Abstract: The author identifies the structural components of the subculture that determine the prospects of its development and influence on common culture: philosophical, creative, social and political bases thereof. The number of efficient bases of subculture is directly proportional to the period of life of the subculture and its influence. There are three major steps of subcultural activities: "being involved in the subculture", "subcultural initiation", and "return", each stage also has particular substages. The structure of subcultural activity is compared to the evolution of the individual. The article provides a description and functions of the main archetypical roles of the participants in subcultural activities: the Hero, the Mentor, the Threshold Guardian, the Herald, the Shapeshifter, the Shadow, the Ally and the Trickster. Methodological basis of the research includes the theory of historical-cultural types offered by Nikolay Danilevsky, Vladimir Propp's, John Campbell's and Christopher Vogler's comparative typological method. The structure-analytical approach to studying subcultures allows to explore subcultural activity over time. In the end, the developed approach provides a complete portrait of the subculture that includes not only a broad description, but also analysis of its influence on human (individual representative) and cultural system.

Keywords: Trickster, Shadow, Ally, Herald, Threshold Guardian, Hero, Mentor, mythologem of the journey, bases of subculture, Shapeshifter

References:
Alekseev-Apraksin A.M. Krosskul'turnye kontakty: turizm i palomnichestvo / A.M. Alekseev-Apraksin // Studia Culturae. – 2013. – ¹ 18. – S. 29-34.
Baeva, L.V. Filosofiya patsifizma i ekstremizma v molodezhnykh dvizheniyakh: nauchno-populyarnoe izdanie / L.V. Baeva. – Astrakhan', 2014. – 250 s.
Vislenko, A.L. Kollektivnoe soznanie v kul'ture. Dis. ... d-ra filosof. nauk / Vislenko Andrey Leonidovich. – SPb, 2015.-366 s.
Vogler, K. Puteshestvie pisatelya. Mifologicheskie struktury v literature i kino / Kristofer Vogler ; Per. s angl. – M.: Al'pina non-fikshn, 2015. – 476 s.
Danilevskiy, N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa / Sostavlenie i kommentarii Yu.A. Belova / Otv. red. O. Platonov. – M.: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2008. – 816 s.
Zharkova, M.A. Tipologizatsiya molodezhnykh subkul'tur v ramkakh postmodernistskogo analiza molodezhnykh subpotokov v Rossiyskom obshchestve / M.A. Zharkova // Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. – T. 15. – 2012. – ¹ 8. – S. 330-384.
Kempbell, Dzh. Tysyachelikiy geroy / Dzhozef Kempbell. – Moskva: REFL-BUK, 1997. – 230 s.
Levikova, S.I. Neformal'naya molodezhnaya subkul'tura / S.I. Levikova. – M.: VUZovskaya kniga, 2010. – 616 s.
Omel'chenko, E. Pokolenie Text: novye imena molodezhnoy kul'tury / Elena Omel'chenko // Reklamnye idei. – 2008. – ¹ 2. – S. 106-111.
Propp, V.Ya. Morfologiya «volshebnoy skazki». Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki (Sobranie trudov V.Ya. Proppa) / V.Ya. Propp / Kommentarii E.M. Meletinskogo, A.V. Rafaevoy. Sostavlenie, nauchnaya redaktsiya, tekstologicheskiy kommentariy I.V. Peshkova. – M.: Labirint, 1998. – 512 s.
Slyusarevskiy, N.N. Subkul'tura kak ob'ekt issledovaniya / N.N. Slyusarevskiy // Sotsiologiya: Teoriya, metody, marketing. – Kiev, 2002. – ¹ 3. – S. 117-127.
Shchepanskaya, T.B. Sistema: teksty i traditsii subkul'tury / T.B. Shchepanskaya. – M.: OGI, 2004. – 288 s.

References (transliteration):
Alekseev-Apraksin A.M. Krosskul'turnye kontakty: turizm i palomnichestvo / A.M. Alekseev-Apraksin // Studia Culturae. – 2013. – ¹ 18. – S. 29-34.
Baeva, L.V. Filosofiya patsifizma i ekstremizma v molodezhnykh dvizheniyakh: nauchno-populyarnoe izdanie / L.V. Baeva. – Astrakhan', 2014. – 250 s.
Vislenko, A.L. Kollektivnoe soznanie v kul'ture. Dis. ... d-ra filosof. nauk / Vislenko Andrey Leonidovich. – SPb, 2015.-366 s.
Vogler, K. Puteshestvie pisatelya. Mifologicheskie struktury v literature i kino / Kristofer Vogler ; Per. s angl. – M.: Al'pina non-fikshn, 2015. – 476 s.
Danilevskiy, N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa / Sostavlenie i kommentarii Yu.A. Belova / Otv. red. O. Platonov. – M.: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2008. – 816 s.
Zharkova, M.A. Tipologizatsiya molodezhnykh subkul'tur v ramkakh postmodernistskogo analiza molodezhnykh subpotokov v Rossiyskom obshchestve / M.A. Zharkova // Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. – T. 15. – 2012. – ¹ 8. – S. 330-384.
Kempbell, Dzh. Tysyachelikiy geroy / Dzhozef Kempbell. – Moskva: REFL-BUK, 1997. – 230 s.
Levikova, S.I. Neformal'naya molodezhnaya subkul'tura / S.I. Levikova. – M.: VUZovskaya kniga, 2010. – 616 s.
Omel'chenko, E. Pokolenie Text: novye imena molodezhnoy kul'tury / Elena Omel'chenko // Reklamnye idei. – 2008. – ¹ 2. – S. 106-111.
Propp, V.Ya. Morfologiya «volshebnoy skazki». Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki (Sobranie trudov V.Ya. Proppa) / V.Ya. Propp / Kommentarii E.M. Meletinskogo, A.V. Rafaevoy. Sostavlenie, nauchnaya redaktsiya, tekstologicheskiy kommentariy I.V. Peshkova. – M.: Labirint, 1998. – 512 s.
Slyusarevskiy, N.N. Subkul'tura kak ob'ekt issledovaniya / N.N. Slyusarevskiy // Sotsiologiya: Teoriya, metody, marketing. – Kiev, 2002. – ¹ 3. – S. 117-127.
Shchepanskaya, T.B. Sistema: teksty i traditsii subkul'tury / T.B. Shchepanskaya. – M.: OGI, 2004. – 288 s.

Abstract: The research subject of the article is the archetypical grounds of the images of Soviet economic daily life represented in popular art of the 1960 – 1980th. The images typical for the Soviet culture depict an archetypical narrative model – longing for harmony and urge to overcome Chaos and create Cosmos. Each image contains a code that serves as the key to understanding the Soviet culture. To discover these image codes, the author of the article analyzes iconic pieces of art that have been popular for long time, reflects the state of mind and spirits of the society and have a large number of readers/audience and popular quotations. The research methods used by Sidorova in her article include the following: the comparative method that allows to describe the changes of the Soviet economic culture since the 1960th (the Khrushchev Thaw) till the Seventieth, semiotic method, the archetype concept, hermeneutic method, content analysis and the method of historical typology. It is the first time that the archetype concept as well as the archetype classification that was introduced by A. Chernyshov within the framework of the Russian national culture offered are applied to the analysis of images of the Soviet economic daily life in popular art of the 1960 – 1980th. Having analyzed the Soviet economic daily life presented in iconic pieces of popular culture of the 1960 – 1980th, the author has discovered the image codes that have the best representation of the archetype narrative model. According to the author, the images of the Soviet economic daily life relate to such archetypes of the Russian national culture as Heroism, Simplicity, Search, Creativity, Wisdom, Loyalty, Love, Care, Carnival and Rebellion. The images that personified the archetype of Love have become the most popular ones. The image codes of Soviet economic daily life present the collective view of the socialistic variant of the national esthetical ideal and reflect the dynamics of that ideal. Thus, the images that personify the archetypes of Simplicity and Creativity have been gradually disappearing since the 1960th till 1980th. The meaning of the Heroism archetype has been shifted from labor deeds for the country to the performance of duties and self-sacrifice for one’s family. New images of Rebellion and Carnival started to appear. Cosmos had the same structure Communism had. The path to Cosmos went in struggle with Chaos but the main drivers were not antagonism between classes or an external enemy but the struggle of the ‘builder of Communism’ against his internal enemy, i.e. his moral diseases, irresponsibility, dishonesty and indifference. These image codes reflect the duality of the Soviet picture of the world: the image codes declared that the society was moving towards Cosmos (i.e. Communism) while in fact Chaos was growing, i.e. massive irresponsibility, economic mismanagement, dishonesty, social injustice and etc.

Keywords: Soviet culture, economic culture, daily life, popular art, symbolic structure, archetype, Russian national culture, image, code, iconic piece of artå.

References:
Kavelti, Dzh. Izuchenie literaturnykh formul // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. – 1996. – ¹ 22.
Kostina, A. V. Sovetskaya massovaya kul'tura / A. V. Kostina // Massovaya kul'tura kak fenomen postindustrial'nogo obshchestva. Izd. 4-e. – M., 2008.
Ivanov, V. D., Musakhanov L. R. Balans khudozhestvennoy kul'tury // Khudozhestvennaya zhizn' Rossii 1970-kh godov kak sistemnoe tseloe. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2001.
Zorkiy, A. V chem sekret ZnaToKov / O. Lavrova O. i A. Lavrov // Sledstvie vedut ZnaToKi. Sbornik telep'es. – M., 1974.
Grushin, B. A. Chetyre zhizni Rossii v zerkale oprosov obshchestvennogo mneniya. V 4 knigakh. M.: Institut filosofii, 2001-2006. Kniga 1.
Ageev, A. Russkiy smekh //Profil'. – 2002. – ¹ 13. – 1 aprelya.
Bogatyreva, E. A. Eshche raz o sotsrealizme // Kul'turologicheskiy zhurnal. Elektronnoe periodicheskoe retsenziruemoe nauchnoe izdanie. – 2010. URL: http://www.cr-journal.ru/rus/journals/11.html/
Leyderman, N.L. Sovremennaya russkaya literatura: 1950-1990-e gody. V 2 t.: uchebnoe posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedeniy. T. 2. 1968-1990 / N.L. Leyderman, M.N. Lipovetskiy. – 2-e izd., ispr. I dop. – M.: Izdatel'skiy tsentr «Akademiya», 2006.
Mark, M., Pirson K. Geroy i buntar', sozdanie brendov s pomoshch'yu arkhetipov /Per. s angl. Pod red. V. Domnina, A. Sukhenko. – SPb.: Piter, 2005.
Makhlina, S. Semiotika kul'tury i iskusstva: Slovar'-spravochnik v dvukh knigakh. – 2-e izd. SPb., 2003. – Kniga 1.
Sidorova, G.P. Sovetskiy tip khozyaystvennoy kul'tury povsednevnosti v massovom iskusstve 1960-1980-kh: tsennostnyy aspekt. Avtoreferat dissertatsii. – SPb., 2013.
Tarasenko, E.N. Kul'tovyy status proizvedeniya: vchera i segodnya. URL: http:// http://luminotavr.narod.ru/PUBL/kult.html
Chernyshov, A.V. Russkie arkhetipy v brendinge i effektivnost' telereklamy: Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata sotsiologicheskikh nauk. – Nizhniy Novgorod, 2011.
Yung, K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy. – M.: «Universitetskaya kniga», AST, 1996.
Sidorova G.P. Sovetskaya khozyaystvennaya povsednevnost' v obrazakh massovogo iskusstva 1960–1980-kh: gendernye osobennosti aksiologiki truda // Chelovek i kul'tura. - 2013. - 5. - C. 70 - 89. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2013.5.9784. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_9784.html
G. P. Sidorova Tsennosti sovetskoy khozyaystvennoy kul'tury
v massovom iskusstve 1960–1980-kh godov:
professiya // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 34 - 42.
Sidorova G.P. Sovetskaya khozyaystvennaya kul'tura v formakh dukhovnoy predmetnosti i obrazakh massovogo iskusstva 1960–1980-kh: tsennost' truda // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2012. - 4. - C. 54 - 79. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_246.html
Sidorova G.P. Sovetskaya khozyaystvennaya kul'tura v formakh material'noy predmetnosti i obrazakh massovogo iskusstva 1960–1980-kh: transport // Chelovek i kul'tura. - 2012. - 2. - C. 1 - 14. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_204.html
Sidorova G.P. Sub'ekt sovetskoy khozyaystvennoy kul'tury v massovom iskusstve 1960–1980-kh: obrazy tela // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2013. - 1. - C. 126 - 140. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.1.228. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_228.html

References (transliteration):
Kavelti, Dzh. Izuchenie literaturnykh formul // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. – 1996. – ¹ 22.
Kostina, A. V. Sovetskaya massovaya kul'tura / A. V. Kostina // Massovaya kul'tura kak fenomen postindustrial'nogo obshchestva. Izd. 4-e. – M., 2008.
Ivanov, V. D., Musakhanov L. R. Balans khudozhestvennoy kul'tury // Khudozhestvennaya zhizn' Rossii 1970-kh godov kak sistemnoe tseloe. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2001.
Zorkiy, A. V chem sekret ZnaToKov / O. Lavrova O. i A. Lavrov // Sledstvie vedut ZnaToKi. Sbornik telep'es. – M., 1974.
Grushin, B. A. Chetyre zhizni Rossii v zerkale oprosov obshchestvennogo mneniya. V 4 knigakh. M.: Institut filosofii, 2001-2006. Kniga 1.
Ageev, A. Russkiy smekh //Profil'. – 2002. – ¹ 13. – 1 aprelya.
Bogatyreva, E. A. Eshche raz o sotsrealizme // Kul'turologicheskiy zhurnal. Elektronnoe periodicheskoe retsenziruemoe nauchnoe izdanie. – 2010. URL: http://www.cr-journal.ru/rus/journals/11.html/
Leyderman, N.L. Sovremennaya russkaya literatura: 1950-1990-e gody. V 2 t.: uchebnoe posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedeniy. T. 2. 1968-1990 / N.L. Leyderman, M.N. Lipovetskiy. – 2-e izd., ispr. I dop. – M.: Izdatel'skiy tsentr «Akademiya», 2006.
Mark, M., Pirson K. Geroy i buntar', sozdanie brendov s pomoshch'yu arkhetipov /Per. s angl. Pod red. V. Domnina, A. Sukhenko. – SPb.: Piter, 2005.
Makhlina, S. Semiotika kul'tury i iskusstva: Slovar'-spravochnik v dvukh knigakh. – 2-e izd. SPb., 2003. – Kniga 1.
Sidorova, G.P. Sovetskiy tip khozyaystvennoy kul'tury povsednevnosti v massovom iskusstve 1960-1980-kh: tsennostnyy aspekt. Avtoreferat dissertatsii. – SPb., 2013.
Tarasenko, E.N. Kul'tovyy status proizvedeniya: vchera i segodnya. URL: http:// http://luminotavr.narod.ru/PUBL/kult.html
Chernyshov, A.V. Russkie arkhetipy v brendinge i effektivnost' telereklamy: Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata sotsiologicheskikh nauk. – Nizhniy Novgorod, 2011.
Yung, K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy. – M.: «Universitetskaya kniga», AST, 1996.
Sidorova G.P. Sovetskaya khozyaystvennaya povsednevnost' v obrazakh massovogo iskusstva 1960–1980-kh: gendernye osobennosti aksiologiki truda // Chelovek i kul'tura. - 2013. - 5. - C. 70 - 89. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2013.5.9784. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_9784.html
G. P. Sidorova Tsennosti sovetskoy khozyaystvennoy kul'tury
v massovom iskusstve 1960–1980-kh godov:
professiya // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 34 - 42.
Sidorova G.P. Sovetskaya khozyaystvennaya kul'tura v formakh dukhovnoy predmetnosti i obrazakh massovogo iskusstva 1960–1980-kh: tsennost' truda // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2012. - 4. - C. 54 - 79. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_246.html
Sidorova G.P. Sovetskaya khozyaystvennaya kul'tura v formakh material'noy predmetnosti i obrazakh massovogo iskusstva 1960–1980-kh: transport // Chelovek i kul'tura. - 2012. - 2. - C. 1 - 14. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_204.html
Sidorova G.P. Sub'ekt sovetskoy khozyaystvennoy kul'tury v massovom iskusstve 1960–1980-kh: obrazy tela // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2013. - 1. - C. 126 - 140. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.1.228. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_228.html

Abstract: By studying the images of the Russian capital in the Russian popular art of 1930 – 2010 (fiction pictures and TV serials) as cultural codes and reference codes that send consumers to the combination of historical, philosophical, psychological, scientific, literary, commonsense and other knowledge, we can discover unique cultural particularities as the key to understanding Russian culture as a special type of culture in general. Moreover, the given research allows to understand how the cultural code defines a set of images related to the combination of stereotypes. In her research the author has used the methods of historical classification, comparative (synchronic and diachronic), semiotic and hermeneutic content analysis of literary texts versus socio-cultural environment. Until now researchers haven’t attempted to analyze and interpret images of the Russian capital in popular cinematographic art as a cultural code. The study of artistic images allows to make the following conclusions. The dynamics of reference codes reflect the cultural dynamics in general as well as all transformations caused by the shift of Russia from the traditional culture to the post-industrial culture and society, from socialistic culture to the modern market culture, from socialistic values to the values of the consumer society. At the same time, since 1930 till the present time popular cinematographic art has been creating images related to the archetype of the Center of the World. While post-industrial culture and society are based on the principle of pluralism in all spheres which results in the declining role of former cultural capitals and increasing role of province, we don’t see the same phenomenon in the Russian culture.

Keywords: Image, Russian capital, popular art, cinematographic art, cultural code, dynamics of culture, reference code, archetype, the Center of the World, stereotype.

References:
Sidorova, G.P. Sovetskaya khozyaystvennaya kul'tura v obrazakh massovogo iskusstva 1960-1980-kh: sotsial'nye organizatsii //Problemy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo politicheskogo i kul'turnogo razvitiya Rossii-vyp.7-Ul'yanovsk. – UlGTU, 2013. – S. 38-48.
Sidorova, G.P. Sovetskiy tip khozyaystvennoy kul'tury povsednevnosti v massovom iskusstve 1960-1980-kh: tsennostnyy aspekt. Avtoreferat dissertatsii. – SPb., 2013.
Shcherbinina, N.G. Obraz goroda kak simvolicheskiy konstrukt // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. – 2011. – ¹ 3 (15).
Zhabskiy, M.I., Tarasov, K.A. K istorii sotsial'nogo regulirovaniya v sfere kinokul'tury // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-2.-C. 42-52.
Zhukovskiy, V.I. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epitsentre khudozhestvennoy kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-11.-C. 1613-1620. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.11.9845.
Popov, E.A. Sovremennaya sotsiologiya iskusstva v interpretatsii sotsial'nogo i khudozhestvennogo. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2010.-11.-C. 121-127.
Makhlina, S. Semiotika kul'tury i iskusstva: Slovar'-spravochnik v dvukh knigakh. – 2-e izd. SPb., 2003.
Kolotaev, V.A. Bytovanie real'nosti v zerkale iskusstva / V.A. Kolotaev // Tretiy Rossiyskiy kul'turologicheskiy kongress. Tezisy dokladov i soobshcheniy. – SPb.: EYDOS, 2010. – S. 183.
Kagan, M.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. Sankt-Peterburg, 1996.
Zorkaya, N. M. Kino. Teatr. Literatura. Opyt sistemnogo analiza. M.: Agraf, 2010. – 400 s.
Glebkina, N.V. Reprezentatsiya povsednevnosti v sovetskom kinematografe kontsa 1950–1960-kh gg.: Dissertatsiya. M., 2010. – 231 s.

References (transliteration):
Sidorova, G.P. Sovetskaya khozyaystvennaya kul'tura v obrazakh massovogo iskusstva 1960-1980-kh: sotsial'nye organizatsii //Problemy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo politicheskogo i kul'turnogo razvitiya Rossii-vyp.7-Ul'yanovsk. – UlGTU, 2013. – S. 38-48.
Sidorova, G.P. Sovetskiy tip khozyaystvennoy kul'tury povsednevnosti v massovom iskusstve 1960-1980-kh: tsennostnyy aspekt. Avtoreferat dissertatsii. – SPb., 2013.
Shcherbinina, N.G. Obraz goroda kak simvolicheskiy konstrukt // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. – 2011. – ¹ 3 (15).
Zhabskiy, M.I., Tarasov, K.A. K istorii sotsial'nogo regulirovaniya v sfere kinokul'tury // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2012.-2.-C. 42-52.
Zhukovskiy, V.I. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epitsentre khudozhestvennoy kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-11.-C. 1613-1620. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.11.9845.
Popov, E.A. Sovremennaya sotsiologiya iskusstva v interpretatsii sotsial'nogo i khudozhestvennogo. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2010.-11.-C. 121-127.
Makhlina, S. Semiotika kul'tury i iskusstva: Slovar'-spravochnik v dvukh knigakh. – 2-e izd. SPb., 2003.
Kolotaev, V.A. Bytovanie real'nosti v zerkale iskusstva / V.A. Kolotaev // Tretiy Rossiyskiy kul'turologicheskiy kongress. Tezisy dokladov i soobshcheniy. – SPb.: EYDOS, 2010. – S. 183.
Kagan, M.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. Sankt-Peterburg, 1996.
Zorkaya, N. M. Kino. Teatr. Literatura. Opyt sistemnogo analiza. M.: Agraf, 2010. – 400 s.
Glebkina, N.V. Reprezentatsiya povsednevnosti v sovetskom kinematografe kontsa 1950–1960-kh gg.: Dissertatsiya. M., 2010. – 231 s.

Abstract: It has become quite a common thing to underline that Utopias are based on real life experience because only the reality can create basis for our imagination. At the same time, it is often forgotten that facts do not always reveal the historical reality because, as a rule, first they are adjusted to ideological cliché and only then they are analyzed. As a result, artistic fiction sometimes happens to be credible than the most precise scientific research. One can easily notice that Orwell’s formula can be easily reversed and sound like ‘«He who controls the future, controls the past. He who controls the present, controls the future». For us the image of future is more important than the image of the past and this is why today there are numerous appeals to the future as the basis for legitimacy of the present. The author of the article analyzes images of the future outlined in the five anti-Utopian novels written in the XX century. The author offers to classify anti-Utopian societies as divergent and convergent. Michel Houellebecq’s project of post-human future is viewed as an antimonic synthesis of polarities.

Keywords: cultural research, philosophy of history, anti-utopian, futurology, convergent society, divergent society, Michel Houellebecq, Francis Fukuyama, George Orwell, post-human future.

Contact information: Boyko Mikhail Evgenievich, 115280, Russia, Moscow, Leninskaya Sloboda 19.

References:
Fukuyama F. Nashe postchelovecheskoe budushchee: posledstviya biotekhnologicheskoy revolyutsii. M.: AST, 2004.
Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i posledniy chelovek. M.: AST, 2005.
Raushning G. Govorit Gitler. Zver' iz bezdny. M..: Mif, 1993.
Lokk Dzh. Sochineniya v 3-kh tt. M.: Mysl', 1985–1988.
Lem S. Summa tekhnologii. M.: Mir, 1968.
Kouker K. Sumerki Zapada. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovaniy, 2000.
Zinov'ev A. A. Zapad: Fenomen zapadnizma. M.: Eksmo, Algoritm, 2007.
Gled Dzh. Budushchaya evolyutsiya cheloveka. Evgenika XXI veka. M.: Zakharov, 2005.
Boyko M. E. Diktatura Nichto. M.: Literaturnaya Rossiya, 2007.
Vallerstayn I. Posle liberalizma. M.: Editorial URSS, 2003.
Chalikova V. Utopiya rozhdaetsya iz utopii. London: Overseas Publications Interchange, 1992.
Shishkina S. G. Istoki i transformatsii zhanra literaturnoy antiutopii v XX v. Ivanovo: Ivan. gos. khim.-tekhnol. un-t., 2009.
P.S. Gurevich Futurologicheskiy bum // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 7. - C. 4 - 5.

References (transliteration):
Fukuyama F. Nashe postchelovecheskoe budushchee: posledstviya biotekhnologicheskoy revolyutsii. M.: AST, 2004.
Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i posledniy chelovek. M.: AST, 2005.
Raushning G. Govorit Gitler. Zver' iz bezdny. M..: Mif, 1993.
Lokk Dzh. Sochineniya v 3-kh tt. M.: Mysl', 1985–1988.
Lem S. Summa tekhnologii. M.: Mir, 1968.
Kouker K. Sumerki Zapada. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovaniy, 2000.
Zinov'ev A. A. Zapad: Fenomen zapadnizma. M.: Eksmo, Algoritm, 2007.
Gled Dzh. Budushchaya evolyutsiya cheloveka. Evgenika XXI veka. M.: Zakharov, 2005.
Boyko M. E. Diktatura Nichto. M.: Literaturnaya Rossiya, 2007.
Vallerstayn I. Posle liberalizma. M.: Editorial URSS, 2003.
Chalikova V. Utopiya rozhdaetsya iz utopii. London: Overseas Publications Interchange, 1992.
Shishkina S. G. Istoki i transformatsii zhanra literaturnoy antiutopii v XX v. Ivanovo: Ivan. gos. khim.-tekhnol. un-t., 2009.
P.S. Gurevich Futurologicheskiy bum // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 7. - C. 4 - 5.

Abstract: the article is devoted to one of the most brilliant pages in history of the Russian art. This is the period of Silver Age that is also sometimes called the Russian cultural Renaissance, which brings it closer to the Western Renaissance of the XV–XVI centuries. That period lasted for quite a short time, yet it was enough time for many new art trends to be created, including Symbolism, Futurism, Modern, Acmeism and Cubo-Futurism. Subsequent historical events such as revolutions, the civil war, totalitarian regime, the Second World War and others, have blurred recollection of the cultural Renaissance and made it more difficult to understand its ending. However, the author of the article is confident that forms of art that had been created at the turn of ÕIÕ–ÕÕ centuries, continued to develop. Since the second half of XX century this art has being ‘rehabilitated’. Researchers try to discover all facts related to the art of those times. Yet, in order to understand those times it is not enough just to collect facts. The author of the article offers a new interpretation according to which art is being viewed based on the periodicity principle. This approach allows to find an unusual form of succession in art history. This form of succession can be understood if compared not to preceding art but to most distant epochs.

Keywords: art history, Silver age, art life, retrospectivism, time of culture, transitory period, bifurcation, periodicity principle, Renaissance tradition, new religious concept.

Contact information: Khrenov Nikolay Andreevich, 125009, Russia, Moscow, Kozitsky per. 5.

References:
1. Belyy A. Puteshestvie na Vostok. Pis'ma Andreya Belogo. V kn.: Vostok-Zapad. Issledovaniya. Perevody.
Publikatsii., M., 1988;
2. Berdyaev N. Krizis iskusstva., M., 1918;
3. Bel'ting Kh. Obraz i kul't. Istoriya obraza do epokhi iskusstva. M., 2002;
4. Bryusov V. Uchiteli uchiteley. Drevneyshie kul'tury chelovechestva i ikh vzaimootnosheniya. V kn. : Bryusov V.
Sobranie sochineniy v 7 t., t.7., M., 1975;
5. Bryusov V. Sobranie sochineniy v 7 t., t.6., M., 1975;
6. Bryusov V. Sobranie sochineniy v 7 t., t. 6., M., 1975;
7. Veydle V. Umiranie iskusstva. Razmyshlenie o sud'be literaturnogo i khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva.,
SPb., 1996;
8. Vipper B. Arkhitektura russkogo barokko., M., 1978;
9. Gaydenko P. Vladimir Solov'ev i filosofiya Serebryanogo veka. M., 2001;
10. Gippius Z. Zhivye litsa. Tbilisi., 1991;
11. Grabar' I. Vvedenie v istoriyu iskusstva. V kn. : Istoriya russkogo iskusstva v 10 t., t. 1., M., 1910;
12. Grabar' I. Pis'ma. 1891-1917;
13. Istoriya russkogo iskusstva., t. 1. Iskusstvo Kievskoy Rusi. 1Kh – pervaya chetvert' Kh11 veka. M., 2007;
14. Kandinskiy V. Izbrannye trudy po teorii iskusstva., t. 2., M., 2001;
15. Kul'turnoe nasledie russkoy emigratsii. 1917 – 1940. , t. 1-2., M., 1994;
16. Kul'tura russkogo zarubezh'ya. 1917– 1939., M., 2008;
17. Makovskiy S. Stranitsy khudozhestvennoy kritiki., t. 2., SPb., 1909;
18. Makovskiy S. Siluety russkikh khudozhnikov. M., 1999;
19. Muratov P. Drevnerusskaya zhivopis'. Istoriya otkrytiya i issledovaniya. M., 2005;
20. Ocherki russkoy kul'tury. Konets Kh1Kh– nachalo KhKh veka. Obshchestvenno-kul'turnaya sreda., M., 2011 ( Otv.
Redaktor L. V. Koshman);
21. Ocherki russkoy kul'tury. Konets Kh1Kh– nachalo KhKh veka. Vlast'. Obshchestvo. Kul'tura. M., 2011 (otv. Redaktor
L. V. Koshman);
22. Pervyy Vsesoyuznyy s'ezd sovetskikh pisateley. Stenograficheskiy otchet. M., 1934;
23. Sarab'yanov D. Russkaya zhivopis'. Probuzhdenie pamyati. M., 1998;
24. Sorokin P. Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya dinamika. Issledovanie izmeneniy v bol'shikh sistemakh iskusstva,
etiki, prava i obshchestvennykh otnosheniy. SP., 2000;
25. Sternin G. Khudozhestvennaya zhizn' Rossii na rubezhe Kh1Kh-KhKh vekov. M., 1970;
26. Tolstoy A. Khudozhniki russkoy emigratsii. M., 2005;
27. Fevr L. Kak Zhyul' Mishle otkryl Vozrozhdenie. V kn.: Fevr L. Boi za istoriyu. M., 1991;
28. Khabermas Yu. Filosofskiy diskurs o moderne. M., 2003;
29. Estetika i teoriya iskusstva KhKh veka. M., 2005 ( Otv. Redaktory N. A. Khrenov, Migunov A. S.).

References (transliteration):
1. Belyy A. Puteshestvie na Vostok. Pis'ma Andreya Belogo. V kn.: Vostok-Zapad. Issledovaniya. Perevody.
Publikatsii., M., 1988;
2. Berdyaev N. Krizis iskusstva., M., 1918;
3. Bel'ting Kh. Obraz i kul't. Istoriya obraza do epokhi iskusstva. M., 2002;
4. Bryusov V. Uchiteli uchiteley. Drevneyshie kul'tury chelovechestva i ikh vzaimootnosheniya. V kn. : Bryusov V.
Sobranie sochineniy v 7 t., t.7., M., 1975;
5. Bryusov V. Sobranie sochineniy v 7 t., t.6., M., 1975;
6. Bryusov V. Sobranie sochineniy v 7 t., t. 6., M., 1975;
7. Veydle V. Umiranie iskusstva. Razmyshlenie o sud'be literaturnogo i khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva.,
SPb., 1996;
8. Vipper B. Arkhitektura russkogo barokko., M., 1978;
9. Gaydenko P. Vladimir Solov'ev i filosofiya Serebryanogo veka. M., 2001;
10. Gippius Z. Zhivye litsa. Tbilisi., 1991;
11. Grabar' I. Vvedenie v istoriyu iskusstva. V kn. : Istoriya russkogo iskusstva v 10 t., t. 1., M., 1910;
12. Grabar' I. Pis'ma. 1891-1917;
13. Istoriya russkogo iskusstva., t. 1. Iskusstvo Kievskoy Rusi. 1Kh – pervaya chetvert' Kh11 veka. M., 2007;
14. Kandinskiy V. Izbrannye trudy po teorii iskusstva., t. 2., M., 2001;
15. Kul'turnoe nasledie russkoy emigratsii. 1917 – 1940. , t. 1-2., M., 1994;
16. Kul'tura russkogo zarubezh'ya. 1917– 1939., M., 2008;
17. Makovskiy S. Stranitsy khudozhestvennoy kritiki., t. 2., SPb., 1909;
18. Makovskiy S. Siluety russkikh khudozhnikov. M., 1999;
19. Muratov P. Drevnerusskaya zhivopis'. Istoriya otkrytiya i issledovaniya. M., 2005;
20. Ocherki russkoy kul'tury. Konets Kh1Kh– nachalo KhKh veka. Obshchestvenno-kul'turnaya sreda., M., 2011 ( Otv.
Redaktor L. V. Koshman);
21. Ocherki russkoy kul'tury. Konets Kh1Kh– nachalo KhKh veka. Vlast'. Obshchestvo. Kul'tura. M., 2011 (otv. Redaktor
L. V. Koshman);
22. Pervyy Vsesoyuznyy s'ezd sovetskikh pisateley. Stenograficheskiy otchet. M., 1934;
23. Sarab'yanov D. Russkaya zhivopis'. Probuzhdenie pamyati. M., 1998;
24. Sorokin P. Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya dinamika. Issledovanie izmeneniy v bol'shikh sistemakh iskusstva,
etiki, prava i obshchestvennykh otnosheniy. SP., 2000;
25. Sternin G. Khudozhestvennaya zhizn' Rossii na rubezhe Kh1Kh-KhKh vekov. M., 1970;
26. Tolstoy A. Khudozhniki russkoy emigratsii. M., 2005;
27. Fevr L. Kak Zhyul' Mishle otkryl Vozrozhdenie. V kn.: Fevr L. Boi za istoriyu. M., 1991;
28. Khabermas Yu. Filosofskiy diskurs o moderne. M., 2003;
29. Estetika i teoriya iskusstva KhKh veka. M., 2005 ( Otv. Redaktory N. A. Khrenov, Migunov A. S.).