptsii: novye grani rossiyskogo ekspertnogo diskursa. URL: http://www.policy.hu/makarychev/rus22.htm
8. Roldugin O. Korruptsiya v Sochi b'et mirovye rekordy / O. Roldugin // Sobesednik.ru. – 2001. – 12 sentyabrya. URL: http://sobesednik.ru/scandals/korruptsiya-v-sochi-bet-mirovye-rekordy
9. Sheretov S.G. Professional'naya etika yurista. Sbornik dokumentov. Almaty. 2008. S.60-?
10. Cartier-Bresson J. 1997, “Corruption network, transaction security and illegal social exchange”, Political Studies, 45 (3), 463-476.
11. Drew K. Compliance with anti-corruption laws through access to public procurement: sanctioning or voluntary self-regulation, background paper for workshop 4. // OECD global forum on governance—fighting corruption and promoting public integrity in public procurement. – 2004.-29–30 November.
12. Fong D. German firms not affected by Siemens scandal, experts say, deutsche welle world online. // Stuttgart.-2008.-7 May (accessed 6 June 2008). URL: http://www.mf.mpg.de/en/abteilungen/roke/news.html
13. Goldman. M. Political Graft: The Russian way // Current History. – 2005.-October.-R. 313–318.
14. Rose-Ackerman S., 1999, Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences and Reform, Cambridge University Press.
15. Stiglitz J. Making globalization work // American Library Association.-2006.
16. Tanzi V. Global financial crime: Terrorism, money laundering and offshore centres. // M.: Publishing House of SU HSE.-2004.-R. ix-x.
17. V.N. Ageev Pravovye mekhanizmy proti vodeystviya korruptsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: regional'nyy opyt (na primere Respubliki Tatarstan) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 1. - C. 16 - 23. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.01.4.
18. Bakhtina M.S. Aktual'nye problemy provedeniya antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy normativnykh pravovykh aktov organami Prokuratury RF. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 2. - C. 209 - 214. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.2.13872.