Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Izhikov, M.Y. Regional systems of protection of human rights and national law: problems and interactions.

Abstract: The author analyzes two key regional systems of protection of human rights: European and Inter-American. By comparing their approaches to the issues of protection of human rights, the author singles out the problems of each of these systems, which stand in the way of more effi cient interaction of those systems with the national law. For example, in respect of the ECHR, the author mentions narrow fi nancial approach to the means of protection of human rights, the ECHR being overloaded with cases, the practice of “pilot” decisions and the tendency to violate the subsidiary principle as its problems. In respect of the inter-American Court on Human Rights the main problem is the low level of implementation of its decisions. Comparison of these regional institutions allowed the author to formulate some ideas for the improvement of the work of the ECHR. While recognizing the need to form the Russian constitutionalism as a domestic protective mechanism, the author mentions that the situation needs to be balanced by defi ning the status of the decisions of the ECHR int eh Russian legal system, introducing the procedure of their offi cial translation and publication, as well as establishing the principle of control over the implementation of the decisions against the Russian Federation. These issues may be regulated by passing a new Federal Law “On the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights”

Keywords:

jurisprudence, human rights, international, national, interaction, European, inter-American, pilot, regional.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Antkowiak T.M. Remedial Approaches to Human Rights Violations: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and
2. Beyond // Columbia journal of transnational law. 2008. vol. 46, ¹2. P. 351–419.
3. Barkhuysen Tom, Van Emmerik Michiel. A Comparative View on the Execution of Judgments of the European Court
4. of Human Rights // SSRN.COM: Social Science Research Network. 2003. URL: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1896160
5. (data obrashcheniya: 09.02.2012).
6. Barkhuysen Tom, Van Emmerik Michiel. Legitimacy of European Court of Human Rights Judgments: Procedural
7. Aspects // SSRN.COM: Social Science Research Network. 2009. URL: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1896144 (data
8. obrashcheniya: 09.02.2012).
9. Chetail Vincent. The Human Rights Council and the Challenges of the United Nations System on Human Rights:
10. Towards a Cultural Revolution? // SSRN.COM: Social Science Research Network. 2010. URL: http://www.ssrn.com/
11. abstract=1647746 (data obrashcheniya: 09.02.2012).
12. Gerards Janneke. The pilot judgment procedure before the European Court of Human Rights as an instrument for
13. dialogue // SSRN.COM: Social Science Research Network. 2012. URL: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1924806 (data
14. obrashcheniya: 09.02.2012).
15. Haeck Yves, Burbano Clara, Zwaak Leo. Strasbourg’s Interim Measures under Fire: Does the Rising Number of State
16. Incompliances with Interim Measures Pose a Threat to the European Court of Human Rights? // SSRN.COM: Social
17. Science Research Network. 2011. URL: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1543945 (data obrashcheniya: 09.02.2012).
18. Helfer L.R. Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principal of the
19. European Human Rights Regime // The European Journal of International Law. 2008. vol. 19, ¹1. P. 125–159.
20. Inam S.T. Asian Human Rights Mechanisms: Problems and Prospects // SSRN.COM: Social Science Research Network.
21. 2010. URL: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1681523 (data obrashcheniya: 09.02.2012).
22. Janis Mark. Russia and the “Legality” of Strasbourg Law // European Journal of International Law. 1997. ¹1. P.
23. 93–99.
24. Kahn J.D. Russia’s “Dictatorship of Law” and the European Court of Human Rights // Review of Central and East
25. European Law. 2004. ¹1. P. 1–14.
26. Langford Malcolm. Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. New York:
27. Cambridge University Press, 2008. 704 p.
28. Posner E.A., Yoo J.C. A Theory of International Adjudication // SSRN.COM: Social Science Research Network. 2004.
29. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=507003 (data obrashcheniya: 29.01.2012).
30. Sinha M.K. Human Rights Committee: a precursor of an International Court of Human Rights // Indian journal of
31. international law. 2001. vol. 41, ¹4. P. 622–632.
32. Tan Morse. Member State Compliance with the Judgments of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights // International
33. Journal of Legal Information. 2005. vol. 33, ¹3. P. 319–344.
34. Wojciech Sadurski. Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalization of the European Court of Human Rights, the
35. Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments // Human
36. Rights Law Review. 2009. vol. 9, issue 3. P. 397–444.
37. Abashidze A.Kh., Alisievich E.S. Pravo Soveta Evropy: Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod.
38. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2007. 303 s.
39. Gorbachev I.G., Voronin M.V. Akty Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka i natsional'no-pravovoy aspekt ikh
40. obyazatel'nosti dlya Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka i aktual'nye voprosy ee
41. primeneniya v rossiyskom i mezhdunarodnom prave: sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy
42. konferentsii, 24-25 oktyabrya 2008 g., posvyashchennoy 60-letiyu prinyatiya OON Vseobshchey deklaratsii prav cheloveka.
43. – Kazan', 2009. – S. 50–58.
44. Zor'kin V.D. Predely ustupchivosti // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2010. – 29 oktyabrya.
45. Kartashkin V.A. Prava cheloveka: nekotorye itogi i perspektivy // Vlast'. 1997. ¹3. S. 13–18.
46. Kravtsova A. Effektivnost' Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka dlya Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Prava chelo-
47. veka: istoriya i sovremennost'. 2009. S. 86–93.
48. Lazarev V.V., Murashova E.N. Mesto resheniy Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka v natsional'noy pravovoy
49. sisteme // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2007. ¹9. S. 110–124.
50. Nikolaev A.M. Mesto resheniy Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka v pravovoy sisteme Rossiyskoy Federatsii
51. // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2007. ¹17. S. 3–6.
52. Chernichenko S.V. Evolyutsiya Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v svete interesov Rossii // Aktual'nye
53. mezhdunarodno-pravovye i gumanitarnye problemy. 2009. Vyp. 9. S. 151–158.
54. Yakovlev N.M. Realizatsiya mezhdunarodno-pravovykh standartov v zashchite lichnosti // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2006.
55. ¹4. S. 35–44.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.