Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Khachatryan, A. K. Application of the Rules about Relief from Criminal Responsibility for Crime Committed in the Sphere of Economic Activity: Problems and Prospects

Abstract: The article discusses the issues related to the application of the rules about relief from criminal responsibility set by Part 2 of Article 761 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Based on the established rules of the relief from criminal responsibility, the author analyzes grounds and conditions for application of these rules as well as problems that may arise as a result thereto. In particular, the author analyzes the questions about the list of crimes Part 2 of Article 761 of the Criminal Code of the RF is applicable to as well as the compensation of damage as a condition for relief from criminal responsibility. The author studies the reasons why Part 2 of Article 761 of the Criminal Code of the RF sometimes cannot be applied to particular practical causes including punishment for economic crime. The article is based on the technical method of analyzing the practice of the application of rules about relief from criminal responsibility set forth by Part 2 of Article 761 of the Criminal Code of the RF. The author also uses the statistical method for evaluating the effi ciency of the application of these rules. According to the author, the latest version of Article 761 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation fails to be effi cient which is caused by such factors as a super high measure of damages, one’s inability to contest this measure of damage before the court, low effi ciency of work performed by law enforcement agencies leading to frequent expirations of the statute of limitations, relatively soft sanctions of the criminal law which makes it more advantageous for a convict to undergo punishment rather than compensate the damage. Taking all these circumstances and factors into account, the author offers amendments to the existing criminal law to make these rules actually effective.


Keywords:

Relief, criminal responsibility, crime, sphere of economic activity, harm, profi t, damage, large scale, active repentance, legal consequences.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. M. S. Turchenko. Politicheskaya povestka dnya v diskursivnykh praktikakh V.V. Putina v period izbiratel'nykh kampanii federal'nogo urovnya 2000-2012 godov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107.
2. I.V. Deklerk. Naturalisticheskie kontseptsi sotsial'no-kommunikativnoi obshchnosti // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2011. – ¹ 7. – S. 104-107
3. M. I. Bocharov, T. I. Bocharova. Global'noe kommunikativnoe prostranstvo: problemy bezopasnosti obshcheniya // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
4. V.M. Rozin. Diskursivnye kommunikatsii i sotsial'noe normirovanie // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107.
5. A.Ya. Neimatova. Bezopasnost' i mirolyubie kak klyuchevye komponenty blagopriyatnogo imidzha strany za rubezhom // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107.
6. I.V. Annenkova. Mesto ritoriki v zarubezhnoi i otechestvennoi filologii // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2012. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107.
7. P.S. Gurevich. Perevoploshchenie teksta v ideologiyu // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.04.1
8. A.G. Sokolov. Krizisnyi diskurs «Edinoi Rossii» i KPRF: sravnitel'nyi analiz // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.02.2
9. V.M. Rozin. Osobennosti obshchestvenno-politicheskogo diskursa // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107.
10. Valiullin I.I.. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «informatsionnaya voina» v politicheskoi nauke // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10064
11. Nikolaev I.V.. Verbal'nye simvoly v strukture politicheskoi ideologii // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.12.10348
12. Chironova I.I.. Kognitivnaya struktura kontsepta «Vlast'» v russkoyazychnom i angloyazychnom politicheskikh diskursakh // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.9542
13. Zaitsev A.V.. Deliberativnaya demokratiya v kontekste dialoga gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.10.7708
14. M.V. Smirnova-Seslavinskaya. Problema sub''ekta rechi i mezhkul'turnoi kommunikatsii v lingvoantropologicheskom issledovanii men'shinstv // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2013.2.6785
15. M.E. Boiko. Strukturnyi analiz i tipologiya aktorov v narrativnoi kul'ture // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.8.8938
16. Solov'ev O. G., Knyaz'kov A. A. Ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti po delam o prestupleniyakh v sfere ekonomicheskoi deyatel'nosti (stat'ya 761 UK RF) // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2012. ¹ 7.
17. S.S. Neretina. Diskursivnyi razbeg // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.6.8732
18. Krylov E. I vnov' gumanizatsiya? // EZh-Yurist. 2012. ¹ 7.
19. Sereda I. M., Sukhanov S. V. Nekotorye pravovye mery spetsial'nogo kharaktera, napravlennye na preduprezhdenie nezakonnogo predprinimatel'stva // Rossii-skii sledovatel'. 2013. ¹ 16.
20. Kibal'nik A. Ponimanie Plenumom Verkhovnogo Suda osvobozhdeniya ot ugolov-noi otvetstvennosti // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2014. ¹ 1.
21. Il'yutchenko N. V. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti po delam o pre-stupleniyakh v sfere ekonomicheskoi deyatel'nosti: usloviya i mekhanizm realiza-tsii // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo. 2013. ¹ 3.
22. Egorova N. Reforma Ugolovnogo kodeksa RF (dekabr' 2011 g.): problemy prime-neniya novykh norm // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. ¹ 3.
23. Epikhin A. Yu. Nalozhenie aresta na imushchestvo kak mera obespecheniya ispolneniya prigovora v vide znachitel'nogo shtrafa // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2012. ¹ 16.
24. Golik Yu. Ocherednaya modernizatsiya Ugolovnogo kodeksa // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. ¹ 2.
25. Gracheva Yu. V. Sudeiskoe usmotrenie v primenenii ugolovno-pravovykh norm: problemy i puti ikh resheniya. M., 2011.
26. Adoevskaya O. O probleme unifikatsii mezhdunarodnykh, zarubezhnykh i natsio-nal'nykh norm o bor'be s korruptsiei // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. ¹ 3.
27. Nikolaeva Yu.V.. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave. // Pravo i politika. – 2005. – ¹ 7. – S. 104-107.
28. R. I. Peizak. Osobennosti osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti v zakonodatel'stve stran kontinental'noi pravovoi sistemy // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107.
29. Bukalerova L.A., Shel'menkova Ya.Yu.. K voprosu ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti v svyazi s istecheniem srokov davnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 9. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.896