Abstract: This article is dedicated to such type of communication technology as inappropriate arguments. Special attention is given to clarification of the key concepts of the topic – “argumentation”, “appropriateness”, “inappropriateness”, and “context”. The original classification is provided to the types of inappropriate arguments. The author reveals the contextual peculiarities of using different types of inappropriate arguments; analyzes the specificity of using inappropriate arguments; as well as offers possible countering mechanisms. Particular examples of using incorrect arguments are confirmed by links to recorded live dialogues. The article employs the methods of intent analysis and comparative analysis. The Russian tradition of studying the theory and practice of argumentation features a number of research that touch upon the problem of inappropriate arguments. However, the study of arguments is just a part of the whole variety of communication technologies. The novelty of this work consists in the centralized, systematized presentation of the assemblage of variations of inappropriate arguments. The types of inappropriate arguments are illustrated on the specific examples from literature, cinematography, cultural -historical, social and political spheres of society. The acquired results can be valuable for the development of lecture courses on the theory and practice of argumentation, students majoring in philosophy, and audience interested in modern research dedicated to communication technologies.

Keywords: arguments ad rem, arguments ad hominem, communication, conviction, dispute, polemics, theory of argumentation, rhetoric, context, communication technologies

References:
Bogdanovskiy A. Sud nad antichnym filosofom Sokratom vosproizveli v Afinakh. [Elektronnyy resurs] https://ria.ru/20120526/657804011.html (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2021)
V Volgogradskoy oblasti podrostka s autizmom otkazalis' puskat' v akvapark. 1 kanal. [Elektronnyy resurs] 4 avgusta 2021 https://1tv-ru.turbopages.org/1tv.ru/s/news/2021-08-04/410859-v_volgogradskoy_oblasti_podrostka_s_autizmom_otkazalis_puskat_v_akvapark (data obrashcheniya: 01.10.2021)
Vecher s Vladimirom Solov'evym. Efir ot 04.04.19. Taymfreym: 1:39:32 – 1:39:55 [Elektronnyy resurs]. 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjsngXmM0YY&feature=youtu.be (data obrashcheniya: 01.10.2021).
Gegel' G.V.F. Raboty raznykh let. V dvukh tomakh. T.1.-M.: Mysl', 1972. – 668 s.
Eemeren F.Kh. van, Grootendorst R. Sitstematicheskaya teoriya argumentatsii: pragma-dialekticheskiy podkhod. M.: Kanon + ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2021. – 264 s.
Ivin A.A. Osnovy teorii argumentatsii. M.: Gumanit. izd. Tsentr VLADOS, 1997 – 352 s.
Katunin A.V. O nekotorykh vidakh manipulyativnoy a

Abstract: This article explores the communication process between the authorities and society via social networks on the example of the municipality of Severodvinsk. Online platforms have become the main source of communication between the government authorities and citizens since 2017. The recently appointed head of the city selected an effective strategy for establishing dialogue with the population; he chose a popular communication channel, published comprehensible texts, and demonstrated quick response to the citizens’ requests. However, having made wrong decisions, from the perspective of the city residents, the administration and the mayor faced a lot of negativity and limited communication in the social networks. The goal of this research is to determine conditions for using social networks as the main communication channel in building dialogue between the government and society on the example of the municipality of Severodvinsk due to the fact that in the course of implementing information policy, it demonstrated two different models of using social networks. The object of this article is the profile page of the administration of Severodvinsk in the social network “Vkontakte”. The subject is the communication process of the municipal authorities in social networks. The conclusion is made that the administration should take into account the specificity of social networks, such as openness in expressing emotions by the citizens; it is necessary to learn working with online platforms, separate work criticism from personal criticism, and establish the dialogue based on the rule of two-way communication, which implies not only sharing information, but also perceiving the feedback.

Keywords: negativity, civil society, government body, dialogue, communication, social networks, reaction, comments, criticism, narrative

References:
Urazova S.L. Sotsial'nye seti kak forma obshchestvennogo dialoga i massovykh kommunikatsiy // Izvestiya Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Ser. 1, Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury. 2016. ¹ 2 (150). S. 26 – 33 [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/39816/1/iurp-2016-150-03.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.09.2020).
Pashkova K.V. Sotsial'nye seti kak sovremennoe sredstvo kommunikatsii // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. May, 2019. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_37464683_76716897.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 15.09.2020).
Shukshin A.I. Sotsial'nye seti kak sredstvo politicheskoy kommunikatsii. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialnye-seti-kak-sredstvo-politicheskoy-kommunikatsii (data obrashcheniya: 02.09.2020).
Novgorodtseva A.N., Sivkova N.I. Sotsial'nye seti kak kanal sotsial'no-politicheskoy kommunikatsii // XVIII Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya pamyati prof. L.N. Kogana «Kul'tura, lichnost',

Abstract: This article is dedicated to examination of approaches towards production of knowledge in the conditions of development of the digital methods of communication. The development of technologies and Internet concept Web 3.0 form a request for collective, interdisciplinary and “civil” character of research activity, emergence of new practices of working with knowledge, focused on confluence of the virtual and real space, transformation of the essence and role of “information” in the context of building the “society of knowledge”. The modern scientific knowledge represents a synthesis of various aspects of science and social life. Within the framework of pilot research, the author analyzes the case of confluence of the digital and real activity in production of knowledge: “public space of collective work ‘the pivotal point’” and digital platform Leader-ID. The article considers the hypothesis that the modern scientific knowledge represents a synthesis of social, culturological, and technological aspects of science and social life. The “distributed knowledge”, forming as a result of cooperation of scholars and various communities, becomes common through the formation of “cluster” and crowdsourcing format of the production of knowledge. Such social interaction is based on the network platform model and generated new zones of exchange and production of knowledge: online platforms (forums, crowdsourcing, scientific network platforms such as ResearchGate, simulators, etc.) or offline platforms (public spaces) that discuss and formulate the requests of scholars to each other, formulate hypothesis, and test the studies.

Keywords: information, public space, exchange zone, digital society, digital platforms, crowdsoursing, distributed knowledge, information technology, scientific knowledge, think tank

References:
Shibarshina S. V. Nauchnye kommunikatsii i kollaboratsii v Seti kak vozmozhnye zony obmena // Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy. ¹2. 2019. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nauchnye-kommunikatsii-i-kollaboratsii-v-seti-kak-vozmozhnye-zony-obmena [data obrashcheniya: 06.11.2019].
Chernikova I. V., Chernikova D. V. Novaya kontseptsiya proizvodstva znaniya v tekhnonauke //Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. – 2017. – ¹. 39
Shipovalova L.V. Raspredelennoe poznanie i ego granitsy v kontekste publichnoy nauchnoy kommunikatsii // Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy. 2019. ¹3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/raspredelennoe-poznanie-i-ego-granitsy-v-kontekste-publichnoy-nauchnoy-kommunikatsii (data obrashcheniya: 02.04.2020).)
Urri D. Mobil'nosti/per. s angl //AV Lazareva. M.: Praksis. 2012. S.130-159.
Chernikova I. V. i dr. Transdistsiplinarnye metodologii i tekhnologii sovremennoy nauki. – 2015. // URL: http://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/services/Download/vtls:000577584/SOURCE1
S

Abstract:  
This article presents the history of emergence of manipulative forms of social management. The correlation between manipulation and dialogical forms of interaction of the individual is determined. The author reveals the essence of manipulations as a destructive phenomenon, within the framework of which the audience of contemporary mass media is views as passive object of influence. The analysis of existing at present stage approaches towards the phenomenon allows conditionally highlighting two directions in its examination: humanitarian-philosophical and engineering. Humanitarian-philosophical approach suggest the ethnical assessment of manipulation, which excludes the application of manipulative technologies of social managements. Engineering approach reviews society as the object of implementation of manipulative communications, and as a result, leads to degradation of the dialogue on all levels. The article initiates discussion with the researchers, who supports the “engineering” views upon the social management. The main method of this research consists in critical analysis. Such approach towards the problem manipulation lies in interconnection of the three levels of examination of this question. Firstly, manipulative communication is the type of social interaction, which generates the abuse of authority. Secondly, it is being realized by means of texts and audiovisual images. Thirdly, this phenomenon must be considered in the context of examination of the cognitive abilities of a human, because it actively forms the image of thinking, mental world, as well as intrudes into the sphere of inexplicit knowledge of a specific individual. The analysis of various phenomena in these three platitudes allows determining the features of manipulative communication in one or another case. The author reviews the transformation of dialogical genres of mass media into the monological expression. It is proposed to metaphorically name such texts as “mono-dialogue”. Imitation of dialogue, which hides the author-creator, is demonstrates as one main instruments of the hidden impact upon the society. Based on M. Bakhtin’s theory about isolation of one or another fragment of text (discourse), and Gadamer’s ideas regarding the questions of interpretation, the author detects the mechanism of control over the information, cognitive, and social space of the mass media dialogical genres, and interview in particular.
 

Keywords: media, discourse, power, democracy, Interview, polysemantic, dialogue, manipulation, communication, text

References:
Khabermas Yu. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deystvie. SPb. 2001.-377 s.
Chernikova V. E. Manipulyatsiya massovym soznaniem kak fenomen informatsionnogo obshchestva // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya . 2015. ¹3. S.141-144.
Sorina G.V. Kommunikativnyy kharakter upravlencheskoy deyatel'nosti//XII vserossiyskoe soveshchanie po problemam upravleniya VSPU-2014 Institut problem upravleniya im. V.A. Trapeznikova RAN. 2014. S. 7865-7870.
Van Dijk T. A. 2006. Discourse and manipulation // Discourse & Society Vol 17(2): 359–383 doi: 10.1177/0957926506060250
Wilhelm, A.G. (1999) Virtual sounding boards: how deliberative is online political discussion? in B.N. Hague and B.D. Loader (eds.) Digital Democracy. Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age, London: Routledge. pp. 90-108.
Melo M. and G. Baiocci 2006 Deliberative Democracy and Local Governance: Towards a New Agenda International Journal of Urban and Regional Research Volume 30.3587–600 DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00686.x
Kim J., Kim E. J

Abstract: The conversation of A. S. Nilogov with V. N. Bazylev is recorded within the framework of publishing projects “Who makes the Russian philosophy today” and is dedicated to the modern problems of the Russian linguistics and language philosophy. It discusses the works of V. N, Bazylev in such linguistic directions as cryptolinguistics (cryptophilology) and sublogic analysis of language. A separate attention is given to the interrelation between the Russian linguistic and philosophical knowledge in the early XXI century. This research clarifies the Russian tradition of language philosophy, the continuation of which can become a developed by A. S. Nilogov philosophy of the anti-language. V. N. Bazylev is one of the first scholars within the Russian philology who suggests an important sphere of research that can collect, describe, analyze, and interpret the ethnogenetic narratives that are created within the framework of the spiritual-practical knowledge.
    

Keywords: Bazylev, cryptophilology, language philosophy, anti-language philosophy, sublogical analysis of language, post linguistics, Nilogov, folk linguistics, Chudinov, Zaliznyak

References:
Nilogov A.S. Antiyazykovaya nominatsiya bol'shikh chisel (V nachale bylo Chislo, i Chislo bylo u Boga, i Chislo bylo Bog) // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2013. ¹ 3. C. 266–274. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2013.3.9645.
Nilogov A.S. Ontologicheskiy status slova/antislova // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2015. ¹ 3. C. 241–252. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2015.3.16615.
Nilogov A.S. Antiyazyk kak yasnovidenie v besslovesnoy kommunikatsii D. G. Benneta // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. 2015. ¹ 1. C. 92–103. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2015.1.13737.
Polinichenko D.Yu., Burkhanova M.S. Lyubitel'skie lingvisticheskie kontseptsii v sovremennoy Rossii (na primere tvorchestva M.N. Zadornova) // NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 67–81. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1596.2013.2.693. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fil/article_693.html.
Nilogov A.S. Psikhologiya i filosofiya antiyazyka (na materiale monografii I. A. Beskovoy «Priroda snovideniy») // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. 2015. ¹ 6. C. 588–601. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2015.6.15111.
Nilogov A.S. Feno

Abstract: Object of this research is the modern system of scientific communications. An object of research – changes of modern scientific communications in the conditions of the new information and media environment. Stable development of science as social institute is impossible without broad public support which inquiries change with development of communication and media technologies. However cardinal changes in development of communication opportunities and alternatives led to prompt changes in information space of modern science. A reverse side of this process was almost exponential growth manipulative the practician which are actively used in generation of the information streams connected with scientific knowledge that, without exaggeration, is the real call to the scientist and their activity. The presented scientific question is in area of interdisciplinary researches (on a joint the nauchnofilosofskikh, the naukovedcheskikh, political and historical disciplines), demands complex use of a number of the methodological principles. Among them: analysis and synthesis, and also principles of historicism and systemacity. Novelty of research is that in this article the perspective directions of development of the scientific communications connected with rehabilitation of the original bases of publicity in modern society are planned.The conclusion that the unique way of development of scientific community in Russia in its relationship with media Wednesday is defined by fight for finding of subjectivity in media is drawn.

Keywords:

References:
Arendt Kh. Vita activa, ili O deyatel'noy zhizni / Per. s nem. i angl. V.V. Bibikhina. Spb.: Aleteyya. 2000. 437s.
Bogdanova I.F. Onlaynovoe prostranstvo nauchnykh kommunikatsiy / Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy. 2010. Tom 1. ¹1. Ss.140-161.
Ganzhin V.T. Nravstvennost' i nauka: k istorii issledovaniya problemy v evropeyskoy filosofii. M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. 1978. 144 s.
Gromova N.S. Kreolizatsiya tekstov pechatnykh SMI kak sposob manipulyatsii adresatom // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2014. ¹8-1 (38). Ss. 59-63.
Luman N. Real'nost' mass-media. M: Praksis. 2005. 256s.
Liotar Zh. Sostoyanie postmoderna / Per. s frantsuzskogo N.A. Shmatko. Spb.: Aleteyya. 1998. 160 s.
Mamaeva S.A. Kommunikativnye strategii uchenykh // Nauchnaya periodika: problemy i resheniya. 2011. ¹3. Ss. 6-13.
Sagan K.E. Mir, polnyy demonov: Nauka kak svecha vo t'me. M.: Al'pina non-fikshn. 2014. 538s.
Talapina E.V. K voprosu ob informatsionnoy funktsii gosudarstva // Informatsionnoe obshchestvo. 2002. Vyp.1. Ss. 20

Abstract: As a free observer, the author of the article shares his own perception of the mass media, media discourse, media philosophy and other media phenomena and explains them from the point of view of systems science. The author provides translations and interpetations of basic terms in media philosophy and carries out a system analysis. The results of the analysis show that semantics of media philosophy is close to enthropic philosophy or 'funeral march in major'. The author anayzes the definition of the philosophical concept of 'transcenence' and demonstrates advantages of the Russian language in the course of this analysis. Living cell is presented as a fractal, a functional model and natural media preventing from the transformation of brave sense into damn eternity. 
 
 

Keywords: media, mediaphilosophy, brave sense, damn eternity, living cell, enthropic philosophy, negative phenomena, manupilation of conciousness, generalizations, natural media

References:
Savchuk V.V. O kul'turologicheskoy distsipline. Voprosy kul'turologii, ¹ 10, 2010, S. 5.
Petukhov Yu.D. Pervoistoki rusov. – M.: Algoritm: Eksmo, 2009. S. 63-69.
Koren' R.V. Ot otraslevykh igr – k opytu evolyutsii Prirody. Ezhenedel'nik «Zelenyy mir», 1993, ¹ 3. S. 6.
Koren' R.V. Printsip poisk istiny. //Materialy Pyatoy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii “Tsikly”. T. 1. – Stavropol': SevKavGTU, 2003.
Bugaev A.F. Vvedenie v edinuyu teoriyu mira. Osnovy ekstrasensoriki. Samoreguliruemaya evolyutsiya cheloveka – put' voina K.Kastanedy.-M.: Belye al'vy, 1998.
Savel'ev V.V. Kul'turologiya kak metanauka //Kul'turologiya segodnya: osnovnye problemy, perspektivy. – M., 1993. S. 44.
Savchuk V. V. Mediafilosofiya: formirovanie distsipliny. // Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii “Media kak predmet filosofii”.
Savchuk V.V. Kul'turolog v Rossii bol'she, chem filosof? Rezhim aktual'nosti. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo SPbGU, 2004.
Erasov B.S. Imperativy novogo kul'turovedeniya // Kul'turologiya segodnya: osnovnye problemy, perspektivy. S. 3

Abstract: This article is another step to introducing the theory of interculture developed by the author. At this point the author focuses on the term ' interculture by advantage'. Based on the author, the United States of America is such interculture by advantage. There are certain grounds for making  USA the core of interculture. USA have come a unique path to what it is now and the founders of America already set the intercultural core of a new European culture, purified from the old traditions. Introducing USA as the interculture by advantage, the author also tries to describe the basic terms of the theory of interculture that are necessary for the readers to better understand  the article. For instance, the term 'interculture by advantange' can be viewed both as the draft ideal interculture and the real culture implementing ideal forms as much as possible. The author tries to reveal this term from both sides and to show how the real culture can be far from the ideal. As the starting point of discussion, the author quotes N. V. Zlobin's book 'America - What a Life!". The article will be of interest for all those who concern with philosophical anthropology.

Keywords: culture, interculture, interculture by advantage, USA, cultural remissions, systems of values, super-value strategy, pre-value strategy, universal human values, globalization

References:
Zlobin N.V. Amerika… Zhivut zhe lyudi! M.: Izdatel'stvo «EKSMO», 2012. S. 10.
Tekst vzyat po internet–adresu: http://www.hist.msu.ru/ER/Etext/indpndnc.htm
Tekst vzyat po internet–adresu: http://larevolution.ru/declaration.html
Razvernutoe vvedenie v teoriyu interkul'tury nakhoditsya zdes': Belyaev V.A. Kritika interkul'turnogo razuma: analiz tsennostnoy struktury novoevropeyskogo mira. M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012.
Kratkoe vvedenie v teoriyu interkul'tury nakhoditsya zdes': Belyaev V.A. K idee inter-kul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya, 2013, ¹ 5.
Tam zhe. S. 8–10.
Tam zhe. S. 16.
Tam zhe. S. 18.
Tam zhe. S. 46 – 47.
Tam zhe. S. 12.
Tam zhe. S. 14.
K. E. Razlogov. Chto stroim: krepost' ili avtostrady? // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. – 2012. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107.
Khrenov N.A.. Modernizatsionnye protsessy na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov i sud'ba traditsionnykh tsennostey // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. – 2013. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.5.9570.
Mel'nikova A.A.. Politika globalizatsii i glubinny

Abstract: The article describes the communicative philosophy and dialogics of Jurgen Habermas. The author of the article defines Jurgen Habermas' dialogics as the intention to overcome conflicts, aggression and contradictions in the form of discussion, i.e. not by force but by the means of rhetorical persuasion, argument and influence through dialogue that allows to reach mutual understanding and consensual approval of certain rules or regulation. 

Keywords: mutual understanding, itneraction, discourse, communication, dialogics, dialogue, consensus

References:
Khabermas Yu. Otnosheniya k miru i ratsional'nye aspekty deystviya v chetyrekh sotsiologicheskikh ponyatiyakh deystviya / Per. s nem. T.Tyagunovoy // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 2008. T. 7. ¹1.
Khabermas Yu. Raskolotyy Zapad / Per. s nem. — M.: Izdatel'stvo «Ves' Mir», 2008.
Muff Sh. K agonisticheskoy modeli demokratii//Logos, 2004, ¹2 (42).
Shul'ts V.L.Kritika «dialogiki» Yu.Khabermasa // Materialisticheskaya dialektika. V 5 t. T.5.-M.: «Mysl'», 1985.10. Khabermas Yu.Vovlechenie drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoy teorii. – SPb.: Nauka, 2001.
Timofeeva L.N. Vlast' i oppozitsiya v Rossii: problemy politicheskogo diskursa (K «sovershennoletiyu» rossiyskoy oppozitsii) //Vlast'. 2007. ¹ 4.
Sergeev V.M. Demokratiya kak peregovornyy protsesss. M. Moskovskiy obshchestvennyy nauchnyy fond, 1999.
Rusakova O.F., Rusakov V.M. PR i diskurs: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy analiz.-Ekaterinburg, 2007.
Kobeleva Kh.A. Osobennosti vzaimootnosheniy gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii i Ukraine v kontse KhKh – nachale KhKhI v. // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudars