Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

History magazine - researches
Reference:

Training of personnel for the healthcare sector at the initial stage of development of the People's Republic of China (1949-1960)

Aktamov Innokentii Galimalaevich

ORCID: 0000-0002-8646-1048

PhD in Pedagogy

PhD, Head of the Centre for Oriental Languages Translation, Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; associate professor of the Department of History and Regional studies of Dorzhi Banzarov Buryat State University

670047, Russia, Republic of Buryatia, Ulan-Ude, Sakhyanova str., 6, office 305

aktamov13@gmail.com
Bodoev Aleksandr Vasil'evich

PhD in Medicine

PhD in Medicine associate professor of the Department of Faculty Surgery of Dorzhi Banzarov Buryat State University

670002, Russia, Republic of Buryatia, Ulan-Ude, Oktyabrskaya str., 36a

bodoev@mail.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0609.2022.6.39150

EDN:

LKCAFW

Received:

12-11-2022


Published:

30-12-2022


Abstract: This article is devoted to the study of issues of cooperation between the USSR and the PRC in the field of personnel training for the healthcare sector in the 1949-1960-ies. Based on the analysis of archival data, sources and literature on this topic, the authors came to the conclusion that after the establishment of diplomatic relations between the countries in 1949, intensive interaction began in various sectors of the economy and public life. The research focuses on the features of building the healthcare system as a whole, as well as training personnel for this area at the initial stage of development of the Chinese state and its healthcare system.    It is revealed that despite the short historical period of active cooperation, China, with the help of the USSR, was able to integrate the Soviet model into the national health system, which allowed solving one of the acute social problems in the specified historical period. In addition, the Soviet model of public health made it possible to deal in a timely manner with the threats of the spread of diseases, including those of a mass nature, up to the present time. The authors concluded that the development of cooperation in the field of healthcare between our countries can be divided into five main stages. The period 1949-1960 is the most effective, since it was at this time that comprehensive assistance was provided by the USSR.


Keywords:

training personnel, healthcare sector, USSR, PR China, cooperation, scientific exchanges, education, doctors, experts, consultation

This article is automatically translated.

 

Historical foundations of cooperation. The healthcare system is one of the foundations of the socio-economic development of the country. The effective functioning of social institutions directly depends on the level of qualification of specialists. Professional training is of particular importance for the field of medical care and prevention. In this regard, the formation and development of the healthcare system in China in the middle of the twentieth century is of research interest. At that time, China was creating a new state, the country's leadership was defining strategic guidelines for its development, and there was active interaction with the Soviet Union. The period from 1949 to 1960 is characterized by many researchers as the "golden" decade [1, p. 47] of Soviet-Chinese interstate relations, during which projects in all spheres of public life were intensively developed. At the same time, the history of bilateral relations between the countries dates back to the time of the Russian Ecclesiastical Mission in Beijing (the end of the XVII century). This can be called the first stage of cooperation. The second stage can be considered the construction of the railway – the KVZhD, which stimulated the systematization of relations between Russian and Chinese subjects. The conditional third stage occurred during the events related to the revolution of 1917 and the great wave of migration, which peaked in the 1920s [2].  The next stage is connected with the activation of the Soviet Union's policy in China during the Second World War. Thus, the so-called "golden" stage in the development of bilateral relations is the fifth stage. During this period, the policy of the Chinese leadership in the field of personnel training for the healthcare sector is of interest. As many domestic researchers note, the historiography of Soviet-Chinese cooperation in the field of medicine is not so extensive, but in recent years the research of P.E. Ratmanov, O.S. Nagornykh, V.Y. Bashkuev, N.P. Shok, etc. has been devoted to these issues.     

After the proclamation of October 1 , 1949 After Mao Zedong created a new state – the People's Republic of China, the communist government began reforms in all spheres of society, including the process of modernizing the health care system.

On February 14, 1950, the "Treaty of Friendship, Alliance and Mutual Assistance" was signed between the USSR and the PRC. In addition to this agreement, a bilateral agreement was signed on the Soviet Union's assistance to China for the construction and reconstruction of large enterprises, including social facilities. Detailed information is presented in the collective work of N.L. Mamayeva, I.N. Sotnikova, A.L. Verchenko entitled "Participation of the USSR in the reconstruction and construction of "156 production facilities" in the PRC in the 1950s. New facts and circumstances of Soviet-Chinese cooperation" [3].

Training of personnel. A separate area of cooperation in the field of medicine was the training of qualified personnel. Cooperation in this direction between the countries began back in the 1930s, when the Soviet leadership began sending specialists to China to work in medical centers and outpatient clinics at Consulates General in the northwest of the country. Doctors' business trips, including military ones, continued during the Second World War [4, p. 78].

A fundamentally important document defining the nature and basic principles of cooperation between the countries is the "Soviet-Chinese Agreement on the working conditions of Soviet specialists in China", which was signed on March 27, 1950 in Moscow. Within the framework of this agreement, the Soviet Union undertook to send specialists and advisers of various qualification areas to China, taking into account the requests of the Chinese side. A few years later, in 1954, an Agreement on cultural cooperation and Technical assistance was signed between the USSR and the People's Republic of China, which made it possible to significantly expand the volume of economic assistance from the Soviet Union, as well as to increase the number of specialists sent to China [Ibid.]. Within the framework of bilateral cooperation, representatives of Chinese youth were sent to study in the Soviet Union. According to statistics, in 1950, 400 students from China studied in the USSR, which was 6.4% of the total number of students from abroad; in 1960, 900 students were 9.7%. The People's education of the People's Republic of China from 1949 to the mid-1950s generally followed the same path as the socialist education system in the USSR [5, p. 80].

At the initial stage of the development of the new Chinese state, the issue of training national personnel was of paramount importance. As I.N. Sotnikova notes, "... at the beginning of the 1950s, there were 164 thousand engineering and technical workers and 15.8 million workers and employees in the whole country, of which only 4.3 million industrial and transport workers employed mainly at small and minute enterprises. In 1953, China had only 78 design organizations, each of which employed, as a rule, less than 200 people" [6, p. 607]. The top leadership of the country understood that without the help of the Soviet Union it is impossible to systematically solve the personnel issue, so the Government of the People's Republic of China asked the USSR to assist in planning, developing and implementing projects in various industries, organizing administrative and managerial apparatus, creating research and design institutions [Ibid.]. In January 1955, Advisor to the President of the Chinese Academy of Sciences B.A. Kovda developed a draft of "Some measures for planning and organizing national research in the People's Republic of China", suggesting that the Chinese side organize and plan scientific research throughout the PRC. to develop a plan of scientific vision of development to address the most important issues set out in the five-year and fifteen-year plans of the national economy [7]. In the period from October 1954 to July 1955, he was the chief adviser to the President of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Thus, it can be argued that consulting, technical and organizational assistance has affected all spheres of the economy and public life.

As for its own health care and training system, China began its creation in the Western manner after 1912. This was due to the epidemic of pneumonic plague in Manchuria in 1910-1911 . The government in 1912 created the Beijing Medical School (now the Center of Medical Sciences of Peking University) as a leading professional medical organization according to the Western model. The first set of the school was 72 people. Over the first fifty years, this institution has trained about 200 thousand specialists. However, given the vast territory and the number of the population, medical workers was clearly not enough. The country's leadership, represented by the Kuomintang, understood that traditional Chinese medicine could not effectively combat diseases, and in the 1920s tried to make every effort to create a modernized public health service and medical education on the Western model. The Department of Public Health was established in the Ministry of Internal Affairs in 1927. In 1945, it was reorganized into the Ministry of Health.

In the early 1950s, China introduced the Soviet model of epidemic prevention and education, created a sanitary and anti-epidemic public health system at medical universities. In addition, the basic principles of the functioning of the health care system were formed: compliance with occupational hygiene, healthy nutrition, environmental hygiene, sanitary standards in general education institutions and compliance with radiation hygiene standards [1].

The Soviet model of healthcare in the People's Republic of China quickly showed its effectiveness. For example, infectious diseases that potentially pose a high risk to public health, such as smallpox, cholera, plague, typhus, etc., have either been completely eradicated or have been effectively combated. Thanks to nationwide routine immunization programs, infectious diseases such as polio, diphtheria, whooping cough, and measles began to be prevented in a timely manner. In addition, most types of endemic and parasitic diseases are generally quite effectively controlled. Despite natural disasters, such as floods and earthquakes, which are a natural source of infectious diseases, there are much fewer cases of outbreaks of epidemics. This indicates that the public health and hygiene situation has improved significantly. The evidence of high quality changes can be assessments and official letters from the leadership of the PRC. For example, on July 21, 1956, Minister of Health Li De Qian sent a letter of gratitude to the leadership of the Soviet Union, in which he noted: "Your advanced medical theory and rich clinical experience in the field of therapy have greatly helped in improving the work of medical institutions and medical practice, also helped to train teachers and reform higher medical educational institutions in China, which promotes the development of public health" [8, pp. 171-172].

The interest in the development of the national health care system on the part of the country's top party leadership was expressed in full support of the USSR's initiatives in this area. In 1960 , an agreement on scientific cooperation on the most important issues of medicine was signed between the Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR and established in 1957 . By the Academy of Medical Sciences of the People's Republic of China [Ibid.].

The creation of institutions for training personnel for the health care system was carried out at an accelerated pace. Already by 1965, there were more than 230 educational institutions in the country that trained specialist doctors. The total number of such medical workers exceeded 200,000 people. The leadership of the People's Republic of China, following the model of the Soviet Union, began to create multidisciplinary hospitals in provinces and counties, and mobile outpatient clinics began to function in rural areas. All this made it possible to create a unified healthcare system throughout the country in a relatively short time. Of course, the functioning of both individual institutions and the entire system as a whole failed, the problem with logistics was not solved, the problem of personnel shortage remained urgent. This even caused concern on the part of the country's top leadership. At the same time, it should be recognized that the foundations laid in the middle of the twentieth century made it possible to create an effective model of disease prevention and treatment of the population of one of the largest countries in the world.   

According to statistics, the total mortality of the population in China decreased from 20 per 1,000 people in 1949 to 6.43 per 1,000 people in 2001. The infant mortality rate decreased from 200 per 1,000 in 1949 to 28.4 per 1,000 in 2000. Maternal mortality decreased from 150 per 10,000 in 1949 to 50.2 per 100,000 in 2001. The average life expectancy increased from 35 years in 1949 to 71.4 years in 2000 [16].

Conclusion. Summing up, it should be noted that in the first years of its existence, the People's Republic of China faced a number of acute social problems that required urgent solutions. Along with the solution of food security issues, the elimination of illiteracy, it was necessary to provide the population with medical care. As with the implementation of the modernization of the agricultural sector, the development of industry, the New China in the field of healthcare fully relied on the assistance of the Soviet Union. The 1949-1960-ies are particularly significant and effective from the point of view of cooperation between the countries, both from the point of view of political and ideological aspects, and in terms of the implementation of specific projects in various sectors of the economy and the social sphere. An invaluable contribution to the development of the personnel training system for the People's Republic of China was made by Soviet specialists who were sent by the country's leadership to fraternally help the Chinese people. These were highly qualified personnel who conducted their activities both at the highest level in the rank of advisers to industry ministers, heads of enterprises, state institutions, and employees directly employed in the real sector. Despite a relatively short period of active cooperation lasting only 10 years, the Chinese state was able to adopt the Soviet model and integrate it into its national health system. Further development of this sphere has shown that the basic foundations of the Soviet model have not lost their significance in modern conditions, including in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. In the future, it is planned to expand the study and trace the evolution of the healthcare system of the People's Republic of China in different periods of state development.

References
1. Sotnikova I.N. Domestic historiography about Soviet assistance to the People's Republic of China in 1949-1960. // Domestic historiography of the PRC: some directions / ed. N.L. Mamaeva and I.N. Sotnikova; Institute of the Far East of the Russian Academy of Sciences.-Moscow: Eastern Literature, 2015. pp. 47-73.
2. Cooperation between the USSR and China in the field of medicine and healthcare in the 1940s-1950s. // Friendship Forever: Essays on the History of Cooperation between the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China (1949-1960) // Moscow: "Research Institute of History, Economics and Law", 2018. pp. 153-172.
3. Mamaeva N.L., Sotnikova I.N., Verchenko A.L. Participation of the USSR in the reconstruction and construction of "156 production facilities" in the PRC in the 1950s. New facts and circumstances of Soviet-Chinese cooperation. Moscow: Ves Mir, 2018. 608 p.
4. Nagornykh O.S., Shok N.P. The business trips of the Soviet doctors to the PR China in the 1950s–1960s: implementation of cooperation plans in the field of medicine and healthcare // Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2020. No 65. Pp. 75-85.
5. Gusevskaya N.Yu., Mamkina I.N. The role of education in the development of Russian-Chinese relations: history and modernity // Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2017. No 423. pp. 77-83.
6. Sotnikova I.N. Help from the Soviet Union // History of China from ancient times to the beginning of the XXI century: Monograph: in 10 volumes / Institute of the Far East of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow: Scientific and Publishing Center “Nauka”. 2017. pp. 590-619.
7. 张柏春 张久春 姚 芳. 中苏科 学技 术合作 中的技术转移. 当代 中国史研究2005 年 3 月第 12 卷 第 2 期77.
8. Nagornykh O.S. Soviet-Chinese relations in the field of medicine: dialogue and ideology // In thoughts about the timely and otherwise: materials of the scientific conference dedicated to the 150th anniversary of the birth of M. Gorky. Nizhniy Novgorod: Privolzhsky Research Medical University. 2018. pp. 167-173.
9. Jin H., Dong G., Zou L. et al. History and status quo of higher public health education in China. Public Health Rev 41, 12 (2020).
10. Bashkuev V. Yu. The Russian-Chinese medical cooperation in the first half of the 20th century // The Bulletin of the Buryat Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2016. No 3 (23). pp. 61-71.
11. Dashieva S.B., Rinchinova O.S., Tsyrenova N.D. Formation of the worldview of traditional medicine doctors in China, Mongolia and Russia // Genesis: historical issues. 2020. No 9. pp. 79-87.
12. Nagornykh O.S. “It was the golden time of our friendship...”: on some aspects of cooperation between the PRC and the USSR in the field of medicine and healthcare in the 1950s-1960s. // Russia and China: History and Prospects of Cooperation: Proceedings of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference, Blagoveshchensk, May 20–28, 2019 / Managing editor A.V. Druzyaka. Blagoveshchensk State Pedagogical University. 2019. pp. 129-136.
13. Nagornykh O.S. Public Health Ethics in the PRC: The Model of Hospitals in the 1950s and 1960s. // Russia and China: history and prospects of cooperation. 2022. No. 1 (12). pp. 244-251.
14. Ratmanov P.E. The contribution of Russian doctors to Chinese medicine (XX century): specialty 07.00.10 "History of science and technology": dissertation abstract for the degree of Doctor of Medical Sciences. Moscow. 2010. 48 p.
15. Ratmanov P.E. Historiography of Russian-Chinese Relations in the Field of Medicine in the First Half of the 20th Century // The Bulletin of the Buryat Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019. No 1 (33). pp. 72-84.
16. Russian-Chinese relations in the XX century: Materials and documents. T. V. Soviet-Chinese relations. 1946-February 1950. Book 2. 1949-February 1950. / Institute of the Far East of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Historical documentary department of MFA of the Russian Federation, Federal Agency of Archives; Responsible editor. S.L. Tikhvinsky. Moscow. Monuments of historical thought, 2005. 608 p.
17. Samoilenko V.V. The current state of traditional Chinese medicine: the history of formation // Far Eastern Studies. 2019. – No 5(2). pp. 133-142.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The object of the research in the article is the system of personnel training for healthcare in the People's Republic of China in the middle of the 20th century, while the subject is Soviet–Chinese cooperation in this field. The study is undoubtedly relevant due to the fact that international cooperation between our countries has not only been maintained, but also intensified in recent years. The main research method is descriptive historical and pedagogical analysis. It is noteworthy that thanks to him, the author managed to show the studied pedagogical system against a fairly broad socio-historical background. The work is done in a language that fully complies with the norms of scientific style. The list of sources meets the requirements and finds a real meaningful reflection on the pages of the work. The work may be of interest to both Russian and Chinese researchers in the field of international cooperation between our countries. There are the following comments on the article. The text does not mention the specific names of the Chinese (neither statesmen, nor famous doctors, nor teachers) who played a significant role in training personnel for the health care of the People's Republic of China at the studied stage. Without this, from a historical point of view, the study does not look complete. From a pedagogical point of view, we note that the training of medical personnel is shown in an effective, but not in a procedural way. So much is said about the final pedagogical and medical effectiveness, but attention is not focused on what methods, means, technologies, institutional forms, etc. it was achieved. The conclusions contain general information about the importance of this stage in the development of the social sphere, however, historical and pedagogical research implies the identification of a specific contribution of a particular era to the state of modern pedagogical practice, namely, which methods, means, forms, institutions, etc. are still used, and which have lost relevance over half a century and why. There is also no information in the article about how exactly the training of medical personnel in China in the middle of the 20th century differed from the beginning of the 20th century. This is how the system is not represented in the dynamics of development. This allows us to conclude that the study is generally descriptive and ascertaining in nature. Since the actual subject of the study in the article is the Soviet-Chinese cooperation in the training of doctors, then perhaps the article should be called "Soviet-Chinese cooperation in the field of medical personnel training in the 1950s." These remarks impoverish the content of the article, but do not negate the fact that, in general, the work meets the basic requirements for articles of a historical and pedagogical nature, and can be published in a peer-reviewed publication.