Abstract: The article examines the features of the legal regulation of social security of state civil servants from the standpoint of the methodology of chronodiscret monogeographic comparative jurisprudence. Within the framework of this methodology, various aspects of the formation and implementation of the right to social security by state civil servants have been studied since the period of the XVIII century. The object of the study was public relations on pension and medical provision of civil servants and their family members, as well as social services for civil servants. The subject of the study is the legal norms regulating these relations, as well as scientific research conducted in the field of social security of civil servants. The scientific novelty of the study is to identify the features of the current state of legal regulation of social security of civil servants, taking into account the history of its development in the conditions of legislative consolidation of guarantees of social security of civil servants, decrees of the President of the Russian Federation on the further development of social guarantees of civil service. The paradox of the modern stage of social security of civil servants is the fact that most of the provisions of the Law on Civil Servants establishing guarantees of social security of civil servants have not yet been implemented in practice and are essentially declarative. Thus, the norms on state pension provision for family members of civil servants, on mandatory state social insurance in case of illness or disability during the period of civil service, on mandatory state insurance, as well as on special medical insurance for civil servants and their family members have not been implemented.

Keywords: chronodiscret monogeographic jurisprudence, comparative law, pension provision, social welfare, methodology, medical support, government civil servants, compulsory social insurance, legal regulation, history of legal regulation

References:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 29 noyabrya 2010 g. № 326-FZ «Ob obyazatel'nom meditsinskom strakhovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // SZ RF. 2010. № 49. St. 6422.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 21 noyabrya 2011 g. № 323-FZ «Ob osnovakh okhrany zdorov'ya grazhdan v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // SZ RF. 2011. № 48. S. 6724.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 28 dekabrya 2013 g. № 400-FZ «O strakhovykh pensiyakh» // SZ RF. 2013. № 52 (chast' I). St. 6965.
Zakon RF ot 12 fevralya 1993 g. № 4468-I «O pensionnom obespechenii lits, prokhodivshikh voennuyu sluzhbu, sluzhbu v organakh vnutrennikh del, Gosudarstvennoy protivopozharnoy sluzhbe, organakh po kontrolyu za oborotom narkoticheskikh sredstv i psikhotropnykh veshchestv, uchrezhdeniyakh i organakh ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy, voyskakh natsional'noy gvardii Rossiyskoy Federatsii, organakh prinuditel'nogo ispolneniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii, i ikh semey» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1993. 26 fevr.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 15 dekabrya 2001 g. № 166-FZ «O gosudarstvennom pensionnom obespechenii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // SZ RF. 2001. № 51. St. 4831.
Rom

Abstract: The article is devoted to the court administration forming and development in the Soviet Russia, to the evolution of processes of the court administration development performed by the subjects of the outward administrative court management (the organization’s executives) as well as by the subjects of the court administration inside the court system. The author of the articles also shows the role of the Soviet Party bodies in forming and developing organizational and ideological principles of the court administration and in working out models of the court administration and its gradual transformation into internal administration which serves to make the present-day court system independent and self-sufficient. The methodological basis of the work is the principles of dialectic and historical materialism which lets view the problems under research in their appearance and development in tight connection with the Soviet State building and the necessities of the court administration. In the course of the research the comparative analysis, technical, logical, historical and legal and other methods of learning the state legal processes and phenomena have been used. The scientific novelty is in the distinctiveness of the question posing which supposes to study the whole complex of the administrative influence in the courts from the Party’s bodies, Administration and State Power branches and the higher courts that aimed at providing the optimal work of the people’s courts. The author of the article strongly believes that the court administration as an institution is not dying, but it is transforming into a new state – internal system administration and continues its incessant influence on the processes in the present-day internal court power.

Keywords:

References:
Khodyrevskiy S.M. Sud i sudebnoe upravlenie. Voronezh, 1976, S. 7.
SU RSFSR. 1922. №69. St. 902.
Stumbina E.Ya. Sudebnoe upravlenie: uchebnoe posobie. Riga, 1973. S. 4.
SU RSFSR. 1917. № 4. St. 50.
Smykalin A.S. Ponyatie sudebnogo upravleniya // Pravovye idei i gosudarstvennye uchrezhdeniya. Sverdlovsk, 1980. S.148.
Rivlin A.L. Organizatsiya suda i prokuratury v SSSR. Khar'kov, 1968. S. 120.
Semenov V.M. Organizatsiya suda i prokuratury v SSSR: ucheb. posobie. Sverdlovsk: Izd-vo «Ural'skiy rabochiy», 1973. S. 70.
Ponikhidin Yu.M. Chrezvychaynye organy upravleniya Sovetskogo gosudarstva v period voennogo kommunizma //Aktual'nye problemy istoriko-pravovoy nauki: mezhvuzovskiy nauchnyy sbornik. Saratov, 1988. Vyp. 3. S. 22.
Organizatsiya sudebnoy deyatel'nosti /otv. red. G.L. Bagurov. M.: Yurid. lit., 1977. S. 3, 161.
Nezavisimost' sudey i svyaz' ikh s rukovodyashchimi organami rayona // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1940. № 10. S. 1-8; GARF. F. R-9492. Op. 1. D. 363. L. 11.
Mikhaylovskaya I.B. Sudebnaya vlast' v sisteme razde

Abstract: The article is devoted to the theoretical and practical aspects of the process of formation of the party and government nomenclature during the civil war and New Economic Policy. The author of the article makes a very important conclusion that it was the war that created a special type of a Soviet leader. 
The author also underlines the constant aspiration of the Soviet nomenclature towards better life and comfort including by the means of simple corruption. That led to the growth of crime among officials and increased criminal prosecution of officials. 
Taking into account the deficiency of loyal staff, the government decided to create the system of special legal privileges for Soviet official. Those legal privileges allowed to avoid responsibility for the crime committed. The author of the article in detail analyzes archive sources and other documents and describes the process of creation of the system of special legal conditions for representatives of the Soviet nomenclature who committed crime. The author also analyzes the legal and social consequences of that double standard policy. The author makes an assumption that in the 1920's Russia followed the double legal standard policy. There were standards especially for the Soviet nomenclature and other standards applied to regular citizens. The double legal standards were based on the unoficial law and existed in the form of secret regulatory acts. Those acts were addressed to judicial authorities and regulated the legal policy towards party members. 

Keywords: justice, law, nomenclature, party member, level of crime, legal liability, punishment, judicial forgeries, non-judicial forgeries, legal consequences

References:
Ezhenedel'nik Sovetskoy Yustitsii. 1927. № 15; № 33
Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Tambovskoy oblasti (GATO). F. R-648. Op 1. D. 44. L.43
Pravda. 28 oktyabrya 1920 goda.
Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv obshchestvenno-politicheskoy istorii Voronezhskoy oblasti (GAOPIVO).
Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv obshchestvenno-politicheskoy istorii Tambovskoy oblasti (TsDNITO).
Bukharin N.I. K voprosu o trotskizme. // Za leninizm. M.; L., 1932. S. 30.
Ob'yavleniya NKYu. 1921. 10 maya. № 7-9.
Izvestiya VTsIK. 1920, № 20
XII s'ezd RKP (b). 17 – 26 aprelya 1923 goda. Stenograf. Otchet. M.: Gosizdat. 1923. S. 78.
Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv sotsial'no-politicheskoy istorii (RGASPI). F. 17.
Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv RF (GARF). F. 1235. Op.61. D.223. L.18, 24, 80, 139.
P. Sorokin. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo. M.: Politizdat. 1992.
X s'ezd RKP (b): Stenograf. Otchet. M. 1922. S. 33.
Pis'mo G.V. Valentinovu Kh.K. Rakovskogo ot 2-6 avgusta 1928g. Voprosy istorii. 1989. № 12.
Kautskiy K. Terrorizm i kommunizm // Polis. 1992. № 2. S. 186.

Abstract: In his article the author reconstructs and analyzes the project of solving the 'serfs issue' as developed by the leading theorist of the Russian liberalism in the middle of the XIX century K.D.Kavelin. Kavelin's idea became a real alternative to bureaucratic reformation of the country. The author of the article views the relationship between the liberal Kavelin and representatives of the ruling circles and his contribution to liberation of the serfs. Special attention is paid to Kavelin's participation in formation of anti-serf public opinion as well as his views on the main features of modernization in Russia. 

Keywords: personal freedom, public opinion, modernization, state institution, liberal bureaucracy, liberalism, serfdom, reform, serfs community, land allotment

References:
Pis'ma K.D. Kavelina k P.L. Lavrovu, E.P. Kovalevskomu i T.N. Granovskomu // Literaturnoe nasledstvo. T. 67. M., 1959.
Chicherin B.N. Opyty po istorii russkogo prava. M., 1858.
Kavelin K.D. Sobr. soch.: V 4-kh t. SPb., 1897-1900. T. 2. SPb., 1898.
Myakotin V.A. Publitsisticheskaya deyatel'nost' K.D. Kavelina // Russkoe bogatstvo. 1902. №9.
Ivanyukov I.I. Padenie krepostnogo prava v Rossii. SPb., 1882.
Vospominaniya Borisa Nikolaevicha Chicherina. Puteshestvie za granitsu. M., 1932.
Korsakov D.A. K.D. Kavelin. Materialy k biografii // Vestnik Evropy. 1886. №8.
Russkoe obshchestvo 40-50-kh godov KhIKh v. Chast' II. Vospominaniya B.N. Chicherina. M., 1991.
Annenkov P.V. Dve zimy v provintsii // Byloe. 1922. №18.
Golosa iz Rossii: Sbornik A.I. Gertsena i N.P. Ogareva // Faksimil'noe izdanie v 3-kh vyp. M., 1974. Vyp. 1. Ch.1.
Revolyutsionnaya situatsiya v Rossii v seredine KhIKh veka. Kollektivnaya monografiya. Pod red. M.V. Nechkinoy. M., 1978.
Zakharova L.G. Velikie reformy 1860-1870-kh godov: povorotnyy punkt rossiysk