Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Bakharev D.V. Spatial thinking in criminology. Part I. Theoretical prerequisites and methodological basis for application of methods of spatial analysis in cognition of the mechanism of determination of crime

Abstract: The object of this research is the capabilities and prospects of using the achievements of spatial science in criminological research. The subject of this research is the theoretical prerequisites and methodological basis for application of methods of spatial analysis in cognition of the mechanismof determination of crime. The author raises the question on the importance of formation within the modern researcher of regularities of formation of territorial differences in the indexes of crime of a specific spatial or geographic thinking. It allows grasping the regularities of the functionality of a particular social system within the spatial aspect, which in turn can be “layered” onto already known regularities of formation of the territorial differences in crime and as a result, expand the understanding of the mechanism of determination of crime overall. The scientific novelty of this research consists in the analysis of the theoretical prerequisites and development of methodological basis for spatial analysis of the socioeconomic events and processes, including crime. Spatial analysis is being positioned as an autonomous, narrower direction of scientific research within the framework of geography of crime, which in turn represents one of the sections of criminological theory of determination, studying the causal complex of criminality in the theoretical aspect.


Keywords:

Mechanism of determination of crime, Causes of crime, Spatial science, Spatial thinking, Spatial analysis, Geography of crime, Territorial differences in crime, Territorial socioeconomic systems, Modelling, Systemic approach


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Nefedova T.G. Szhatie vnegorodskogo osvoennogo prostranstva Rossii: real'nost', a ne illyuziya // Szhatie sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo prostranstva: novoe v teorii regional'nogo razvitiya i praktike ego gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya. M.: Eslan, 2010. S. 128-145.
2. Kolomak E. Neravnomernoe prostranstvennoe razvitie v Rossii: ob''yasneniya novoi ekonomicheskoi geografii // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 132-149.
3. Kuznetsova O. Piramida faktorov sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 121-131.
4. Fujita M., Krugman P. and Venables A.J. The Spatial Economy. Sities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999. 367 p.
5. Fujita M., Krugman P. The New Economic Geography: Past, Present and the Future // Papers in Regional Science. 2003. Vol. 83. ¹ 1. pp. 139-164.
6. Spiridonov L., Leps A. Teoreticheskie voprosy izucheniya territorial'nykh razlichii prestupnosti // Teoreticheskie problemy izucheniya territorial'nykh razlichii prestupnosti. Tartu, 1985. Vyp. 725. S. 3-18.
7. Raska E.E. Prestupnost' kak pokazatel' sostoyaniya sotsial'nogo prostranstva (K voprosu ob obosnovanii territorial'nogo podkhoda k izucheniyu prestupnosti) // Teoreticheskie problemy izucheniya territorial'nykh razlichii v prestupnosti. Tartu, 1987. Vyp. 761. S. 28-29.
8. Bakharev D.V. K voprosu o predmete i soderzhanii geografii prestupnosti kak odnogo iz napravlenii issledovaniya prichinnogo kompleksa prestupnosti // Kriminologicheskii zhurnal Baikal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2012. ¹ 1. S. 32-38.
9. Bakharev D.V. Ispol'zovanie integral'nykh pokazatelei v issledovanii sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh faktorov territorial'noi differentsiatsii urovnya prestupnosti: istoriya i sovremennye perspektivy // Kriminologicheskii zhurnal Baikal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 33-41.
10. Bakharev D.V. Kharakter sovremennykh demograficheskikh protsessov v Rossii i ikh uchet pri izuchenii prichin prestupnosti // Problemy kodifikatsii ugolovnogo zakona: istoriya, sovremennost', budushchee (Posvyashchaetsya 200-letiyu proekta Ugolovnogo ulozheniya 1813 goda) // Materialy VIII Rossiiskogo kongressa ugolovnogo prava, sostoyavshegosya 30-31 maya 2013 g. M., 2013. S. 400-404.
11. Izuchenie prestupnosti v gorodakh i sel'skoi mestnosti / M.M. Babaev, I.I. Karpets, E.V. Kuznetsova, A.S. Nikiforov i dr. M.: Yurid. lit-ra, 1971. 212 c.
12. Vliyanie sotsial'nykh uslovii na territorial'nye razlichiya v prestupnosti / M.M. Babaev, V.K. Zvirbul', E.B. Mel'nikova i dr. M.: Izd-vo Vsesoyuz. in-ta po izuch. prichin i razrab. mer preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti, 1977. 140 c.
13. Babaev M.M., Kuznetsova E.V., Urlanis E.B. Vliyanie demograficheskikh protsessov na prestupnost'. M.: Yurid. lit-ra, 1976. 176 s.
14. Bakharev D.V. Vozmozhnosti territorial'nogo podkhoda v ramkakh provedeniya kriminologicheskoi ekspertizy Evraziiskoi transportnoi sistemy // Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 141-145.
15. Pivovarov Yu.L. Al'ternativnaya kontseptsiya makroregional'nogo razvitiya Rossii: szhatie intensivno osvoennogo prostranstva // Mir Rossii. 1996. ¹ 2. S. 63-74.
16. Baranskii N.N. Izbrannye trudy: Stanovlenie sovetskoi ekonomicheskoi geografii. M.: Mysl', 1980. 239 s.