Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Sumachev, A.V. On the issue of the definition of cultural values and improvement of the administrative legal regime of their protection.

Abstract: The article is devoted to the mechanism of administrative legal protection of cultural heritage and cultural values. The necessary precondition for such activity is the due definition of cultural values. The author of this article defines the terms of \"cultural heritage\" and \"cultural values\", as well as administrative means of their protection, based on the systemic approach and the provisions of constitutional, administrative and culture protection legislation. Then she points out the favorable and unfavorable conditions for the greater efficiency of such protection. Then the author analyzes the development of the institutions of administrative law, which are meant to improve administrative legal regime of protection of cultural heritage and cultural values.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, cultural heritage, archaeological heritage, administrative legal regime, mechanism for administrative legal protection, administrative law, the science of administrative law.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Baskov V.A. Kompleksnye mery protivodeystviya prestupnym posyagatel'stvam na kul'turnye tsennosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk, M., 2006. 30 s.
2. Bratanov V.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za posyagatel'stva na kul'turnye tsennosti v Rossii: retrospektivnyy analiz // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2007. ¹ 12. S. 9-11.
3. Gaydashov A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za khishcheniya predmetov, imeyushchikh osobuyu istoricheskuyu, nauchnuyu ili kul'turnuyu tsennost': diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. M.: Yurid. in-t MVD Rossii, 1997. 167 s.
4. Gerasimova E.V. O probleme zakonodatel'nogo opredeleniya ponyatiya «kul'turnye tsennosti» // Problemy rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva: istoriya i sovremennost': materialy Mezhregional'noy nauch.prakt. konf. (2-3 fevr. 2007 g., g. Tol'yatti). Samara: Izd-vo Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii, 2007. Ch. 2. S. 13-22.
5. Goloviznin A.V. Soderzhanie prava sobstvennosti na kul'turnye tsennosti // Aktual'nye problemy tsivilisticheskikh otrasley prava: mezhvuzovskiy sb. nauch. tr. Vyp.
6. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo yurid. in-ta MVD Rossii, 2007. S. 104-108. 6. Klebanov L.R. O rodovom ob'ekte prestupleniy, posyagayushchikh na kul'turnye tsennosti // «Chernye dyry» v Rossiyskom Zakonodatel'stve. 2009. ¹ 2. S. 89-93.
7. Medvedev E.V. Kul'turnye tsennosti kak predmet ugolovno-pravovoy okhrany / otv. red. A.I. Chuchaev. M.: Yurist, 2004. 177 s.
8. Paleeva O.L. Zashchita kul'turnykh tsennostey: nezakonnyy vvoz, vyvoz i peredacha prava sobstvennosti na kul'turnye tsennosti // Rossiyskiy ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2004. Spets. vypusk. Spb.: Rossiya – Neva, 2005. S. 146-153.
9. Pridanov S.A., Shcherba S.P. Prestupleniya, posyagayushchie na kul'turnye tsennosti Rossii: kvalifikatsiya i rassledovanie. M.: Yurlitinform, 2002. 520 s.
10. Sabitov T.R. Okhrana kul'turnykh tsennostey: ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekty: diss. na soisk. … kand. yurid. nauk. Chelyabinsk: Chelyab. un-t, 2002. 196 s.
11. Sobchenko V.P. K voprosu ob obosnovannosti st. 164 UK RF // Nauchnye issledovaniya vysshey shkoly: sb. tez. dokl. i soobshch. na itogovoy nauch.-prakt. konf. (8 fevr. 2006 g.). Tyumen': Tyumenskiy YuI MVD Rossii, 2006. S. 74-75