Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychologist
Reference:

Value and Semantic Grounds for Obtaining Education in the Postgraduate Course of the National Research University

Dianov Sergei Aleksandrovich

Doctor of History

Professor, Department of Public Administration and History, Perm National Research Polytechnic University; Professor, Department of Private Law, Perm Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia

614990, Russia, Perm Krai, Perm, Komsomolsky Prospekt str., 29

sadianov@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 
Dianova Yuliya Viktorovna

PhD in Cultural Studies

Assistant Professor, Department of Design, Graphics and Engineering Geometry, Perm National Research Polytechnic University

614990, Russia, Perm Krai, Perm, Komsomolsky Prospekt str., 29

julok1@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8701.2023.2.39896

EDN:

CBLVMK

Received:

04-03-2023


Published:

29-03-2023


Abstract: The article deals with a range of issues related to motivation factors for admission to graduate school and behavioral reactions in the process of studying under the programs of scientific specialties in a modern national research university. Using the example of the implementation of postgraduate programs in political sciences at a technical university, the key motives of young specialists to continue their studies at the university are revealed. The features of the motivational and value sphere of graduate students mastering the training curriculum and performing the tasks of research work are determined. The reasons for expulsion from graduate school, the reasons for failure in the educational program, as well as the motives for frequent academic leave are analyzed. The article presents arguments in favor of the author's hypothesis about the need to develop postgraduate studies in the humanities and social sciences in technical universities. Political science education contributes not only to the conscious choice of the profession of an engineer or a highly qualified specialist for state and municipal service bodies. A young researcher gets the opportunity to recognize the value-semantic grounds for working in the organization of higher education. A potential high school teacher develops stable ideas about pedagogical ethics, about the psychology of communication with students of different age groups, about the inadmissibility of forms of deviant behavior when performing professional tasks.


Keywords:

value orientations, motivation, socialization of personality, moral standards, university, postgraduate study, educational program, learning process, pedagogical techniques, professional education

This article is automatically translated.

The system of postgraduate education in the first quarter of the XXI century has undergone significant changes. Already in the early 2000s, Russian universities faced the problem of reducing the number of graduates who expressed a desire to continue their studies in graduate school. Sociologists have recorded the outflow of a significant part of creative youth from the scientific and educational space to other areas of professional employment and personal positioning - business and finance, public administration, service, the hospitality industry [1]. At the same time, the tradition of recommending the best graduate students to graduate school, who showed a high level of motivation to study and research, was preserved. At the humanities faculties of Russian universities, activities were regularly carried out to identify the most capable and motivated junior researchers from among the students. This practice gave positive results. For example, at the historical faculties of Perm Pedagogical University, D.I. Mendeleev Tobolsk Pedagogical Institute and Nizhny Tagil Socio-Pedagogical Academy, students of 3-4 courses prepared for admission to graduate school through active participation in archaeological and ethnographic expeditions as mentors of first-year students, participation in the presentation of the results of their field research at scientific forums and scientific andpractical conferences [2; 3]. Taking personal part as a student and then a graduate student in these events, we state that most of the participants have a strong desire not just to enter graduate school and defend their dissertation, but also an understanding of the exceptional importance of preserving the scientific traditions of humanitarian education that took shape in the XX century. It should be noted that almost all participants of the Tobolsk scientific conference "Dialogue of Cultures and Civilizations" (2002 – 2009) successfully defended their PhD theses.

In the 2010s, reforms in the education sector of the Russian Federation initiated the process of transformation of the system of postgraduate vocational education. We support the opinion of a number of researchers that the adoption in 2012 of the federal law "On Education in In the Russian Federation" significantly changed the status of postgraduate studies and led to an update of the content of postgraduate training [4, p. 41]. Postgraduate studies became the third level of higher education, research training programs were now subject to the state accreditation procedure. This turn was not supported by all participants of educational relations in the country's universities. A number of prominent representatives of the scientific community made critical statements, emphasizing the unreasonableness of the transition to the educational model of postgraduate studies [5; 6]. At the same time, postgraduate studies as a level of higher education have been included in the strategic development programs of federal and national research universities.

In 2015, Perm National Research Polytechnic University (PNRPU) hosted the first enrollment for the postgraduate program "Political Institutions, Processes and Technologies". Within the framework of this article, an attempt is made to summarize the results of the author's study of the features of the motivational and value sphere of graduate students-political scientists. First of all, it should be borne in mind that by order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation No. 900 dated July 30, 2014, the federal state educational standard in the field of training "41.06.01 ? Political Sciences and Regional studies" was approved. It was this document that guided the heads of the working groups on the opening of political science programs in the capital and regional universities.

Having acted in 2015 as the initiator and head of the postgraduate program at PNRPU, we had the opportunity to determine the components of the socio-psychological portrait of the candidate for postgraduate studies. At the beginning of the program, it seemed that the candidate should have an internal motivation to study in graduate school. For this type, as experts note, "the highest level of individual autonomy is characteristic, when the locus of control is internal and is associated with interest and/ or pleasure from learning and related activities" [4, p. 49]. Internal motivation allows a thinking individual to be in a permanent state of searching for effective methods to achieve the goals postulated in scientific work. Further, it was quite logical to expect admission to the postgraduate program of people who had relatively recently completed their master's degree or at the specialist level. Moreover, in order to master the curriculum of the program "Political institutions, processes and technologies", serious training in the field of social sciences and humanities was required (areas of training – "State and municipal Administration", "Jurisprudence", "Political Science", "Sociology", etc.). Finally, the curriculum of the program and the schedule of training sessions were arranged in such a way that the graduate student had the opportunity to simultaneously carry out professional work in organizations of the state and public sectors. Of course, great hopes were pinned on state civil and municipal employees, to whom this program was addressed in the first place.

The postgraduate program provided that the postgraduate student throughout the entire period of study (3 years – full–time, 4 years - in absentia) gets acquainted with all traditional and innovative teaching methods: lectures, practical classes, scientific seminars, research activities, pedagogical and research practices. The training was completed by the GIA procedure: passing the state exam and submitting a scientific report on the main results of the prepared dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Sciences.

The practice of admission to the postgraduate program "Political institutions, processes and technologies" in 2015-2021 yielded the following results. Firstly, the educational program proved to be in demand among graduates of Perm Humanitarian Pedagogical University and teachers-historians of educational organizations of general and vocational education. Secondly, several representatives of political parties of the Russian Federation, who expressed a desire to study and start work on a dissertation, decided to expel another 1 year of study. Thirdly, by conducting interviews with applicants, it was possible to get acquainted with the value-semantic grounds of their choice, namely:

? motivation for professional growth (the desire of history teachers ? the average age of 33 years ? to update their knowledge base, improve their qualifications and apply for leadership positions at school);

? motivation of scientific growth (the desire to skillfully express their ideas, opinions in the form of scientific papers: publications, monographs, dissertations);

? motivation for career growth (to leave the education system in the system of state and municipal administration, while having a PhD in political science).

The results of entrance exams in a special discipline ("Political Science") showed that candidates for graduate students did not always demonstrate a good level of theoretical knowledge. Thus, graduates of the Faculty of History of the PGGPU found it difficult to formulate answers to questions from the subject area of public administration and regionalism. Taking into account this circumstance, elective courses such as "Regional Political Elite in Russia" and "Regional political processes in modern Russia" were included in the graduate student's curriculum. Graduate students, as a rule, passed the candidate's exam in the specialty in the third year. Admission to the candidate's minimum became a mandatory requirement for the availability of scientific publications and participation in research work in the areas of work of the department.

In the course of their studies, political science graduate students demonstrated different value orientations and behavioral reactions when typical problems arise. Let's list the most characteristic value orientations.

1) Focus on achieving learning goals and self-realization.

In this case, it can be stated that the graduate student has a work plan of consistent actions, the use of standard and creative methods to achieve research objectives, the manifestation of tolerance and correctness in overcoming problematic phenomena. When working with a graduate student, the supervisor does not have to be reminded regularly about the timeliness of submitting a report on the implementation of an individual work plan, about upcoming scientific and practical conferences, about increasing the pace of publication activity. The scientific mentor can only unobtrusively adjust the trajectory of the postgraduate student's research activity, "proofread" the texts of the scientific qualification work and make the necessary edits.  

2) Orientation towards maintaining relations with "people of science".

It is established that some diligent graduate students have serious difficulties with writing the text of a scientific qualification work (dissertation). Credits in academic disciplines are given to them easily, they demonstrate a high level of purposefulness in the implementation of tasks in pedagogical practice. However, despite regular contact work with the supervisor and leading teachers of the program, the deadlines for submitting texts on the dissertation are constantly being disrupted. Some researchers pointing to this contradiction come to the conclusion that it is important for such "graduate students to exchange ideas, experience, meetings with scientists at conferences, the opportunity to learn their opinion about their research" [7, p. 70]. Thus, the main motivating factor here is the desire not so much to engage in scientific work itself, as to have the opportunity to regularly communicate with "people of science" ? reputable scientists, researchers, heads of scientific innovation centers and laboratories.

3) Orientation to the status positions of a graduate student – "the image of a teacher-researcher".

Among the graduate students of political science, persons were identified who demonstrate a friendly style of behavior, willingness to respond to the request of classmates and support any initiative of the supervisor (for example, to participate in the organization of a thematic section at a scientific conference). At the same time, such a graduate student approaches the implementation of an individual work plan without an obvious desire. Serious failures often occur in the theoretical preparation for a scientific seminar. The graduate student refuses to participate in significant scientific events of the faculty and department. It quickly becomes clear to the supervisor that this graduate student is not motivated to fulfill the research work plan. It is preferable for him to complete his studies and receive a diploma of a "teacher-researcher" as a reward. N.G. Bagdasaryan calls such a phenomenon "external motivation" in his publications [8].    

4) Focus on demonstrating creative "excellence".

The value-semantic basis in this case is the energetic activity of the graduate student to prove his right to creativity. The graduate student thinks of himself outside the framework of the training program, shows a strong desire to dominate others – colleagues, teachers, researchers. It is obvious that the status of a graduate student gives him a kind of "springboard" to create conditions for rapid career growth. At the same time, this type of behavior of graduate students is accompanied by a high risk of failure. By entering into a confrontation, consciously modeling winning situations exclusively for himself, a graduate student becomes vulnerable to assessments and counteractions to a challenge from a close-knit scientific team of like-minded people.

Concluding the review, it is impossible not to highlight another recent trend. Today, the influx into graduate school, especially for full–time study, is observed in people who have reached a solid age (40 - 45 years) and have a long work experience, according to the profile of a science far from the world. So, privately, we received several appeals from people who stated their desire to study in graduate school, and without any research project ideas. Moreover, they were not aware of what awaits a candidate for graduate students at the entrance exams. Naturally, for our part, we tried to explain to these persons in the correct form that postgraduate studies are not a place for free pastime. In the event that they do submit an application and a package of documents, the entrance examination procedure will be conducted in strict accordance with the spirit and letter of the normative legal acts regulating admission to postgraduate programs. As a result, none of them ever applied for admission to graduate school. Experienced scientific supervisors are also well aware of such facts when unscrupulous people attempt to evade conscription by choosing a seemingly "easy" path to an advanced university – to graduate school.

 Currently, postgraduate studies have again ceased to be the third stage of higher education [9; 10]. Despite this, we express confidence that postgraduate studies will not be reduced to only one result – the defense of a PhD thesis [11]. Not so many years have passed since, upon completion of full-time postgraduate studies, universities issued only a certificate of education. Of course, teaching such academic disciplines as "Pedagogy of higher education", "Psychology of higher education", "History and Philosophy of Science" form the personal and professional business qualities of a future teacher-methodologist, researcher-innovator. We see promising areas for the development of political science education at the postgraduate level, firstly, in attracting state and municipal employees to training in order to expand their scientific horizons and instill research competencies; secondly, in continuing the practice of enrolling school teachers in the ranks of competent researchers, which corresponds to the priorities of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation [12]. In addition, it is necessary to support the point of view of N.G. Bagdasaryan about the importance of carrying out comprehensive work aimed at correcting "wrong" motives in the process of postgraduate studies [8, p. 388].

 

 

References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The paper "Value-semantic grounds for obtaining education in graduate school of the national research University" is presented for review. The subject of the study. The subject of the study is not indicated in the work, but it is clearly traced. The subject corresponds to the content of the scientific work. In the article, the subject is disclosed in accordance with the set goal and objectives. Research methodology. In the peer-reviewed work, the task was set to identify the value-semantic grounds for obtaining education in graduate school. An interview was used as a tool. The relevance of the study is beyond doubt. The author substantiates the relevance from the point of view of the need to increase the importance and prestige of postgraduate studies. The scientific novelty in the work is not indicated. The author analyzed the work experience of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Considerable attention was paid to the specifics of the postgraduate program "Political Institutions, processes and Technologies". The empirical study was conducted in the form of a survey of applicants. This made it possible to identify the value-semantic grounds for their choice. We are talking about: ? motivation for professional growth (the desire of history teachers ? the average age of 33 years ? to update their knowledge base, improve their qualifications and apply for leadership positions at school); ? motivation for scientific growth (the desire to skillfully express their ideas, opinions in the form of scientific papers: publications, monographs, dissertations); ? motivation career development (exit the education system into the system of state and municipal administration, while having a PhD in political science). The author identified value orientations and behavioral reactions also in the learning process and in the event of typical problems: - orientation towards achieving learning goals and self-realization; - orientation towards maintaining relationships with "people of science"; – orientation towards the status positions of a graduate student - "the image of a teacher-researcher"; - focus on demonstrating creative "excellence". The author noted that currently not only young people, but also mature people with long work experience, non-core education and field of work are striving to study in graduate school. Style, structure, content. The style of presentation corresponds to publications of this level. The language of the work is scientific. The structure of the work is practically not traceable. At the beginning of the article, attention is paid to the relevance of considering the system of postgraduate education at the present time. The author notes the problem of reducing the number of graduate students at the beginning of the XXI century. At the same time, in the 2010s, due to the transformation of the postgraduate vocational education system, the content of postgraduate training was updated. Further, the author examines in detail the experience of Perm National Research Polytechnic University in the implementation of the postgraduate program "Political Institutions, processes and Technologies". Based on the work carried out, the main conclusions were drawn. The work ends with the identification of promising areas for the development of political science education at the postgraduate level. Bibliography. The bibliography of the article includes 12 domestic ones, a significant part of which has been published in the last three years. The list contains mainly research articles. The sources of information are designed correctly. Appeal to opponents. The goals and objectives set by the author have been implemented. However, the recommendations are: - the need for a more detailed description of the results of the incoming survey, the allocation of quantitative values, as well as patterns and relationships; - a more complete description of the activities within the framework of promising areas for the development of political science education at the postgraduate level. Conclusions. The problems of the article are of undoubted relevance, theoretical and practical value, and will be of interest to researchers. The work may be recommended for publication.