Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Leusenko, D. A. Integrated legal consciousness and the genetic method in legal sciences

Abstract: This article considers the problems of establishing a theory of integrated legal consciousness in Russia, outlines the particulars of developing the genetic method in the Russian school of legal sociology, and presents an analysis of the theoretical position of Bogdan Kistyakovsky in relation to the possibility of objective law and the role of the inherent concept of the “public sphere” when discussing the nature of law. The article focuses on the essence of the genetic method of learning and the nature of the historiographical situation in Russian legal science at the turn of the 20th century. For Kistyakovsky, the hermeneutical schema was of particular importance in the formation of the genetic method in Russian legal sociology. This alludes to the logical relationship between the reality of objective laws and the normative system of society – the social norms which form society. The framework of the genetic method gives rise to an understanding of law primarily through the study of the problems of the origins of law: the study of the nature of law which brings about its operationality. The problems of the origins of law were touched upon by the majority of the representatives of the Russian school of integrative legal consciousness (Maxim Kovalevsky, Sergey Muromtsev, Bogdan Kistyakovsky). On the one hand, contemporary discussion of the types of legal consciousness is characterized by an increased interest in the problem of generating a consistent integrative theory of legal consciousness. On the other hand, there is a lack of serious theoretical interest in the pragmatic and practical tradition of the study of law using the genetic method, as outlined in Russian jurisprudence in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.


Keywords:

normative theory of law, school of legal sociology, legal autonomy, origins of law, social norms, objective law, genetic method, integrated legal consciousness, scientific-integrated approach, operationality of law


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Apanasevich O.O. M.M. Kovalevskiy o predmete i metode geneticheskoy sotsiologii prava // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – ¹
2. S. 285-290. 2.Goyman-Kalinskiy I.V., Ivanets G.I., Chervonyuk V.I. Elementarnye nachala obshchey teorii prava: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov / Pod obshchey red. d-ra yurid. nauk, prof. V.I. Chervonyuka. M.: KolosS, 2003. 544 s.
3. Grafskiy V.G. Istoriya politicheskikh i pravovykh ucheniy : uchebnik. – 3-e izd., dop. M.: Norma, 2009. 736 s.
4. Ershov V.V. Rossiyskoe pravo s pozitsii legizma i integrativnogo pravoponimaniya // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. – 2011 – ¹ 10. S. 5-22.
5. Kistyakovskiy B.A. Krizis yurisprudentsii i diletantizm v filosofii // Yuridicheskiy vestnik. 1914, kn. 5. S. 70-106.
6. Kistyakovskiy B.A. Real'nost' ob'ektivnogo prava // Sotsial'nye nauki i pravo. M.: Izdanie M. i S. Sabashnikovykh, 1916. 704 s.
7. Mal'tsev G.V. Nravstvennye osnovaniya prava. M.: Izd-vo SGU, 2008. 552 s.
8. Novgorodtsev P.I. Krizis sovremennogo pravosoznaniya: Vvedenie v filosofiyu prava. Vyp. 2. M.: Tipo-lit. t-va I.N. Kushnerev i Ko, 1909.
9. Polyakov A.V. Peterburgskaya shkola filosofii prava i zadachi sovremennogo pravovedeniya // Pravovedenie. – 2000. – ¹ 2.
10. Syrykh V.M. Istoriya i metodologiya yuridicheskoy nauki: uchebnik. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2012.
11. Timoshina E.V. Ideya «sinteza» v rossiyskoy teorii prava i problema integral'noy yurisprudentsii // Entsiklopediya pravovedeniya ili integral'naya yurisprudetsiya? Problemy izucheniya i prepodavaniya». Sed'mye filosofsko-pravovye chteniya pamyati akademika V.S. Nersesyantsa. Tezisy uchastnikov. M.: Rossiyskaya sektsiya mezhdunarodnoy assotsiatsii pravovoy i sotsial'noy filosofii, 2012.
12. Chernenko A.K. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty formirovaniya pravovoy sistemy obshchestva. Diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora yuridicheskikh nauk. M.: 2006.